swiss, austria, bilgates, lcs and some others.
So WTF is going on?
You say you received it, which list node are you subscribed to? Did
anyone else receive it?
Subject: Re: ZKS: how EXACTLY does this protect privacy?
Not trying to bombard anyone, just trying to particpate in discussion.
I was ge
> >an economy based on "nyms" is a pipe dream. No human has ever purchased
> >a car, or purchased a home, or taken out a loan, or started a business,
> >or gotten a job by using an anonymous "nym".
> I have started a business, received payment for contract work, purchased
a car,
> and registe
At 8:26 PM -0700 7/12/00, Kevin Elliott wrote:
>At 19:12 -0400 7/12/00, Robert Guerra wrote:
>>>Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 07:23:34 -0700
>>>From: Kevin Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Subject: Re: ZKS: how EXACTLY does this protect privacy?
>>>
>>>
An anonymous Hushmail user wrote:
>Since when does scrambling my IP address have anything to do w/
>my privacy? IP addresses are almost never personally identifying,
>since (a) most corporate users are coming from behind a firewall,
>(b) most consumers have a dynamic DHCP address anyway and (c)
At 23:32 -0700 7/11/00, Tim May wrote:
>[Again, I urge folks to not use toad.com. It is being filtered by
>many of us, due to the hundreds of MakeMoneyFast and HelpMeMakeBombz
>and Spark.Net messages each day. I've changed toad.com over to
>algebra.com, one of the main nodes.]
>
Good point, I'
[Again, I urge folks to not use toad.com. It is being filtered by
many of us, due to the hundreds of MakeMoneyFast and HelpMeMakeBombz
and Spark.Net messages each day. I've changed toad.com over to
algebra.com, one of the main nodes.]
At 1:31 AM -0400 7/12/00, dmolnar wrote:
>On Tue, 11 Jul 2
Note: This message being responded to originally had
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" as the cc: address. Like many, I am filtering
all toad.com traffic into a special folder, for likely dumping. Most
of the list's junk seems to have a toad.com address. Anyway, I caught
Dave Molnar's message here when sca
On Mon, 10 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> both companies seem to make the point that you don't have to trust
> them as a third party, and yet the first thing they ask for is my credit
> card number -
This *is* a problem. Not least because I don't have a credit card. :)
If I recall corr
At 14:47 -0800 7/10/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>could somebody on cypherpunks please explain to me what the whole
>point behind companies like Privada and ZKS really is?
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume your just
ignorant and looking for an education, not obnoxious and
