Sarad AV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Seriously, I *highly* doubt that any nation at this
> > time would *seriously*
> > think of bombing another nuclear-enabled nation with
> > a nuclear weapon. It's
> > just suicide.
>
> Well-pakistan has been constantly nuclear black
> mailing india.They say
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 12:22:31PM +0100, Ken Brown wrote:
> Harmon,
>
> your knowledge of the history of the Roman Empire & early Christianity
> is flakier than Choate's physics. Go home and read some history books
> instead of New Age loonies with a persecution complex.
I'm not reading new
Harmon,
your knowledge of the history of the Roman Empire & early Christianity
is flakier than Choate's physics. Go home and read some history books
instead of New Age loonies with a persecution complex.
No point in refuting the heap of ignorance appended below because there
isn't enough meaning
--- Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And then the whole world dies, because of ... what?
>
> Seriously, I *highly* doubt that any nation at this
> time would *seriously*
> think of bombing another nuclear-enabled nation with
> a nuclear weapon. It's
> just suicide.
Well-pakistan has
> Kelsey[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >How ever I wonder if the report of an Apache
> >helicopter being shot down by a farmer with his
> >rifle-the chopper was certainly downed but I find it
> >hard to beleive that a bullet brought it down.
>
> I heard (I think on BBC) that a whole bunch of the cho
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 09:46:46PM +0100, Ken Brown wrote:
> Completely correct. The stuff of modern neo-paganism is synthesised from
> bits of Celtic and Norse lore got from books (books written, of course,
> by Christian priests and monks who preserved the ancient pre-Christian
> stories - withou
"Kevin S. Van Horn" wrote:
> the side contributing the most corpses won.
True of Vietnam of course.
And of WW2, the dead being mainly in Eastern Europe and China.
Arguably of WW1 as well, the Germans lost fewer men on the Western Front
than the Belgians, French and British, but they had more de
at Tuesday, April 01, 2003 11:53 PM, Kevin S. Van Horn
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was seen to say:
> What's a legitimate government? One with enough firepower to make its
> rule stick?
One with real (not imagined) WMD to frighten off american presidents. NK
being a good example...
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 12:16:20PM +0100, Vincent Penquerc'h wrote:
> >I don't think they will need to fight us, just impose
> > sanctions by the UN, or
> > even just a world boycott of the US. That and a few suicide
> > bombers in the US
> > now and again. How many suicide bombers in airport
>I don't think they will need to fight us, just impose
> sanctions by the UN, or
> even just a world boycott of the US. That and a few suicide
> bombers in the US
> now and again. How many suicide bombers in airports would it
> take to finish off
> the US air industry? The rest of the world
Tim May wrote...
You fucking cretin, _you_ are the one who cited the article and then
wrote:
I always get a distinct pleasure out of getting posters to go postal. This
is close and I'm laughing my ass off!
(Even better is to knock a poster out of his nym into a new one. Tim? How
about 'cyphercr
> Relying on httpd operators to protect those who access is plain silly,
> even if echelon (funny how that word dropped below radar lately) did
> not exist.
Echelon could be grouped together with Carnivore and CALEA devices into
the group of Generic Transport-level Eavesdroppers. No need to consid
On Tuesday, April 1, 2003, at 10:43 PM, Sarad AV wrote:
--- Damian Gerow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And then the whole world dies, because of ... what?
Seriously, I *highly* doubt that any nation at this
time would *seriously*
think of bombing another nuclear-enabled nation with
a nuclear weap
Ben,
Would you care to comment for publication on web logging
described in these two files:
http://cryptome.org/no-logs.htm
http://cryptome.org/usage-logs.htm
Cryptome invites comments from others who know the capabilities
of servers to log or not, and other means for protecting user priv
Frankly, it seems that some brains around here are softening. Relying on httpd
operators to protect those who access is plain silly, even if echelon (funny
how that word dropped below radar lately) did not exist.
The proper way is, of course, self-protection. Start with tight control of
outgoing i
At 2:58 PM -0800 4/2/03, John Young wrote:
>Ben,
>
>Would you care to comment for publication on web logging
>described in these two files:
>
> http://cryptome.org/no-logs.htm
>
> http://cryptome.org/usage-logs.htm
>
>Cryptome invites comments from others who know the capabilities
>of servers to
On Wed, 2 Apr 2003, Ken Brown wrote:
> On paper they won on the Eastern Front, but the Soviet Union
> was produced out of the Russian defeat and I suspect many Germans would,
> in the log run, not have thought that that was a good outcome.
One really can't deny that that shipping the secret weapo
At 10:43 PM 4/1/03 -0800, Sarad AV wrote:
>Well-pakistan has been constantly nuclear black
>mailing india.They say that their nuclear options are
>always open and there is nothing india can do about
>it.
>Sarath.
Hilarious, dude. Who got nukes first? India.
See your own propoganda site, http://
hi,
Blitz comes with high casualities.Shock and awe
technique can use troops paratrooping into baghdad.But
casualities are always unacceptable to the U.S. So
they do it the conventional way.
Sarath.
--- Ken Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tyler Durden wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > PS: Anyone notic
After reading this, I feel like I missed something in my original post...
Mike Rosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And then the whole world dies, because of ... what?
>
> Natural stupidity.
Spot on.
> Which is why MAD works. But a regular bombing run on a few oil refineries
> would put th
20 matches
Mail list logo
