On Friday 07 March 2003 00:52, gann wrote:
A tiny fuel cell that detects the alcoholic breath of a
drink-driver and calls the police has been developed snip
I'm in favor of it snip
Neither you nor anyone else has the right to force me or any other
individual to subsidize your welfare.
On Sunday 09 March 2003 10:31 am, david wrote:
Neither you nor anyone else has the right to force me or any other
individual to subsidize your welfare.
This device, if forced on individuals by a government entity, would
violate fourth amendment protections against self-incrimination.
DUI
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 09:31:40 -0500 (est), Sunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Screw that - just buy a few thousand of these little devices, disable them
so that they're always transmitting drunk driver and install them in
politicians' cars all over DC (make sure you install'em in cop
cars too.) You
david wrote:
But you wouldn't mind if insurance companies required the device
in order for you to get a policy (whether or not it called the
police or just the insurance company) ?
Right ?
If I did mind, I'd just find a different insurance company. It's a
little bit harder for me to say, I
At 08:52 AM 03/10/2003 -0500, david [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 09 March 2003 18:16, you [whoever that was?] wrote:
On Sunday 09 March 2003 10:31 am, david wrote:
Neither you nor anyone else has the right to force me or any
other individual to subsidize your welfare.
This device,
I wonder what the effect would be in states like WI which don't require auto
insurance. Insurance is noticably cheaper here than in MN which does require it.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 01:25:05PM -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
At 08:52 AM 03/10/2003 -0500, david [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 00:52:29 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A tiny fuel cell that detects the alcoholic breath of a drink-driver
and calls the police has been developed by a team of engineers at
Texas Christian University. A pump draws air in from the passenger
cabin, a platinum catalyst converts
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:56:36PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not crazy about everything that the government does, but there
are trade- offs in a non-perfect society. One of them is monitoring
the innocent to, in turn, attempt to prevent the guilty from
trampling over everything, God
On Sunday 09 March 2003 18:16, you wrote:
On Sunday 09 March 2003 10:31 am, david wrote:
Neither you nor anyone else has the right to force me or any
other individual to subsidize your welfare.
This device, if forced on individuals by a government entity,
would violate fourth amendment
On Sunday 09 March 2003 18:16, A.Melon wrote:
On Sunday 09 March 2003 10:31 am, david wrote:
Neither you nor anyone else has the right to force me or any
other individual to subsidize your welfare.
This device, if forced on individuals by a government entity,
would violate fourth
Fuck you and fuck the man. I don't need any electronic snitch in my
car. Do you? If you do, maybe you're in need of professional help!
Hey! Keep him alive! :)
If he's genuine, he can serve as a study material for observing the
Adversary-sympathetic mindset. Think zoo, or a lab animal.
The
At 02:56 PM 3/7/03 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not crazy about everything that the government does, but there are
trade-
offs in a non-perfect society. One of them is monitoring the innocent
to, in
turn, attempt to prevent the guilty from trampling over everything,
Allah willing.
Wrong
On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 12:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would fairly entertain said discussion.
Erle
http://ganns.com
You're on the wrong list here for at least four reasons:
1. You're spamming us with some idea I have a hunch you are connected
with in some way.
2. You're a statist.
instead of scraping the bottom of the vocabulary barrel.
- Original Message -
From: Sunder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Sycophantic Boot Licker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:28 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Drunk driver detector that radios police
On Fri, 7 Mar
- Original Message -
From: Major Variola (ret) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 11:28 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Drunk driver detector that radios police
False positives: What about folks with vinegar on their breath?
I think that being pulled over once
- Original Message -
From: Dan Veeneman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 1:42 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Drunk driver detector that radios police
I had an acquaintance years ago that always kept a bottle of cologne
in the car. If he was ever pulled over
ggc University. A pump draws air in from the passenger cabin, a platinum catalyst
ggc converts any alcohol to acetic acid, which then produces a current
ggc proportional to the concentration of alcohol in the air. A chip analyses the
ggc data, and if it is too high, turns on a wireless transmitter
At 10:52 PM -0800 3/6/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A tiny fuel cell that detects the alcoholic breath of a drink-driver and calls
the police has been developed by a team of engineers at Texas Christian
University. A pump draws air in from the passenger cabin, a platinum catalyst
converts any
At 12:52 AM 3/7/03 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A tiny fuel cell that detects the alcoholic breath of a drink-driver
and calls
the police has been developed by a team of engineers at Texas Christian
University. A pump draws air in from the passenger cabin, a platinum
catalyst
converts any
At 09:28 AM 03/07/2003 -0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
At 12:52 AM 3/7/03 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A tiny fuel cell that detects the alcoholic breath of a drink-driver
and calls the police has been developed by a team of engineers
Would you buy one if you're drunk? Would you put one in
At 2:56 PM -0500 on 3/7/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow, easy there, chief.
You're new here, aren'tcha?
:-)
Cheers,
RAH
--
-
R. A. Hettinga mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation http://www.ibuc.com/
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
A tiny fuel cell that detects the alcoholic breath
of a drink-driver and calls the police has been developed by a team of engineers
at Texas Christian University. A pump draws air in from the passenger cabin, a
platinum catalyst converts any alcohol to acetic acid, which then produces a
Screw that - just buy a few thousand of these little devices, disable them
so that they're always transmitting drunk driver and install them in
politicians' cars all over DC (make sure you install'em in cop
cars too.) You can also leave them in cabs.
They'll be banned immediately.
So you hook it up to a wad of cotton dipped in Jack... Whatever. Fuck
Big Brother. Fuck it in the ass until it squeals, then fuck it some more.
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
+ ^ + :NSA got $20Bil/year |Passwords are like underwear. You don't /|\
Good job. You just caused law enforcement to ignore emitters from all cabs,
government, and police vehicles.
My guess is that the unit will perform a self-check and emit a broken signal
instead of drunk. Maybe the police will only pull over broken vehicles not
listed above, knowing that broken
Actually, read the article. It covers sober driver and drunk passengers.
Quoting Bill Frantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
At 10:52 PM -0800 3/6/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A tiny fuel cell that detects the alcoholic breath of a drink-driver and
calls
the police has been developed by a team of
I don't guess you read the article. It answers at least your first question.
Another option to breathing through a tube might be to not drink alcohol before
driving. Wow, you know... deterring people from drinking and driving might be a
favorable side effect of this public-monitoring,
At 12:52 AM 3/7/03 -0600, you wrote:
A pump draws air in from the passenger cabin, a platinum catalyst converts
any alcohol to acetic acid, which then produces a current proportional to
the concentration of alcohol in the air.
I had an acquaintance years ago that always kept a bottle of cologne
drunk driving?
-p
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: stuart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Drunk driver detector that radios police
I don't guess you read the article. It answers at least your first
question
: Drunk driver detector that radios police
I don't guess you read the article. It answers at least your first
question.
Another option to breathing through a tube might be to not drink alcohol
before
driving. Wow, you know... deterring people from drinking and driving might
Wow, easy there, chief. I think you have some aggression you may want to let a
professional address. Besides that...
I'm not crazy about everything that the government does, but there are trade-
offs in a non-perfect society. One of them is monitoring the innocent to, in
turn, attempt to
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 Sycophantic Boot Licker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not crazy about everything that the government does, but there are trade-
offs in a non-perfect society. One of them is monitoring the innocent to, in
turn, attempt to prevent the guilty from trampling over everything,
32 matches
Mail list logo
