On Jan 28, 2008, at 5:30 AM, DAVOUD TOHIDY wrote:
See: http://meyerweb.com/eric/thoughts/2008/01/24/almost-target/
...for details.
Thanks a lot for joining to the discussion George. So based on what
Eric states on that page, a strict doctype requires that the correct
CSS specifications to
@George:
I understand your points very well.
Again: doctypes and doctype-switching should *not* have anything to do
with how CSS should be interpreted, but the fact that it does affect CSS
is the only reason I'm responding on-list.
That is exactly what I am reffering to George. Doctype
George wrote:
I think that is one of the few proper uses one can make of a doctype.
Yes that is ONLY one of the proper uses of a Doctype.
Thanks a lot for everybody who contributed to this thread.
Regards,
davoud
P.S.:To contribute to my research please visit:
DAVOUD TOHIDY wrote:
Now from here I would like to point out an important issue. There has
been some people on the internet claiming that Doctype is only for
VALIDATION purposes. I believe they are just joking and that they
do not see the big picture.
The big picture is that browsers
Davoud Tohidy wrote:
@George:
I understand your points very well.
Again: doctypes and doctype-switching should *not* have anything to do
with how CSS should be interpreted, but the fact that it does affect CSS
is the only reason I'm responding on-list.
That is exactly what I am
Yes that is ONLY one of the proper uses of a Doctype.
Doesn't make much sense to CC the list with quotes like that, when my
mails are delayed forever and too often don't ever reach the list.
G
--
http://www.gunlaug.no
DAVOUD TOHIDY wrote:
on Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 20:22:38 Philippe Wittenbergh wrote:
'The standards' (and the doctypes) were not written with differences
in 'rendering' in mind.
is this what you know or you believe? is there anything documented
about this statement?
In
o.k thanks a lot for everybody's contribution so far.
Let me ask you a question.
Suppose we use a strict doctype. Back to the image gap example.
Now browsers encounter the strict doctype:
I would like to know what happens that makes browsers
insert the gap in strict mode?
davoud
Jan 2008 19:03:25 +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL
PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [css-d] Doctypes rendering comparision table (my
5c) On 27/01/2008, DAVOUD TOHIDY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would
like to know what happens that makes browsers insert the gap in strict
mode? The cause
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [css-d] Doctypes rendering comparision table (my 5c)
DAVOUD TOHIDY wrote, On 27.01.2008 18:37:
Let me ask you a question.
Suppose we use a strict doctype. Back to the image gap example.
Now browsers encounter the strict doctype:
I would like
Rafel wrote:
David, please configure your e-mail client...
well I am using hotmail and i am not sure How I can do that...lol
but I will look at the options to see what I can do there.
The paragraph above looks like a possible answer to me...How about you?
But it is not to me. It is not
I may be the only one who feels this way, but what started as a reasonable
question has become very off topic (DTDs have nothing to do with CSS). I say
this not only because off topic messages are considered annoying by some,
but also because it means you are asking the wrong group of people.
DAVOUD TOHIDY wrote:
[...] So based on what Eric states on that page, a strict doctype
requires that the correct CSS specifications to be applied to an
element such as the img in question.
However almost standard mode does not necessarily requires it in SOME
cases like above.
Am I
13 matches
Mail list logo
