Re: [Crm-sig] HW Temporal Primitives

2017-03-10 Thread martin
Dear Richard, Your comments have been discussed in the last SIG meeting. Indeed, the fuzzy start and end of a Temporal Entity corresponds to upper and lower bounds for the properties P82a/P81a ('start of the beginning' and 'end of the beginning') and P81b/P82b ('start of the end' and 'end of

[Crm-sig] Fwd: Re: Crm-sig Digest, Vol 122, Issue 8

2017-03-10 Thread Dominic Oldman
-- Forwarded message -- From: "Dominic Oldman" List-Post: crm-sig@ics.forth.gr Date: 10 Mar 2017 6:03 p.m. Subject: Re: [Crm-sig] Crm-sig Digest, Vol 122, Issue 8 To: "Martin Doerr" Cc: Sure, that seems logical as in this case the part of expression is arbitrary. I will submit an

[Crm-sig] CIDOC CRM and Archaeology - Round Table @ EAA2017 Maastricht

2017-03-10 Thread Achille Felicetti
Dear colleagues, Apologies for cross-posting. Please find to the links below details of the upcoming CIDOC CRM roundtable entitled: “Describe Your Data: the CRM approach to Archiving and Exchange of Archaeological Field Databases” - https://www.klinkhamergroup.com/eaa2017/sessions/overview/pr

Re: [Crm-sig] Rights model

2017-03-10 Thread martin
On 28/2/2017 9:50 μμ, Robert Sanderson wrote: Dear all, Given the current model, I believe that E30 Right is an instance of the holding of a Right, rather than the concept of the Right itself? For example, E30 is not “Copyright” or “Apache 2.0” or “Ownership” … it is “The holding of copyrigh

Re: [Crm-sig] Rights model, ISSUE

2017-03-10 Thread martin
Dear Robert, Attached how I would model your use cases now. Simply and deliberately, the CRM describes rights so far only as current state. Note that the triangle P75,P104, P105 circumscribes a state of "Right Holding" in the centre of the triangle, which would carry a time interval. If we int

Re: [Crm-sig] Pages reproduced as spreads

2017-03-10 Thread martin
/crm-sig ___ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig ___ Crm-sig mailing list Crm-sig@ics.forth.gr http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig -

Re: [Crm-sig] Crm-sig Digest, Vol 122, Issue 8

2017-03-10 Thread martin
Dear Dominic, If you regard this as a new issue, or new evidence of an old one, please mark your message by "ISSUE", and it will be on the agenda. Every crm-sig member has the right to raise an issue. BTW, I agree that a "Page" is not a self-contained expression, but a fragment. In general,

Re: [Crm-sig] Pages reproduced as spreads

2017-03-10 Thread Florian Kräutli
gt;>> partitioning of an >>>>>> information object. Each page number can be seen as an identifier. >>>>>> Paragraphs belong to an alternative partitioning system. The >>>>>> reproduction has its own particioning, the scanned double pages.

Re: [Crm-sig] Crm-sig Digest, Vol 122, Issue 8

2017-03-10 Thread Dominic Oldman
Hi Florian, Here is an off line discussion that we should have put on the list. Cheers, D orcid.org/-0002-5539-3126 On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Christian-Emil Smith Ore < c.e.s@iln.uio.no> wrote: > Do so, and send my regards. Please incorproate the following example: > > > To c

[Crm-sig] Proposed Change

2017-03-10 Thread athinak
Dear All, We propose a new entity named Right Holding (see the attached file), which is in fact the event/state which is implied from the triangle structure Actorossesses:Right:applies to: Legal Object: right held by:Actor. This new class has temporal properties (timespan of rights), someth