condary h4.c2, #secondary h4.c3 { ... }
> Seeking fix for ie or 55 gallon drum of aspirin.
> Thanks.
> ~dL
>
Hi David,
I looks as the "O" of MORE is a minimum to wide to fit.
At the first glance I'd say, to widen the "H4" from 1em
to 1.1em or 1.15em should do th
moin, moin
I'd appreciate if someone could point out, how to persuade
MSIE 4/PC to display an unordered list horizontally.
Even NS 4 is able to understand an "li {display: inline}".
thanks in advance,
Uwe Kaiser
--
___
to me why FF behaves this way, please.
Thanks in advance,
Uwe Kaiser
[1]
These
two elements [del/ins] are unusual for HTML in that they may serve as
either block-level or inline elements (but not both). They may contain
one or more words within a paragraph or contain one or more block-level
incutio.com/?page=ListTabs
Another good starting point is:
http://www.d.umn.edu/itss/support/Training/Online/webdesign/
and there: "Cascading Style Sheets"
http://www.d.umn.edu/itss/support/Training/Online/webdesign/css.html
As an alternative you could feed google with:
"css l
left margin of 0px,
MSIE/PC won't display the bullets, I guess.
< http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/list-indent.html >
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
--
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo
Is this a known bug, or has anybody noticed this behavior already?
Thanks,
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
@beta tester
Does anybody know, whether MSIE 7 is supporting the following CSS?
a:link {color: blue}
a:hover {color: red}
a:visited {color: gray}
a:visited:hover {color: black} <== supported or not?
Yours, sincerely
Uwe Kai
On 27.05.2006 10:20, Uwe Kaiser wrote:
> On 26.05.2006 22:32, Scott Haneda wrote:
>
>>> I have read every vertical align thing out there, setting to table
>>> display
>>> is not something I am into:
>>>
>>> <http://www.newgeo.com/web/css/ni
dding-left: 10px;
/* background: #315563; */
top: 12px;
margin-top: -0.6em;
/* value is corresponding with the line-height
of 1.2 in this case. */
}
dasdas |d dasdas
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
_
ument typ declaration as it 'text/html' is.
http://www.experts-exchange.com/Web/Web_Languages/JavaScript/Q_20483232.html
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/03/19/dive-into-xml.html
http://ln.hixie.ch/?start=1091626816&count=1
Furthermore it is not al
an adequate parent element, for instance.
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -
reason is, that the specification of CSS2.1 define it this way:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CSS21-20050613/visudet.html#the-width-property
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CSS21-20050613/visufx.html
regards,
Uwe Kaiser
_
ormation about which browser in combination
with which font is using the maximum ascenders and descenders for
content area.
The only font with really tall ascenders and descenders I know,
is Zapfino. < http://www.linotype.com/1175/
http://slashdot.org/~Quantum%20Jim/journal/111067 >
I hope, that hepls a bit.
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
S
f the background.
I agree with you by 99.9% ... since I never use to agree by 100% ;-)
Best
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
ment it is relative to the default font size
of the user's system.
Since MSIE/PC is working internally in points,
it's default font size is always 12pt.
12 points could be 12 pixels as well as 20 pixels.
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
fox will align them at the text base/bottom approximately. With IE
> they're rather high.
>
In order to get more control, you should consider to use
a background-image instead of bullets.
< http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listutorial/
et a min-height of 100%, instead.
>
>
> A second problem is that IE doesn't show the style sheet at all.
As long as you are using a syntax to filter MSIE,
you won't get another result.
< http://www.dithered.com/css_filters/css_only/index.php >
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
: 5px;
margin: 0;
font-size: .9em;<=== remove this [1]
background-color: #fff;
border:#A1A4AA 1px solid;
}
[1] Set a font size to #sidebar instead, if you need.
Best,
Uwe Kaiser
P.S.
I'm working since a couple of months with WP and I've had th
Thanks!
>
> Debbie
On the foot of every posting you can see the following link to the FAQ:
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
And there:
Tips & Tricks
# CenteringBlockElement - how to center a block element
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
___
ra 8/9 is missing):
< http://hsivonen.iki.fi/doctype/ >
The minimum to switch browsers to Compat1 in (X)HTML is:
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/c
es bigger than normal text size.
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
a more serious explanation, take a look at:
< http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/about-boxmodel.htm >
To avoid such problems in the future, don't use left and
right paddings on an containing block with a fixed width,
and use left and right ma
developer uses *EM or %* for font-sizing, because MSIE is working
intern in points and not in pixels, as the others do.
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
sing 120 DPI as a standard logical resolution on their laptops,
when the installed OS is XP. Or they are using a feature of MSIE 6 [1]
which often results in ugly graphics. We have had a discussion about it
here on css-d already.
[1]
<http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/overvi
lines -- is there any way
> around this problem other than to use a depreciated rule?
>
An alternative could be to use Javascript in order to
insert 'wrap=off' via a 'node'.
You could keep clean your markup this way.
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
___
help you getting your goal.
#middle {
min-height: 450px;
height: auto !important;
height: 450px;
}
MSIE/PC will apply the 450px height. Other browsers understand
!important (including IE/Mac) and will apply auto height instead.
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
_
is correct.
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org
On 30.09.2005 04:55, JJ wrote:
I need to display a map legend. This consists of a vertical list of
images with a text explanation (never more than a few words) immediately
to the right of each image. What is best way to display the image (26px
tall) and then the text (about 12px tall) on the
this effect?
We have had this topic of discussion about four weeks ago.
< http://archivist.incutio.com/viewlist/css-discuss/61474 >
For MSIE, there is another way to style the dotted border,
but I just can't remember how.
Rega
nless you float it.
I uploaded a simple example file that demonstrates it.
In this example I used the border-top to keep the text
centered vertically if one changes the font-size.
< http://www.kriton.de/TEST/_Formular.html >
Regards,
scrollbars should appear.
Reference:
http://www.xulplanet.com/references/elemref/ref_StyleProperties.html
http://www.communitymx.com/content/article.cfm?cid=528A0
I don't think that Safari or Opera is supporting any equivalent.
Regards,
Uwe K
;left: 0;" to the positioned Menu should do the job.
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
--
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by
hen I increase the font size, or use a minimum
font size of 22px (16pt in IE6, respectively).
B.t.w., most destroyed it looks in IE6.
_That's_ your problem.
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
--
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Hi, Philippe
Many thanks for the suggestion.
About one year ago I was searching for a solution
to visually eliminate the outline-box, too. But I
couldn't find a satisfying one :(
But now, it seems to became a nice day, today :-)
Uwe Kaiser
Philippe Wittenbergh schrieb:
On 9 Aug
need to use a
server side scripting language (i.e. PHP, ASP).
The trick is, to rename the GIFF randomly, and to load
every time the same image, but with another name.
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
--
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/overview/highdpi.asp
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
--
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Zoe M. Gillenwater schrieb:
I personally use the star html hack for IE all the time, so I really
hope they don't fix that in IE7.
Zoe
They will do -- if I understood it right.
http://blogs.msdn.com/ie/archive/2005/07/29/445242.aspx#445550
Regards,
Uwe K
never was included in any standard, therefore every validation
will fail - but it is most widely supported.
2)
...
3)
...
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
--
They are just hrefs with a class set to them, so like this:
1
2
3
4
5
6
Here is my css:
a.topLinks {
font-size: 11px;
padding: 4px
astelosnoar.com/studies/aboutCSS/IE_bugs_hacks/overflow_visible.htm
------------
Uwe Kaiser wrote:
Another way is to give the paragraph a negative right margin
(e.g. margin-right: -5em;).
If you give the '#sidebar' or '#sidebarContents' any right or
left pa
ay the line will keep its vertical position,
when the user is changing font size. */
}
Another way is to give the paragraph a negative right margin
(e.g. margin-right: -5em;).
Both of them is _not_ for the "normal use", but may help you
in certain situations.
n properly until
Wednesday so all help is greatly appreciated.
Regards, Keith.
Hi Keith,
I hope I understood you right.
< www.kriton.de/TEST/liste-PC.htm >
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED
the same place
> regardless of the length of the page.
> I know - it's not perfect - but I'm just learning!
>
In my opinion, you should give the html element a height
of 100.02% or 100.03%.
This way Mozilla and friends should permanently display the
vertical sc
Thanks for the answers.
For the future, I will set both foreground *and* background,
or none of it.
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
--
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ
nd I don't understand, why it could/should be important,
since this is the initial value anyway, and there is no
earlier declaration to overwrite. Prevention?
Every background information would be appreciated.
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
--
___
102dpi, but when
I manually control it, the horizontal resolution is 109dpi and the
vertical one is 107dpi.
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
>
>>Small hint: Screen resolutions are 96px/in, which is why we try to
>>layout web pages with 740px of print width. 740px = 7.7 inches which
>
whole document, such as
> 100% or 100,01%...
> If anyone has more infos, discuss this point, or just tell me this is
> not a way to go... I'll be glad...
>
> Guillaume.
It sounds great.
Send me the list of brow
xt?
Many thanks in advance,
Uwe Kaiser
--
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
quot;writing-mode":
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/author/dhtml/reference/properties/writingmode.asp
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/samples/author/dhtml/refs/writingMode.htm
http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-css3-text-20021024/#Progression
http://www.w3.org/TR/20
{overflow: hidden}".
(Opera older than 7, MSIE/Mac etc.)
Opera 7 needs to see "body {overflow: hidden}".
All modern browsers don't care about hidden or not, I guess.
The best would be to use a hack especially for Opera 7.
<http://www.fu2k.org/alex/css/frames/examples>, but I couldn't
get a satisfying answer there.
Thanks in advance,
Uwe Kaiser
--
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List
me;
element.className += ' over';
}
function Out() {
element.className = Originalvalue;
}
regards,
Uwe Kaiser
--
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
So I tried this:
:link, :active {
background: #white;
}
:hover {
background: #yellow;
}
It seems to work, but I don't know, whether this is a 'official' way
to achieve what I intend.
I wonder, if somebody could give me any background information.
Thanks in
nger be generous enough to write out a tutorial for
> it...
>
Hi Abyss,
I can't imagine, that it should be very difficult
to produce any page with or without using tables,
that breaks in every browser on W2K, as yours.
Uwe Kaiser
___
e if Opera provided some means via DOM to perform its
> "reload from cache" command - which is much cleaner than reloading
> from the server.
Thanks to all for for help and clearing background information.
Uwe Kaiser
_
iner/CSS1Compat-fixedpos
Is this a well-known feature?
If it is, how can I fix it?
(All I know is, to cause Opera reloading the page via script.)
regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/m
Bruno Fassino schrieb:
Uwe Kaiser wrote:
An italic styled h1 element is destroying the layout on:
<http://www.kriton.de/CSS/rounded/rounded.html>
In order to reproduce the effect, you need to decrease the viewport
until the width is near the small range of pixels before the line of
h1 e
Gunlaug Sørtun schrieb:
Uwe Kaiser wrote:
Does it means, there is no satifying solutionat all?
Of course there is a solution to the italic bug...
I "kill" it all the time.
Paste this into your page, and see if it's close enough for your taste.
(only tested in IE6, Opera
bed on
<http://www.positioniseverything.net/explorer/italicbug-ie.html>
already, but nothing could help -
except a fixed width of the h1 element.
Does it means, there is no satifying solution at all?
regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECT
nd up only, at the time, but it is IMO correct CSS2.1 syntax.
Browsers, as MSIE 5 and Opera older 7 can't tell #Nav and #nav apart.
In some special constallations Opera 5/6 can differ it, though!
regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
c
side:
"The page can't be displayed Try this and that ...".
There seems to be something wrong, I guess.
regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wi
ive #container a width of 20%, and #left of 100%, please.
regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Suppo
ttings, and set
a dark background-color and a bright (white) text-color,
and try to surf with this settings, please.
Please, please, please, "forget" to set both or none of it.
Uwe Kaiser, a highly annoyed surfer.
__
c
ttp://www.l-c-n.com/IE5tests/hiding/
regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
eif (IE 7 will be a completely new browser) {
We can hope for a better CSS support = true;
document.write("hope dies last")
}
else ...
regards,
Uwe Kaiser
--
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-disc
owser bugs
3) http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=FontSize
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=UsingFontSize
http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=ForceFontSize
regards,
Uwe Kaiser
--
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTE
Hi,
It is just an idea of how to center a container vertically.
Don' care about german text.
http://www.kriton.de/CSS/zentrieren/alle-zentriert.html
regards
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ww
Many thanks for the prompt and proper help.
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http
Christian Heilmann schrieb:
On 5/24/05, Brian Cummiskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Uwe Kaiser wrote:
Do we really need the extension ".css"? And if yes, why?
There may be a better reason behind this, but... the extention triggers
the webserver to serve the page in the pro
David Laakso schrieb:
On Tue, 24 May 2005 17:01:51 -0400, Uwe Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Two interesting articels:
By Dave Shea
http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2005/05/10/image_attrib/index.php
By Dimitri Glazkov
http://glazkov.com/blog/archive/2005/04/18/430.aspx
regar
Two interesting articels:
By Dave Shea
http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2005/05/10/image_attrib/index.php
By Dimitri Glazkov
http://glazkov.com/blog/archive/2005/04/18/430.aspx
regards
Uwe Kaiser
--
jack fredricks schrieb:
david laasko wrote recently;
Move the inline styles for all
the extension ".css"? And if yes, why?
regards
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
} /* inherited scaling factor= 1.5 */
p {font-size: 1.3em} /* font-size= 16px, line-height= 24px [1] */
[1] The exact line-height depends on the rounding algorithm
of the used browser. Some displays a line-height of 23px.
regards,
Uwe Kaiser
ze,
because browsers are made for that.
My grandma is using MSIE6/PC. And if she wants to increase the
font-size a developer has set on 8pt, than she do it, in oposition
with this developer she knows how.
BTW. MSIE has this ability since version 4 (released 11.11. 1997)
Even the zooming
of MSIE is different. All the browsers behave as expected.
You may call it a "phenomenon", if you like.
regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css
additional script
inside the document?
What are you thinking about the construction at all?
How do I have to handle Safari? I have no Mac, and Apple
says, Safari behaves similarly Mozilla -- wich I doubt.
Do I need a special section for Safari?
Every suggestion would be appreciated.
regards,
Uwe Kai
. */
body {margin: 0; etc.}
/*
lot of
styles
here.
*/
@import url(msie.css);
I know, that MSIE/PC will import "msie.css" against the rules.
Does any other browser import it too, or can I use it as a hack?
Thanks in advance,
Uwe Kaiser
<[EM
-- one list, many options:
< http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listamatic/ >
Background images for bullets:
< http://css.maxdesign.com.au/listutorial/ >
CSS Design -- Taming Lists:
< http://www.alistapart.com/articles/taminglists/ >
f the tool's users -- along with hybris --
is laziness ;-)
Uwe Kaiser
PS. To be serious, IMHO there is no comparable tool for this job.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/c
2px dotted red; padding: 5px 1em;}
.hidden.text {display: none;}
.text {display: block; color: #000;}
Congratulations, you are using browser XY!
regards,
Uwe Kaiser
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
out background here,
"dl a:hover dt {background: value;}" will not funktion at all. */
dl a:hover dt {background: #FFF; } <<<== add this
regards,
Uwe Kaiser
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
__
css-discuss
3px;
}
MSIE 5/PC interprets it (wrongly) as: every descendant 'LI'
of an element with the ID 'Nav' or 'nav'.
This filter is tested under W2K only.
Does anybody know wether another browser
is able to interpret this too. (Mac especiall
etter-spacing use in headlines etc. only.
Even than you need to use 'hacks' to get an so-so equal result in
different browsers.
Regards,
Uwe Kaiser
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/li
Ingo Chao schrieb:
> ... thanks for the fun :)
Don't mention it!
Ah ... Ok. We should take it with composure.
I know, always be nice ...
So I will enlarge the bitmap for some few pixels.
Have a nice day
Uwe
__
css-discuss [EMAIL
nother solution for this problem?
Thanks in advance,
Uwe Kaiser
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
omnes omnia omnino
[Jan Amos Komenský]
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List w
85 matches
Mail list logo
