[css-d] Bizarre validation messages

Hi People, I'm getting bizarre message from the validator when I try to validate my css for http://blackboxnyc.com/soulsearching/ and http://blackboxnyc.com I get error message that I have many errors and wrong values entered - which I don't see in my files. When I enter the uri http://blackbo

Re: [css-d] can there be any difference between div and span withdisplay:block

liketo findoutwhy wrote: > I wonder if there can be any difference for > > ... > > and > > ... > > in other words, EVERYTHING is the same except a div is changed to a > span, with display: block. No differences are to be expected _if_ your CSS code will be applied _and_ no other stylesheet

[css-d] can there be any difference between div and span with display:block

I wonder if there can be any difference for ... and ... in other words, EVERYTHING is the same except a div is changed to a span, with display: block. the ultimate question is, Can they *DISPLAY* differently on major browsers? Can they BEHAVE differently on major browsers? I haven't s

[css-d] Fw: positioning problems (IE and Opera)

I would apply position:relative and z-index in the "branding" div. I am not sure about the problem you are having on the gallery page, but certainly gallery section is very bumpy when trying to refresh the page( especially in IE). Try not to use the javascript where it's not necessary. Shinya --

Re: [css-d] positioning problems (IE and Opera)

Thank you Dmitry Demeshkin and Ingo Chao. So, here's the problems and solutions again: In IE 6 and 7: #main-image not positioned right Solution: #additional-content {position:relative; width:450px; } #home #main-image {position: absolute; top:0; left:0;} divs pushed down Solution: declared .prepe

Re: [css-d] Any IE8 news - missing content in links

Alan Gresley wrote: > Alan Gresley wrote: > >> Could it be that the lower in the source and element is, the lest likely >> that IE8 will fully render content correctly? > > > I guess I wrong, not quite that simple. [...] Here another screenshot.

[css-d] IE8b2 missing content bug with list item

Hello all All this missing content that I have noticed all happens when content are in at least unordered list. Another page. The second gallery will not render all the images. Refreshing over and over shows images there and then not there.

Re: [css-d] Any IE8 news - missing colors

Alan Gresley wrote: > Could it be that the lower in the source and element is, the lest likely > that IE8 will fully render content correctly? I guess I wrong, not quite that simple. Another page. The first visit shows some colors missing.

Re: [css-d] Any IE8 news - missing content

Bruno Fassino wrote: > Alan Gresley wrote: >> I do note a strange rendering bug where pages do not download >> properly. Sometimes positioned elements are in strange positions and a >> refresh is needed to fix their placement up. Also text (links) seems >> to be missing here and there and then app

Re: [css-d] [IE6] position:relative makes text overflow browser window

Erik Rieselbach wrote: > ... the bottom 125 pixels actually extend below body, and cannot be > reached by the scrollbar! Relative offset makes #wrapper extend below in all browsers, but of course only out of reach in IE6. Something similar happened in other browsers too a few years ago, IIRC.

[css-d] [IE6] position:relative makes text overflow browser window

This is a very simple but maddening bug -- so simple that I can't understand why I can't find any reference to it anywhere. I have a very simple document with one div inside . The div has position:relative and top:125px. IE6 apparently deals with this by sliding the whole div down 125 pixels

Re: [css-d] I must be fundementally misunderstanding something.

On Thursday 28 Aug 2008, Ingo Chao wrote: > Alan Chandler wrote: > > ... > > YET. When I place a link to this file ahead of the main style > > sheet, the page stops being styled completely - its almost as if > > the second style sheet is ignored. > > > > If I move the link to this stylesheet until

Re: [css-d] I must be fundementally misunderstanding something.

Ingo Chao wrote: > You are declaring two stylesheets as preferred (so the first one wins > ?) The first one indeed wins by HTML specifications. The specs are somewhat obscure, but the idea is that at most one style sheet can be "preferred", and you make a style sheet "preferred" by using rel="s

Re: [css-d] I must be fundementally misunderstanding something.

Alan Chandler wrote: > ... > YET. When I place a link to this file ahead of the main style sheet, the > page stops being styled completely - its almost as if the second style > sheet is ignored. > > If I move the link to this stylesheet until after the main one the page > display works fine. >

[css-d] I must be fundementally misunderstanding something.

I have an application (dynamic web page) that styles perfectly with a whole range of css linked in via an external web sheet with a tag in the header. I am wanting to add a calendar picker which I have written to this web page - so as stage one I added the link to the css file for this picker

Re: [css-d] Trying to control floats on page

Hi Reg, in this style: #main { margin-left:220px; margin-right:10px; overflow:auto; } you have a margin-left:220px; change it to margin-left:10px; like so: #main { margin-left:10px; margin-right:10px; overflow:auto; } And your problem should be fixed. Thank You, Parag Jagdale Un-identif

[css-d] Trying to control floats on page

I'm having trouble getting elements on my page to display correctly. http://www.ukcrugby.co.uk/test/index.html The navigation bar is floated to the left, as is the sponsor column underneath it. I have added a clear:left to the sponsor ID as without it it positioned itself to the right of the nav

Re: [css-d] positioning problems (IE and Opera)

Elle Meredith wrote: > ... > In Opera 9 the main problem is that the logo is positioned too much to > the left. Also my stage on the gallery page is again positioned to the > left instead of right > > The site is at: http://designbyelle.com.au/poinciana/ It is absolutely positioned, but i

Re: [css-d] positioning problems (IE and Opera)

Elle Meredith wrote: > ... > > the round corners in the main navigation -- one > corner does not align. > > The site is at: http://designbyelle.com.au/poinciana/ > > #main-nav ul li a { /*screen.css (Line 68)*/ background: white url(../img/rounded-left.gif) no-repeat left bottom; ... I t

Re: [css-d] Any IE8 news?

Alan Gresley wrote: > Guess what, IE8b2 seems to be to one of the most standard compliant > CSS2.1 browsers. I know that seems odd to say about IE but they at MS > have really done a good job with my bug list. :-) [...] > I do note a strange rendering bug where pages do not download > properly.

Re: [css-d] Any IE8 news?

Nancy Johnson wrote: > I had some additional questions, in previous conversations regarding > IE8, it wasn't clear to me whether IE8 supports conditional comments > the same way as other versions of IE do. > > Does it support conditional comments? If not how would you have a > separate Style shee

Re: [css-d] IE7, background-image - displays OK on one page but not on the others

Hi Christian >That way I found out that if you delete the >height: 1%; for the footer, the the #fauxframe is displayed: That worked like a magic charm - I am so relieved - thank you. However, in IE 6 it resulted in the footer relocating itself halfway up the page, so I put back the height but

Re: [css-d] Any IE8 news?

Alan K Baker wrote: > Very brave. > > Regards, > > Alan. Hello Alan, the brave indeed. Guess what, IE8b2 seems to be to one of the most standard compliant CSS2.1 browsers. I know that seems odd to say about IE but they at MS have really done a good job with my bug list. :-) http://css-cl

Re: [css-d] Any IE8 news?

I had some additional questions, in previous conversations regarding IE8, it wasn't clear to me whether IE8 supports conditional comments the same way as other versions of IE do. Does it support conditional comments? If not how would you have a separate Style sheet for IE8? For instance I had a

Re: [css-d] Pseudo frame and Skip to Content, unexpected behaviour

Rachel Mawhood wrote: > Thank you for suggesting that - I tried it but in Firefox on a pc the > effect is to push the content 175 pixels down the computer screen > below the pseudo frame, ie creating a big empty space between the > masthead image and the start of the text. You've forgotten to

Re: [css-d] IE7, background-image - displays OK on one page but not on the others

Hello, I started deleting parts of your page (of the html code) and recognized that after I deleted the footer, the.#fauxframe was displayed. Then I inserted the footer again and started commenting out its CSS definitions. That way I found out that if you delete the height: 1%; for the footer,

Re: [css-d] Pseudo frame and Skip to Content, unexpected behaviour

Hi Georg Thank you for suggesting that - I tried it but in Firefox on a pc the effect is to push the content 175 pixels down the computer screen below the pseudo frame, ie creating a big empty space between the masthead image and the start of the text. But I am grateful to you, all the same,

Re: [css-d] Any IE8 news?

Very brave. Regards, Alan. www.theatreorgans.co.uk www.virtualtheatreorgans.com Admin: ConnArtistes, UKShopsmiths, 2nd Touch & A-P groups Shopsmith 520 + bits Flatulus Antiquitus - Original Message - From: Nancy To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org Se