Yeah--you got it--Poppies...and now that the Warlords are back in
charge the cash crop is back.
Remember that it was the US which encouraged the Taliban to crack down on the
cultivation of Afghanistan poppies. A gift of several million US
dollars convinced the Taliban to ban the farming of
On Wednesday, December 18, 2002, at 10:31 PM, Anonymous wrote:
And again, who cares WHAT happens to governments, as long as I can say
what I want to whomever I want without worry about it being snooped
on. And there's no way they can stop that now, just make things suck a
little until
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Tim May wrote:
I just noticed a disclaimer in a t.v. ad for H-P computers.
Intended only for lawful uses. at the bottom of the screen towards
the end of the commercial.
Strange. Why would H-P or any other computer company feel the need to
include this
I just noticed a disclaimer in a t.v. ad for H-P computers.
Intended only for lawful uses. at the bottom of the screen towards
the end of the commercial.
Strange. Why would H-P or any other computer company feel the need to
include this warning/disclaimer? Worries about legal actions against
--
On 18 Dec 2002 at 9:50, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Yeah, the Objectivists (TM) seem to have been taken over by
militant zionist interventionists too.
Of all the advanced states, Israel is arguably the one that
accords least with Objectivist ideals. It is nominally
socialist in land
On Thursday, December 19, 2002, at 12:29 PM, Michael Motyka wrote:
I believe that the primary battle, subversion of the proprietary OS
and mainstream
applications for intelligence purposes, was over before we even
thought about fighting
it.
Now the commercial interests are being brought into
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:54:57AM -0800, Tim May wrote:
| (Much has been made of how the Microsoft- and Intel-backed security
| regimes will be opt in or voluntary. This seems dubious. It is
| precisely the non-volunteers who these companies, and Hollywood, and
| the Nation States, will be
Steve Schear[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
This crackpot idea is a follow-on to my suggestion for improving public
library privacy in the face of TLA inquiries. The basic notion here is
for
na ISP to allow all its premises to be bugged. Every room (except maybe
the restroom) by its
Yeah, except for the scummy multi level marketing and the rather expensive
$25/month, it's nice, but I'm unsure how much nicer than say, hushmail :)
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
+ ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\
Speculation: I expect the battles over cyberspace to shift to the OS,
with the leading private (non open source) OS makers enlisted in the
War Against Illegal Thoughts. The easiest initial front in this war,
one the OS companies like Apple and Microsoft have a corporate interest
in, is
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 04:56:12PM -0500, John Kelsey wrote:
| At 12:53 PM 12/15/02 -0500, Adam Shostack wrote:
| ...
| I think that a law which re-affirmed the rights to be anonymous, to
| call yourself what you will, to be left alone, to not carry or show ID
| would transform the debate about
11 matches
Mail list logo
