-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gil wrote:
Faustine writes:
best is write code, write code. The main thing is to DO something, whatever
your skills and talents are. Spare everyone the hot air and just do it.
What *you* say is hot air; what *I* say is policy analysis.
But who's
At 05:14 PM 3/27/02 -0800, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Additionally, Aimee is an Outlook user, and mattd is a Eudora user. The
forgery referenced below was sent from Eudora.
And strings in exe's can't be edited?
I know of folks who've edited the PGP header line to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gil wrote:
Faustine writes:
best is write code, write code. The main thing is to DO something, whatever
your skills and talents are. Spare everyone the hot air and just do it.
What *you* say is hot air; what *I* say is policy analysis.
But who's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Morlock wrote:
And whatever deceptive advantages might possibly come from the *public
perception* of rampant incompetence and donutchompery, the drawbacks are
Optimism may somatize one against dread of reality, but it will surely
impair
to noise proposal)
Faustine
If I was not a lady I would say you are full of shit
On 26 Mar 2002 at 23:07, Faustine wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Faustine:
Aimee wrote:
Well, I doan' kno' nuttin' 'bout no agents. That fact has been
established.
Careful
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Aimee Farr
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Homeland Deception (was RE: signal to noise proposal)
Faustine
If I was not a lady I would say you are full of shit
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Faustine wrote:
Bah. I say it depends entirely on what the lie is, who's being lied to, and
how confident and artistic the confidence artists are.
If they were good enough (and their targets comfortable enough), all three
could be lying their asses off about anything
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim wrote:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Faustine wrote:
Bah. I say it depends entirely on what the lie is, who's being lied to, and
how confident and artistic the confidence artists are.
If they were good enough (and their targets comfortable enough),
Faustine:
Aimee wrote:
To wit, no two people can safely tell the same lie to the same person.
Bah. I say it depends entirely on what the lie is, who's being
lied to, and how
confident and artistic the confidence artists are.
You're probably right.
Choate:
Actually they can, only
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Aimee Farr wrote:
Recursive is just writing backwards.
No it doesn't, it means 'write again'; as in over and over.
--
There is less in this than meets the eye.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Faustine wrote:
Maybe, but whether they're picked up on is the only thing that counts.
Actually not, if the various agents involved act as if the lie is the
truth then at some point their actions will come into conflict. In fact
this sort of behaviour can lead to the
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Aimee Farr wrote:
You know, ME LUCKY CHARMS!
I know the little boys and girls are after me lucky charms.
Silly rabbit, Tricks are for kids!
--
There is less in this than meets
And I thought you were from Texas. ;)
Hold it up to a mirror.
(Well... it does make a point.)
~Aimee
Recursive is just writing backwards.
No it doesn't, it means 'write again'; as in over and over.
--
Faustine wrote:
But what about when the unlucky charmers find they're actually the victims
of a deceivers-deceiving-the-deceivers-deceiving-the-deceivers
kind of thing.
What shows that the snowers know they've slowly been snowed? Bet
it keeps a lot
of people awake at night, that one.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Aimee Farr wrote:
And I thought you were from Texas. ;)
Hold it up to a mirror.
It's the same size it was before, only reversed.
--
There is less in this than meets the eye.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Faustine:
Aimee wrote:
Well, I doan' kno' nuttin' 'bout no agents. That fact has been
established.
Careful parsing is the spice of life... :P
So sayeth the academic-researcher-grad student pretext... :P
ITS A CONSPIRACY -some poor
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Aimee Farr wrote:
To wit, no two people can safely tell the same lie to the same person.
Actually they can, only one (or both, if we allow 3 or more agents, only
one is required to 'know' the lie) of the people must believe it is the
truth.
--
To wit, no two people can safely tell the same lie to the same person.
Choate:
Actually they can, only one (or both, if we allow 3 or more agents, only
one is required to 'know' the lie) of the people must believe it is the
truth.
Well, I doan' kno' nuttin' 'bout no agents. That fact has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
- ... the mailing list
simply records # of posts written by each poster. call
this P
- mailing list records # of times someone wrote
a post that was replied to. ... call this R
- pseudoreputation is a measure of the above two
parameters. one can
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 06:45:20PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- posts to the list are like currency. lurkers
Not a useful analogy. For some people, the more they post, the
lower their reputation falls.
- mailing list records # of times someone wrote
a post that was replied to. posts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Declan wrote:
There may be the germ of an idea here, but I'm hardly convinced an
automated mechanism such as you describe will work.
Even if it did, getting people focused on improving their popularity ratings
rather than contributing ideas is
ahem, yes I am aware any simple system is easily
circumvented defeated, but that doesnt imply
that it will be.
Ive noticed many objections to any new proposal often
take the form, but that would be different
than what we have now!!! wow, amazing, no kidding!!!
I can come up with all kinds of
On Sunday, March 24, 2002, at 12:30 PM, Declan McCullagh wrote:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 06:45:20PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- posts to the list are like currency. lurkers
Not a useful analogy. For some people, the more they post, the
lower their reputation falls.
A lot of the
[Warning to humor/lexicaly impaired: Use of third person 'you' below]
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ahem, yes I am aware any simple system is easily
circumvented defeated, but that doesnt imply
that it will be.
So are most hard systems also :)
ok, fine, status quo stays
hi all. Ive been fascinated with the problem of
signal to noise for as long as Ive been dinking
around in internet-cyberspace (now over a decade).
oldtimers may recall that Ive had many various proposals
over the past on the list.
it does seem that cypherpunks has succumbed to
significant
Already in (limited but growing) existance...
http://open-forge.org
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi all. Ive been fascinated with the problem of
signal to noise for as long as Ive been dinking
around in internet-cyberspace (now over a decade).
oldtimers may recall that
Apart from my recent comments about NoCeM's and on onspool NoCeM
reader, another perhaps simpler idea would be to do it all with simple
CGI stuff and a web archive. I'm sure this has been discussed before
in the past, but I don't recall anyone actually trying it out:
subscribers would choose how
27 matches
Mail list logo
