Re: [Crm-sig] Digging for a unknown issue, help needed

Dear Christian-Emil, I think it is 469 and 365, as well as the introduction about compatibility of extensions: 1A new class or property is added to an extension of the CIDOC CRM, which is not covered by superclasses other than E1 CRM Entity or a superproperty in the CIDOC CRM respectively.

[Crm-sig] Digging for a unknown issue, help needed

Dear all, In the work with the cleanup of the definition document for CRMarcheo, I found a comment (written by myself) next to AP5 removed part or all of (was partially or totally removed by) Domain:

[Crm-sig] issue 557

Dear all, Regarding my HW (refer the publicly accessible archival material from SeaLit and find the fields that Spectrum uses to document museum transactions), you can find the reference in this doc https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r5mgVbLmD3bwjgaWkyQapHedpplSvXEe/edit#heading=h.gjdgxs