I am experimenting with an older laptop at work and its docking station.
With Fedora 17 and dual-monitors (though the docking station), it seems
that the left-most edge of the left monitor is actually at x-coordinate
+1024. Therefore, all the windows I have defined to be at positions +X
where X <
My reply didn't go to the list the first time...
I changed my LANG setting from en_US.UTF-8 to C and now everything works
correctly. I'm not well-versed enough in what the LANG variable does to
know how that affected things -- I'll have to research some. I'll also
have to test and see if using o
I recently upgraded my kernel and a few other packages on my system.
Now when I start up vmware-player, I don't get any fonts -- just little
blocks. I noticed the same thing when I start realplayer. Both seem to
work fine, but it's rather hard to work with them when I cannot see the
fonts 1n the
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 02:12:40PM -0500, Michael George wrote:
> I recently upgraded my kernel and a few other packages on my system.
> Now when I start up vmware-player, I don't get any fonts -- just little
> blocks. I noticed the same thing when I start realplayer. Both seem
/2 or USB?
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 06:18:31PM +0200, Marcel Heinz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Michael George wrote:
> [qemu not releasing it's focus when pressing Ctrl-Alt]
> >
> > So when you want to have the qemu window (running X11 inside of it)
> > release the focus of th
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:13:37PM +0200, Marcel Heinz wrote:
> Michael George wrote:
> > This past weekend I installed qemu to give it a try. It seemed to work
> > okay until it started up an X11 session inside the emulator window.
> >
> > I had to click on the win
This past weekend I installed qemu to give it a try. It seemed to work
okay until it started up an X11 session inside the emulator window.
I had to click on the window to get it to take input from the mouse and
keyboard. However, I cannot get that window to release the focus.
According to the d
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 09:49:14PM +0100, J.O. Aho wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, Michael George wrote:
>
> >Are there any experienced users here who could adapt the ctwm port in
> >gentoo so that it will be ready for the move to the module XOrg in the
> >near future? I s
Are there any experienced users here who could adapt the ctwm port in
gentoo so that it will be ready for the move to the module XOrg in the
near future? I see that ctwm is still on the "broken" list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular.txt.20060130
I am a new gentoo us
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:30:11AM +0100, Michael Widerkrantz wrote:
> Michael George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I haven't changed my ctwmrc much for a LONG time. I am on a Gentoo
> > system running 3.6 and I'm ready to unmask 3.7.
>
>
I haven't changed my ctwmrc much for a LONG time. I am on a Gentoo
system running 3.6 and I'm ready to unmask 3.7.
I have a question that perhaps someone here can clarify...
On my "older" apps, like xterm, xcalendar, etc, I can select Occupy from
my menu (bound to f.occupy) and click on the wind
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:38:50PM -0400, Michael George wrote:
> I just updated from SuSE 8.2 to 9.1. Things went relatively well for the most
> part, but there is one last annoyance that I'm trying to fix.
>
> Before, using ctwm as my window manager, I would have just a blac
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 09:38:50PM -0400, Michael George wrote:
> I just updated from SuSE 8.2 to 9.1. Things went relatively well for the most
> part, but there is one last annoyance that I'm trying to fix.
>
> Before, using ctwm as my window manager, I would have just a blac
I just updated from SuSE 8.2 to 9.1. Things went relatively well for the most
part, but there is one last annoyance that I'm trying to fix.
Before, using ctwm as my window manager, I would have just a black arrow
pointer over nearly all of the screen. After the upgrade, I have the black
arrow on
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 12:24:50AM +1000, drewbian wrote:
> Well If You didn't mind a using a bit of memory you could allways run
> the gnome-settings-daemon from .xinitrc, that way you could have your
> mouse thingy today.
That's a good idea! I'll try that for a while to see how useful it real
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 09:28:47PM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
> george> When converting my system to SuSE 8.2 Pro, I noticed that
> george> GNOME2 has this cool facility where you can press and release
> george> the control key (with no other keys) and it will put this
> george>
When converting my system to SuSE 8.2 Pro, I noticed that GNOME2 has this cool
facility where you can press and release the control key (with no other keys)
and it will put this little graphic around the mouse pointer on the screen for
a second.
Help locate that little bugger with something beside
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 07:50:31AM -0400, Michael George wrote:
> I got the tarball for 3.7a4 and applied this patch, but I still get an error;
> ---
> /usr/local/src/ctwm-3.7-alpha4>patch < patch
> patching file g
I got the tarball for 3.7a4 and applied this patch, but I still get an error;
---
/usr/local/src/ctwm-3.7-alpha4>patch < patch
patching file gram.y
/usr/local/src/ctwm-3.7-alpha4>xmkmf
imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config
/
I have SuSE 8.2 Pro installed and I'm having trouble building ctwm 3.6.
I applied the "group leader" patch from Rhialto, but I don't think that's the
problem...
I did "xmkmf", followed by "make", but I get errors from bison/yacc:
/usr/local/src/ctwm-3.6>make
bison -y -d gram.y
gram.y:423.3: pars
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 08:43:29PM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
> On Fri 23 May 2003 at 19:07:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael George) writes:
> >
> > > For either of these apps, when I click on it for an f.occupy, I do
> > > NOT get th
Richard, some time ago I sent you a tarball with some screenshots and the
relevant .*rc files for my minimalistic theme.
I haven't yet seen them on the CTWM website. That means one of two things:
1. You never got the tarball.
2. You haven't had a chance to add it to the site.
If 1. then I want t
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 11:27:15PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
>
> george> I have a very naieve(sp?) question... actually a "failure to
> george> understand"...
> george>
> george> I've been using X since '87, with TWM until '96, with CTWM
> george> since.
> george>
> george> I
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 06:00:34PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> I included all changes proposed by Björn Knutsson.
>
> Now, I haven't heard very much from almost any tester. Is there
> anyone running these alphas under Gnome that can tell me how well that
> worked (I don't run Gn
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:32:44AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I agree with Bjorn that the reason that people dropped off from the
> > ctwm list isn't likely to be because it was suddenly focused on
> > development. Looking at the archives, I think this list has been
> > focused on devel
In checking out the newly-moved site, I looked at the themes. I noticed that
all of them use the iconic workspace manager. My setup uses a more tabular WM
(probably because I started with a .twmrc file rather than a "theme" :), and
while that may be passe, there might be some interested in my con
26 matches
Mail list logo
