> 
> Typical text site : http://marden-prg.org.uk/
> Typical graphic-dependent high-resolution site : 
> http://www.royalholloway.ac.uk/Hellenic-Institute/Research/Etheridge/
> 
> 

For what it's worth, a smart enough phone - like my iPhone - can render the 
"high resolution" site mentioned above with only minor Issues. I could even 
view the manuscript with little problem (minor button display issue), which 
seems to be the most complex area. I have to 'pinch and zoom' but it works. 

I'm not saying mobile optimized sites aren't giving a better experience. They 
do. But in case Philip hasn't looked (as he states he doesn't have a mobile) 
it's still useable. He's not leaving mobile users *completely* out in the cold.

I'm a huge proponent of responsive sites, but you need to know your user base. 
There are still cases for not doing responsive.
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d@lists.css-discuss.org]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/

Reply via email to