Re: [css-d] Why is the background of the selected text not black?

Fred Janon wrote: > http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/mars/ > > When I select the text: "The Mars Project is an XML-friendly > representation for PDF documents called PDFXML. PDF, an ISO standard > format, is the global standard...". The color of the text changes > from black to blue but the bac

[css-d] Why is the background of the selected text not black?

Hi, I encountered a couple of web sites where the color of the text selected changes but the background color doesn't, where the background color should be "inverted". Here is an example: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/mars/ When I select the text: "The Mars Project is an XML-friendly repres

Re: [css-d] More than one background image to ?

On Oct 2, 2008, at 6:44 AM, Erik Harris wrote: > On 9/30/2008 10:27 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: >> Current: you could attach one background image to the html element >> and >> one to the body element. > > I'd recommend against this. I haven't tested it on recent browsers, > but > when I

[css-d] Hello, spent the time learning CSS now understood some questions

I spent some time on learning CSS and HTML and now that I have a much stronger, not perfect but stronger understanding of it, I have some questions. I have spent the longest time trying to get PNG 24 images to work with IE6. I have tried from IEPNGFIX to IEFIX all javascript none of them worked i

Re: [css-d] More than one background image to ?

Hedley Finger wrote: > David: > > > > Convention usually has it that the light source is > coming over the left shoulder, so conventionally, the shadow is on the > right and bottom. > > Regards, > Hedley > > Got it. As ever, Vincent -- A thin red line and a salmon-color ampersand

Re: [css-d] More than one background image to ?

David: >> Yes, but not specifically on the element. I actually just >> asked a question troubleshooting this very application. You can see >> the fixed (thanks to Georg) version on my work-in-progress site at >> http://www.kungfu-silat.com/wp/ > Drop shadow? For those among us who are (nea

Re: [css-d] More than one background image to ?

On 10/1/2008 7:45 PM, David Laakso wrote: > Erik Harris wrote: >> Yes, but not specifically on the element. I actually just >> asked a question troubleshooting this very application. You can see >> the fixed (thanks to Georg) version on my work-in-progress site at >> http://www.kungfu-silat.c

Re: [css-d] More than one background image to ?

Erik Harris wrote: > On 9/30/2008 9:24 PM, Hedley Finger wrote: > > > Yes, but not specifically on the element. I actually just asked > a question troubleshooting this very application. You can see the fixed > (thanks to Georg) version on my work-in-progress site at > http://www.kungfu-sil

Re: [css-d] More than one background image to ?

On 10/1/2008 6:48 PM, Hedley Finger wrote: > Re the 1px deep repeating graphic, I thought that this would save > download time -- the usual delayer -- and allow the browser to quickly > render the page. If I use a larger graphic and it is not an exact > submultiple of the page depth, what happe

Re: [css-d] More than one background image to ?

Erik: > On 9/30/2008 9:24 PM, Hedley Finger wrote: > >> > I would like to add a Gaussian blur drop-shadow to the right and bottom >> > edges of the element floating in the middle of the browser >> > canvas. ... To avoid downloading a >> > large albeit compressed image, is there any way to a

Re: [css-d] More than one background image to ?

On 9/30/2008 9:24 PM, Hedley Finger wrote: > I would like to add a Gaussian blur drop-shadow to the right and bottom > edges of the element floating in the middle of the browser > canvas. Most of the methods found suggest a massive background image > displaced diagonally with negative margins.

Re: [css-d] More than one background image to ?

On 9/30/2008 10:27 PM, Philippe Wittenbergh wrote: > Current: you could attach one background image to the html element and > one to the body element. I'd recommend against this. I haven't tested it on recent browsers, but when I tried this solution in 2004, it crashed Gecko-based browsers ha

Re: [css-d] fluid layout within a div with title and controls

Mansour wrote: > however, when I float .title and .controls the .window-bar resize and > disapear as they go out of this container. I tried many things but > nothing worked. Can someone please suggest something? You probably need an "expand to contain floats" styling on .window-bar, but I'm uns

[css-d] fluid layout within a div with title and controls

Hello all: I have been trying to do this for a while with no luck. I am trying to create a layout for sections of my page that looks like a window (title bar, controls ..etc). Here's the html my title my contents .window-bar{width:100%;} .titl

Re: [css-d] Div covering up sub menu in Safari

Lourens, Many thanks for the direction and suggestions. I will try the SWFObject method you have mentioned. I currently use "DW" and noted in the link you sent that I may need to acquire a DW extension for this method so I will see how it all shakes out. Thanks so much for the help. Jimmy Priest

Re: [css-d] Div covering up sub menu in Safari

I suggest you start using SWFObject, the script and documentation can be found here: http://blog.deconcept.com/swfobject/ After downloading the script, open it in your editor and search for the object and embed tag. Give these tags the following class: "lowzindex" Add this to your css file: .lowz

Re: [css-d] footer doesn't occupy width in IE6

Good afternoon David, It was foretold that on 01/10/2008 @ 10:55:00 GMT-0400 (which was 11:55:00 where I live) David Laakso would write: > Average users are not running around with IE debuggers in order to zoom > fonts in IE/6, so it's a mute point in my opinion. The IE/7 page-zoom > thin

Re: [css-d] footer doesn't occupy width in IE6

Luc wrote: > > Well, with the Debugbar i can zoom in IE6 but i guess it's not much > of an issue because not so many users will surf at small text, right? > > I was more worried about how it looks at large resolutions: if the > footer keeps sticking at the bottom > > > RE:

Re: [css-d] footer doesn't occupy width in IE6

Good morning David, It was foretold that on 01/10/2008 @ 01:07:52 GMT-0400 (which was 02:07:52 where I live) David Laakso would write: > Only IE/7 has the > "mickey mouse" zoom thingy. It zooms *the page* up or down. So I guess > there's not much you can do about the page being 50 percent

Re: [css-d] vertical expansion of fixed layout

Keith LaFrenier wrote: > [...] > I cleared both #maincontent and #sidebar containers with the #footer, > but If I don't specifiy a height for the #sidebar then #maincontent > gets knocked out of the flow of the document. I've tried using > %height and no height specified without any luck. Fo