Re: [css-d] Variable width of menu

Philippe, Thank you for responding. > If/when you want to add an additional , you'll have to adjust the > width of the div; that is the correct behaviour given the fixed width > of the div. Okay, I understand. The bottom line is that the menu can't be automatically expandable to compensate

Re: [css-d] Variable width of menu

On Jun 10, 2007, at 12:12 AM, Dave M G wrote: > Philippe, > > Thank you for responding. > >> ...it breaks in Firefox 2.0.0.x, and that is a bug... >> b1. add a width back to the div. 7.5em seems to work fine. >> > > Sorry, but I'm a little unclear on what the expected results should > be. > Do

Re: [css-d] CSS Quirks Comparison Chart?

Thanks, David! I'll check it out... Rick -Original Message- From: David Hucklesby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 12:30 PM To: Rick Faircloth; css-discuss Subject: Re: [css-d] CSS Quirks Comparison Chart? On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:38:13 -0400, Rick Faircloth wrote:

Re: [css-d] Safari problem?

On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 08:56:32 -0400, Suzanne Goodwin wrote: > I'm working on a site at http://208.76.80.155/~czcejymt, and it looks fine in > all the > browsers I have installed (IE7 and Firefox Win, Firefox and Camino OS X) > except for > Safari. On the two longer pages (Work and Customers) Safari

Re: [css-d] Clearing absolutely positioned elements

Thanks for that - I didn't even notice it was doing that. Too bad, though - I was all excited there for a second ;) ~Shelly __ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7 information -- ht

Re: [css-d] Clearing absolutely positioned elements

> Ingo is still right. This page is just absolutely positioning > everything and using overflow hidden to keep things from > overlapping. But that means text is lost/hidden if it can't fit (try > increasing your tet size to see what I mean). It may look like > clearing, but it isn't. I

Re: [css-d] Clearing absolutely positioned elements

Shelly, On Jun 9, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Shelly wrote: > I know I don't contribute a lot to this list (kind of hard to offer > advice when you're in the ranks that some of you all are in - I > sometimes feel like a Private standing in front of Patton, if you know > what I mean) - but I found something

[css-d] Clearing absolutely positioned elements

I know I don't contribute a lot to this list (kind of hard to offer advice when you're in the ranks that some of you all are in - I sometimes feel like a Private standing in front of Patton, if you know what I mean) - but I found something I thought was interesting. I was having an issue with a

Re: [css-d] CSS Quirks Comparison Chart?

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:38:13 -0400, Rick Faircloth wrote: [...] > > Is there some nice chart somewhere that explains concisely what the coding > differences > are between those (and other) browsers that I have to consider? > [...] Hopefully these will help:

Re: [css-d] Firefox problem with menu's

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 13:31:38 +0100, Nic Pulford wrote: > > http://lasadev.com/NewLasa/articles.htm now try and click on the menu link > for home. On > my version of firefox 2.0.0.4 you only get the hand cursor when the cursor is > about > level with and only over the area equivalent to an underlin

[css-d] Site Check Please Footer Problem

Good Morning; I have very slowly learned how to use CSS for text formating etc. and use those techniques on most of my new pages. I have now created my first CSS layout page and would appreciatesome feedback from the experts before converting hundreds of pages. Please take a look at http://

Re: [css-d] Variable width of menu

Philippe, Thank you for responding. > ...it breaks in Firefox 2.0.0.x, and that is a bug... > b1. add a width back to the div. 7.5em seems to work fine. > Sorry, but I'm a little unclear on what the expected results should be. Do you mean that applying a 7.5em width will make it a minimum of

Re: [css-d] Footer stick not going all the down.

Jon Hughes wrote: > I was doing SO good! All the way through the entire page without asking > css-d for any help... then came the footer :( > > I tried FooterStick and FooterStickAlt and I get the same result: the footer > starts at the bottom of the browser, not the bottom of the content (which >