-Caveat Lector-
Having seen Danny's photograph, I have wondered how the DNA test could have
been negative. Others have too, I'm sure, but none of us has been willing to
say it out loud. My questions were: Did the Clintonistas get to the DNA lab,
or was Danny's photo doctored?
A
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/12/99 10:40:33 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"I'm not degrading anyone, but where in the hell did you all (both North
South) get your education? The slave issue was the tip of the iceburg. The
war
dealt with the south's
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/10/99 9:20:22 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
itnesses, etc.
My problem is with the mentality that pervades all of this and that is that
this is about sex (you and I both know that is not the issue here but Joe
Blow
apparently
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/10/99 12:05:14 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lest you jump to conclusions, I hasten to add that I know that racism exists
and
has existed in the South (as well as the North), and that I am opposed to
what I
know of the KKK as it
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/10/99 2:29:32 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(snip beginning)
I can't disagree with you (I rarely do) I only assume that you are right,
that the Senate can do pretty much anything that it wants since it's not a
criminal trial and
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/7/99 10:32:00 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, the results still are not in. Does anyone besides me find that a
bit mysterious? They took the DNA sample from Danny 1 month ago. I wonder
if the whitehouse may be
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/4/99 8:25:09 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On this one, I am in total agreement with you. This feces is getting
sickening! If this turns out to be a farce, as so many of Drudge's
"reports" have proven to be, here's hoping
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/4/99 12:15:51 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Why are youassuming it's not true?
J2
You miss the point, J2.
SnowOwl is talking about the responsibility of the news media to not spread
every rumor of scandal. Nor is
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/4/99 10:49:48 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Well, I will tell you one thing I am NEVER going to call the Art Bell show!
Because if I do then the whole list will erupt into a flame war like WWIII!
Teo1000
And IF you do we're
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/3/99 12:07:16 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Hey, I was wondering the same thing. Guess great minds think alike.
And, p lease answer the question Teo, inquiring minds want to knowvbg
Lynne
I was NOT on the show,
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 1/3/99 1:03:11 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
FWIW, all, I only sign up with one ISP and am not using any false names.
Usually it is the ones who do the accusing of doing such a thing that are
actually doing it.
Now to get off
Teo,
I hope you're happy! If you hadn't called in to Art Bell this catfight would
never have happened!
Jim
In a message dated 1/3/99 6:17:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
On Sun, 3 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I made a harmless comment wondering if it was Teo
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/30/98 12:42:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
After having read
"Votescam" by the Collier brothers (both are now dead)
The book was a bombshell, but I somehow missed the fact that they BOTH are now
dead? Do you have details?
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/24/98 11:08:39 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, at long last. I'm so glad to hear someone else say it. Seemed
to me that all through this business Starr's "investigation," and the
House Committee has been dealing with Clinton
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/19/98 11:43:11 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
In a message dated 12/19/98 12:15:00 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, the Civil War was about States' Rights...slavery was a side issue,
and Lincoln
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/17/98 9:12:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
U.S. Prez wears many hats. One hat is Commander-in-Chief. When
Commander-in-Chief, legal argument is he's subject to U.S. Military
Code.
Brian Redman
Conspiracy Nation News
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/16/98 5:06:43 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KILLING FISH IN THE
BARREL
Where are those Iraqis going to go?
Are they going to move buildings?
The Iraqis are like fish in the
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/15/98 11:33:30 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hillary Clinton has my vote. God knows she deserves it and she is more than
qualified.
OK, I've finally caught on. I've been responding to some of these posts in
good faith, but now
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/14/98 8:05:13 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a sidebar (which perhaps has something to do with a potential
'conspiracy', perhaps not), it's interesting that both Powell AND Reagan
found renewed popularity in the new medium of
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/14/98 9:51:49 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All:
Has anyone besides myself noticed a slight--but nonetheless
palpable--change in the media's approach to covering the Clinton
impeachment proceedings? I could be wrong, but I
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/13/98 5:46:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
In a message dated 12/12/98 8:36:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, JYester@AOL.
COM
writes:
Now that's an interesting observation. The media have been defending and
covering
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/13/98 12:42:57 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Generally in newsrooms you have a perponderence of democrats, -- just as in
the general population . . .duh! The ownership is almost 100% percent
republican and there is no true
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/13/98 9:32:50 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Reagan!?! I mentioned before about how Reagan derailed half of Garrison's
investigation, but good lord, do the words "iran-contra" mean anything to
anyone
any more? What about
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/12/98 2:54:05 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just one more case of the media--which seems to be in the pocket of
the Republicans and the radical right and whoever the puppetmasters
are--calling the shots before the play is done.
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/10/98 6:25:04 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
What a perfectly outrageous presentation. Why would anyone ask anyone else
any question based on that garbage unless they were investigating a "REAL"
sex
crime. I imagine that if
Original message
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 98 04:36:45 EST
From: Spirit Of Truth Page http://www.ucc.uconn.edu/~jpa94001/
Subject: IS PRESIDENT CLINTON ABOUT TO ANNOUNCE HIS RESIGNATION?
IS PRESIDENT CLINTON ABOUT TO
26 matches
Mail list logo
