-Caveat Lector-
--- RevCOAL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> From: Samantha L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Yikes. If he had the latest technology in
> television he wouldn't know how
> >to use it except to switch to Barney & Friends. He
> said he watched the
> first
> >plane crash on
-Caveat Lector-
--- "Samantha L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> In a message dated 12/10/01 3:20:10 PM Central
> Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > asking you why he WOULDN'T have a television seems
> to
> > have offended you...probably because the
> absurdity of
-Caveat Lector-
From: Samantha L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Yikes. If he had the latest technology in television he wouldn't know how
>to use it except to switch to Barney & Friends. He said he watched the
first
>plane crash on television
No he didn't, at least not in the quote provided; that quote
INSTITUTE on-line: http://home.earthlink.net/~thew
> From: "Samantha L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Conspiracy Theory Research List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 02:29:26 EST
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [CTRL] Bush Saw The FIRST Plane
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/10/01 3:20:10 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> asking you why he WOULDN'T have a television seems to
> have offended you...probably because the absurdity of
> your stance has been highlighted by this very simple
> and logical question
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: "eric stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --- Joshua Tinnin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > quite on top of this surprise - wasn't he?
> >
> > From this story alone as proof, I doubt it.
> >
>
> if you ever want to get to the bottom of anything, i
>
-Caveat Lector-
--- Joshua Tinnin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > quite on top of this surprise - wasn't he?
>
> From this story alone as proof, I doubt it.
>
> - jt
>
if you ever want to get to the bottom of anything, i
suggest putting several clues TOGETHER...
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: "eric stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --- Joshua Tinnin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Caveat Lector-
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "eric stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > --- Jim Rarey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I hav
-Caveat Lector-
--- Joshua Tinnin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "eric stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > --- Jim Rarey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I have read all three transcripts and nowhere
> does
> > > it cite Bush as saying he
> > >
-Caveat Lector-
- Original Message -
From: "eric stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --- Jim Rarey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have read all three transcripts and nowhere does
> > it cite Bush as saying he
> > saw the first plane hit a tower.
>
> from the transcript you say you read:
>
>
-Caveat Lector-
--- inri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> > under the circumstances [the circumstances being
> that
> > it is largely presumed that the president of the
> > world's only hyperpower has, at his disposal, the
> > latest in communications technology], since YOU
> are
-Caveat Lector-
> under the circumstances [the circumstances being that
> it is largely presumed that the president of the
> world's only hyperpower has, at his disposal, the
> latest in communications technology], since YOU are
> the one challenging a common notion, it is definitely
> your job t
-Caveat Lector-
--- inri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> > > which i most certainly have. in fact, i'm
> > > certain that he is involved up
> > > to his neck. that doesn't change the fact that
> he
> > > was nowhere near a
> > > television set that morning..
> > >
> >
> > thi
-Caveat Lector-
> > which i most certainly have. in fact, i'm
> > certain that he is involved up
> > to his neck. that doesn't change the fact that he
> > was nowhere near a
> > television set that morning..
> >
>
> this is based on what evidence, circumstantial or not?
the fact that the mer
-Caveat Lector-
--- inri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> > > i think that was my point; that what he said is
> in
> > > no way
> > > incriminating..just incredibly difficult to
> take
> > > at face value because
> > > it makes absolutely *no* sense!
> > >
> >
> > it makes no
-Caveat Lector-
> > i think that was my point; that what he said is in
> > no way
> > incriminating..just incredibly difficult to take
> > at face value because
> > it makes absolutely *no* sense!
> >
>
> it makes no sense if your perception template has not
> taken into account the enormous
-Caveat Lector-
--- inri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> > > > bush said in WHITE HOUSE TRANSCRIPTS that he
> > > watched
> > > > it live...
> > >
> > > ..yet bush is a liar. you admit so yourself
> by
> > > claiming that he knew
> > > about the attacks.
> > >
> >
> > he may
-Caveat Lector-
> > > bush said in WHITE HOUSE TRANSCRIPTS that he
> > watched
> > > it live...
> >
> > ..yet bush is a liar. you admit so yourself by
> > claiming that he knew
> > about the attacks.
> >
>
> he may be a liar and he may be dumb enough to slip...
>
> but he is not dumb enough t
-Caveat Lector-
--- inri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Caveat Lector-
>
> > bush said in WHITE HOUSE TRANSCRIPTS that he
> watched
> > it live...
>
> ..yet bush is a liar. you admit so yourself by
> claiming that he knew
> about the attacks.
>
he may be a liar and he may be dumb enough to sl
-Caveat Lector-
--- Jim Rarey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have read all three transcripts and nowhere does
> it cite Bush as saying he
> saw the first plane hit a tower.
from the transcript you say you read:
"And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go
in, and I saw an airplane hit
-Caveat Lector-
> bush said in WHITE HOUSE TRANSCRIPTS that he watched
> it live...
..yet bush is a liar. you admit so yourself by claiming that he knew
about the attacks.
why are you grasping on to this comment so strongly?
inri
np:
http://chat.carleton.ca/~jparent2/
"sure, we'll have f
hinks your bias makes you overreach the actual evidence.
Jim Rarey
- Original Message -
From: eric stewart
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2001 6:12 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Bush Saw The FIRST Plane Hit The WTC On
TV?
-Caveat Lector Jim Rarey <[EMAIL PROTECTED
-Caveat Lector-
--- Jim Rarey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is obvious that Bush is saying he saw a plane hit
> the WTC. That doesn't
> mean it was the first one.
your statement indicates that you have not read the
white house transcript, the url for which i
provided...i am not going to even s
-Caveat Lector-
--- Jim Rarey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There was a crew on the street outside the WTC
> filming some kind of training
> film When the plane came in so low the cameraman
> raised his camera and just
> caught the plane hitting the WTC.
think man!
why do i have to think FOR yo
-Caveat Lector-
> It is obvious that Bush is saying he saw a plane hit the WTC. That doesn't
> mean it was the first one.
yes it does.
>I was sitting outside the cla
>
> ssroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was
>
> obviously on.
.
> But I was whisked off
-Caveat Lector-
I do believe that he probably mispoke, but what HE SAYS is he saw the first
one hit before he went into the class and, I personally watched live, the act
of card telling him about the second plane hitting later, Bush then stayed in
the kids classroom and continued reading for twen
ism and exposure of prior knowledge by at
least some in the government.
Bush is not noted for clear explanations of many things.
Jim
- Original Message -
From: Kris Millegan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Bush Saw The FIRST Plane Hi
-Caveat Lector-
In a message dated 12/8/01 9:57:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>This simply is not true and comes very close to disinformation. There is
>
>enough evidence that the government had advance warning without
>
>manufacturing it.
>
>
>
>There was a crew on the street outside the WTC
Message -
From: eric stewart
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 12:29 PM
Subject: [CTRL] Bush Saw The FIRST Plane Hit The WTC On
TV?
-Caveat Lector-Bush Saw The First Plane Hit The WTC On
TV? (english)Bush Reveals TOTAL 9.11 Complicity--Says Saw Film
ofFIRST Attack
-Caveat Lector-
Bush Saw The First Plane Hit The WTC On TV? (english)
Bush Reveals TOTAL 9.11 Complicity--Says Saw Film of
FIRST Attack on
WTC: THERE WAS NO SUCH BROADCAST!!
** Comments show complicit gov't elements had OWN
cameras in place to film OWN attack!!!
TOP_VIEW has caught Junior wit
30 matches
Mail list logo
