In 1997 I proposed something along these lines. Appended at the end is
the last rev I did of the Internet Draft...
Donald
===
Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1 914-276-2668 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
65 Shindegan Hill Rd, RR#1 +1 914-784-7913
>On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 10:09:31PM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
>> I've been thinking about cryptographic signing of messages at the mail
>> transfer agent level. I can think of how to do it, but I'm not sure
>> what problem it solves. :) Anyone have any ideas?
>
At 12:01 PM 8/22/99 -0700, Er
Greg Rose writes:
> At 22:09 21/08/1999 -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
> >I've been thinking about cryptographic signing of messages at the mail
> >transfer agent level. I can think of how to do it, but I'm not sure
> >what problem it solves. :) Anyone have any ideas?
>
> Signing messages
At 22:09 21/08/1999 -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
>I've been thinking about cryptographic signing of messages at the mail
>transfer agent level. I can think of how to do it, but I'm not sure
>what problem it solves. :) Anyone have any ideas?
Signing messages at the MTA level solves no problem
On Sat, Aug 21, 1999 at 10:09:31PM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
> I've been thinking about cryptographic signing of messages at the mail
> transfer agent level. I can think of how to do it, but I'm not sure
> what problem it solves. :) Anyone have any ideas?
I wrote a similar system for Sun
I've been thinking about cryptographic signing of messages at the mail
transfer agent level. I can think of how to do it, but I'm not sure
what problem it solves. :) Anyone have any ideas?
[I remember that someone in Australia built some experimental patches
to do this for sendmail some time