On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:09 AM, Ron Koster wrote:
-
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:06:01 -0500
> From: Ron Koster
> Subject: [css-d] The CSS Overlords
> To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flow
At 11:31 AM 1/18/2009 -0500, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>one of more important reasons is speed .
>
>CSS pages render about 1/3rd less time than table based layouts
So instead of rendering in, say, 3 to 6 seconds (which, off the top
of my head, seems about average, for any average page on the 'net --
Ron Koster wrote:
>
>> one of more important reasons is speed .
>>
>> CSS pages render about 1/3rd less time than table based layouts
>>
>
> So instead of rendering in, say, 3 to 6 seconds (which, off the top
> of my head, seems about average, for any average page on the 'net --
> at least o
On 19/01/2009, at 5:40 AM, Ron Koster wrote:
> At 11:31 AM 1/18/2009 -0500, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>> one of more important reasons is speed .
>>
>> CSS pages render about 1/3rd less time than table based layouts
>
> So instead of rendering in, say, 3 to 6 seconds (which, off the top
> of my head,
This thread teeters precariously on the sharp edge of troll bait. (gravity
pulling toward trolling)
Time to stop.
- CC
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 9:40 AM, Ron Koster wrote:
> At 11:31 AM 1/18/2009 -0500, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> >one of more important reasons is speed .
> >
> >CSS pages render abou
At 02:38 PM 1/18/2009 -0700, Cyber Cog wrote:
>This thread teeters precariously on the sharp edge of troll bait. (gravity
>pulling toward trolling)
Sorry, folks -- didn't mean to beat a dead fish, er, horse. :/
I do appreciate/have appreciated this thread, though, and it has been
genuinely helpf
At 09:25 AM 1/19/2009 +1300, Karl Hardisty wrote:
> At 11:31 AM 1/18/2009 -0500, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>> CSS pages render about 1/3rd less time than table based layouts
Ask anyone not on a fast internet connection. Not everyone has the
luxury (utility?) of high speed internet connections such
I must have a slow "brain connection", because something about the above just
hit me: how fast a page renders has nothing to do with the speed of your
internet connection, but rather the speed of your computer. You would
*download* the files faster or slower depending on your connection, but the
At 12:57 PM 1/21/2009 -0800, Kevin Doyle wrote:
It's ~both~ how quickly your computer can process the page and how
quickly your computer can download the page; however, it's mostly
how quickly you can download a page because the processing load of a
single web page, no matter how complex, is ve
I know this whole thing is did to death already... but I just read some of
this, and it makes me think.
I suspect that a lot of the table based layout enthusiasts are people who made
a switch (partial even) from desktop publishing. Ron mentioned he did, and I
have some clients that have website
I know this whole thing is did to death already... but I just read some of
this, and it makes me think.
I suspect that a lot of the table based layout enthusiasts are people who
made a switch (partial even) from desktop publishing. Ron mentioned he
did, and I have some clients that have webs
On Jan 21, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Ron Koster wrote:
At 09:25 AM 1/19/2009 +1300, Karl Hardisty wrote:
> At 11:31 AM 1/18/2009 -0500, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>> CSS pages render about 1/3rd less time than table based layouts
In that regard, I still don't know how important a factor it is for
CSS
At 01:32 PM 1/21/2009 -0800, Joseph Sims wrote:
I know this whole thing is did to death already...
Actually, I agree, believe it or not -- I don't know what else could
be said, really, about the whole tables vs. CSS layouts thing. I only
popped back in under that subject heading, though, beca
At 04:18 PM 1/21/2009 -0600, Del Wegener wrote:
I have had ( and surely others have also had) clients who were so
insistent the webpage (as designed by their long-time advertising
company) be as static as the printed page that they furnished a JPEG
image of the desired page and I was instructed
I have had ( and surely others have also had) clients who were so
insistent
the webpage (as designed by their long-time advertising company) be as
static as the printed page that they furnished a JPEG image of the
desired
page and I was instructed that web page was to consist of that
single
Ron Zisman wrote:
On Jan 21, 2009, at 2:02 PM, Ron Koster wrote:
At 09:25 AM 1/19/2009 +1300, Karl Hardisty wrote:
> At 11:31 AM 1/18/2009 -0500, Larry C. Lyons wrote:
>> CSS pages render about 1/3rd less time than table based layouts
In that regard, I still don't know how important a facto
16 matches
Mail list logo
