The only way to do something like this is get them mapers to use something
like /dev/shm as there storage folder that's 100% memory
outside of that everything is flushed because the mapper exits when its done
the tasktracker is the one delivering the output to the reduce task.
Billy
"paula_t
I used streaming and php before to work with processing data with a data set
of about 1TB with out any problems at all.
Billy
"s d" wrote in message
news:24b53fa00905191035w41b115c1q94502ee82be43...@mail.gmail.com...
Thanks.
So in the overall scheme of things, what is the general feeling ab
I am seeing the the same problem posted on the list on the 11th and have not
any reply.
Billy
- Original Message -
From: "Manish Katyal"
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.hadoop.user
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:48 AM
Subject: Regarding Capacity Scheduler
I'm exp
Does the Capacity Scheduler not recover reduce tasks in the setting
mapred.capacity-scheduler.queue.{name}.reclaim-time-limit?
on my test it only recovers map task if it can not get its full Guaranteed
Capacity.
Billy
Might try setting the tasktrackers linux nice level to say 5 or 10 leavening
dfs and hbase setting to 0
Billy
"zsongbo" wrote in message
news:fa03480d0905110549j7f09be13qd434ca41c9f84...@mail.gmail.com...
Hi all,
Now, if we have a large dataset to process by MapReduce. The MapReduce
will
ta
When I was looking to capture debugging data about my scripts I would just
write to stderr stream in php it like
fwrite(STDERR,"message you want here");
then it get captured in the task logs when you view the detail of each task.
Billy
"Mayuran Yogarajah"
wrote in message
news:4a049154.607
In php I run exec commands with the job commands and it has a variable that
stores the exit status code.
Billy
"Mayuran Yogarajah"
wrote in message
news:49fc975a.3030...@casalemedia.com...
Billy Pearson wrote:
I done this with and array of commands for the jobs in a php script
I done this with and array of commands for the jobs in a php script checking
the return of the job to tell if it failed or not.
Billy
"Dan Milstein" wrote in
message news:58d66a11-b59c-49f8-b72f-7507482c3...@hubteam.com...
If I've got a sequence of streaming jobs, each of which depends on the
The only way I know of is try using different Scheduling Queue's for each
group
Billy
"nguyenhuynh.mr"
wrote in message news:49ee6e56.7080...@gmail.com...
Tom White wrote:
You need to start each JobControl in its own thread so they can run
concurrently. Something like:
Thread t = new
Not 100% sure but I thank they plan on using zookeeper to help with namenode
fail over but that may have changed.
Billy
"Stas Oskin" wrote in
message news:77938bc20904110243u7a2baa6dw6d710e4e51ae0...@mail.gmail.com...
Hi.
I wonder, what Hadoop community uses in order to make NameNode resili
I seen the same thing happening on 0.19.branch.
When a task fails on the reduce end it always retries on the same node until
it kills the job for to many failed tries on one reduce task.
I am running a cluster of 7 nodes.
Billy
"Stefan Will" wrote in message
news:c5ff7f91.18c09%stefan.w..
Your client doesn't have to be on the namenode it can be on any system that
can access the namenode and the datanodes.
Hadoop uses 64MB block to store files so file sizes >= 64mb should be as
efficient as 128MB or 1GB file sizes.
more reading and information here:
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop
66% is the start of the reduce function so its likely a endless loop there
burning the cpu cycles
"Amandeep Khurana" wrote in
message news:35a22e220903271631i25ff749bx5814348e66ff4...@mail.gmail.com...
I have a MR job running on approximately 15 lines of data in a text
file. The reducer
I run 10 node cluster with 2 cores 2.4Ghz with 4Gb Ram and dual 250GB drives
per node.
I run on used 32 bit servers so I can only run 2GB hbase but I still have
memory left for tasktracker and datanode.
more files in hadoop = more memory used on the namenode. hbase master is
lightly loaded so I
#x27;m not sure.
Thanks
Amareshwari
Billy Pearson wrote:
I am seeing on one of my long running jobs about 50-60 hours that after
24 hours all
active reduce task fail with the error messages
java.io.IOException: Task process exit with nonzero status of 255.
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred
adasu wrote:
Set mapred.jobtracker.retirejob.interval
This is used to retire completed jobs.
and mapred.userlog.retain.hours to higher value.
This is used to discard user logs.
By default, their values are 24 hours. These might be the reason for
failure, though I'm not sure.
Thanks
Amareshwari
I am seeing on one of my long running jobs about 50-60 hours that after 24
hours all
active reduce task fail with the error messages
java.io.IOException: Task process exit with nonzero status of 255.
at org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskRunner.run(TaskRunner.java:418)
Is there something in the confi
tputs, but not any intermediate files produced. The reducer
will decompress the map output files after copying them, and then compress
its own output only after it has finished.
I wonder if this is by design, or just an oversight.
-- Stefan
From: Billy Pearson
Reply-To:
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 200
open issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-5539
Billy
"Billy Pearson"
wrote in message news:cecf0598d9ca40a08e777568361de...@billypc...
How are you concluding that the intermediate output is compressed from
the map, but not in the reduce? -C
my hadoo
er outputs, but not any intermediate files produced. The reducer
will decompress the map output files after copying them, and then compress
its own output only after it has finished.
I wonder if this is by design, or just an oversight.
-- Stefan
From: Billy Pearson
Reply-To:
Date: Wed, 18 Mar
How are you concluding that the intermediate output is compressed from
the map, but not in the reduce? -C
my hadoop-site.xml
mapred.compress.map.output
true
Should the job outputs be compressed?
mapred.output.compression.type
BLOCK
If the job outputs are to compressed as Sequenc
I can run head on the map.out files and I get compressed garbish but I run
head on a intermediate file and I can read the data in the file clearly so
compression is not getting passed but I am setting the CompressMapOutput to
true by default in my hadoop-site.conf file.
Billy
"Billy Pe
runnning at the same
time.
Billy Pearson
Watching a second job with more reduce task running looks like the in-memory
merges are working correctly with compression.
The task I was watching failed and was running again it Shuffle all the map
output files then started the merged after all was copied so non was merged
in memory it was c
I understand that I got CompressMapOutput set and it works the maps outputs
are compressed but on the reduce end it downloads x files then merges the x
file in to one intermediate file to keep the number of files to a minimal
<= io.sort.factor.
My problem is the output from merging the inte
I am running a large streaming job that processes that about 3TB of data I
am seeing large jumps in hard drive space usage in the reduce part of the
jobs I tracked the problem down. The job is set to compress map outputs but
looking at the intermediate files on the local drives the intermediate
If it was me I would prefix the map values outputs with a: and n:.
a: for address and n: for number
then on the reduce you could test the value to see if its the address or the
name with if statements no need to worry about which one comes first just
make sure they both have been set before outp
the disks with mapred and mapred tasks may use a lot of disks temporally.
So
trying to keep the same %free is impossible most of the time.
Hairong
On 1/19/09 10:28 PM, "Billy Pearson"
wrote:
Why do we not use the Remaining % in place of use Used % when we are
selecting datanode f
Why do we not use the Remaining % in place of use Used % when we are
selecting datanode for new data and when running the balancer.
form what I can tell we are using the use % used and we do not factor in non
DFS Used at all.
I see a datanode with only a 60GB hard drive fill up completely 100% be
Doug:
If we use the heap as a cache and you have a large cluster then you will
have the memory on the NN to handle keeping all the namespace in memory.
We are looking for a way to support smaller clusters also that might over
run there heap size causing the cluster to crash.
So if the NN has the
I would like to see something like this also I run 32bit servers so I am
limited on how much memory I can use for heap. Besides just storing to disk
I would like to see some sort of cache like a block cache that will cache
parts the BlocksMap this would help reduce the hits to disk for lookups a
If I understand the secondary namenode merges the edits log in to the
fsimage and reduces the edit log size.
Which is likely the root of your problems 8.5G seams large and likely
putting a strain on your master servers memory and io bandwidth
Why do you not have a secondary namenode?
If you do
I need the Reduce to Sort so I can merge the records and output in a sorted
order.
I do not need to join any data just merge rows together so I do not thank
the join will be any help.
I am storing the data like >> with a
sorted map as the value.
and on the merge I need to take all the rows tha
I have a job that merges multi output directories of MR jobs that run over
time.
The output of them are all the same and the MR that merges them uses a
mapper that just outputs the same key,value as its is given so basically the
same as the IdentityMapper
The Problem I am seeing is as I add
generate a patch and post it here
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-675
Billy
"Arthur van Hoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Below is some code for improving the read performance of large tables by
processing each region on the host holding that re
Do we not have an option to store the map results in hdfs?
Billy
"Owen O'Malley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
It isn't optimal, but it is the expected behavior. In general when we
lose a TaskTracker, we want the map outputs regenerated so that any
reduces that n
Might be able to use InverseMapper.class
To help flip the key/value to value/key
Billy
"Jeremy Chow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi list,
The default way hadoop doing its sorting is by keys , can it sort by
values rather than keys?
Regards,
Jeremy
--
My rese
You should be able to add nodes to the cluster while jobs are running the
jobtracker should start assigning task to the tasktrackers and dfs should
start using the nodes for storage
But map data files are stored on the slaves and copied to the reduce task so
if a node goes down during a MR job
I do not totally understand you job you are running but if each simulation
can run independent of each other then you could run a map reduce job that
will spread the simulation's over many servers so each one can run one or
more at the same time this will give you a level of protection on server
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-1700
"过佳" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does HDFS support it?I need it to be synchronized , e.g. I call many
clients
to write a lots of IntWritable to one file.
Best.
Jarvis.
2008-06-21 20:30:18,928 WARN org.apache.hadoop.mapred.TaskTracker: Error
running child
java.io.IOException: Type mismatch in key from map: expected
org.apache.hadoop.io.LongWritable, recieved org.apache.hadoop.io.Text
at
org.apache.hadoop.mapred.MapTask$MapOutputBuffer.collect(MapTask.java:419)
when need to add extra cpu power to my cluster and to automatically start
the tasktracker vi a shell script that can be ran at startup.
Billy
"Billy Pearson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a question someone may have answered here before bu
/docs/r0.16.4/api/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/lib/IdentityMapper.html
ckw
On Jun 14, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Billy Pearson wrote:
I have a question someone may have answered here before but I can not
find the answer.
Assuming I have a cluster of servers hosting a large amount of data
I want to run a la
I have a question someone may have answered here before but I can not find
the answer.
Assuming I have a cluster of servers hosting a large amount of data
I want to run a large job that the maps take a lot of cpu power to run and
the reduces only take a small amount cpu to run.
I want to run th
Streaming works on stdin and stdout so unless there was a way to capture the
stdout as a counter I do not see any other way to report the to the
jobtracker. Unless there was a url the task could call on the jobtracker to
update counters.
Billy
"Miles Osborne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
m
45 matches
Mail list logo