Re: [CTRL] Polls

1998-12-30 Thread JYester
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/30/98 12:42:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > After having read > "Votescam" by the Collier brothers (both are now dead) The book was a bombshell, but I somehow missed the fact that they BOTH are now dead? Do you have details? DECL

Re: [CTRL] Polls

1998-12-30 Thread Gavin Phillips
-Caveat Lector- Good job Jim. You've taken the time to research the subject and your conclusions verify what many others are saying, which is, that these Clinton polls showing him to be very popular are nonsense. After having read "Votescam" by the Collier brothers (both are now dead) I'm in ag

Re: [CTRL] Polls

1998-12-29 Thread Gerald Harp
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/28/98 7:30:19 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > If you do the math, the percentage of the actual population of the > United States represented in the polls works out to .027%. That > doesn't sound very "representative" to me! S

Re: [CTRL] Polls

1998-12-29 Thread Jim Condit Jr.
-Caveat Lector- Hey, Jerry! Polling is a "discipline"??? A discipline in high risk, high stakes deception maybe -- when practised by the Big 5 TV networks (FOX now aboard in that elite group). Also, your assertion that "the American people" "elected" Clinton twice is merely an act of faith on yo

Re: [CTRL] Polls

1998-12-28 Thread Teo1000
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/28/98 4:18:46 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: << When are you Clinton haters going to stop weaseling about Clinton's popularity and face the fact that the voters have elected him twice, think he is terrific for the economy and conducts

Re: [CTRL] Polls

1998-12-28 Thread MShrum
-Caveat Lector- In answere to Jerry: If you do the math, the percentage of the actual population of the United States represented in the polls works out to .027%. That doesn't sound very "representative" to me! I'm not sure if this is exactly correct because my calculator probably won't go

Re: [CTRL] Polls

1998-12-28 Thread Stopforth, Jamie
-Caveat Lector- >>>n are you Clinton haters going to stop weaseling about Clinton's popularity > and face the fact that the voters have elected him twice, think he is > terrific > for the economy and conducts foreign policy much better than his recent > predecessors? All your awkward ra

Re: [CTRL] Polls

1998-12-28 Thread Gerald Harp
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/28/98 11:53:50 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > routinely garner 75 to 85 percent support. > Even regular polls show a hardcore of one-third of the > public that wants to see Clinton ousted immediately. > Add to that those who don't

Re: [CTRL] [Re: [CTRL] Polls?]

1998-12-27 Thread Gerry Forbes
-Caveat Lector- Robert Tatman wrote: > >"A.C. Szul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I wager that if we were to ask everyone on this list --about 400 plus-- and >folks on >> the other lists (MC, REPUB, RUSH, XPOLT, etc.) you'll find not one person >who has >> been "polled" or "interviewed

Re: [CTRL] [Re: [CTRL] Polls?]

1998-12-23 Thread Stopforth, Jamie
-Caveat Lector- > > I wager that if we were to ask everyone on this list --about 400 plus-- > and > folks on > > the other lists (MC, REPUB, RUSH, XPOLT, etc.) you'll find not one > person > who has > > been "polled" or "interviewed" by Gallup or any of its sister polling > organizations. > > >

Re: [CTRL] [Re: [CTRL] Polls?]

1998-12-23 Thread Robert Tatman
-Caveat Lector- "A.C. Szul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wager that if we were to ask everyone on this list --about 400 plus-- and folks on > the other lists (MC, REPUB, RUSH, XPOLT, etc.) you'll find not one person who has > been "polled" or "interviewed" by Gallup or any of its sister polli

Re: [CTRL] Polls?

1998-12-23 Thread Stopforth, Jamie
-Caveat Lector- Exactly! Who ever said the media has to tell the truth? Much less the truth about who says what about Klinton? If the pres can lie under oath, then why do people believe that the press isn't lying about the polls? Jamie >>>I wager that if we were t

Re: [CTRL] Polls?

1998-12-22 Thread JYester
-Caveat Lector- In a message dated 12/21/98 10:14:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > First, let me say that I do not dispute the results of these latest polls > regarding Clinton. I do, however have questions regarding the general stock > we Americans put in them: > >

Re: [CTRL] Polls?

1998-12-22 Thread A.C. Szul
-Caveat Lector- I wager that if we were to ask everyone on this list --about 400 plus-- and folks on the other lists (MC, REPUB, RUSH, XPOLT, etc.) you'll find not one person who has been "polled" or "interviewed" by Gallup or any of its sister polling organizations. Hey, Mr. Andy Kohut, pollin

Re: [CTRL] Polls?

1998-12-22 Thread MShrum
-Caveat Lector- What makes me so damn mad about these polls is the first one that came out that put Klinton up to 72% was from 519 people polled with a 4.5% error margin and they lead all the people on like they polled everyone in america. Michael Stopforth, Jamie wrote: > > -Caveat Lector- >

Re: [CTRL] Polls?

1998-12-22 Thread Stopforth, Jamie
-Caveat Lector- Great post Edward! This whole poll thing gets to me. I like the way J.C. Watts put it in his speech Saturday morning... If this nation was a nation governed by polls, women may still not have voting rights and we would still have slavery. Jamie > All: > > Fi