IE is processing the sublevel rule, it just does not clear the background
image that is inherited. I have tried both background: none; and
background-image: none;. The transparent image has been suggested and while
it sounds awful, that may be the only solution.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
Jeff Chastain wrote:
>I have a multi-level list in which the top level list item has a background
>image applied. The background image is being inherited by all of the list
>items as expected, but I am trying to disable it for all of the sub levels.
>I tried a 'background-image: none' which seems
>>>Kathryn wrote:
>>>see http://admin.berkeley.edu/.
>>>[...]
>>>there is a division (right below the gold bar) between the main nav
>>>bar and the left and right divs in internet explorer for pc (for mac
>>>is fine). do you know of a hack that would eliminate this space/white
>>>bar? or is the
On 4/27/06, Anjali Arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's interesting, can you expand on that? Would you use a specific
> DTD for IE6 always, or would it be 'it depends on ___'. In the latter
> case, what factors determine the DTD to assign to a document.
IMO one should always use a DTD that wi
I have a multi-level list in which the top level list item has a background
image applied. The background image is being inherited by all of the list
items as expected, but I am trying to disable it for all of the sub levels.
I tried a 'background-image: none' which seems to work for FireFox, but
From: Schalk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>http://www.epda.cc/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=32&Itemid=26,
>
>it does not work in IE.
>
>My css is located
>here:http://www.epda.cc/joomla/templates/epda/css/template_css.css
It's working in IE6 for me, not that that is a help to you at
Hello All,
This is a liquid 3 column layout centered and utilizes faux columns.
http://www.availcompany.com/webdev/webcode/css_test10.htm# The right
column width is 1px so it looks like a 2 column design. It also uses
things I learned here:
CSS for photo gallery, see /* CSS for Horiz Gallery
On Apr 28, 2006, at 5:04 AM, Tyson Tate wrote:
> For the first time in my career of CSS-based design, I've run in to
> a problem whereby Firefox
> differs in its rendering from that of Safari in MacOS X.
>
> [... snipped code ...]
>
> In Safari, the end-cap (ul:after) is correctly budges up 8px
That's interesting, can you expand on that? Would you use a specific
DTD for IE6 always, or would it be 'it depends on ___'. In the latter
case, what factors determine the DTD to assign to a document.
Thanks.
-Anjali
>
> Actually IE6 will do the box model reasonably well if you give it the
>
On 4/28/06, Bill Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Stuart,
>
> Adding z-index: 1000 to the #headingFloat style block fixed it for me on
> Firefox/WinXp and IE/WinXP. What OS are you using?
>
> Bill Brown
> Webmaster, MacNimble.com
>
Hi Bill,
Just put the z-index to 1000 and it worked a treat,
Hi List,
I'm having a hard time trying to figure this one out, the below link takes
you to the problem:
URL: http://www.nailzone.co.uk/dev/training.php
CSS: http://www.nailzone.co.uk/dev/css/styles.css
I am trying to position a header image at the top lefthand corner of the
pink box but it seem
Hello all,
I'm having a hell of a time over here trying to get this (seemingly simple)
layout work cross browser and was wondering if anyone could point me into
the right direction.
Basically it's a centered three column layout (51px wide/410px wide/445px
wide), without a footer or header. Can
I am having a padding issue in Mozilla. Seems to show up here only
and I have NO idea how to fix it.
The issue is in the blog section in the middle of the page.
The page in question is: http://www.agiprodj.com/?cat=191
The css in questions is: http://www.agiprodj.com/wp-content/themes/
dj_v3/
Ted,
Nice job on this site. Here is what I like and what I suggest IMHO
What I like (strengths):
1. Color choices and blending is easy on the eyes.
2. Clean design, not a lot of clutter and overload of useless content.
3. Catalog form is concise and clear.
What I suggest:
1. older 12" Laptop us
I'm using IE 6 and I see tool tips well.
Liked the page content as well. If you were doing this site in Florida,
our agency Florida Division of Blind Services would be one of your
parnters and you agency ours. ( 23 percent of cases we serve each year
are due to diabetic retinopathy.)
-Origin
On 4/27/06, Anjali Arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks a ton, I'm glad you liked the site.
>
> Ok, so after tearing my hair for the last couple of hours, I have
> managed to fix the problem. The clue came from an online resource
> that said that because of IE's buggy implementation of the box
On 4/27/06, tedd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> only 20 percent of the viewing audience has a screen size of 800 x 600 and
> that figure is dropping at a rate of 5 percent per six months (10 percent per
> year).
> As such, in two years, the narrow-screen user number will drop below a
> detectable a
> On Apr 27, 2006, at 3:55 PM, cj wrote:
> > if you'll notice in ie, a horizontal scroll bar appears on narrower
> > screens as well as the div getting pushed down. usually ie will shove
> > stuff below other stuff when it's too wide to fit the screen, so going
> > through your code and checking f
Thanks a ton, I'm glad you liked the site.
Ok, so after tearing my hair for the last couple of hours, I have
managed to fix the problem. The clue came from an online resource
that said that because of IE's buggy implementation of the box-model,
it's best not to use margins or borders alongwi
Felix hath said:
> > Okay, what would be a good maximum width measurement (in pixels)?
>
>None. Let it be whatever size it needs to be.
-snip (good stuff) --
>Those adjustments may very well including permitting a reduced width, in
>order to allow a squeeze in place of a scroll for viewers with
> 1) Text structure, use of semantics (refer to the bare CSS Zen Garden site)
While the garden is great for showing that CSS is capable of
attractive designs, I'm not so sure it's good for learning from the
code. It was designed to be very easy for hundreds of people to
author stylesheets for it
At 3:59 PM -0400 4/27/06, Tom Livingston wrote:
>On 4/27/06, David Merchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>a max measurement: 544 for the width
>>
>> TTFN,
>> David
>>
>
>
>8^O
>
>544!? Max!? Wow! What's that look like at a 1600x1200+ resolution?
>
I personally think that in trying to accommodat
Hi Paul,
I would approach it this way:
I. Separation of style and content
II. Where to put CSS: style sheets, between head tags, inline
III. Block vs. Inline Elements
IV. Margins, Padding, Border
I think that is about all you can reasonably cover in 3 hours
considering your other curriculum item
Opera Mini Browser emulator:
http://www.opera.com/products/mobile/operamini/demo.dml
HTH,
TTFN,
David Merchant
--
Director of Integrated Technology
CATALyST
Louisiana Tech University
catalyst.latech.edu
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PRO
> -Original Message-
> From: tedd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 7:55 AM
> To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
> Subject: [css-d] Site Check Please -- ancientstones.com
>
> Hi gang:
>
> Please review the following site:
>
> http://ancientstones.com
>
> Suggestio
At 16:08 -0400 27/4/06, Felix Miata wrote:
... an incredibly fulsome post on users, viewports and widths.
This thread has long since strayed far from the discussion of the
practical use of css and on to the practicalities of web design.
So can it end now please.
Alex Robinson
css-d moderator
>8^O
>
>544!? Max!? Wow! What's that look like at a 1600x1200+ resolution?
Well, I actually try to make them fluid, so for larger resolutions the
sites don't look bad, but 'tis hard to make sites completely fluid (at
least for me) and so at some point when reducing window down, the page
isn't
I suspect the large font size must be due to selecting Georgia as the
first choice?
Just a question, as a newbie ( still! ), what does the "lge" class do; as in
... | ...
I didn't see it defined in either style sheet?
Really liked the clean design, especially after reducing the text size!
J.
On 06/04/27 12:32 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
> At 9:54 AM -0400 4/27/06, Felix Miata wrote:
>>On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
>>> Please review the following site:
>>> http://ancientstones.com
>>> Suggestions and comments welcomed.
>>Nice. But, those using sidebars
For the first time in my career of CSS-based design, I've run in to a problem
whereby Firefox
differs in its rendering from that of Safari in MacOS X.
Here's the relevant XHTML:
Menu Title
Menu Link
Menu Link
And the relevant CSS:
#s
Hi all.
I am creating a course on how to design web sites using CSS. (That's a
very loose title: it could easily be "How to make your website
better..." etc.) It will be a 3-hour short course for people with some
experience of web design, aimed at individuals and small businesses, and
does not n
On 4/27/06, David Merchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>a max measurement: 544 for the width
>
> TTFN,
> David
>
8^O
544!? Max!? Wow! What's that look like at a 1600x1200+ resolution?
--
Tom Livingston
Senior Multimedia Artist
Media Logic
www.mlinc.com
___
I am trying to create multiple css layouts for an application. For one of
the "skins," I'm using a JavaScript to affect the design. Is there a way
for it to only affect one design and not others?
--
Marc Luzietti
Flagship Project
Bayview Financial, L.P.
(305) 341-5624
__
this isn't "this is the solution" per se, but more of "this is part of
the problem".
if you'll notice in ie, a horizontal scroll bar appears on narrower
screens as well as the div getting pushed down. usually ie will shove
stuff below other stuff when it's too wide to fit the screen, so going
thr
My apologies, the link for Klondike WAP Browser should've been
http://www.apachesoftware.com/download.html
HTH,
TTFN,
David Merchant
--
Director of Integrated Technology
CATALyST
Louisiana Tech University
catalyst.latech.edu
__
Hi,
I have this page at www.artbrush.net/dp/. It works fine In Firefox on
Windows, & great on Firefox & Safari on the mac.
However, IE on Windows is another story. The middle column (div
id="main") of the page which contains all of the body text starts way
down on the page. What would set
>Okay, what would be a good maximum width measurement (in pixels)?
Some may disagree with this, but I try to aim at using WebTV's (MSN TV)
browser's usable screen area as a max measurement: 544 for the width (I
haven't succeeded with all my pages yet). As we all know, it is hard,
really, to de
The main page title bar says "Ancient Title". Think you mean "Tile" :)
On 4/27/06 5:55 AM, "tedd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi gang:
>
> Please review the following site:
>
> http://ancientstones.com
>
> Suggestions and comments welcomed.
>
> Thank you.
>
> tedd
___
At 1:23 PM -0400 4/27/06, David Laakso wrote:
>>>On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
>>Okay, what would be a good maximum width measurement (in pixels)?
>>
>>Thanks.
>>
>>tedd
>>
>I prefer 780 min with 1200 max feeding same to the 'evil one' with
>'ie expressions." Felix will, I
* Openwave Phone Simulator http://developer.openwave.com/dvl/
* Microsoft Mobile Explorer
http://www.devhood.com/tools/tool_details.aspx?tool_id=52 (though the site
seems to be down at present)
* Nokia has an emulator but I've never gotten it to work.
* Latest Opera browsers has emulators built-i
At 9:54 AM -0400 4/27/06, Felix Miata wrote:
>On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
>
>> Please review the following site:
>
>> http://ancientstones.com
>
>> Suggestions and comments welcomed.
>
>Nice. But, those using sidebars are likely not to appreciate it so much.
>It requires
Opera has an emulation mode for small screen devices, you press Shift-F11.
IIts not perfect, but it gives you a pretty good idea.
Sam
On 27/04/06, cj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> msdn had a web series dealing with mobile devices a while ago, and
> their web casts are saved and available to repla
At 8:20 PM +0530 4/27/06, Rahul Gonsalves wrote:
>tedd wrote:
>>Hi gang:
>>
>>Please review the following site:
>>
>>http://ancientstones.com
>>
>>Suggestions and comments welcomed.
>>
>>Thank you.
>>
>>tedd
>
>
>Sweet!
>
>Has David Laakso seen this site?
Interesting that you should ask -- he's p
On 4/26/06, Kathryn Bader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there is a division (right below the gold bar) between the main nav
> bar and the left and right divs in internet explorer for pc (for mac
> is fine). do you know of a hack that would eliminate this space/white
> bar? or is there some other fi
msdn had a web series dealing with mobile devices a while ago, and
their web casts are saved and available to replay online. i don't
remember the links they had to various company's controls/applications
that let you view your pages on their phones, but i'm sure if you
watched the 'cast they'd giv
Stephanie, Christian, tedd, Rahul and Thierry:
Thank you for taking your time replying, I really appreciate it. Looking at
all the different solutions offered so far it looks very promising! :)
Thanks,
Jakob Persson
web designer and usability consultant
www.jakob-persson.com
-Original
Must agree with both reviewers:
1. I use a sidebar virtually 100% of the time and so I have to scroll
horizontally to see all of this Web page. On the Catalog page, for
instance, I do not see the Price radio buttons at all. Funny how, for many
people, the eye notices a vertical scrollbar readil
Hi,
one of the advantages of using CSS is creating a wide readable HTML
content. I don't know about you, but I've alway accessed it via
computer browsers :-)
Now I would like to test my html with an handheld or smartphone
browser, I don't actually have one of thoose devices so I was
wondering abou
Typo in main paige in the
find "ouri" where it should be "our"
On 4/27/06, Rahul Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tedd wrote:
> > Hi gang:
> >
> > Please review the following site:
> >
> > http://ancientstones.com
> >
> > Suggestions and comments welcomed.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > tedd
tedd wrote:
> Hi gang:
>
> Please review the following site:
>
> http://ancientstones.com
>
> Suggestions and comments welcomed.
>
> Thank you.
>
> tedd
Sweet!
Has David Laakso seen this site?
Nothing constructive to add, however, some of your images seem to need
the background changed to
On 06/04/27 01:32 (GMT-0400) Kathryn Bader apparently typed:
> see http://admin.berkeley.edu/.
> there is a division (right below the gold bar) between the main nav
> bar and the left and right divs in internet explorer for pc (for mac
> is fine). do you know of a hack that would eliminate this
On 06/04/27 08:55 (GMT-0400) tedd apparently typed:
> Please review the following site:
> http://ancientstones.com
> Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Nice. But, those using sidebars are likely not to appreciate it so much.
It requires a lot of viewport width or a smallish default text size to
Martin Heiden wrote:
>
> No, it works with enabled background transparency. You've got to add:
>
>
>
> inside the . In this mode the flash will not render on top of
> all other content, but it doesn't work with all plugin-versions on all
> browsers. But it will work at least for IE and Firefox on
Shelly,
on Thursday, April 27, 2006 at 14:24 Design Groups wrote:
>>>You can't use the swf in the css background property. But you could
> place an object with absolute positioning and z-index under a div. You
> have to add background transparency to the flash (and pray...).<<
> Actually, this
Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
> On Apr 27, 2006, at 7:08 PM, Christian Heilmann wrote:
>> Personally I dread the day when designers can force me to download
>> a 1.4MB ttf in CSS. I also can forsee the day where this will
>> become a massive security vulnerability.
>
>
> +1 on this.
It'll be ok
Wow thanks for all the feedback I really appreciate it.
The dropping header yep I know this is a nightmare but the client was ok
with this, my problem is the horizontal scrollbar in FF on the Mac.
I need to find a way to resolve this
Thanks again
Karl
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL P
Hi gang:
Please review the following site:
http://ancientstones.com
Suggestions and comments welcomed.
Thank you.
tedd
--
http://sperling.com/
_
Oops, I also see the first problem (the header disappearing when the
window shrinks). However, I don't see the horizontal scrollbar.
Would a min-width (with the appropriate IE fixes, of course) help the
disappearing header problem?
--
John
On Apr 27, 2006, at 8:46 AM, Design Groups wrote:
> not rendering well in Firefox on the Mac, could someone please be so kind as
> to
> send me a screen shot or some feedback
>
>
> http://www.journalistaward.stop-discrimination.info
Actually, you can see the problems if you're running Firefox on a PC.
(I have it on a Mac, too, and both look
Looks great to me (Firefox 1.5.0.2, MacBook Pro).
Let me know if you need a screenshot, and I'll get one for you!
--
John Sico
On Apr 27, 2006, at 8:28 AM, Karl Camenzuli wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
>
> We have just launched a new site today and I have had report that
> its not
> rendering well in Fi
jack fredricks wrote:
> I have this rule;
>
> .myclass
> {
> border: 1px dashed #000;
> }
>
> When I scroll down the page, IE doesn't redraw the borders well, and
> they end up all 'bunched up' (so instead of steady dashes, i get
> little sections of solid lines randomly dispersed throughout)
>
> I
Hi all
We have just launched a new site today and I have had report that its not
rendering well in Firefox on the Mac, could someone please be so kind as to
send me a screen shot or some feedback
http://www.journalistaward.stop-discrimination.info/
Thanks
Karl
>>You can't use the swf in the css background property. But you could
place an object with absolute positioning and z-index under a div. You
have to add background transparency to the flash (and pray...).<<
Actually, this will not work. Flash uses a plugin which occupies a
z-index outside th
On Apr 27, 2006, at 7:08 PM, Christian Heilmann wrote:
>>> Is this a planned for css3? I am not really that bothered but the
>>> two things graphic designers (argggh!!) ask me are...
>>> (i) why does IE not render text?
>> Georg had a good answer.
>>> (ii) can the text not be in my own chosen f
Christine,
on Thursday, April 27, 2006 at 13:04 Christine Rainer wrote:
> does anyone know of a well functioning css-method for placing an .swf file
> in the backround of a div?
You can't use the swf in the css background property. But you could
place an object with absolute positioning and z-in
On 27/04/06, Christine Rainer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does anyone know of a well functioning css-method for placing an .swf file
> in the backround of a div?
It isn't possible (at least in current browsers).
You can use positioning to place a flash object in the foreground, but
behind other
Hi all,
does anyone know of a well functioning css-method for placing an .swf file
in the backround of a div?
Regards,
Christine
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub
> > Is this a planned for css3? I am not really that bothered but the two
> > things graphic designers (argggh!!) ask me are...
> > (i) why does IE not render text?
> Georg had a good answer.
> > (ii) can the text not be in my own chosen font.
> As a member of the W3C CSS Working Group I can tell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is this a planned for css3? I am not really that bothered but the two things
> graphic designers (argggh!!) ask me are...
>
> (i) why does IE not render text?
Georg had a good answer.
>
> (ii) can the text not be in my own chosen font.
>
As a member of the W3C CSS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is this a planned for css3? I am not really that bothered but the two
> things graphic designers (argggh!!) ask me are...
>
> (i) why does IE not render text?
Think that's Microsoft's department actually :-)
> (ii) can the text not be in my own chosen font.
CSS in it
Is this a planned for css3? I am not really that bothered but the two things
graphic designers (argggh!!) ask me are...
(i) why does IE not render text?
(ii) can the text not be in my own chosen font.
Just a thought!
Ross
_
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
> Richard Brown wrote:
>> Also does the 'if' statement in the header file work please? How do
>> I test whether it is working?
>
>
> Yes, the min/max expression is working as intended.
I was a bit quick there, I think.
Yes, it is working :-)
To test it:
1: Make sure IE6
Richard Brown wrote:
> Thanks Gunlag that fixed it but...
>
> On 26 Apr 2006, at 14:45, Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
>
>
>> * html body #column-c {margin-right: -200px;}
>>
>> ...in that it will make IE think that floating column is 200px
>> narrower than its actual width - by pulling in its backside
Iorhael wrote:
>In this layout...is there any way possible to get the filmstrip (a background
>image) to show up *over* the banner (using a z-index or some other way)? I am
>trying to get away from a "boxy" looking layout...
>
>http://www.drkdesign.com/parkerpennington/
>
>http://www.drkdesign.c
>>> http://www.loudjoy.com/styled_div.html
>> Option 2: add... #newest{float: left; display: inline;}
> If you have time, I'd love a brief explanation of what this is doing.
> I'm afraid I don't really understand it and I wasn't aware of
> alternatives to using clearing elements in a situation
sorry my mistake. you are right! Thanks
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pete Stuart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [css-d] problem with list elements
> wrapping in works for ff & safari but IE (no suprises) still does no
wrapping in works for ff & safari but IE (no suprises) still does not
work.
Ross
"I have a problem with if you look here
http://scottishsocialnetworks.org/events.php list element that have text
that is on two line aligns with the li not the text. I can fix this by
putting in a few non br
Kathryn Bader wrote:
>hi all,
>
>see http://admin.berkeley.edu/.
>
>there is a division (right below the gold bar) between the main nav
>bar and the left and right divs in internet explorer for pc (for mac
>is fine). do you know of a hack that would eliminate this space/white
>bar? or is there
francky wrote:
> Ho, just one: the htc-file seems to be called two times:
Francy, thanks for your comments. I haven't got round to testing in
anything except FF1.5 (default browser) and IE6. If it won't work in
IE6 it is (sadly) pointless worrying too much about the rest, although
the fact that
Hi Zoe,
Though it broke in FF I've managed to sort it, many thanks.
Tim
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/F
80 matches
Mail list logo
