Tom,
you cannot associate tap with small screen that way:
Not only do there are more and more devices with wide tappable screens,
but screens can have very different pixel dephts,
so two screens with the same pixel dimensions can have dramatically
different sizes.
Most browsers will interpret
Dear Eric,
first of all, tank you so mutch for your css-d work all this years.
I've been using the list on and off over its existence (my web work is
intermitent, so I need refreshes and upadates from time to time, but
reading about doubts others find is a great way to get speed up updating
You can still give them support via the javascript polyfill respond.js (
https://github.com/scottjehl/Respond) and give the fallback to no-js
enabled non media queries supporting browsers (with modernizr classes for
instance http://modernizr.com/).
Nowadays though, with Windows XP dead since last
Hi Tom,
font-weight:500 means semi-bold, default for strong is bold, so I gess
you need to add that extra rule
strong {
font-weight: 500;
}
you can take a look at:
http://elliotjaystocks.com/blog/font-weight-in-the-age-of-web-fonts/
and
http://css-tricks.com/watch-your-font-weight/
hope it
Hi Wesley,
I'm not sure what you want, it really depends on the kind of reflection,
and the movement of the elements, but if you want a simple reflection
simulation (like reflecting 2d images, not 3d, on an horizontal plane, for
instance) you have the negative scale transform to invert the image
hi Angela,
it's prety strange,
are you generating content via script?
Because I'm getting different content in IE10 and FF21
They both break at higher browser window sizes (Dee Olsen stays vertically
aligned with Randy Lawrence, and the rest of the second row drops a row)
Anyway, firebug on ff
Hi Elli,
I cannot find the conditional comment on your code, not on the ie developer
tools, nor on firebug, (I gess it has to do with a onload js script) so I'm
not sure I'm seeing the right css files, but you do not really need a
conditional code for the multiple backgrounds if you write the
Paul,
if you intend to load a javascript function on select,
I gess you should use javascript to colapse the menus.
You can give a class to the menus that by default keeps them open,
and another class to define them as closed.
Then you can close the menus by changing the classes via js,
on load
Hi Brian,
I'm not sure exactly where you want the buttons, but something like:
#social {position:absolute; left:180px; bottom:20px;} /* sets absolute
position relative to the next positioned ancestor */
#bodyContainer {position:relative;} /* sets reference for descendents
positioning */
would
Hi Theresa,
Its a form, you can treat it as text, no need for width:100% or margin:auto;
div.searchForm {text-align:center;}
hope it helps
isabel
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Theresa Jennings
theresajennings2...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's the link to the page:
Hi Ruben,
we can download the css file, but the link
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/39492899/Flamenconl/flamenco_1.html[URL] even
taking out the [URL] portion of it
isn't working, so I'm not sure how the markup is layed out, could you fix
the link, or paste the markup to the list?
isabel
On Wed,
I'm not sure why is it happening,
but
div:first-child {height:236px;}
removes the white space
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Ruben van den Berg
ruben_van_den_b...@hotmail.com wrote:
Dear Isabel,
Thx for pointing that out. The html link is:
Jeff,
the problem is if you need to put images one on top of the other you need
to use absolute positioning, wich relies on the position on the page
relative to the closest positioned parent and not on the position of the
closest parent.
The solution is old and has support on most browsers:
10, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Isabel Santos unboun...@gmail.com wrote:
Jeff,
the problem is if you need to put images one on top of the other you need
to use absolute positioning, wich relies on the position on the page
relative to the closest positioned parent and not on the position of the
closest
Russ,
you could support older versions of ie, but you would need more markup.
An example of an old technique (sliding doors) can be found here:
http://www.jankoatwarpspeed.com/post/2008/04/30/make-fancy-buttons-using-css-sliding-doors-technique.aspx
(The example uses pngs. png 24 with alpha
(It seams I keep doing the same mistake:
Clicking on reply instead of reply to all,
so I'll repeat my previous answer to Philippe at the end of this one.)
Alan,
Philippe was right, and his suggestion is handy and makes a lot of sense.
Yet
:)
ok Alan,
quoting
Philippe has already provided reasons why this is and a possible solution
but this could also be solved by creating a SVG with no intrinsic size or
ratio. Like so.
http://css-class.com/test/svg/ellipse/intrinsic-none.svg
/quoting
I'm not sure about my sintax, its a lot easier
Hi all,
I seem to have come accross a strange problem in gecko and webkit browsers,
and I cannot find info on this anywhere, so I'm turning to your infinit
wisdom :)
I'm using an svg on a background, and providing a fallback png element for
older browsers.
(I'm treating ie versions lower then 9
Hi Eric Heitz,
main reason is that modern browsers all support, html5 has more semantic
elements and there are new and prety exciting features.
Some dificulties may arise on older browsers.
Most of them will render new elements as inline elements, so the solution
is easy:
Simply specify display:
matt1027,
I'm sory, yestarday was kind of late,
I think I replyed only to you and not to the list;
wich is terribly unpolite,
anyway, I complicated it to much
and forgot the simplest solution:
However flexilbe a layout,
if you do not want it to get smaller then some size,
you just give it some
Hi Ted,
first of all, you use the tags that make sense for your content,
not because it is css-ish.
If your data should be presented in a list, because for instance,
it constitutes a list of items, thats ok.
If it is tabular data, it should go on a table.
As for the alignment, you are having
Hi *Anastasios Angelidis,*
To standard browsers 100% height should be a real 100% height:
html, body, #heightestwrapper {height:100%;}
Your heightestwrapper should contain all the others.
Hope it helps,
Isabel Santos
On 9/26/05, Anastasios Angelidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I mamanged
it, hope it works
Isabel Santos
On 9/23/05, Rich Points [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy,
I've set up a background image with a small arrow on hyper links in my
navigation. This works fine in Firefox and other Gecko browsers but I
can't get it to render in IE6. Here is a page that uses it
graphic
23 matches
Mail list logo