-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [[EMAIL PROTECTED]: trouble again downloading.]
Anyone interested in helping this guy?
Doesn't a subject like trouble downloading
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:05 AM
Ok. There is a setup-md5.ini in /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/cygwin
(home of setup.exe and setup.ini). I generated it against my
local release directory so there may
Hi Charles,
(*) tentative because I can't actually test it myself against HEAD,
given the pre-existing problem with binutils HEAD on pe386.
The unwanted symbols, which this patch avoid, seems to be exported in some
packages. When this patch is applied, perhaps it makes sense to update the
Hello,
Robert has been waiting with including Gary's patch to
integrate the chooser as a 'normal' setup page.
I am wondering if it actually is a good idea to do it.
My main worry is the limited size of the 'normal' setup
window compared with the size of the now separate chooser
window.
Can't the window be resizable? It would be nice to integrate it
because if it looses the focus you can't alt-tab to it atm :(
J.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Also if (some time) functionality is added to show the ldesc
than we even need more space (or a separate
-Original Message-
From: Morrison, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 8:50 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: SETUP: Is chooser integration as setup page
really a good idea?
Can't the window be resizable? It would be nice
-Original Message-
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:46 AM
Also, after checking out setup:
cvs -d
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/cygwin-apps co setup
I also get setup/libgetopt++, setup/cfgaux (and zlib and,
bzlib, of
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:52 AM
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Error in configuring setup.
Required AUTHORS and NEWS files are missing.
Required by what?
Cheers,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:57 AM
http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html (which is linked from
http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps) documents the bootstrap.sh
requirement for libgetopt++, and provides
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:14 AM
To: Earnie Boyd
Subject: Re: Error in libgetopt++ from the setup build
directory [WAS: Re: Error in configuring setup.]
BTW, the CVS has a configure file in the setup
Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:52 AM
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Error in configuring setup.
Required AUTHORS and NEWS files are missing.
Required by
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:27 PM
To: Robert Collins
Cc: Earnie Boyd
Subject: Re: Error in configuring setup.
Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL
Dave,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 05:50:09PM -0500, David Abrahams wrote:
Sorry it took me so long to reply; I was in Curacao at the C++ committee
meeting. Being anything but a Unix-style distribution expert (hell, I
don't know anything about Windows distribution/installation either) I'm
not
Heh,
Currently I use the regex boost library in a project, and it
occurred to me that as they are a really good resource, so it would be a
help to the community to have them available...
I certainly don't have time, nor much of an itch myself. There's plenty
of work that could be done in
Hi there,
could someone of the gurus arround tell a (half-)guru :)) what the
standard way would be if packages have rebase problems?
See cygwin@ list for recent posts about apache rebase problems.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
I think I've got a handle on this... looks like read only (-r--r--r--)
files don't delete properly, so setup fails to overwrite them.
Patches gratefully accepted, it's going in the TODO for now.
I recall having sent a patch for
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:55 AM
Thank you. Is it ok with you if I call it setup.ini and put
it in a dir
called test after inserting ../ in front of every instance of
'release/'?
I guess so. I
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:44:01AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 2:55 AM
Thank you. Is it ok with you if I call it setup.ini and put
it in a dir
called test after inserting ../ in
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:13 AM
If you've got the bandwidth and disk space... cool. I figured that a
single copy of setup.ini getting mirrored was a low-cost
solution (vs a
completely separate site).
Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:10 AM
To: cygwin-apps
Subject: rebasing new packages?!
Hi there,
could someone of the gurus arround tell a (half-)guru :))
what the standard way would be if packages
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:28 AM
I thought that the last time this subject came up, the consensus was
that Jason's code should go into the cinstall area (now, of
course, that
means the setup repository).
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:44 AM
To: CygWin Apps; Cygwin-Xfree
Subject: Re: setup.exe and inuse files for X
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
I think I've got a handle on
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 10:45 AM
Well, now libstdc++ is allowed, right? (assuming you can find and
install one, since nobody's stepped forward with mingwlibs-for-cygwin
package).
Exactly, in fact libstdc++
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:27 AM
Actually, I decided to just creat a version of setup.exe
(based on the setup200202 branch) which silently skips extra
the md5 element in
install: and source: tags. This
--- Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Collins wrote:
Yes, and at that point we had two issues:
1) We couldn't use libstdc++, let alone the STL. The STL still isn't
available - beyond whats in libg++-3.
2) I think that Jason's design needed some tweaking.
Well,
Hello,
I am compiling an X Windows program in win98 using cygwin/xfree86. But when
I link I get an unresolved external to function XShmAttach. Any of u know
what the problem is.
thanx
Hi,
I'm running Xfree86 4.2.0 on cygwin 1.3.10, and have had set my keyboard to
xmodmap.uk.
All the keys seem to work fine in xterm, but when I run the netscape
directory 4.13 console, a login box comes up,and it won't let me print the
'e' character in the password box.
I tried this with
Hello,
I am compiling a linux XWindows application in win98 using cygwin/xfree86.
But when I execute the program, opening XDisplay fails, due to the following
code fragment
dpy = XOpenDisplay(getenv("DISPLAY"));
if (dpy == 0)
{
fprintf(stderr,"Can't open X display\n");
exit(1);
}
hello,
Does cygwin/xfree86 support MIT shared memory extension. I am trying to port
some code that uses these functions on linux. and I get a linker error.
thanx
Harold Hunt wrote:
Christian,
This question is really off-topic for this mailing list.
I am not agree (please, see below cause i think Cygwin/XFree
doesn't give events to the window manager and so it is a bug).
...
Thanks a lot for information links and usage about twm.
When you
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
I think I've got a handle on this... looks like read only (-r--r--r--)
files don't delete properly, so setup fails to overwrite them.
Patches gratefully accepted, it's going in the TODO for now.
I recall having sent a patch for
I don't think this was cc'd to the list. Looks like I'm a genious. We'll just
see what my discrete math final says about than in ten minutes... :)
Harold
Forwarded message:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 2 12:06:56 2002
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain;
Hi,
I installed XFree86/Cygwin via the semi-manual procedure that predates
the release of Setup.exe packages.
I want to know how I should handle switching over to the Setup.exe-based
installation of XFree86/Cygwin.
Should I just download the packages and install over the existing
I`ve installed Cygwin/XFree86, but I can not run it.
It show error :
XIO: fatal IO error 104 (Connection reset by peer) on X server 127.0.0.1:0.0
In FAQ is this :
Server Test Series release Test44, released on 2001-08-15, changes the maximum number
of clients from 32 to 1024 by passing the
Mi,
..so I`ve downloaded this XWin-Test44.exe.bz2 and run it,
but another error:
Fatal Server Error:
could not open default font 'fixed'
You really didn't want to do that. Test44 is wy older than the 4.2.0
release. Please revert to the previous executable.
The 4.2.0 server is
-Original Message-
From: Corinna Vinschen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 1:44 AM
To: CygWin Apps; Cygwin-Xfree
Subject: Re: setup.exe and inuse files for X
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 04:58:36PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
I think I've got a handle on
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 10:12:08AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
That makes sense... but doesn't that again break something else?
What it might break is the case for which linger was added in the first
place, i.e. processes terminating and Windows flushing
-Original Message-
From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Mellman Thomas; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: using Windows links
An interesting side effect: I have a shortcut (Desktop.lnk)
on my $HOME
that was originally
If it helps anybody, which it might not : in the entire Cygwin provision
there are I think a dozen *.lnk files. I found that 5 of them induced
objections from Norton (invalid shortcuts). As was pointed out to me on
this list, this is a Windows/Norton glitch, not a Cygwin glitch ... but it
bugged
At 08:15 02/05/2002 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
No problems, but is all the following expected behaviour? Having
uncompressed the new .dll and copied it to /bin:
1. had to make /proc using mkdir /proc
2. ls -al / doesn't actually show /proc
3. ls -al /proc shows (something like)
dr-xr-xr-x
I've updated the version of apache in release/apache to 1.3.24-3.
Changes to the previous release:
* This release includes a patched behaviour for the detach daemon
mode (1.3.24-2), where httpd detaches from the calling parent process
if invoked without any flags. This is the normal behaviour
Hello Dave,
I can neither confirm, nor deny this behaviour. I've tried hard to
reproduce it but to no avail :( I'll take a look at the source code
this night - hopefully I'll see something :) The disturbing thing
about your issue is that no one (except you) has reported this
behaviour. Usually
-Original Message-
From: Michael Beach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:16 AM
thread - lock
thread - state=run
thread - signal
main - lock
main - test state (passes)
calls pthread_cond_wait().
Doh. I need some real serious sleep.
Linux
On 1 May 2002, Eduardo Chappa spoke unto us wif:
*** Mark Cooke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote today:
:) I know this may be off topic, but I've selected links as my web brower
:) in pine (using the full path - /usr/bin/links), but when I go to view a
:) url from pine, it just returns that it has
Thanx, it worked. But I also needed to add the --with-slang option.
$ ./configure --with-ncurses --with-included-gettext --with-slang
$ make
$ make install
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf
Of Frank Schmitt
Sent: Wednesday, May 01,
No problems, but is all the following expected behaviour? Having
uncompressed the new .dll and copied it to /bin:
1. had to make /proc using mkdir /proc
Yes, same way you have to mkdir /cygdrive if you want it to show up in a
directory listing I'm afraid.
2. ls -al / doesn't actually
Michael,
that patch I included in my last email fixed the problem, and
didn't introduce any regressions as far as I could tell, so I've checked
it in. If you build yourself a cygwin dll, or grab the next snapshot to
be generated, it will be fixed.
Jason - -this- bug may be the one that
-Original Message-
From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:16 AM
Come on Charles,
you have a complete version of libiconv, ready for upload,
what should the volunteer do? Repackage it to install in
/usr instead of /usr/local ?
Please write back (to me or the list, your choice) whether you use the
DELIBERATE 'download again' functionality of setup.exe or not.
And if so, how often and for what purpose.
I don't, ever.
Ciao,
Ronald
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:
-Original Message-
From: Alan Dobkin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:54 AM
When I run this new version (2.216) and select Install from
Local Directory, as soon as setup gets to the Progress
window (before
listing any available packages), the CPU
Haven't done this myself. I don't know. It looks like a user rights problem, but
I couldn't get it to work either.
Maybe someone else on cygwin@ will know.
Max.
Mike Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I can see what the problem is but when I try to start cron as a specific
user I get a
-Original Message-
From: Paul G. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 9:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Setup.exe problem?
Hi folks,
Not sure if this is correct mailing list.
It is.
Tried using latest version of setup.exe on
Hi all,
I got a problem when running mv :
i have the directory abc and want to rename
it as Abc (or something that changes the
capitalisation only).
I get the following result :
$ mv abc Abc
mv: cannot create directory
On Thursday 02 May 2002 21:28, Robert Collins wrote:
Michael,
that patch I included in my last email fixed the problem, and
didn't introduce any regressions as far as I could tell, so I've checked
it in. If you build yourself a cygwin dll, or grab the next snapshot to
be generated, it
Hi all,
I'm modifying some old code I last compiled in October 2000. The code uses a 3rd-party
DLL, which
comes with an import library. It used to link without fuss against that import library
and run perfectly.
I've moved on to cygwin_1.3.10, gcc version 2.95.3-5, and I now get a host of
Rob,
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:28:54PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
Jason - -this- bug may be the one that killed python. Could you retest
with a new dll when you have a few free moments?
Bingo! This one is finally squashed!
I am running the Python test_threadedtempfile regression test in
Just because it isn't recognized as a Cygwin symbolic link
doesn't mean it
doesn't exist as a file as far as Cygwin is concerned.
The thing is, the Windows-created Shortcut is called
Desktop.lnk and I'm trying to create simply Desktop. There
is NO file called Desktop. But ln(1) fails,
I think current port of CVS-1.1 does have a little problem with CVS/*
files being read in binary mode... e.g. if CVS/Root has \r\n it prints
cannot access cvsroot\rCVSROOT (you can read only CVSROOTces cvsroot
as it overwrite the line itself).
This is of course not a serious problem as an
Ok, I'm new to this list. I was using cygwin a few months ago and changed
computers... I just installed cygwin on my new computer but can not get make
to be recognized. I keep getting this message:
bash: make: command not found
bash: gcc: command not found
obviously gcc was when I tried to
Did you install gcc and make when you installed Cygwin? They're no longer
installed by default, you have to tell the installer you want them.
James Potts
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Original Message -
From: Tim Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:40 AM
On Thu, 2 May 2002 11:29:03 -0400 Satya Nemana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry. Please ignore this as a false alarm. Here is an update. It does
not occur anymore even with my new cygwin path and got fixed as follows.
I could isolate this problem by getting rid of .profile which was same
as
On Thu, 02 May 2002 15:40:43 + Tim Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I'm new to this list. I was using cygwin a few months ago and changed
computers... I just installed cygwin on my new computer but can not get make
to be recognized. I keep getting this message:
bash: make: command
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 04:54:18PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
[...]
2002-04-30 Eric Blake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* path.cc (hash_path_name): Improve hash function strength.
$ diff -u path.cc.bak path.cc
--- path.cc.bak Tue Apr 30 16:32:52 2002
+++ path.cc Tue
So I was building automake-1.6.1 and ran its self tests, which uncovered
bugs in libtool-devel-20020316 and in cp.exe. I'll report the libtool
bug to that list as well, but the cp.exe bug needs fixin'...
Two unexpected failures:
pr300-ltlib (libtool bug)
subobj9 (cp.exe bug -- or
*** Mark Cooke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote today:
:)Could you please post the way that you set links as your browser. I
:) will find a solution for you. Also, have you read
:) /usr/doc/Cygwin/pine-4.11-1.README? The solution may be in there. I
:) am working on expanding that document.
Mr. Paul,
[ This is entirely non-Cygwin-specific. ]
Apart from the FORTRAN business, about which I know nothing...
If you're running the ordinary BASH-in-a-console-window Cygwin, which is
the default for a Cygwin installation when you launch using the Cygwin
Icon on the desktop or in the
To Arek and Michael,
That is exactly what I did not do. I thought I had selected all of the
packages to install... works great now!
thank you both,
tim
From: Michael A Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Michael A Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tim Orr [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone confirm or deny this? Both products mentioned are reputable virus
checkers, so it would be nice to get some official feedback on the
situation.
Thanks
Winston Gutkowski
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Elmar Haneke
Sent:
Hello all!
Please tell me how do you pronounce GCC and Cygwin?
Thanks!
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
My computer here at work is required to do a daily scan with Norton. They
also push updates when I log in in the morning.
I have seen no hits of this kind. After the first post a few days ago, I
also did a full scan with up-to-date Norton at home,
where I run Cygwin also. Again, no virus was
Hi,
[ This message duplicates one with identical content (below this paragraph)
to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so please don't redirect this message to that
list. ]
I installed XFree86/Cygwin via the semi-manual procedure that predates
the release of Setup.exe packages.
I want to know how I should
On Thu, 2 May 2002 11:04:06 -0700 Winston Gutkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Can anyone confirm or deny this? Both products mentioned are reputable virus
checkers, so it would be nice to get some official feedback on the situation.
To date, every alarm about setup.exe has been either an
--On Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:41 PM +1000 Robert Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, can you build setup from the -src tarball,
and run it under gdb? If it crashes then, you can type\
'bt full'
and send me or the list the output.
I haven't tried compiling the source yet, but using the
Just downloaded and replaced my cygwin1.dll with the latest containing /proc
feature (cool!). But now automake does not work. So I did a complete setup
of cygwin. Still automake does not work. Replaced the cygwin1.dll with the
previous one. Automake works. Replaced it again with the newest.
*** On Thu, 2 May 2002 I wrote:
:) try /usr/bin/links _URL_, including the quotes. Does that work? Are you
:) using bash as your shell?
Just for the record in the archives, the additional symptom is that the
original poster is using the bash shell and the problem is that the bash
shell does not
Charles schrieb:
[...]
Determine which patches should be sent on to Bruno Haible for inclusion
in the upstream version. Advocate their adoption on that list. Monitor
that list for information that may affect the cygwin port.
That is easy...(monitoring), the other point, we both tried to
john schrieb:
I hope the title explains the problem in full.
http://62.138.63.18/cywgin/findutils/
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
Thank you very much -- that did it for me. I didn't try the first form,
but the second form worked just fine. This enabled me to send my output
to a shared network printer.
Dave
Charles Wilson wrote:
Try this
$ export PRINTER=computerprintername
(or maybe)
$ export
Jason schrieb:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 02:09:44PM +0100, Mark Cooke wrote:
fetchmail -u mark
results in this error all the time:
fetchmail: SMTP connect to localhost failed
fetchmail: can't raise the listener; falling back to
/usr/local/bin/procmail -d %T
I have never seen the above
Westley Weimer wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Thu, 2 May 2002 14:41:24 -0700 (PDT):
Clearly it is possible to get red text in a dos prompt window: cygwin does
it somehow. My personal theory is that the normal cygwin version is doing
some special setup before main is called that causes stdout
There is no virus in setup.exe as distributed by Cygwin. I think there's been
enough reports on this list to confirm that this is the case.
Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com
838 Washington Street
Chris January wrote:
Chris Chris,
Cool!
Is the registry as reflected in /proc/registry writable?
I'm torn between writing no, and no, not yet.
The problem with this is that it is inevitable that at some point or other
someone will post to the cygwin mailing list complaining they typed rm
My background is Unix and I'm *very* new with NT... so this has,
I'm sure, a very simple solution.
Trying to get inetd to work, the doc's say to set the system PATH.
How? What file contains the settings? Somehow, NT pickeds up
the PATH I had in my autoexec.bat when I open a DOS window...
but
Robert Collins wrote:
Two things: if /proc/registry isn't writable, cating 1 to
/proc/registry/.writeable won't work - without special case code. I'd
suggest /proc/sysopts/fs/registry/writeable.
Two, why not have two options:
writeable
nextwrite
one is persistent (until all cygwin
David Starks-Browning wrote:
This has been discussed on the mailing list before, search the
archives. I noticed it with cygwin-1.3.10 on NT4, and found that
enabling ntsec solved the problem for me. But there are lots of
things to check, like the correctness of your /etc/passwd and
On Thu, 02 May 2002 23:44:50 -0500 Dave Bodenstab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Starks-Browning wrote:
This has been discussed on the mailing list before, search the
archives. I noticed it with cygwin-1.3.10 on NT4, and found that
enabling ntsec solved the problem for me. But there
Stipe,
[...]
Any hope to shorten this last method ?!
Yep, do we (package contributors) have to rebase packages before
tarballing them, or what's the standard way to do it?
[...]
No, I didn't mean that. What I was thinking, was if rebase couldn't actually
be included in cygwin distro, and
87 matches
Mail list logo
