On lundi 19 février 2018 05:51:23 CET darkta...@911networks.com wrote:
> DT 2.4.1
>
> How do I set the export selected size.
>
> I need: 8" tall x 10" wide @ 300dpi ==> 2400 pixels tall x 3000
> pixels wide
>
> * If i use 2400 x 3000 in the max size global option, I get: Image
> Size : 2400x194
DT 2.4.1
How do I set the export selected size.
I need: 8" tall x 10" wide @ 300dpi ==> 2400 pixels tall x 3000
pixels wide
* If i use 2400 x 3000 in the max size global option, I get: Image
Size : 2400x1947 (exiftool)
* If I use 0x0, I get: Image Size : 4263x3459
* If I use 3000x3000, I get: I
Hallo all,
now, Frankenstein seems ready and looking pretty alive.
First lensfun was downgraded to lensfun 0.2.8 from Debian-repositorys
(no backports for lensfun available).
Then I copy pasted the data from xml-files
in /var/lib/lensfun-updates/version_1/
into the according files in /usr/share/
* J. Paul Bissonnette [02-18-18 07:05]:
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 00:04:41 -0500
> rogerb wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 19:53:40 -0400
> > "J. Paul Bissonnette" wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Paul try the lens tissues for glasses they don't leave a film
> >
> I tried that on the photos; but it doesn
hi robert,
glad to hear it worked in the end :)
the base- vs tonecurve thing is a philosophical question to some
extent. the main difference is the position in the pipeline: a base
curve makes everything non-linear at a quite early point in the
pipeline. this can be desirable, for instance to com
On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 00:04:41 -0500
rogerb wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 19:53:40 -0400
> "J. Paul Bissonnette" wrote:
>
>
> Hi Paul try the lens tissues for glasses they don't leave a film
>
I tried that on the photos; but it doesn't work.
>
> > I managed to put a finger smudge on the le
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Bernhard wrote:
>
>
> Roman Lebedev schrieb am 18.02.2018 um 11:19:
>>
>> It is provided with lensfun-0.3.x, but not with 0.2.8,
>> so use stable-backports to get the newer lensfun+darktable.
>
> Does that mean dt 2.4.x will work with lensfun-0.3.x?
> I ask because
Roman Lebedev schrieb am 18.02.2018 um 11:19:
It is provided with lensfun-0.3.x, but not with 0.2.8,
so use stable-backports to get the newer lensfun+darktable.
Does that mean dt 2.4.x will work with lensfun-0.3.x?
I ask because some time ago I ran into the same "Thoby-problem" and
learned I
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 1:10 PM, Christian Kanzian
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Sonntag, 18. Februar 2018, 09:25:30 CET schrieb Jean-Luc Lacroix:
>> I meant *lensfun-update-data*
>
> There is no such command on old Debian stable AKA Jessie.
It is provided with lensfun-0.3.x, but not with 0.2.8,
so use stab
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 18. Februar 2018, 09:25:30 CET schrieb Jean-Luc Lacroix:
> I meant *lensfun-update-data*
There is no such command on old Debian stable AKA Jessie.
>
> Cheers.
> >>> Uhm, is that debian *old*stable?
> >>
> >> Yes it is. I bought a graphic-card less than a year ago for open-cl
>
I meant *lensfun-update-data*
Cheers.
On 18/02/18 09:23, Jean-Luc Lacroix wrote:
Did you try lensfun-update?
On 17/02/18 22:56, frieder wrote:
Am Samstag, den 17.02.2018, 17:09 +0300 schrieb Roman Lebedev:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 4:48 PM, frieder wrote:
Am Freitag, den 16.02.2018, 12:05 +0
Did you try lensfun-update?
On 17/02/18 22:56, frieder wrote:
Am Samstag, den 17.02.2018, 17:09 +0300 schrieb Roman Lebedev:
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 4:48 PM, frieder wrote:
Am Freitag, den 16.02.2018, 12:05 +0300 schrieb Roman Lebedev:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 2:38 AM, frieder wrote:
Am Don
12 matches
Mail list logo