Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-10 Thread William Hugh Tunstall
-Caveat Lector- Thanks for the clarification, K. So, there is a difference between the L and the l.. and the capital L liberals are hypocrites and poseurs... I won't argue with that. There are hypocrites and jerks in every political camp. And I actually agree with you. I remember back in the

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-10 Thread KA
-Caveat Lector- On Wed, 9 Dec 1998, Sno0wl wrote: >I admit Joshua2 has gone overboard but in the past two decades, it >seems to me that it hasn't been "liberal white males" but >conservatives--mostly Republicans, but conservatives of every stripe >who have fought against ERA, against abortion an

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-09 Thread Sno0wl
-Caveat Lector- Hey, June-- I admit Joshua2 has gone overboard but in the past two decades, it seems to me that it hasn't been "liberal white males" but conservatives--mostly Republicans, but conservatives of every stripe who have fought against ERA, against abortion and a woman's right to choos

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-09 Thread KA
-Caveat Lector- On Wed, 9 Dec 1998, William Hugh Tunstall wrote: >What is your basic gripe about "white liberals"? My 'gripe' as you put it is not with white liberals, but white Liberals The 'capital L' variety are big on mouthing platitudes, but are the worst racists and sexists around...

Re: [CTRL] [Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH]

1998-12-09 Thread Robert Tatman
-Caveat Lector- William Hugh Tunstall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ka- > What is your basic gripe about "white liberals"? I'm curious. I'm a > Native American (of European-Native American ancestry)...and I don't > remember "white conservatives" or "white libertarians," for that matter, > riskin

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-09 Thread William Hugh Tunstall
-Caveat Lector- Ka- What is your basic gripe about "white liberals"? I'm curious. I'm a Native American (of European-Native American ancestry)...and I don't remember "white conservatives" or "white libertarians," for that matter, risking their lives on freedom rides to the south to end segregat

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-09 Thread Bill Kingsbury
-Caveat Lector- Disputes are not kosher, here. This is a research list. Whatever you're smoking, flush it. Try some major tranquilizers. At 08:49 PM 12-8-98 -0800, Joshua2 wrote: > > > > > > > > DECLARATION & DISCLAIMER == CTRL is a discussion and informational exchange list.

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-09 Thread KA
-Caveat Lector- On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, nurev wrote: >Yeah I bet you like this. You're the fool who studies philosophy at feet >of that loonytwat JanaButterfly. With the above statement, Joshua proves my point regarding the typical white male Liberal's attitude towards women... He is unable to obj

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-09 Thread KA
-Caveat Lector- On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, Mike Moxley wrote: > >and shouldn't be living amidst >>decent people trying to make the world a better place for all the >>different kinds of people who make up this country. > >Translation: All these "different kinds of people" who are socialists and >make up

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-09 Thread KA
-Caveat Lector- On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, nurev wrote: >I don't work for the guvment and I hate semi-educated white morons >like you. As opposed to a totally ignorant (presumably) white moron like you... >You are a paranoid idiot and shouldn't be living amidst >decent people trying to make the worl

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-09 Thread KA
-Caveat Lector- On Tue, 8 Dec 1998, nurev wrote: >I hate this fascist bullshit. I think that you and people like you should >be rounded up and sent to places where you would be set straight. If you >refuse your families should be held until you get your ugly fascist heads >straight. I f none of

[CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH A CLASSIC EXAMPLE

1998-12-09 Thread dduckquack
-Caveat Lector- Subject: 010.000 HATE SPEECH A CLASSIC EXAMPLE In this thread we have presented the case that words are hate speech DEPENDING WHO SAYS THEM. In response one states these words == I hate this fascist bullshit. I think that you and

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-08 Thread nurev
-Caveat Lector- "Jim Condit Jr." wrote: > > -Caveat Lector- > > Reply: This is one of the very best posts I've ever seen on the internet. Thanks, >Mike. Jim Condit Jr. > > On Monday, December 07, 1998 11:33 PM, Mike Moxley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >wrote: > > -Caveat Lector- > > > > At 02:36

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-08 Thread Mike Moxley
-Caveat Lector- >I don't work for the guvment I glad about that. >and I hate semi-educated white morons >like you. I am very educated and you have no idea of my heredity. You must be plagiarizing from the "Famous Socialist Quotes Handbook". >You are a paranoid idiot Unintelligent name-cal

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-08 Thread Mike Moxley
-Caveat Lector- At 08:27 PM 12/8/98 -0800, you wrote: >Mike Moxley wrote: >> >> Hate Speech is a term defined by the extreme left. It is only >> recognized and used by the left. It means generally any speech that >> disagrees with the far-left national socialist agenda. Since this is the >

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-08 Thread nurev
-Caveat Lector- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > -Caveat Lector- > > Subject: 010.000 HATE SPEECH > > The government is gonna crack down on hate speech? > Just what is hate speech? > > Is it not that which is said (or written) that enrages or > suggest punishment for people doing something > disapp

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-08 Thread nurev
-Caveat Lector- Mike Moxley wrote: > > -Caveat Lector- > > At 02:36 PM 12/7/98 -0500, you wrote: > >Subject: 010.000 HATE SPEECH > > >The government is gonna crack down on hate speech? > >Just what is hate speech? > >Is it not that which is said (or written) that enrages or > >suggest punishmen

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-08 Thread Jim Condit Jr.
-Caveat Lector- Reply: This is one of the very best posts I've ever seen on the internet. Thanks, Mike. Jim Condit Jr. On Monday, December 07, 1998 11:33 PM, Mike Moxley [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > -Caveat Lector- > > At 02:36 PM 12/7/98 -0500, you wrote: > >Subject: 010.000 HATE SPEECH

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-07 Thread Mike Moxley
-Caveat Lector- At 02:36 PM 12/7/98 -0500, you wrote: >Subject: 010.000 HATE SPEECH >The government is gonna crack down on hate speech? >Just what is hate speech? >Is it not that which is said (or written) that enrages or >suggest punishment for people doing something >disapproved of? >When pol

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-07 Thread BStokes45
-Caveat Lector- Amendment 1 of the Constitution states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Gover

Re: [CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-07 Thread Franklin Wayne Poley
-Caveat Lector- All NYC muggers take note. When you mug somebody if you say anything at all say, "I LOVE beating the crap out of people like you" not "I am mugging you and I hate you mo' fo' that you are." FWP. On Mon, 7 Dec 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > -Caveat Lector- > > Subject: 010.000

[CTRL] 010.000 HATE SPEECH

1998-12-07 Thread dduckquack
-Caveat Lector- Subject: 010.000 HATE SPEECH The government is gonna crack down on hate speech? Just what is hate speech? Is it not that which is said (or written) that enrages or suggest punishment for people doing something disapproved of? When politicians come on tv and tell us "what the A