-Caveat Lector-
At 12:16 AM 1/19/99 -0500, pontificating little prick wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Listen -up Barb and Jim,
>This is my list to run as I wish. I can expose myself to any idea I wish.
blah, blah, blah. Mine, Mine, Mine, Wah! You are amazing.
I would have been unsubscri
At 07:56 PM 1/18/99 -0600, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>>>Barb Witt wrote:
>
>>>> Two pertinent articles (The Global Hand and Technology
Hoax), from the
>>>> April 21, 1997 edition of Forbes:
>>>>
>>>>
http://www.forbes.com
-Caveat Lector-
At 10:40 AM 1/18/99 -0800, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Barb Witt wrote:
>>
>> -Caveat Lector-
>>
>> At 09:34 PM 1/16/99 -0800, you wrote:
>> > -Caveat Lector-
>> >
>> >"M.A. Johnson" wrote:
>> >
-Caveat Lector-
At 10:02 PM 1/17/99 -0500, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>In a message dated 1/17/99 10:03:57 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
><< We believe in 'such conspiracies', but we also know that Klinton has
> absolutely NO self-control, and is the sole cause of hi
-Caveat Lector-
At 08:13 PM 1/17/99 -0800, Chris wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:
>>I understand, some persons are simply unable to bear the discomfort that
>>can result from exposure to the ideas of others, and are especially
>>confounded when those ideas directly
-Caveat Lector-
At 09:59 PM 1/17/99 -0500, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>In a message dated 1/17/99 9:46:17 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>writes:
>
><< clear.) What is the judicial logic that disallows camera views
> of the assembled senators? >>
>
>I think they got stung when t
-Caveat Lector-
At 07:05 PM 1/17/99 +, Snobird wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>Congratulations, Hawk!
>
>You have made it to my Filter-Delete list.
>
>I have absolutely no idea what you are doing here. I have absolutely no idea
>what
>you're trying to say to people on this list that has any valu
-Caveat Lector-
Linda: I am interested and appreciate your posts on the subject from
various sources.
Barb
At 09:59 AM 1/17/99 -0600, Linda Minor wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Barb Witt wrote:
>>Since you seem very convinced, and recite your story as if factual, it
>>woul
-Caveat Lector-
At 09:41 AM 1/16/99 -0500, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>In a message dated 1/15/99 8:19:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
><< Sex, period. Not 'sexual relations', not 'sex act'...it's all parsing
> words, anyways, cuz anyone with half a brain knows sex
-Caveat Lector-
At 09:34 PM 1/16/99 -0800, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>"M.A. Johnson" wrote:
>>
>> -Caveat Lector-
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>I would estimate that of over 50% of all consumer manufactured
>>goods are coming from Communist China. Why? Well, because the
>>c
-Caveat Lector-
--Caveat Lector-
Fred is a credible and knowledgeable person. Does anyone have additional
info about the Norway Naming Law?
Barb
From: Fred Battey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FIGHTING NORWAY'S NAMING LAW
:
:
:
We still have relative freedom, although we are seeing o
-Caveat Lector-
At 06:02 PM 1/16/99 -0600, LM wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Assuming, arguendo, that your imaginary scenario is true, it proves nothing
>other than Clinton is lacking in self-control and easily manipulated. The
>rest is entertaining, but clearly irrelevant.
>
>Barb
>
>
>On
-Caveat Lector-
At 12:17 PM 1/15/99 -0600, Linda Minor wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Carlene M. Wojahn wrote:
>>>
>>> Someone correct me if I'm wrong. Isn't the only thing Clinton admitted
>to
>>> lying about the fact that he had sex with Monica Lewinsky?
>>
>>Ahhh...but he hasn't admitte
-Caveat Lector-
One thing has always puzzled me and I respectfully request the experienced
conspiracy researchers on this list to explain how the movements, actions
and membership of *supersecret* organizations seems to be common
knowledge?? One post even talked about a meeting surrounded with
-Caveat Lector-
At 07:23 PM 1/15/99 -0500, Brian Redman wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>> -Caveat Lector-
>>
>> Rehnquist's stripes are old news - he added them long before this
>> impeachment business even began.
>>
>> Barb
>>
>
>>Is there some way you can verify that? You may, for all I
>>know, b
-Caveat Lector-
Rehnquist's stripes are old news - he added them long before this
impeachment business even began.
Barb
At 02:57 PM 1/15/99 -0600, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>STRIPED SLEEVES MEAN IMPEACHMENT IS MILITARY?
>=
>
>(CNNS, 01/15/99) --
-Caveat Lector-
Yes, and we're all terribly surprised at Ms. Reno's findings. Who would
have guessed???
Barb
At 12:37 PM 1/15/99 -0600, LM wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>[01/14] Reno finds no wrongdoing by former top Gore aide
>WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Attorney General Janet Reno said Thursday tha
-Caveat Lector-
At 06:06 AM 1/14/99 -0500, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>In a message dated 1/13/99 10:04:35 PM Eastern Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
><< So, when the teacher unions run full-page ads to "save our schools",
> we know they really do mean their schools - not ours. >
-Caveat Lector-
At 07:52 AM 1/13/99 -0500, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>In a message dated 1/12/99 5:18:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>writes:
>
><< Sorry to hear that he wasn't given air time. Mustn't upset the right-wing
> freaks by exposing their hypocrisy. On the local
-Caveat Lector-
>In a message dated 1/9/99 2:32:46 PM GMT-5:00 - United States of Ame,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Hiya Kris,
>
> My vote would be for 2 lists: one for discussion and the second one to post
> articles. A combined lists would mean way too many posts. IMHO.
>
> Hilary
> >>
>I
-Caveat Lector-
>From the Wasington Post, Wednesday, January 6, 1999; Page A25
The Truth About Evil By Michael Kelly
Some months ago, I wrote a column in which I expressed revulsion at an
affectionate feature in the New York Times about a small band of elderly
communists and socialists who do g
-Caveat Lector-
At 01:44 PM 1/8/99 -0600, Hugh wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Hawk has informed me that he was removed from the list.
>I would like the listowner to reconsider his or her decision.
>All of us have been guilty of intemperate remarks from time to time on
>this list. (myself included.)
-Caveat Lector-
At 01:44 PM 1/8/99 -0600, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Hawk has informed me that he was removed from the list.
>I would like the listowner to reconsider his or her decision.
>All of us have been guilty of intemperate remarks from time to time on
>this list. (myself included.)
-Caveat Lector-
At 10:56 AM 1/6/99 -0800, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Hawk wrote:
>>
>> -Caveat Lector-
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> > -Caveat Lector-
>> >
>> > What's wrong with adopting a national energy policy?
>> >
>> > I think it's a sane thing to do, especially since the end
-Caveat Lector-
At 08:50 AM 1/6/99 -0500, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Smiley:
>
>>What better scapegoat for society's ills than the defenseless.
>
>Of course, that's what Republicans and Libertarians do: they gain their
>popularity, as fascists always have, by stepping on the ones who cannot
-Caveat Lector-
At 01:34 PM 1/5/99 -0800, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:
>>Your post is exceedingly and unnecessarily cruel to those persons whose
>>feelings of moral superiority necessitate their bearing a burden of guilt
>>and forever paying penance for the
-Caveat Lector-
At 03:15 PM 1/5/99 -0500, Howard Davis wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>E Mael wrote:
>>
>
>> it takes a white man to make a wasteland
>>
> Well, I don't think that is completely accurate, even if perhaps it
>is true that "white men" are the masters of this ability and could, in
>fa
-Caveat Lector-
What a romantic you are, Hugh! What's that line of M. Johnson's about the
only right is might??
Barb
At 11:18 AM 12/22/98 -0600, Hugh wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>As far as "native populations" go, since I'm Native American, I find it
>odd that European Americans assume that w
-Caveat Lector-
At 10:27 AM 12/20/98 -0500, June wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>On Sun, 20 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Well said, but this Jerry Harp won't understand, neither will Prudy or
>>the other Clintonites. He could nuke Ohmaha and they would still support
him,
>
>Or perhaps O
-Caveat Lector-
At 10:02 PM 12/19/98 -0500, Jerry Harp wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Then, shazam, it was no longer a matter of sex or about lying. It was a
>matter of lying under oath about sex! Phew! (see Barb Witts last post if
you
>doubt that this is the new party line.
For the sake of cl
-Caveat Lector-
At 01:16 PM 12/18/98 -0500, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>In a message dated 12/18/98 2:55:14 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>>
>> As far as Livingston, or any of the other philanderers/crooks in office,
>they
>> too can screw their brains out, they just
-Caveat Lector-
At 06:52 AM 12/18/98 -0600, Linda Minor wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Anyone who refuses to see that this was a set up is no different than the
>people who followed Hitler blindly into the holocaust.
O.k., assuming, arguendo, that your speculation is correct, I would still
prefe
-Caveat Lector-
At 12:13 AM 12/18/98 -0500, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>The private lives of our reps ought to remain as such.
>
>Papers like Roll Call and dirt mags like Hustler, both allegedly involved
in the
>Livingston expose, apparently have nothing better to do but go on WH tips and
>r
-Caveat Lector-
Are you off your meds again, Chris??
Barb
At 04:18 PM 12/17/98 -0800, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED],Internet writes:
>>Perhaps *you* should take your own advice.
>
>
>i will take my own advice. you seem to be the penultimate narcissist, no
>one can touch you
-Caveat Lector-
At 10:00 PM 12/17/98 +, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>On 17 Dec 98 , Alamaine wrote:
>
>> -Caveat Lector-
>>
>> >From
http://www.rollcall.com
>>
>> Livingston Confesses Affairs
>>
>> By Jim VandeHei
>>
>> House Speaker Bob Livingston (R-La.) tonight plans to disclose
to th
-Caveat Lector-
At 05:21 PM 12/17/98 -0500, Harp wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>
>This is pure bunk. We are not some banana republic.
Maybe you should inform your buddy Clinton.
>
>DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER
>==
>CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list. Proselyzting
propaga
-Caveat Lector-
At 01:03 PM 12/17/98 -0500, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>In a message dated 12/16/98 9:23:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>writes:
>
>> >
>> > They don't have to strike today, tomorrow or next month.
>> > The people have no where go . EXCEPT TO PUT UP A
>>
-Caveat Lector-
At 09:17 PM 12/14/98 -0500, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Ignorance and provocation - the similarities of events now and '20s & '30s
>pre
>> WWII is eerie.
>>
>> Om
>> K
>>
>> In a message dated 12/14/98 10:07:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> >Y
-Caveat Lector-
After reading material from one side of an issue, how can either one of you
comment on a program that you apparently didn't watch, and a case about
which you state you are unfamiliar Just curious.
Barb
At 04:05 AM 12/12/98 -0600, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>Gee ...
-Caveat Lector-
At 11:41 PM 12/11/98 -0600, Linda Minor wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>---snip
---
>There was a
>time when a person could learn the law simply by working as an apprentice to
>a practicing att
-Caveat Lector-
But if all the lessor beings on the list upgraded, wouldn't that diminish
the openings for your cheap shots??
Barb
At 07:00 AM 12/7/98 -0500, you wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
>On Sun, 6 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>The only other time I heard of these women was in The Sun,
41 matches
Mail list logo
