Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 08:34:40PM -0800, Igor Furlan wrote:
--- Christopher Faylor wrote:
I don't know why every message I send on this subject requires such
intense clarification.
Bruno is showing willingness to help ... That's all
I *understand* tha
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 08:34:40PM -0800, Igor Furlan wrote:
>--- Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>I don't know why every message I send on this subject requires such
>>intense clarification.
>
>Bruno is showing willingness to help ... That's all
I *understand* that. I appreciate that. I apologize f
--- Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> I don't know why every message I send on this
> subject requires such
> intense clarification.
Bruno is showing willingness to help ... That's all
>
> What difference does it make if you are or are not
> needed to run new
> tests? Are you going to have to
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 09:50:34PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 04:19:50PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
>>>(setup.log.full) xac
>>
>>I don't know if anyone is following the discussion in the cygwin-apps
>>mailing list but it looks like a few setup prob
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 04:19:50PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
(setup.log.full) xac
I don't know if anyone is following the discussion in the cygwin-apps
mailing list but it looks like a few setup problems have been discovered
and a new setup.exe may be imminent. Th
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 04:19:50PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
>(setup.log.full) xac
I don't know if anyone is following the discussion in the cygwin-apps
mailing list but it looks like a few setup problems have been discovered
and a new setup.exe may be imminent. The problem where setup.exe doesn'
Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes:
>
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 04:31:53PM +, Roboco Sanchez wrote:
> >The setup.exe should do the installation job properly.
> >[snip]
> >As for what our two develpers said, I do respect them for what they do
> >for us but I wouldn't tell my users to shut
(second time setup.log.full) xae
xae
Description: Binary data
(second time setup.log.full) xab
--- Begin Message ---
cygcheck.out.after2
Cygwin Configuration Diagnostics
Current System Time: Sat Nov 13 10:59:42 2004
Windows XP Home Edition Ver 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Path: c:\program files\imagemagick-5.5.7-q16
C:\WINDOWS\system32
C:\WINDOWS
C:\WINDOWS\Sys
--- Begin Message ---
cygcheck.out.after1
Cygwin Configuration Diagnostics
Current System Time: Sat Nov 13 10:54:59 2004
Windows XP Home Edition Ver 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Path: c:\program files\imagemagick-5.5.7-q16
C:\WINDOWS\system32
C:\WINDOWS
C:\WINDOWS\Sys
cygcheck.out.before
Cygwin Configuration Diagnostics
Current System Time: Sat Nov 13 10:45:39 2004
Windows XP Home Edition Ver 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Path: c:\program files\imagemagick-5.5.7-q16
C:\WINDOWS\system32
C:\WINDOWS
C:\WINDOWS\System32\Wbem
C:\P
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:32:51PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
So my work is to begin a new complete install with the new packages.
Do I have to reload all of them ? only xorg related packages ?
You have to do whatever it is that you do to cause the problem.
The mir
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:32:51PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
>So my work is to begin a new complete install with the new packages.
>Do I have to reload all of them ? only xorg related packages ?
You have to do whatever it is that you do to cause the problem.
The mirror has been updated (I create
>
>ftp://mirrors.sunsite.dk/pub/cygwin/release/X11/xorg-x11-fscl/
>WIW,
http://mirrors.rcn.com/pub/sourceware/cygwin/release/X11/xorg-x11-fscl/
>hows that this file is now updated on the mirrors.rcn.net mirror.
>Bobby, do you want to try that one?
>cgf
Trying it now. Let me see here.
> >hope that helps
>>
>> I'm noticing a bunch of XFree86 modules in this cygcheck, too.
>>
>> Where are they coming from? I wouldn't have expected many XFree86
>> modules in a clean install.
>Installing everything should also grab all of the empty XFree86 upgrade
>elpers.
Igor, it was grabbing t
One question that should have been asked long before: is your disk full?
Do you perhaps have quotas enabled?
Igor
Igor,
Ok, I verified, there are quotas on xp but on MY box they are deactivated.
Bruno
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 03:39:23PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 09:22:16PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
>> >Good evening again,
>> >
>> >install in two phases worked well. I can deinstall again and verify if
>> >there is the
Installing everything should also grab all of the empty XFree86 upgrade
helpers.
Igor
I'll have to read closely the doc on setup as I do not understand what
you mean by "empty XFreee86 upgrade".
Bruno
One question that should have been asked long before: is your disk full?
Do you perhaps have quotas enabled?
Igor
For this one, it is easy, my box is a completely new one. I have plenty
of room but for any quota mechanism (is there one on xp ?)
Bruno
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 09:22:16PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
> >Good evening again,
> >
> >install in two phases worked well. I can deinstall again and verify if
> >there is the problem again ? could it be useful ?
> >
> >joined :
> >an analysis of
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, bruno patin wrote:
> Christopher,
>
> I'm not understanding really well what to do (you know my proficiency in
> english is not so perfect as to understand really everything). I understand
> that you think that to open for writing a name where the directory do no exist
> could
Christopher,
I'm not understanding really well what to do (you know my proficiency in
english is not so perfect as to understand really everything). I
understand that you think that to open for writing a name where the
directory do no exist could provoke problems. It would explain the non
block
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Carlo Florendo wrote:
> >
> > > [snip]
> > > In any case, here's setup.log.bz2. (Compressed since it is greater than
> > > 100K) The WinXP SP2 machine is accessible to me off-line. Thus, the
> > > del
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 07:27:32PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
>>So, Bruno, could you periodically check:
>>
>>ftp://mirrors.sunsite.dk/pub/cygwin/release/X11/xorg-x11-fscl/
>>
>>wait until the file xorg-x11-fscl-6.8.1.0-2.tar.bz2 shows
>>today's date, and then try your test case again to see if it
>
So, Bruno, could you periodically check:
ftp://mirrors.sunsite.dk/pub/cygwin/release/X11/xorg-x11-fscl/
wait until the file xorg-x11-fscl-6.8.1.0-2.tar.bz2 shows
today's date, and then try your test case again to see if it
hangs? I think that setup.exe should do the right thing and
download the c
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:20:57PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>So, Bruno, could you periodically check:
>
>ftp://mirrors.sunsite.dk/pub/cygwin/release/X11/xorg-x11-fscl/
FWIW, http://mirrors.rcn.com/pub/sourceware/cygwin/release/X11/xorg-x11-fscl/
shows that this file is now updated on the m
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 06:42:44PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
>Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
>
>>bruno patin wrote:
>>
>>>something I forgot, the number of handler increases at the same speed
>>>as the memory. I suspect that this resource is not released when
>>>exiting setup because when doing my experi
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
bruno patin wrote:
something I forgot, the number of handler increases at the same speed
as the memory. I suspect that this resource is not released when
exiting setup because when doing my experiments my computer is being
slower and slower.
What is the actual limit for N
bruno patin wrote:
something I forgot, the number of handler increases at the same speed as
the memory. I suspect that this resource is not released when exiting
setup because when doing my experiments my computer is being slower and
slower.
What is the actual limit for NT? I never was aware th
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 09:22:16PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
Good evening again,
install in two phases worked well. I can deinstall again and verify if
there is the problem again ? could it be useful ?
joined :
an analysis of my system
the cygcheck result
hope that he
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 09:22:16PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
>Good evening again,
>
>install in two phases worked well. I can deinstall again and verify if
>there is the problem again ? could it be useful ?
>
>joined :
>an analysis of my system
>the cygcheck result
>
>hope that helps
I'm noticing
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:15:16PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
Last experiment,
I use the ollydbg tool in order to begin to see what is the problem
inside setup. It traps also the debug messae of setup and one ofit
consists of saying (as it is given by this tool) :
"fa
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 01:15:16PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
>Last experiment,
>
>I use the ollydbg tool in order to begin to see what is the problem
>inside setup. It traps also the debug messae of setup and one ofit
>consists of saying (as it is given by this tool) :
>
>"failed too open
>cygfi
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
bruno patin wrote:
Ok there the status
As already stated a loop somewhere that consume memory with time when
installing /usr/X11R6/share/doc/Cygwin/xorg-x11-fscl-6.8.1.README
the joined files:
1 cygcheck.txt (this mail)
This is perhaps a problem:
TEMP = `C:\DOCUME~1\bruno\L
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
bruno patin wrote:
Ok there the status
As already stated a loop somewhere that consume memory with time when
installing /usr/X11R6/share/doc/Cygwin/xorg-x11-fscl-6.8.1.README
the joined files:
1 cygcheck.txt (this mail)
This is perhaps a problem:
TEMP = `C:\DOCUME~1\bruno\L
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
bruno patin wrote:
Ok there the status
As already stated a loop somewhere that consume memory with time when
installing /usr/X11R6/share/doc/Cygwin/xorg-x11-fscl-6.8.1.README
the joined files:
1 cygcheck.txt (this mail)
This is perhaps a problem:
TEMP = `C:\DOCUME~1\bruno\L
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
bruno patin wrote:
Ok there the status
As already stated a loop somewhere that consume memory with time when
installing /usr/X11R6/share/doc/Cygwin/xorg-x11-fscl-6.8.1.README
the joined files:
1 cygcheck.txt (this mail)
This is perhaps a problem:
TEMP = `C:\DOCUME~1\bruno\L
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
bruno patin wrote:
Ok there the status
As already stated a loop somewhere that consume memory with time when
installing /usr/X11R6/share/doc/Cygwin/xorg-x11-fscl-6.8.1.README
the joined files:
1 cygcheck.txt (this mail)
This is perhaps a problem:
TEMP = `C:\DOCUME~1\bruno\L
following the work I can say there are two messages and that they are
issued in the logFile.cc file of setup and thee messages are numbered :
first : "LOG : 1 Installing file cygfile"
second "LOG : 2 (see my last mail)"
hope that helps
BPatin
bruno patin wrote:
Ok there the status
As already stated a loop somewhere that consume memory with time when
installing /usr/X11R6/share/doc/Cygwin/xorg-x11-fscl-6.8.1.README
the joined files:
1 cygcheck.txt (this mail)
This is perhaps a problem:
TEMP = `C:\DOCUME~1\bruno\LOCALS~1\Temp'
TMP = `C:\
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Carlo Florendo wrote:
[snip]
In any case, here's setup.log.bz2. (Compressed since it is greater than
100K) The WinXP SP2 machine is accessible to me off-line. Thus, the
delay in the sending of these files.
[...]
Hmm, the fact that it attempts to reins
Carlo Florendo wrote:
Cygwin Rocks!
Yes.
I tried to reproduce the problem on the WinXP SP2 machine in question
and I was unsuccessful in reproducing it...
Cygwin installed like a charm =)
Now, I don't know why such is the case.
Hmmm...To tell the truth, I was actually asking someone to follow
Last experiment,
I use the ollydbg tool in order to begin to see what is the problem
inside setup. It traps also the debug messae of setup and one ofit
consists of saying (as it is given by this tool) :
"failed too open
cygfile:///usr/X11R6/share/doc/Cygwin/xorg-x11-fscl-6.8.1.0.README for
wri
rsday, November 11, 2004 5:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: xorg installation fails, 99% complete only
Freezing back under SP2.
Here is the ps and cygcheck.
Freezing back under SP2.
Here is the ps and cygcheck.
cygcheck.out
Description: Binary data
ps.out
Description: Binary data
(As I had problems sending this mail, you'll receive it as the last one,
excuse me, there is only the setup.log, before you have the three last
compressed part of the setup full and after the first part)
Good morning this time,
Ok I'm here again.
The situation.
The problem occurs when I do a com
the last
setupfull4.txt.bz2
Description: Binary data
the third
setupfull3.txt.bz2
Description: Binary data
second file
setupfull2.txt.bz2
Description: Binary data
Carlo Florendo wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
It seems like you have a lot of XFree86 packages still installed.
I have a couple of these in my installation but certainly not the
number that I see above.
Yes. I did it after installing cygwin minus xorg. Regarding the
(version) numbers, I don'
Christopher Faylor wrote:
It seems like you have a lot of XFree86 packages still installed.
I have a couple of these in my installation but certainly not the
number that I see above.
Yes. I did it after installing cygwin minus xorg. Regarding the
(version) numbers, I don't remember choosing oth
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
What did you do, exactly, on the last setup run? The log file shows that
you installed the following packages:
startup-notification-0.7-1
transfig-3.2.4-2
xorg-x11-bin-dlls-6.8.1.0-1
xorg-x11-devel-6.8.1.0-1
xorg-x11-fcyr-6.8.1.0-2
xorg-x11-fenc-6.8.1.0-2
xorg-x11-fscl-6.8
bruno patin wrote:
Good evening again,
install in two phases worked well. I can deinstall again and verify if
there is the problem again ? could it be useful ?
joined :
an analysis of my system
the cygcheck result
Please add -r to the cygcheck options for the registry scan.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 08:54:17AM +0800, Carlo Florendo wrote:
>XFree86-base4.3.0-11
>XFree86-bin 4.3.0-21
>XFree86-bin-icons 4.3.0-7
>XFree86-doc 4.3.0-2
>XFree86-etc 4.3.0-12
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, Carlo Florendo wrote:
[snip]
In any case, here's setup.log.bz2. (Compressed since it is greater than
100K) The WinXP SP2 machine is accessible to me off-line. Thus, the
delay in the sending of these files.
Carlo,
What did you do, exactly, on the last setup run? The log file
Igor,
I've tried to chmod directly the var directory thinking it could be the
answer but it does not work. I block on the same file and that's all. I
don't think sending you another cygcheck is really necessary. I'll find
a way to follow what's going on in the setup app. Perhaps you have ideas ?
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, bruno patin wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Also, I believe that Gerrit suggested sending the contents of the
setup
> log files.
>
> [snip]
>
> I appreciate that you're trying to think of solutions here but there
> have already been a couple of sugg
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, bruno patin wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Also, I believe that Gerrit suggested sending the contents of the setup
> log files.
>
> [snip]
>
> I appreciate that you're trying to think of solutions here but there
> have already been a couple of suggestions that no one seems
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Darryl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> 1) Cygwin is not a commercial set up , we do not pay support fees, we do
> not even pay for Cygwin.
>
> 2) We accept red hat owns the IP
>
> 3) The "developers & supporters" are volunteers, they do not HAVE to be
> nice and have the "customer is always
Hi!
1) Cygwin is not a commercial set up , we do not pay support fees, we do
not even pay for Cygwin.
2) We accept red hat owns the IP
3) The "developers & supporters" are volunteers, they do not HAVE to be
nice and have the "customer is always right" approach as opposed to some of
us in the co
I appreciate that you're trying to think of solutions here but there
have already been a couple of suggestions that no one seems to have
bothered to follow through on. Why not just humor us and provide the
debugging info that we're asking for?
cgf
I'm on it really :-)
I'll give you what
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 10:50:58PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
>>Is there some reason why you won't just run cygcheck.exe while setup is
>>hung? Have you tried it? AFAIK, cygcheck should be operational by the
>>time setup has gotten to installing X. It really has to be operational
>>since cygcheck
Is there some reason why you won't just run cygcheck.exe while setup is
hung? Have you tried it? AFAIK, cygcheck should be operational by the
time setup has gotten to installing X. It really has to be operational
since cygcheck.exe comes along with the Cygwin DLL.
Also, you could even run, oh I
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:43:02PM +0100, bruno patin wrote:
>Good evening from france,
>
>I bought a new box some days ago and decided to install cygwin. I had
>exactly the same install problem than the other people of the list. My
>computer is a win xp family edition sp2. I have the administrat
Good evening again,
install in two phases worked well. I can deinstall again and verify if
there is the problem again ? could it be useful ?
joined :
an analysis of my system
the cygcheck result
hope that helps
Bobby McNulty wrote:
Look, I love Cygwin, xorg, and KDE.
I set up webpage so I can co
Look, I love Cygwin, xorg, and KDE.
I set up webpage so I can contribute to the progect.
And I will. I have to find some soundfonts small enough to distribute with
Timidity.
I wanted to also contribute Rosegarden. It requires KDE and Xorg.
I will try again in a minute here, without xorg, and then i
Good evening from france,
I bought a new box some days ago and decided to install cygwin. I had
exactly the same install problem than the other people of the list. My
computer is a win xp family edition sp2. I have the administrator rights
and installed using the "just me" and "unix" options. Wh
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> Bobby McNulty wrote:
>
> > Sorry for the insult, but under Harolld, he would have everything tested
> > on different machines and configurations. I'm running Windows XP
> > professional with Service Pack #2. Find out what the others are using.
>
> I don't expect people
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
Maybe you need to turn off the firewall?
Firewall is enabled (default settings)
Is it a difference what permissions a user has or in which groups she
is? I am in the Administrators group everywhere.
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 02:41:02AM +0100, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
>Bobby McNulty wrote:
>>Sorry for the insult, but under Harolld, he would have everything
>>tested on different machines and configurations. I'm running Windows
>>XP professional with Service Pack #2. Find out what the others are
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 07:38:41PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Bobby McNulty wrote:
> >
> >> Gerrit, I will try once more.
> >> This time, though, all my software was in place, no service pack, nothing,
> >> just Office.
>
Bobby McNulty wrote:
> Sorry for the insult, but under Harolld, he would have everything tested
> on different machines and configurations. I'm running Windows XP
> professional with Service Pack #2. Find out what the others are using.
I have currently two machines for testing:
Win2k SP4
WinXP SP
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 07:38:41PM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Bobby McNulty wrote:
>
>> Gerrit, I will try once more.
>> This time, though, all my software was in place, no service pack, nothing,
>> just Office.
>> Same spot, same readme file.
>> the mirror I was using was
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> Roboco Sanchez wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure what different posting you're referring to. Maybe they
> > all provide correct information and maybe they are two or more
> > different problems?
>
> One was from Hannu which was about a completely different
ge-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 4:22 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: xorg installation fails, 99% complete only
>
> Bobby McNulty wrote:
>
> > OK Chris, here it is. Th
Roboco Sanchez wrote:
I'm not sure what different posting you're referring to. Maybe they
> all provide correct information and maybe they are two or more
> different problems?
One was from Hannu which was about a completely different issue which I
replied in lenght, the other was from Bobby today
Gerrit P. Haase familiehaase.de> writes:
>
> Bobby McNulty wrote:
>
> > OK Chris, here it is. The full report. Complete down to the readme file
> > that it is hanging at.
> > Cygwin setup is at 97%
> > it says install xorg-x11-fscl-6.8.1.0-2
> > /usr/X11R6/share/doc/Cygwin/xorg-x11-fscl-6.8.1.
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: xorg installation fails, 99% complete only
Bobby McNulty wrote:
> OK Chris, here it is. The full report. Complete down to the readme file
> that
Bobby McNulty wrote:
OK Chris, here it is. The full report. Complete down to the readme file
that it is hanging at.
Cygwin setup is at 97%
it says install xorg-x11-fscl-6.8.1.0-2
/usr/X11R6/share/doc/Cygwin/xorg-x11-fscl-6.8.1.0.README
its in a contiuous loop, not gettiing past this point.
In a d
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 04:31:53PM +, Roboco Sanchez wrote:
>The setup.exe should do the installation job properly.
>[snip]
>As for what our two develpers said, I do respect them for what they do
>for us but I wouldn't tell my users to shut up like that. Being a
>volunteer doing things for peo
Bobby McNulty bellsouth.net> writes:
>
> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 01:04:04PM -0600, Bobby McNulty wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Alexander Gottwald wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Bobby McNulty wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> I'm not installing cygwin on my mach
Thank you all for the replies. I'm sorry but it seems that I wasn't
cc'd for all messages (I mentioned I'm not part of the Cygwin/XFree ML).
So, I just replied to my original message. (Sorry if this breaks the
thread.)
So, I've just checked the ML website and read up to the one of Bobby Mc
Nu
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 01:04:04PM -0600, Bobby McNulty wrote:
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Bobby McNulty wrote:
I'm not installing cygwin on my machine until the xorg problem is
resolved. One program I wanted to port to Cygwin is Rosegarde
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 01:04:04PM -0600, Bobby McNulty wrote:
>Alexander Gottwald wrote:
>>On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Bobby McNulty wrote:
>>>I'm not installing cygwin on my machine until the xorg problem is
>>>resolved. One program I wanted to port to Cygwin is Rosegarden. Which
>>>I can't because Xor
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Bobby McNulty wrote:
I'm not installing cygwin on my machine until the xorg problem is resolved.
One program I wanted to port to Cygwin is Rosegarden.
Which I can't because Xorg is not installing, so that means the kde port
won't work,.
The KDE por
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Bobby McNulty wrote:
> I'm not installing cygwin on my machine until the xorg problem is resolved.
> One program I wanted to port to Cygwin is Rosegarden.
> Which I can't because Xorg is not installing, so that means the kde port
> won't work,.
> The KDE port won't work eithe
Daniel Newhouse wrote:
--- Alexander Gottwald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Bobby McNulty wrote:
Did he also tell why? If the xorg packages are the
problem then
it should be solved instead of avoided.
bye
ago
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gotti.org ICQ: 1
--- Alexander Gottwald
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Bobby McNulty wrote:
>
>
> Did he also tell why? If the xorg packages are the
> problem then
> it should be solved instead of avoided.
>
> bye
> ago
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.gotti.org ICQ
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Bobby McNulty wrote:
> Carlo Florendo wrote:
> Don't install Xorg. that is what Hanu told me.
Did he also tell why? If the xorg packages are the problem then
it should be solved instead of avoided.
bye
ago
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.gotti.org ICQ:
Carlo Florendo wrote:
Hello Cygwin/XFree gurus,
I've installed cygwin on a WinXP SP2 machine and setup looped forever
up to the point when it was post-installing the xorg applications. I
got 99% done.
This issue has been discussed last week only as started by these 2
separate threads of messa
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Carlo Florendo wrote:
> The front page of the cygwin/xfree website says that:
>
> "Cygwin/X is installed via Cygwin's setup.exe and the installation
> process is documented in the Cygwin/X User's Guide. Whether or not you
> already have Cygwin installed, you can add Cygwin/X
92 matches
Mail list logo
