me as
shm_rss?
I would also like to inquire if swap_attempts and swap_successes the same in
Linux and Cygwin, always being zero and unused?
I would appreciate it if you could offer some related information.
Best Regards,
Yang Kun
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.htm
On 4/2/2024 9:50 AM, Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote:
Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote:
,,,
BTW, according to the Linux kernel sources, BLKPBSZGET etc return
'unsigned int' and not 'unsigned long' since first appearance in
2.6.32-rc3 (2009?):
https://elixir.bootlin.c
Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote:
,,,
BTW, according to the Linux kernel sources, BLKPBSZGET etc return
'unsigned int' and not 'unsigned long' since first appearance in
2.6.32-rc3 (2009?):
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v2.6.32-rc3/source/block/ioctl.c#L276
https:
Bruce Jerrick via Cygwin wrote:
Downgrading to util-linux-2.33.3-3 does not help. The related code
differs, but has the same problem.
I take that back. The above should read "util-linux-2.33.1-3".
But it was OK in util-linux-2.33.1-3 .
Yes, this is correct. I possibly downg
> Downgrading to util-linux-2.33.3-3 does not help. The related code
> differs, but has the same problem.
But it was OK in util-linux-2.33.1-3 . The only difference in output
between that and the fixed 2.39.3-2 is that the latter includes one more
decimal place in the reported "human&
Hi Mark,
Mark Geisert via Cygwin wrote:
Hi Christian,
On 3/31/2024 1:11 AM, Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote:
Testcase:
# cygcheck -f /sbin/fdisk.exe
util-linux-2.39.3-1
# /sbin/fdisk.exe -l /dev/sdd
Disk /dev/sdd: 465.76 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512
Hi Christian,
On 3/31/2024 1:11 AM, Christian Franke via Cygwin wrote:
Testcase:
# cygcheck -f /sbin/fdisk.exe
util-linux-2.39.3-1
# /sbin/fdisk.exe -l /dev/sdd
Disk /dev/sdd: 465.76 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical
On Sun, Mar 31, 2024 at 9:15 PM Keith Thompson
wrote:
>
> Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de wrote:
> > Beyond that, the version 5.4.6 that everybody is currently reverting to
> > (and is also still available for Cygwin if you want to go back) was
> > already released when the presumed bad actor was co
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de wrote:
> Beyond that, the version 5.4.6 that everybody is currently reverting to
> (and is also still available for Cygwin if you want to go back) was
> already released when the presumed bad actor was co-maintainer and their
> involvement goes back even farther based
Testcase:
# cygcheck -f /sbin/fdisk.exe
util-linux-2.39.3-1
# /sbin/fdisk.exe -l /dev/sdd
Disk /dev/sdd: 465.76 GiB, 500107862016 bytes, 976773168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 34359738880 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 34359738880
ce to this: sorry if you're already aware of this issue.
Based on what I know so far (and I can't check in detail right now)
Cygwin is likely not affected: it isn't Linux, nor does it use glibc or
systemd and also not the patch for OpenSSH that allows the backdoor to
get activated
There is a serious security issue with xz (and liblzma) versions 5.6.0-1
and 5.6.1-1. I note that cywin currently is suggesting an upgrade to
5.6.1-1, which is unsafe. I've looked at the cygwin archives and I don't
see a reference to this: sorry if you're already aware of this issue.
Reference
On 2024-03-24 12:59, Matthias--- via Cygwin wrote:
I downloaded ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2022.10.3.tgz from tuxera, extract it and run,
in my cygwin 3.5
environment:
./configure
make ntfsprogs
I got a "fatal error: linux/fd.h: No such file or directory".
All ntfsprogs are build in ~
Hello,
I downloaded ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2022.10.3.tgz from tuxera, extract it and run,
in my cygwin 3.5
environment:
./configure
make ntfsprogs
I got a "fatal error: linux/fd.h: No such file or directory".
All ntfsprogs are build in ~/ntfsprogs but not ntfsrecover, ntfsse
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* util-linux-2.39.3-1
* util-linux-debuginfo-2.39.3-1
* libblkid-devel-2.39.3-1
* libblkid1-2.39.3-1
* libfdisk-devel-2.39.3-1
* libfdisk1-2.39.3-1
* libsmartcols-devel-2.39.3-1
* libsmartcols1-2.39.3-1
* libuuid-devel
On 2/2/2024 3:52 AM, Bruce Jerrick via Cygwin wrote:
util-linux 2.33.1-3 depends on cygwin >= 3.5.0 . The latter has come
out of test, so can util-linux 2.33.1-3 also come out of test?
Done. Note that this means if you select util-linux 2.33.1-3 for
installation, your Cygwin version w
util-linux 2.33.1-3 depends on cygwin >= 3.5.0 . The latter has come
out of test, so can util-linux 2.33.1-3 also come out of test?
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.h
On 1/27/2024 7:47 AM, Marco Atzeri via Cygwin wrote:
On 27/01/2024 11:06, Mark Geisert via Cygwin wrote:
On 1/26/2024 11:26 PM, ASSI via Cygwin wrote:
Mark Geisert via Cygwin writes:
A new build of the util-linux package, 2.33.1-3, now includes
fallocate and its man page. The updated package
On 27/01/2024 11:06, Mark Geisert via Cygwin wrote:
On 1/26/2024 11:26 PM, ASSI via Cygwin wrote:
Mark Geisert via Cygwin writes:
A new build of the util-linux package, 2.33.1-3, now includes
fallocate and its man page. The updated package is now making its way
to the Cygwin mirrors
On 1/26/2024 11:26 PM, ASSI via Cygwin wrote:
Mark Geisert via Cygwin writes:
A new build of the util-linux package, 2.33.1-3, now includes
fallocate and its man page. The updated package is now making its way
to the Cygwin mirrors. fallocate requires Cygwin version >= 3.5.0.
It a
Mark Geisert via Cygwin writes:
> A new build of the util-linux package, 2.33.1-3, now includes
> fallocate and its man page. The updated package is now making its way
> to the Cygwin mirrors. fallocate requires Cygwin version >= 3.5.0.
It also doesn't work at all on Cygwin 3.
all bug report:
> > >> Cygwin 3.5. now has support for SEEK_HOLE (thanks! :-) ), but
> > >> /usr/bin/fallocate is still missing in the "util-linux" package.
> > >>
> > >> Can someone please enable that tool ?
> > >
> > > I&#
t; >> /usr/bin/fallocate is still missing in the "util-linux" package.
> >>
> >> Can someone please enable that tool ?
> >
> > I'll look into this.
>
> A new build of the util-linux package, 2.33.1-3, now includes fallocate
> and its man
On 1/23/2024 4:41 PM, Mark Geisert via Cygwin wrote:
On 1/23/2024 3:36 AM, Roland Mainz via Cygwin wrote:
Small bug report:
Cygwin 3.5. now has support for SEEK_HOLE (thanks! :-) ), but
/usr/bin/fallocate is still missing in the "util-linux" package.
Can someone please enable
gt; > /usr/bin/fallocate is still missing in the "util-linux" package.
> >
> > Can someone please enable that tool ?
>
> Good catch!
>
> @Corinna Vinschen
> Does /usr/bin/cp in Cygwin copy holes correctly?
cp, mv, tar, pax must be sparse file awar
On 24/01/2024 06:33, Cedric Blancher via Cygwin wrote:
> Does /usr/bin/cp in Cygwin copy holes correctly
Yesterday, within the 'ware,
I saw some bytes that weren't there!
They weren't there again today,
They'd better not just go away.
--
Sam Edge
(with apologies to Willian Hughes Mearns)
Open
On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 12:37, Roland Mainz via Cygwin wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> -
>
> Small bug report:
> Cygwin 3.5. now has support for SEEK_HOLE (thanks! :-) ), but
> /usr/bin/fallocate is still missing in the "util-linux" package.
>
> Can someone please e
On 1/23/2024 3:36 AM, Roland Mainz via Cygwin wrote:
Small bug report:
Cygwin 3.5. now has support for SEEK_HOLE (thanks! :-) ), but
/usr/bin/fallocate is still missing in the "util-linux" package.
Can someone please enable that tool ?
I'll look into this.
..mark
--
Hi!
-
Small bug report:
Cygwin 3.5. now has support for SEEK_HOLE (thanks! :-) ), but
/usr/bin/fallocate is still missing in the "util-linux" package.
Can someone please enable that tool ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org
\__\/\
Hi list,
I just published a docker image with all the necessary build dependencies
(except
for dumper.exe) for building cygwin. We are using it to compile our WinDRBD
driver
and with a few additional packages it was possible to compile cygwin
(newlib-cygwin)
as well.
This is how to obtain it:
The following package has been upgraded in the Cygwin distribution:
* man-pages-linux 6.05.01
Documents the Linux kernel system calls and C library interfaces used
by programs, plus system and administrative utilities, devices, file
system, file, and data formats, and related information
Hi Bruno,
On Apr 18 14:47, Bruno Haible via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The renameat2 function is "Linux-specific", says the man page [1]; however,
> Cygwin implements it as well.
>
> In Cygwin 3.4.6, in a specific case, it operates differently than the
> Lin
Hi,
The renameat2 function is "Linux-specific", says the man page [1]; however,
Cygwin implements it as well.
In Cygwin 3.4.6, in a specific case, it operates differently than the
Linux function. Namely, if the old* arguments and the new* arguments
are the same and the flag RENAME_NO
The following package has been upgraded in the Cygwin distribution:
* man-pages-linux 6.04
Documents the Linux kernel system calls and C library interfaces used
by programs, plus system and administrative utilities, devices, file
system, file, and data formats, and related information
On Mar 25 13:03, Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote:
> On 2023-03-25 05:49, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> It looks like /proc/locales contains the same content as produced by locale
> -a?
Yes, locale -a actually opens /proc/locales to read the locales from the
Cygwin core, just as it opens /pro
On Mar 25 13:03, Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote:
> On 2023-03-25 05:49, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > On Mar 24 16:49, Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote:
> > I never heard about an environment variable called LANGUAGE. This is
> > about LANG/LC_ALL/LC_whatever, so POSIX syntax is required...
>
On 2023-03-25 05:49, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
On Mar 24 16:49, Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote:
On 2023-03-24 06:18, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
First, it's a bug in the Emacs testsuite. The test simply assumes that
there's no en_DE locale on any system, but that's just not true
On Mar 24 16:49, Brian Inglis via Cygwin wrote:
> On 2023-03-24 06:18, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> > > First, it's a bug in the Emacs testsuite. The test simply assumes that
> > > there's no en_DE locale on any system, but that's just not true.
> > > Windows support the RFC 5646 locale "e
On 2023-03-24 06:18, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
On Mar 23 22:14, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
On Mar 23 15:48, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
I'm reporting this here rather than the newlib list because the behavior is
compatible with Posix but not Linux, so I think it'
e (LC_COLLATE_MASK | LC_CTYPE_MASK, locale,
> > > > 0);
> > > >if (!loc)
> > > > perror ("newlocale");
> > > >else
> > > > printf ("newlocale succeeded on invalid locale %s\n", locale);
> > > &g
locale_t loc = newlocale (LC_COLLATE_MASK | LC_CTYPE_MASK, locale, 0);
if (!loc)
perror ("newlocale");
else
printf ("newlocale succeeded on invalid locale %s\n", locale);
}
$ gcc -o locale_test locale_test.c
$ ./locale_test.exe
newlocale succeeded on invali
On Mar 23 22:14, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
> On Mar 23 15:48, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> > I'm reporting this here rather than the newlib list because the behavior is
> > compatible with Posix but not Linux, so I think it's a Cygwin issue.
>
>
On Mar 23 15:48, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> I'm reporting this here rather than the newlib list because the behavior is
> compatible with Posix but not Linux, so I think it's a Cygwin issue.
Actually, it's a Windows issue :)
> Consider the following test case:
Am 23.03.2023 um 20:48 schrieb Ken Brown via Cygwin:
I'm reporting this here rather than the newlib list because the
behavior is compatible with Posix but not Linux, so I think it's a
Cygwin issue.
Consider the following test case:
$ cat locale_test.c
#include
#include
I'm reporting this here rather than the newlib list because the behavior
is compatible with Posix but not Linux, so I think it's a Cygwin issue.
Consider the following test case:
$ cat locale_test.c
#include
#include
int main ()
{
const char *locale = "en_DE.UTF-8&q
ine 3: $'clear\r': command not found
> ^^^
> >> Dr▒cken sie beliebige Tasten und dann return
> >> ': not a valid identifierd: `TASTE
> >> These are just two of several issues coming up with bash scripting in
> >> Cy
not found
^^^
Dr▒cken sie beliebige Tasten und dann return
': not a valid identifierd: `TASTE
These are just two of several issues coming up with bash scripting in
Cygwin. Maybe this is merely a corse problem with my platform
understanding. But why is Cygwin calling er
ust two of several issues coming up with bash scripting in
Cygwin. Maybe this is merely a corse problem with my platform
understanding. But why is Cygwin calling errors when performing standard
Linux bash commands? Is it due to a different syntax? Or is it even simpler?
It looks like your scr
in
Cygwin. Maybe this is merely a corse problem with my platform
understanding. But why is Cygwin calling errors when performing standard
Linux bash commands? Is it due to a different syntax? Or is it even simpler?
I would appreciate any advice and information on this. As i said, i am
quite used t
The following package has been upgraded in the Cygwin distribution:
* man-pages-linux 6.03
Documents the Linux kernel system calls and C library interfaces used
by programs, plus system and administrative utilities, devices, file
system, file, and data formats, and related information
The following package has been upgraded in the Cygwin distribution:
* man-pages-linux 6.02
Documents the Linux kernel system calls and C library interfaces used
by programs, plus system and administrative utilities, devices, file
system, file, and data formats, and related information
The following package has been upgraded in the Cygwin distribution:
* man-pages-linux 6.01
Documents the Linux kernel system calls and C library interfaces used
by programs, plus system and administrative utilities, devices, file
system, file, and data formats, and related information
The following package has been upgraded in the Cygwin distribution:
* man-pages-linux 6.00
Documents the Linux kernel system calls and C library interfaces used
by programs, plus system and administrative utilities, devices, file
system, file, and data formats, and related information
oo long to manage.
> -- Chris
> On 2022-03-31 06:18, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> Greetings, Greco Giovanni!
>>
>>> must port 22 on Windows server be enabled in a bidirectional way to
>>> establish a connection with RSA key exchange?
>>> I have a Linux server on a
Windows server be enabled in a bidirectional way to
establish a connection with RSA key exchange?
I have a Linux server on a vlan and a Windows server on another vlan, those
vlans are connected thru a firewall, where port 22 is enabled from Linux
server to Windows server unidirectionally.
Connection
Greetings, Greco Giovanni!
> must port 22 on Windows server be enabled in a bidirectional way to
> establish a connection with RSA key exchange?
> I have a Linux server on a vlan and a Windows server on another vlan, those
> vlans are connected thru a firewall, where port 22 is enable
Hello,
must port 22 on Windows server be enabled in a bidirectional way to establish a
connection with RSA key exchange?
I have a Linux server on a vlan and a Windows server on another vlan, those
vlans are connected thru a firewall, where port 22 is enabled from Linux server
to Windows server
On 12/3/2021 3:56 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Goswami-EXT, Himanshu writes:
I want to generate the Linux compatible binaries on Windows System.
If you are on a recent Windows version your easiest option is probably
to use WSL and use native compilation on Linux. second easiest is
likely to set up
Goswami-EXT, Himanshu writes:
> I want to generate the Linux compatible binaries on Windows System.
If you are on a recent Windows version your easiest option is probably
to use WSL and use native compilation on Linux. second easiest is
likely to set up a VM to run Linux in (that might actua
On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 8:51 AM Goswami-EXT, Himanshu
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I want to generate the Linux compatible binaries on Windows System.
> Cygwin is a cross compiler which offers POSIX environment.
> But I could not find any Unix libraries to generate the Linux compatible
&
On 12/3/2021 11:50 AM, Goswami-EXT, Himanshu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to generate the Linux compatible binaries on Windows System.
> Cygwin is a cross compiler which offers POSIX environment.
> But I could not find any Unix libraries to generate the Linux compatible
binaries.
>
Hi,
I want to generate the Linux compatible binaries on Windows System.
Cygwin is a cross compiler which offers POSIX environment.
But I could not find any Unix libraries to generate the Linux compatible
binaries.
Could you please advice any steps that I can follow?
Thanks in Advance.
Himanshu
The following new package has been added to the Cygwin distribution:
* man-pages-linux 5.13
Documents the Linux kernel system calls and C library interfaces used
by programs, plus system and administrative utilities, devices, file
system, file, and data formats, and related information
On 2021-08-13 14:48, Richard Beels via Cygwin wrote:
At 8/13/2021 at 01:11, Shakespearean monkeys danced on Brian Inglis's
keyboard and said:
I suggested linux-manpages a while back, as it comes from the same
source as posix-manpages, and I install it myself, but did not get
voted to pa
At 8/13/2021 at 01:11, Shakespearean monkeys danced on Brian Inglis's
keyboard and said:
I suggested linux-manpages a while back, as it comes from the same
source as posix-manpages, and I install it myself, but did not get
voted to package, due to duplication with conflicting prior
releases/years
behind.
Also, I'll throw in an oddball request to save a bucket of headers -
linux manpages. I see the posix ones are packaged for the cyg, it would
be nice to also get the linux manpages packaged in similar fashion.
Cheers - glad those are helping some - looking at
in an oddball request to save a bucket of headers -
linux manpages. I see the posix ones are packaged for the cyg, it
would be nice to also get the linux manpages packaged in similar fashion.
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.co
On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 10:08:58AM +0200, Roberto Sabelli via Cygwin wrote:
> Hi everyone, I have this problem that I can't solve:
>
> I have a linux server (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 64bit) and a Windows
> server (Windows Server 2016 Datacenter).
> CYGWIN v. 1.5.22 is inst
Hi everyone, I have this problem that I can't solve:
I have a linux server (Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 64bit) and a Windows
server (Windows Server 2016 Datacenter).
CYGWIN v. 1.5.22 is installed on the Windows server.
If I make an SSH connection between the Linux server and the Windows serve
On Jul 11 12:33, Ken Brown via Cygwin wrote:
> While investigating an emacs bug
> (https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=49524), I noticed a
> difference in the behavior of cfsetspeed(3) on Cygwin and Linux. I'm not
> sure we should "fix" this, because Cygwin&#x
While investigating an emacs bug
(https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=49524), I noticed a difference in
the behavior of cfsetspeed(3) on Cygwin and Linux. I'm not sure we should "fix"
this, because Cygwin's behavior is consistent with the Linux man page, and
Lin
On Sat, Dec 05, 2020 at 12:43:25PM +0300, cygwin wrote:
> Strange. On Win7 this doesn't work:
>
> il@mar2 /cygdrive/c/Windows/System32
> $ cat /proc/partitions
> major minor #blocks name win-mounts
>
> 8 0 0 sda
> 816 0 sdb
>
> il@mar2 /cy
Strange. On Win7 this doesn't work:
il@mar2 /cygdrive/c/Windows/System32
$ cat /proc/partitions
major minor #blocks name win-mounts
8 0 0 sda
816 0 sdb
il@mar2 /cygdrive/c/Windows/System32
$ dd of=/dev/null if=/dev/sda bs=1M
On 2020-11-28 01:08, Basin Ilya via Cygwin wrote:
Actually I have nothing to add to the subject. blockdev.exe missing in
util-linux. How to determine block device size in bash?
$ cat /proc/partitions
major minor #blocks name win-mounts
8 0 976762584 sda
8 1 16384 sda1
Hi list.
Actually I have nothing to add to the subject. blockdev.exe missing in
util-linux. How to determine block device size in bash?
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020, 5:12 PM René Berber via Cygwin
wrote:
> On 9/23/2020 1:07 PM, Jim McNamara via Cygwin wrote:
>
> > I tried to use tigervnc to connect to a linux virtualbox guest from
> cygwin.
>
> Those 3 things are independent, i.e. there's no VNC in Cygwin (OK
On 9/23/2020 1:07 PM, Jim McNamara via Cygwin wrote:
I tried to use tigervnc to connect to a linux virtualbox guest from cygwin.
Those 3 things are independent, i.e. there's no VNC in Cygwin (OK there
is, but you don't need it... and installing an X server just for that is
over
Hi all-
I tried to use tigervnc to connect to a linux virtualbox guest from cygwin.
I am not sure it is possible after many attempts.
I did have ssh working and x forwarding of smallish APPS.
Thanks for any insight.
Roboloki
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ
>1 [main] ssh 11260 find_fast_cwd: WARNING: Couldn't compute FAST_CWD pointer
>The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential.
>If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all
>copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message
1 [main] ssh 11260 find_fast_cwd: WARNING: Couldn't compute FAST_CWD pointer
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all
copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in a
On Jul 27 22:52, marty leisner via Cygwin wrote:
> I want to cross compile cygwin programs on linux.
>
> I vaguely recall there was a debian package for this years ago. No luck
> now.
>
> All my web searches talk about cross compiling on cygwin for linux.
>
> I
I want to cross compile cygwin programs on linux.
I vaguely recall there was a debian package for this years ago. No luck
now.
All my web searches talk about cross compiling on cygwin for linux.
I wonder if there's a pre-assembled kit to do this (i.e. include files,
libraries, and specs
The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution:
* util-linux-2.33.1-2
* libblkid1-2.33.1-2
* libblkid-devel-2.33.1-2
* libfdisk1-2.33.1-2
* libfdisk-devel-2.33.1-2
* libsmartcols1-2.33.1-2
* libsmartcols-devel-2.33.1-2
* libuuid1-2.33.1-2
* libuuid-devel-2.33.1-2
* uuidd
On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 15:18 +0530, vishnu via Cygwin wrote:
> I have installed cygwin.
> I am trying to compile linux kernel.It is for x86 platform.
> But When I give below command:
> #make
> CC scripts/mod/empty.o
> cc1: error: code model kernel does not support
Hi Team,
I have installed cygwin.
I am trying to compile linux kernel.It is for x86 platform.
But When I give below command:
#make
CC scripts/mod/empty.o
cc1: error: code model kernel does not support PIC mode
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:268: scripts/mod/empty.o] Error 1
make
Cygwin and/or Windows for what they can
do on Linux.
Agreed - glad to help! Eliot
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: https://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
. I need to research the packaging steps because I intend
to ITA this package. I do also want to take another look at the other programs
built as part of --enable-schedutils; they might (or might not) build cleanly
but AFAIK there's no support within Cygwin and/or Windows for what they c
On 2020-03-23 03:42, Mark Geisert wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Mar 21 10:41, Brian Inglis wrote:
>>> On 2020-03-21 02:18, Mark Geisert wrote:
Eliot Moss wrote:
> On 3/20/2020 1:54 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:
>> I've reproduced your snags. It/they are due to my having forgotten
>>
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 21 10:41, Brian Inglis wrote:
On 2020-03-21 02:18, Mark Geisert wrote:
Eliot Moss wrote:
On 3/20/2020 1:54 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:
I've reproduced your snags. It/they are due to my having forgotten
another tiny update that should have been part of the
2.33.1-cyg
On Mar 21 10:41, Brian Inglis wrote:
> On 2020-03-21 02:18, Mark Geisert wrote:
> > Eliot Moss wrote:
> >> On 3/20/2020 1:54 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:
> >>> I've reproduced your snags. It/they are due to my having forgotten
> >>> another tiny update that should have been part of the
> >>> 2.33.1-cy
gt;
> > Of course. AFAICT taskset does not need the syscall, it just needs the
> > library call to work. Asking about the syscall is, I suppose, a kind of
> > Linux
> > shorthand to see if something is supported on the particular platform.
> > Mark's
> >
PS - The same patches work fine for a 32-bit build (I just test it). Again, I
can supply the package files if desired.
Regards - EM
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubsc
the corresponding syscall. The whole builds and installs. I can
provide the packaged up version (I assume that is the 'dist' hierarchy) if
that would be helpful.
Regards - Eliot
NAME="util-linux"
VERSION=2.33.1
RELEASE=1
CATEGORY="Base"
SUMMARY="Collection of b
en /usr/bin/taskset
>> works. In fact, it seems that the version in .libs is the "real" program
>> and /usr/bin/taskset is some kind of trampoline (?) to it?
> Libtool wrapper is shell script on Unix/Linux and executable on Microsoft
Windows OS. Goal of
> "wrapp
On 2020-03-21 02:18, Mark Geisert wrote:
> Eliot Moss wrote:
>> On 3/20/2020 1:54 AM, Mark Geisert wrote:
>>> I've reproduced your snags. It/they are due to my having forgotten
>>> another tiny update that should have been part of the
>>> 2.33.1-cygwin-cpuset.patch file. If you
>>> 'echo "#defin
ot;real" program
and /usr/bin/taskset is some kind of trampoline (?) to it?
Libtool wrapper is shell script on Unix/Linux and executable on Microsoft Windows OS.
Goal of "wrapper" is to prepare environment in the way that allows to run real
executable without installation.
Project that
Am 21.03.2020 um 12:07 schrieb Eliot Moss:
So here's a thing, though I don't understand it:
In addition the build/taskset.exe, there's a build/.libs/taskset.exe.
that is usually the unstripped version
If I install the latter in /usr/bin/.libs/taskset.exe, then
/usr/bin/taskset
works. In fa
So here's a thing, though I don't understand it:
In addition the build/taskset.exe, there's a build/.libs/taskset.exe.
If I install the latter in /usr/bin/.libs/taskset.exe, then /usr/bin/taskset
works. In fact, it seems that the version in .libs is the "real" program
and /usr/bin/taskset is som
king from the Cygwin util-linux-2.33.1-1 source package. Is that the
correct one? Also, I am in the x86-64 world for all this.
Eliot
--
Problem reports: https://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: https://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation:https://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubsc
bout the syscall is, I suppose, a kind of Linux
shorthand to see if something is supported on the particular platform. Mark's
suggestion of providing a fake definition of that syscall definition is a
workaround that may disturb the util-linux sources the least.
What I did here was defini
1 - 100 of 1172 matches
Mail list logo
