Re: [css-d] sticky footer position in IE - bottom of window instead of page

I don’t know what your expectations are but given your code, your footer will always position itself at the bottom of the content when the page is longer than the height of the viewport (as in the sample page you link to) and will be positioned at the bottom of the viewport if there is little

Re: [css-d] sticky footer position in IE - bottom of window instead ofpage

-Original Message- From: Debbie Campbell Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2014 12:59 AM To: CSS-Discuss Subject: [css-d] sticky footer position in IE - bottom of window instead ofpage Having a problem with IE here... http://www.boissonconsulting.com/resources/ I'm using this sticky

Re: [css-d] sticky footer position in IE - bottom of window instead of page

> Le 8 nov. 2014 à 09:59, Debbie Campbell a écrit : > > Having a problem with IE here... > > http://www.boissonconsulting.com/resources/ > > I'm using this sticky footer method (after trying several others): > > http://mystrd.at/modern-clean-css-sticky-footer/ > > It's working fine in Chrome

Re: [css-d] sticky footer position in IE - bottom of window instead of page

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Debbie Campbell wrote: > Having a problem with IE here... > > http://www.boissonconsulting.com/resources/ > > I'm using this sticky footer method (after trying several others): > > http://mystrd.at/modern-clean-css-sticky-footer/ > > It's working fine in Chrome, FF

Re: [css-d] sticky footer position in IE - bottom of window instead of page

Not working in ios8.1 safari either. Just sits at the bottom of the content. Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 7, 2014, at 7:59 PM, Debbie Campbell wrote: > > Having a problem with IE here... > > http://www.boissonconsulting.com/resources/ > > I'm using this sticky footer method (after trying seve

[css-d] sticky footer position in IE - bottom of window instead of page

Having a problem with IE here... http://www.boissonconsulting.com/resources/ I'm using this sticky footer method (after trying several others): http://mystrd.at/modern-clean-css-sticky-footer/ It's working fine in Chrome, FF, Safari/Win, but in IE 11 the footer is initially at the bottom of t

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

Crest Christopher wrote: > I've always wanted to add a watermark to images automatically when > uploaded to the server for display on the page. Can you customize the > watermark ? Of course : see the code fragment below. > My only problem is I have to check if I can support IIS, > which is

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

I've always wanted to add a watermark to images automatically when uploaded to the server for display on the page. Can you customize the watermark ? My only problem is I have to check if I can support IIS, which is faster IIS or PHP ? Christopher Philip Taylor F

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

Well with Wordpress it creates the different sizes for you that you set in your prefs. Best, Karl DeSaulniers Design Drumm http://designdrumm.com On Nov 7, 2014, at 10:21 AM, Angela French wrote: > This discussion on responsive images is making me wonder how modern CMSs that > support cont

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

This discussion on responsive images is making me wonder how modern CMSs that support content editors inserting an image onto a page are handling the fact that they might need to upload three images ? Any ideas? Angela French -Original Message- From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

On Nov 7, 2014, at 9:50 AM, GJim wrote: > Howdy Karl, > > ~~~ > Friday, November 7, 2014, 10:38:31 AM (USA 'Somewhere on-the-road time-zone'), > you wrote the message that appears below. > > My reply appears here and/or interspersed within your message. > ~~~ > >> Actually it is dynamic. > >

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

Howdy Karl, ~~~ Friday, November 7, 2014, 10:38:31 AM (USA 'Somewhere on-the-road time-zone'), you wrote the message that appears below. My reply appears here and/or interspersed within your message. ~~~ > Actually it is dynamic. > $yearstamp = date( "Y"); > ... > $copyright = "Copyright Desig

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

On Nov 7, 2014, at 9:08 AM, GJim wrote: > Howdy Karl, > > Nice utility to automate adding a copyright to an image. > > However, that's not a dynamic solution such as Philip mentioned. > > Also, I notice that your code allows for a maximum image size of 516K - is > there > a particular reason

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

Howdy Karl, ~~~ Friday, November 7, 2014, 9:44:17 AM (USA 'Somewhere on-the-road time-zone'), you wrote the message that appears below. My reply appears here and/or interspersed within your message. ~~~ > http://designdrumm.com/upload_images_test.zip > This was used to place a copyright on prod

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

On Nov 7, 2014, at 8:32 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > On Nov 7, 2014, at 8:27 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > >> Yes php is one. There are tuts on this all over and example scripts. >> Best to have an Apache server for this, not Windows from my experience. >> Depending on your server there may be

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

On Nov 7, 2014, at 8:27 AM, Karl DeSaulniers wrote: > Yes php is one. There are tuts on this all over and example scripts. > Best to have an Apache server for this, not Windows from my experience. > Depending on your server there may be some php.ini directives that you will > need to set, > but

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

Yes php is one. There are tuts on this all over and example scripts. Best to have an Apache server for this, not Windows from my experience. Depending on your server there may be some php.ini directives that you will need to set, but these tuts usually go over this part with you. Some search ter

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

Crest Christopher wrote: The only issue is the images hug the border of the browser, but that is a style issue ;-) How do you set this up using this Asp.Net code ? I like it better then image replacements as I don't notice the flicker when the image changes size. Well, your server needs to

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

The only issue is the images hug the border of the browser, but that is a style issue ;-) How do you set this up using this Asp.Net code ? I like it better then image replacements as I don't notice the flicker when the image changes size. Christopher Philip Taylor

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

Crest Christopher wrote: What is faster for page request from the server, ASP.Net code or image swapping ? I found the ASP.Net code fast, then again my connection may just be fluid, I can't assume all will be like this, unless the ASP.Net code is effective. :-) Bear in mind that that Asp.Ne

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

On Nov 7, 2014, at 7:50 AM, Philip Taylor wrote: > Hallo Karl -- > >> Have you thought of pointer-events: none; and pointer-events: auto for your >> images? > > The site is /very/ old, and has not been updated for some considerable time. > I am not familiar with "pointer-events" : could you

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 8:34 AM, Crest Christopher < crestchristop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks ! > The polyfill for pictures is nice, as you mentioned lousy support ! > > Christopher > Native support for is spotty. The polyfill works. -- Tom Livingston | Senior Front-End Developer | Media

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

Hallo Karl -- Have you thought of pointer-events: none; and pointer-events: auto for your images? The site is /very/ old, and has not been updated for some considerable time. I am not familiar with "pointer-events" : could you briefly explain what they accomplish and the effects of the tw

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

On Nov 7, 2014, at 7:41 AM, Philip Taylor wrote: > > Completely certain; it is my web site. > > Philip Taylor Hey Philip, Have you thought of pointer-events: none; and pointer-events: auto for your images? Noticed you have -webkit-user-select: none. That doesn't work for the mouse. Thinking y

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

GJim wrote: Are you certain that the watermarks are added dynamically? Completely certain; it is my web site. If so, I would like to see the code that accomplishes that feature. It would solve some issues for me, and also for some others on another discussion list. I will send under sepa

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

nov 7 2014 14:28 MiB : > When you do this, you typically will realize that content, its structure and > presentation is a design problem. Depending on your clients it may also > involve teaching your them about their content. Talking about fluff, that ”your” wasn’t supposed to be there. Should

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

What is the technology behind this scaling on the fly ? It's fluid compared to image replacement. Christopher Philip Taylor Friday, November 07, 2014 3:56 AM Crest Christopher wrote: Why not scale on-the-fly ? Visit : http://photos.for-charity.org/ click

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

Mobile first to me is mos logical because simply, it's easier to add then to take away ! Christopher MiB Friday, November 07, 2014 8:28 AM The main reason as I see it, is that mobile first methodology forces you to take a hard look at your content and prior

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

nov 7 2014 00:38 Crest Christopher : > Why do you recommend building mobile first ? The main reason as I see it, is that mobile first methodology forces you to take a hard look at your content and prioritize it after what the users actually need to see first, second and so on. All fluff has to

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 6, 2014, at 9:34 PM, Crest Christopher > wrote: > > @media is what you recommend for changing images based on browser size, > correct ? > > Christpher ? Background images, yes. For images coded in the markup, see the polyfill I gave a link to twice before or

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

Howdy Philip, ~~~ Friday, November 7, 2014, 3:56:34 AM (USA 'Somewhere on-the-road time-zone'), you wrote the message that appears below. My reply appears here and/or interspersed within your message. ~~~ > The watermarking is added dynamically at the same time. > Philip Taylor Are you certain

Re: [css-d] Responsive Images

Crest Christopher wrote: Question is, how many resolutions, one, three,five... ? Why not scale on-the-fly ? Visit : http://photos.for-charity.org/ click on any album thumbnail, then any image thumbnail, and notice that the resulting URL is of the form : http://photos.fo