Agreed. And it would make the standard more compact, an important principle!
Deprecate
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 6:30 PM Robert Sanderson via Crm-sig <
crm-sig@ics.forth.gr> wrote:
> yes to deprecating both properties.
>
> preference is both context specific, and a classification of an identifier
yes to deprecating both properties.
preference is both context specific, and a classification of an identifier
in that context, not a globally true relationship.
Permanent location has the same problem as permanent custodian, which was
not approved as a relationship at a recent SIG - its a
Dear All,
Since it is on tomorrow's agenda to deprecate or not "preferred
identifier" and "current permanent location", I'd suggest an e-vote,
if the meeting tends to deprecation, because basically the question
remains if these are used or not. The latter is a question to a wider
audience.
Dear Martin,
Just trying to understand:
Time-Span P191 had duration E54 Dimension:
was "one to one (1,1:1,1)", which is contradictory, and both are wrong
in this issue it was tentatively (1,1:0,n):
(1,1:_,_): Martin: I think the phenomenal time-span has exactly one duration,
which can be
Dear Martin, and all,
if you are going to discuss aboutness I am really sorry I cannot be there and
talk about it, but life is about many things, talking about teaching and
semester start...
Aboutness can be defined very wide (anything someone thinks and is willing to
state relates to
Dear All,
With respect to issue 576, a specific aboutness, I'd like to keep in mind
(A) to keep the CRMbase small
(B) fear that the variety in which "aboutness" may occur is even much
greater than that between an image and what is on it. If we talk about
texts, we do not encounter the
