Thanks Joe.
To make things clear I have pushed a revised webrev with solution 3.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dfuchs/JDK-7169894/javax.xml.stream/webrev.02.3/
The lines of interest are in FactoryFinder.java - right hand side:
267 if (type.getName().equals(factoryId)) {
268
I am sorry. Seems that I am out of discussion context, but did we get
that sort of problem:
https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=42265#c114
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1987032nocache=0
The article in Russian:
http://habrahabr.ru/post/164881/
Regards,
-uta
Seriously doubt Android uses (recent) OpenJDK HashMap code, otherwise many
lawyers around the world would now be having heart attacks. Also,
java.util.Random is plain congruent PRNG, having nothing to do with entropy
pools, preseeded with nanoTime() at most.
-Aleksey.
On 07.01.2013, at 16:19,
Thanks for explanation, Aleksey!
Regards,
-uta
On 07.01.2013 16:30, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
Seriously doubt Android uses (recent) OpenJDK HashMap code, otherwise many
lawyers around the world would now be having heart attacks. Also,
java.util.Random is plain congruent PRNG, having nothing to
On 01/07/2013 01:19 PM, Alexey Utkin wrote:
I am sorry. Seems that I am out of discussion context, but did we get
that sort of problem:
https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=42265#c114
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1987032nocache=0
The article in Russian:
Updated webrev and javadoc:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~chegar/8005311/ver.01/
I plan to finalize the API based on this updated version.
Note: the links in the javadoc do not work. It is simply the way that I
copied the html files. I verified that they all link correctly in a full
docs
Hello,
I had a question about how the double accumulation logic was intended to
be used. I've taken a quick look at the code and it uses
straightforward sum = sum + nextValue code to compute the double sum.
Summing doubles values with code numerical accuracy is surprisingly
tricky and if
Changeset: 1d9638ba5202
Author:ksrini
Date: 2013-01-07 09:58 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/1d9638ba5202
8004547: Extend JavaFX launcher support to allow full JavaFX launch feature set
Reviewed-by: mchung, kcr, ksrini
Contributed-by: david.deha...@oracle.com
Hmmm. Is that algorithm doable concurrently without needing a 128-bit CAS?
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Joe Darcy joe.da...@oracle.com wrote:
Hello,
I had a question about how the double accumulation logic was intended to
be used. I've taken a quick look at the code and it uses
On 01/07/13 14:07, Joe Darcy wrote:
Hello,
I had a question about how the double accumulation logic was intended to be
used. I've taken a quick look at the code and it uses straightforward sum =
sum + nextValue code to compute the double sum. Summing doubles values with
code numerical accuracy
Changeset: a9cb93cca229
Author:jjh
Date: 2013-01-07 17:51 +
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/langtools/rev/a9cb93cca229
8005647: langtools/test/tools/javap/MethodParameters.java fails on windows
Summary: Fix javap to not output \r\r\n
Reviewed-by: jjg
!
Changeset: dbc692ea3f0a
Author:bchristi
Date: 2013-01-07 13:19 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/dbc692ea3f0a
8003228: (props) sun.jnu.encoding should be set to UTF-8 [macosx]
Summary: Hard-code sun.jnu.encoding to UTF-8 on Mac
Reviewed-by: naoto
!
(Note for other readers: StreamPipe is not part of this webrev; the source is
viewable at [1].)
Hi Mandy,
I don't see any place where the StreamPipe threads are interrupted, so the
silent exit on InterruptedIOException probably doesn't ever get exercised. This
handling does seem a bit odd to
Hi,
I have been recommended to post my below query to your mailing list, if it
is the right place to post. If not could you recommend who would be best
placed to answer the below questions.
I couldn't find an appropriate mailing list for 'jarzip' (as it is
part of langtools)
- any suggestions?
On 1/7/2013 3:01 PM, Stuart Marks wrote:
(Note for other readers: StreamPipe is not part of this webrev; the
source is viewable at [1].)
Hi Mandy,
I don't see any place where the StreamPipe threads are interrupted, so
the silent exit on InterruptedIOException probably doesn't ever get
On 1/7/13 3:39 PM, Mandy Chung wrote:
Swallowing an exception with no good reason seems a potential cause of
reliability issue. As you think this seems a pretty rare case, I'm fine if
you prefer to do this in a future cleanup. Just wanted to point this out.
Right. You know how I feel
Changeset: 797e8a3dcd51
Author:smarks
Date: 2013-01-07 18:09 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/797e8a3dcd51
7187882: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/activation/checkusage/CheckUsage.java fails
intermittently
Summary: Tighten up JavaVM test library API, and adjust tests to
Hi Daniel,
I also agree with option 3 be the best option among them. Joe's
suggestion to throw an exception if factoryId is not the base service
type is good so that any existing application depending on that behavior
will catch this change. Are you going to revise the spec - there is
I've generated a fresh webrev with your changes.
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dholmes/8004265.v2/webrev.jdk/
Looking to get the Thumbs up on the src and test changes.
Thanks,
David
On 4/01/2013 5:54 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 02/01/2013 18:53, Mandy Chung wrote:
I reviewed the src/test
Hi,
Today I submitted several jprt jobs asusual, but all jobs failed in
building processat the same place. I tried to build jdk locally, and it
worked fine. And I also tried to create a new jdk repo from the scratch,
and then submitteda job. But the jprt job also failed in the buildwith
the
Hi Dan,
On 8/01/2013 5:11 PM, Dan Xu wrote:
Hi,
Today I submitted several jprt jobs asusual, but all jobs failed in
building processat the same place. I tried to build jdk locally, and it
worked fine. And I also tried to create a new jdk repo from the scratch,
and then submitteda job. But the
David,
Thanks for your reply.
I saw other jobs also had the similar jprt command. I wonder why others
could succeed in the build.
-Dan
On Mon 07 Jan 2013 11:20:18 PM PST, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Dan,
On 8/01/2013 5:11 PM, Dan Xu wrote:
Hi,
Today I submitted several jprt jobs asusual, but
On 8/01/2013 5:30 PM, Dan Xu wrote:
David,
Thanks for your reply.
I saw other jobs also had the similar jprt command. I wonder why others
could succeed in the build.
I'm not seeing such successes. I am seeing similar failures eg:
23 matches
Mail list logo
