Perhaps a perl-friendly firm might be able to offer some rack space for
perl testing hardware?
Dean
On 2014-09-05 21:30, Curtis Jewell wrote:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014, at 02:23, Dean Hamstead wrote:
Amazon Smile may be worth setting up.
TPF should probably make sure they are set up there.
"Ye
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014, at 02:23, Dean Hamstead wrote:
>
>
> Amazon Smile may be worth setting up.
>
> TPF should probably make sure they are set up there.
"Yet Another Society" (the official business name of TPF) is set up on
Amazon Smile already. So yes, they're there.
--Curtis
> Dean
--
Amazon Smile may be worth setting up.
TPF should probably make sure they are set up there.
Dean
On 2014-09-05 16:44, Barbie wrote:
> Hi BooK,
>
> Unfortunately,the CPAN Testers Fund is quite substantial enough to set up
> unusual platforms yet, but it may be a possibility in the future
Hi BooK,
Unfortunately,the CPAN Testers Fund is quite substantial enough to set up
unusual platforms yet, but it may be a possibility in the future.
You currently have two ways to contribute to the CPAN Testers Fund.
gittip/gratipay is one, but the main one is the Fund run by EPO -
https://member
An SGI octane is quite cheap on ebay... i suspect there are plenty
around that can be had for a case of beer or a decent bottle of wine.
The expense would be the power costs...
You raise a good point though.
OpenBSD proudly shares their lab picture ->
http://www.openbsd.org/images/rack2009.jp
Barbie will surely tell you more about it but this is the Gratipay account
of CPAN testers: https://gratipay.com/cpantesters/
Gabor
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:35:18PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> The problem is that the interesting platforms that aren't getting tested
> are those for which you can't just spin up another VM. In particular I'm
> thinking of Solaris on Sparc, and Irix.
>
> Irix is an especially interesting p
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 12:35:18PM +0100, David Cantrell wrote:
> The problem is that the interesting platforms that aren't getting tested
> are those for which you can't just spin up another VM. In particular I'm
> thinking of Solaris on Sparc, and Irix.
There's also other dimensions of testing w
On 08/26/2014 06:35 AM, David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:49:14PM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
Hence I wonder if there is something a matrix that shows deficiencies in
testing coverage, which will give people like myself a quick list of
platforms we could fire up in a VM (or old h
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:49:14PM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> Hence I wonder if there is something a matrix that shows deficiencies in
> testing coverage, which will give people like myself a quick list of
> platforms we could fire up in a VM (or old hardware we could
> beg/borrow/steal/ebay
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:49:14 +1000, Dean Hamstead
> said:
> Hi All
> I was looking to fire up some cpan smokers, but adding yet another
> linux i386/amd64 smoker probably isnt needed. In the past i have run
> DragonflyBSD and OpenBSD smokers.
Both Dragonfly and OpenBSD often h
Im sort of looking for the opposite of that list, which would include
hypothetical's
Dean
On 2014-08-26 14:13, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> If I am not mistaken you are looking for the data I referred to yesterday
> http://stats.cpantesters.org/mplatforms.html [1]
> when I was looking for a grap
If I am not mistaken you are looking for the data I referred to yesterday
http://stats.cpantesters.org/mplatforms.html
when I was looking for a graph to see the trends in number of reports / OS
(or rather platform).
Sinan linked to a script extracting the data from the HTML, but I have not
had time
Hi All
I was looking to fire up some cpan smokers, but adding yet another linux
i386/amd64 smoker probably isnt needed. In the past i have run
DragonflyBSD and OpenBSD smokers.
Looking through the list it's clear that there is a lot of coverage
across a lot of different platforms, but its no
14 matches
Mail list logo
