I'm still experiencing the problem.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 10, 2014, at 9:37 PM, Debbie Campbell wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Debbie Campbell
>> wrote:
>>> Works fine in Android both portrait and landscape (centered on the screen),
>>> and fine in iPhone portrait view, but in
Works fine on my iPhone 5.
Ken
On Thursday, April 10, 2014, Debbie Campbell
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Debbie Campbell
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Works fine in Android both portrait and landscape (centered on the
>>> screen),
>>> and fine in iPhone portrait view, but in landscape view on
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Debbie Campbell
wrote:
Works fine in Android both portrait and landscape (centered on the screen),
and fine in iPhone portrait view, but in landscape view on an iPhone the
modal window is off to the lower right.
I tried making an adjustment to the CSS but don't
apr 10 2014 18:50 Tom Livingston :
> it's still useable. He's not leaving mobile users *completely* out in the
> cold.
That it is so is still quite a bit beside the point I think. The users only
have to get used to sites that cater for them, their use cases and their
devices, to do feel left
apr 10 2014 16:19 Davies, Elizabeth :
> the Mobile First philosophy brought many "wins" with it. Perhaps the name is
> misleading and it should be "Simplicity First" or "Basics First"
;D
I liked that one.
__
css-discuss [css-d
Also, we're drifting away from list appropriate topics...
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 10, 2014, at 12:32 PM, Chris Williams wrote:
>
> Philip, as I described in the message I just sent, I too am developing a
> very complex and detailed application where I was convinced that one
> needed a huge
>
> Typical text site : http://marden-prg.org.uk/
> Typical graphic-dependent high-resolution site :
> http://www.royalholloway.ac.uk/Hellenic-Institute/Research/Etheridge/
>
>
For what it's worth, a smart enough phone - like my iPhone - can render the
"high resolution" site mentioned above
Philip, as I described in the message I just sent, I too am developing a
very complex and detailed application where I was convinced that one
needed a huge screen to appreciate it. After many discussions with my
contract designer she was able to convince me that the mobile user was
worth pursuing.
This, too, is a place where we "engineers" try to pretend we are like our
users and, in doing so, often fail them. We all are comfortable with
technology, and feel that "sure, let's let them customize the heck out of
this thing, give them a ton of options". Because we are comfortable with
lots of
Thank you for your comments, Chris, which clearly contain a great
deal of sense. Let me, if I may, address just one part of what
you say, in terms of what I create ("create", in terms of "create
web sites", that is) --
The problem that "mobile-first" is trying to solve is an issue not simply
on
On 4/10/2014 10:33 AM, Chris Williams wrote:
Then you all can be happy carrying your pagers and listening to the latest
hit from Abba as well.
Mobile use is not a fad. It's not just something those whippersnappers
are doing, even if you're not. It is, for many, the first and sometimes
only w
Then you all can be happy carrying your pagers and listening to the latest
hit from Abba as well.
Mobile use is not a fad. It's not just something those whippersnappers
are doing, even if you're not. It is, for many, the first and sometimes
only web device they use. And it's use is growing expo
As with the previous authors, I also do not own/carry a mobile device. However,
our site visitors do. While I'm neutral overall on Mobile First vs. Desktop
First, I can say that going to a "Mobile First" style sheet reduced our overall
CSS by more than half. About 25% of our visitors are coming
On 2014-04-10 11:24 (GMT+0100) Philip Taylor composed:
I cannot trace the original
That's one of the hazards of mailing lists that do not munge. The habit of
needing to reply specially instead of with a normal reply button can induce
someone receiving a private reply to a list post to believ
Thank you - I'll give that a try.
--
Debbie
On 4/10/2014 7:18 AM, Tom Livingston wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Debbie Campbell
wrote:
>Works fine in Android both portrait and landscape (centered on the screen),
>and fine in iPhone portrait view, but in landscape view on an iPhone t
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Debbie Campbell
wrote:
> Works fine in Android both portrait and landscape (centered on the screen),
> and fine in iPhone portrait view, but in landscape view on an iPhone the
> modal window is off to the lower right.
>
> http://www.artofequinemassage.com/class-pho
Works fine in Android both portrait and landscape (centered on the
screen), and fine in iPhone portrait view, but in landscape view on an
iPhone the modal window is off to the lower right.
http://www.artofequinemassage.com/class-photos/
I tried making an adjustment to the CSS but don't have an
Den 10.04.2014 12:59, skrev MiB:
What mobile first does is focusing on the content and the essential
presentation of it. Something all web design should be doing already.
That they should, regardless of how they approach visual design.
regards
Georg
___
apr 102014 12:36 Georg :
> I agree in principle, but guess how much you "play by the market", or not,
> depends on whether you are trying to sell something, or not. :-)
>
> FWIW, I have no "first" in mind when designing, only "all"...
> http://www.gunlaug.com/contents/design/mobile-first.html
Den 10.04.2014 12:24, skrev Philip Taylor:
My thoughts regarding "Mobile-first design" is that it is putting
the cart before the horse -- we should (IMHO) (a) be designing to
W3C standards (and not designing to accommodate browser deficiencies),
and (b) be designing to be flexible (so that no mat
Someone wrote:
I would like to hear your thoughts/recommendations on Mobile
devices for clarification and advice?
I consider them for the most part more toys than tools. I own no
mobile device, and do not anticipate ever owning one. I leave here
infrequently. I've been fueling my car about 3-4
21 matches
Mail list logo
