Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-11 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2013-09-11 00:00, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: Here are the updated changes: The build changes are here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8020552/webrev.jdk8.1/ the delta changes since last reviewed: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8020552/webrev.jdk8.1/webrev.delta/index.html The jdk c

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-10 Thread David Holmes
On 11/09/2013 8:00 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: Here are the updated changes: Looks okay to me. David The build changes are here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8020552/webrev.jdk8.1/ the delta changes since last reviewed: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8020552/webrev.jdk8.1/webrev

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-10 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
Here are the updated changes: The build changes are here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8020552/webrev.jdk8.1/ the delta changes since last reviewed: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8020552/webrev.jdk8.1/webrev.delta/index.html The jdk changes are here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ks

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-10 Thread Staffan Larsen
In SunCommandLineLauncher.java: 198 if (home.length() > 0) { 199 String os_arch = System.getProperty("os.arch"); 200 if ("SunOS".equals(System.getProperty("os.name"))) { 201 exePath = home + File.separator + "bin" + File.separato

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-09 Thread Alan Bateman
On 09/09/2013 16:12, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: Alan, are the nio changes acceptable? Let me know if you need more time to go over all the changes. It looks fine (sorry I should have made that clearer). I skimmed over the other tests too (the launcher tests in particular) and don't see any oth

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-09 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
Hi David, Hi Kumar, This is still dead code in src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/jdi/SunCommandLineLauncher.java String os_arch = System.getProperty("os.arch"); Ah, I will take care of it. Thanks for spotting this. Also: test/java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/lib/sol

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-09 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On 2013-09-06 18:47, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: Hello, Please review the changes to remove Solaris 32-bit binaries from JDK8 distros, at this time the dual mode support in the launcher is being disabled. Message regarding this: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-September/00315

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-09 Thread Alan Bateman
On 09/09/2013 04:28, David Holmes wrote: : Also: test/java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/lib/solaris-amd64/libLauncher.so I know this already exist but I thought binaries were disallowed in the open repo? Right, we don't want binary files checked in. The test needs to

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-08 Thread David Holmes
Hi Kumar, This is still dead code in src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/jdi/SunCommandLineLauncher.java String os_arch = System.getProperty("os.arch"); Also: test/java/nio/channels/spi/SelectorProvider/inheritedChannel/lib/solaris-amd64/libLauncher.so I know this already exist but I thought bi

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-08 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
Hi David, Staffan, Alan, I have addressed all the issues pointed and some more I found while jprt testing. The updated webrev for jdk is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini/8020552/webrev.jdk.1/ and the delta webrev since the last review webrev is here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ksrini

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-08 Thread David Holmes
Hi Kumar, A few minor comments ... src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/jdi/SunCommandLineLauncher.java Seems to me this is all dead now: 199 /* 200 * A wrinkle in the environment: 201 * 64-bit executables are stored under $JAVA_HOME/bin/os_arch

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-08 Thread Tim Bell
Kumar - the makefile changes look good to me. Tim On 09/ 7/13 03:50 AM, Staffan Larsen wrote: This is a welcome change. I've looked at the serviceability test and the changes look good except: test/demo/jvmti/DemoRun.java test/sun/tools/jhat/HatRun.java - Looks like there are still some -d

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-07 Thread Staffan Larsen
This is a welcome change. I've looked at the serviceability test and the changes look good except: test/demo/jvmti/DemoRun.java test/sun/tools/jhat/HatRun.java - Looks like there are still some -d64 remnants that I wasn't expecting. Thanks, /Staffan On 6 sep 2013, at 22:17, Kumar Srinivasan

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-06 Thread Joe Darcy
Hello, On 9/6/2013 10:20 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote: Google is interested in using DUAL_MODE on Linux and would prefer that at least the code to support DUAL_MODE is not removed. I see that you are not removing DUAL_MODE, just disabling it for Solaris. I would prefer to see DUAL_MODE semi-suppo

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-06 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
On 9/6/2013 12:21 PM, Alan Bateman wrote: On 06/09/2013 17:47, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: Hello, Please review the changes to remove Solaris 32-bit binaries from JDK8 distros, at this time the dual mode support in the launcher is being disabled. Message regarding this: http://mail.openjdk.java.

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-06 Thread Alan Bateman
On 06/09/2013 17:47, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: Hello, Please review the changes to remove Solaris 32-bit binaries from JDK8 distros, at this time the dual mode support in the launcher is being disabled. Message regarding this: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-September/00315

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-06 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
On 9/6/2013 10:20 AM, Martin Buchholz wrote: Google is interested in using DUAL_MODE on Linux and would prefer that at least the code to support DUAL_MODE is not removed. I see that you are not removing DUAL_MODE, just disabling it for Solaris. correct, jdk8 will have the dual mode support.

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-06 Thread David M. Lloyd
Another thing to consider is that there may be more "modes" than just 32/64 as time goes on (x32 on Intel springs to mind). Whether that's an argument for keeping dual mode, or dropping it even faster, I'm not sure. On 09/06/2013 12:20 PM, Martin Buchholz wrote: Google is interested in using

RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-06 Thread Kumar Srinivasan
Hello, Please review the changes to remove Solaris 32-bit binaries from JDK8 distros, at this time the dual mode support in the launcher is being disabled. Message regarding this: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8-dev/2013-September/003159.html The jdk changes are here: http://cr.op

Re: RFR: Changes to disable and/or remove Solaris 32-bit from JDK8

2013-09-06 Thread Joe Darcy
Hi Kumar, The changes to the launcher itself and the launcher tests look good. Thanks, -Joe On 9/6/2013 9:47 AM, Kumar Srinivasan wrote: Hello, Please review the changes to remove Solaris 32-bit binaries from JDK8 distros, at this time the dual mode support in the launcher is being disable