i [mailto:kakar...@kakaroto.homelinux.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2018 3:40 PM
To: Desimone, Nathaniel L
Cc: coreboot
Subject: Re: [coreboot] Kaby Lake FSP
Great, thanks!
I understand that as platform ages, it gets less development, I was mostly
asking because I saw that coffeelake FSP headers are in coreboot bu
y, I would expect the
> frequency of FSP releases to lengthen as a platform ages.
>
> Thanks,
> Nate
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Youness Alaoui [mailto:kakar...@kakaroto.homelinux.net]
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 12:29 PM
> To: Desimone, Nathaniel L
, I would expect the
frequency of FSP releases to lengthen as a platform ages.
Thanks,
Nate
-Original Message-
From: Youness Alaoui [mailto:kakar...@kakaroto.homelinux.net]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2018 12:29 PM
To: Desimone, Nathaniel L
Cc: coreboot
Subject: Re: [coreboot] Kaby Lake FSP
Hi Nate,
Thanks a lot for listening to our request and taking care of this! I'm
happy to see the binaries finally updated and the FSP headers in
coreboot having a matching publicly available binary to use.
You've only mentioned Kabylake in your email, is it safe to assume
that you'll use these sam
9:39 AM
To: Desimone, Nathaniel L ; Patrick Georgi
Cc: coreboot
Subject: Re: [coreboot] Kaby Lake FSP
Hi,
On 11.07.2018 18:18, Desimone, Nathaniel L wrote:
> However, there is nothing in the license that prevents you from
> providing links to github.com/IntelFsp. It might not be exactly
Hi,
On 11.07.2018 18:18, Desimone, Nathaniel L wrote:
> However, there is nothing in the license that prevents you from
> providing links to github.com/IntelFsp. It might not be exactly what you
> were hoping for but would adding a git submodule in coreboot blobs that
> points to github.com/IntelF
feasible to setup
the repo tool to pull github.com/IntelFsp at the same time it pulls the
coreboot repo.
Thanks,
Nate
From: Patrick Georgi
Date: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 11:38 PM
To: "Desimone, Nathaniel L"
Cc: coreboot
Subject: Re: [coreboot] Kaby Lake FSP
Nate, thank you f
Nate, thank you for getting these things out and for the public update!
Could you please ask the lawyers if they consider 2.1 (b) and (c) of the
license sufficient for unmodified redistribution (eg in the coreboot blobs
repo: paths change, the files remain unmodified)? It seems like that should
be
Hi All,
I am a UEFI firmware architect working for Intel Corp. One of my focus areas is
FSP. There was some prior discussion here regarding the lack of public updates
for Kaby Lake FSP binaries and headers and questions regarding specialized FSP
binaries being built for specific boards. I would
9 matches
Mail list logo