Bingo. Right there plain as day. Thanks Philippe - I'll be able to sleep
tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Philippe Wittenbergh [mailto:e...@l-c-n.com]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 7:16 PM
To: CSS-D
Cc: Venditelli, Daniel - Web Development Administrator
Subject: Re: [css-d]
If your response is going to be that I need to validate the html/CSS
before you can consider my question, then please STOP NOW and do NOT
reply; no hard feelings - I understand.
While I am aware that the html and CSS will not validate (around 70
errors); I'm in a corner here. Our CMS does not pr
The columns are dropping the way they are as much because of the source
order of your code as the float properties. I think the only way you'll
be able to get the LEFT columns to drop instead of the RIGHT columns
would be to reverse your source order AND use float fight.
i.e. As I understand it yo
Since I haven't seen another reply to this, while I certainly don't KNOW
the answer, I have a very strong feeling this has to do with how retina
displays scale background images differently due to the increased
physical resolution of the screen. Perhaps the following discussion
might help..
-
http
or , the issue with IE 6 was about font-style italic and still
occur(s/ed) even if you declare it purely through CSS and custom tags.
My work around was to add an additional css rule that made anything
presented with the italic font-style just less than 100% of it's normal
width. Worked well enoug
Maybe I'm missing something, but if you design for a larger screen
resolution, than without the scroll bar the smaller screen view would
not only have the information off-screen, they would never be able to
see it. Seems like the scroll bar is helping you out there rather than
hurting you.
Beyond
I won't speak to appropriate min/max sizes for "most" as that debate
seems to already be handling itself quite nicely without me. ;)
However, if you want to look into responsive design, Ethan's books is
short, to the point and filled with more than enough info to get your
feet wet. It's well worth
I'm not seeing "sticking links either" but I am also seeing the very
precise target area on both Firefox 5 and Chrome 13. In fact Chrome and
Firefox are identical for performance.
Also, I only see drop-downs on Pet Adoption and Memorials. Do the others
have drop-downs at all?
-Original Messa
Her slides are available. (Though they don't exactly match the
presentation.) Flipping through those in tandem with recording of
presentation helped me some.
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
-Original Message-
From: css-d-boun...@lists.css-discuss.org
[mailto:css-d-boun..
12 PM
To: Venditelli, Daniel - Web Development Administrator
Cc: css-d
Subject: Re: [css-d] Issue with clearing nested floats.
On Jul 8, 2011, at 9:39 AM, Venditelli, Daniel - Web Development
Administrator wrote:
> I've stumbled upon an issue with clearing floats that I feel like I'
It's been one of those days...
I've stumbled upon an issue with clearing floats that I feel like I've
done before but for the life of me cannot figure out today. I'm either
too close, too tired, too low on caffeine or getting a bit senile and
misinterpreting the CSS box model and sibling relation
>From an accessibility and convenience* standpoint, I have an issue
whenever we use pictures of text over actual text. (Alt tags aren't
enough) The CSS rotation may not quite be ready for prime time, but if
USED CAREFULLY, it can still be better than text out of Photoshop.
*Can't even begin to cou
You can easily add a margin on the tag within the footer to push the
text down the page to where you need it to be.
The height and width you added are NOT for your background image but
rather for the DIV you are assigning it to. Otherwise that div will only
grow as large as your content, the cop
Shame they didn't refer to it as grid-cell, grid-row and grid-column. At
least then it wouldn't be so confusing given that so many of us have
been around long enough to remember when tables were the only method for
complex layouts.
Maybe they're just expecting that full and final adaptation won'
Just keep in mind that if you do use than you layout won't hold up
as soon as someone with slightly older eyes uses their browser settings
to increase the font-size even a single step where-as the table MAY hold
up a little better.
Or, if you're not worried about that, keep a note somewhere so
Bill,
What about treating this as a list object instead of a table? It might
be a bit of work/thought to set up initially but would certainly be much
easier to maintain especially when you have to reorder items.
The code/layout would essentially by fixed and easily replicated for
each new entry a
Funny, even though I'm on this side of the pond, I've never been able to
write that shade as "gray" - always looked wrong to me... guess that's
why I always use the hex values. Though it certainly confuses family
when I say, "is my #555 and black jacket still at the cleaners?"
- daniel
"the colon
Why are you using the additional tag around "Corporations &
LLCs"? Not that I think it has anything to do with your problem, but it
just seems unnecessary to me and I'd like to know if I'm missing
something.
Also, I've had better luck explicitly defining the margins for top left
right and such...
nal Message-
From: Allison Bloodworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 5:38 PM
To: Venditelli, Daniel - Web Development Administrator;
css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: RE: [css-d] Problems styling an in FF 1.5.0.4
Thanks very much Daniel--I was actually using borders orig
Allison,
I had a similar issue earlier today and ended up using this instead:
#subsection {
position: static;
border-width: 1px;
border-top-style: solid;
border-color: #ccc;
margin-top: 0px;
20 matches
Mail list logo
