> My module is a superset of Joshua's... however, mine still needs the
> interface to be polished (I plan on adding a way to select which
> optional pieces of ISO8601 are legal).
Hmm... I could use your module for recurrence and duration parsing.
-J
--
> Is there any reason it can't all go in one module? I think that'd be much
> easier for end users.
Yes. Ben and I have discussed this off list. In fact that discussion is, I believe,
where the DT::F::DateManip module came from. I started on this several months ago and
never got around to fi
My module is a superset of Joshua's... however, mine still needs the
interface to be polished (I plan on adding a way to select which
optional pieces of ISO8601 are legal).
Mine may also be slightly slower (but I don't think there is much in
it).
-ben
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 0
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> Agreed. I think it should boil down to recurrences and durations.. If
> most people need that functionality then lets call your module
> DT::F::ISO8601 and I'll use ISO8601::Simple. If they don't then I'll
> take ISO8601 and you can use ISO8601::Compl
> We should get this name thing resolved so we can get both modules
> committed and up on CPAN. I don't care either way.
Agreed. I think it should boil down to recurrences and durations.. If most people
need that functionality then lets call your module DT::F::ISO8601 and I'll use
ISO8601::Si
> Try http://oscon.kwiki.org/ .
That's just for OSCON - I'm thinking in the general case.
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> links to local movie listings - including the McWorldDomination's pages
> the laser light shows at OMSI
Something to consider when dealing with OMSI:
They had promised to provide a drop for a wireless connection
for KBOO radio in order to facilitate
Try http://oscon.kwiki.org/ .
On (Tue, Jul 01 08:48), Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> This question has crossed 3 lists that I'm on in various forms
> (datetime, pdx.pm, plug) and probably a few others. Maybe an out of
> town geek page would be a good idea? I'd volunteer to do it but I
> count as out of t
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 07:36:48AM -0700, Hill, Ronald wrote:
> Yes, and so will Date::Calc (that is what I use) But I wanted to use only
> one
> Date module. It makes no sense to use say Date::Calc with DateTime.
I know you provided a code snippet below, but in general when using
Date::Calc do yo
Ben Bennett wrote:
> No DT::F::ISO8601 (::?) is still a separate beast (which may get
> called by DT::F::Complex). ISO8601 parsing is pretty much done except
> for recurrences... I have some questions how to translate a
> recurrence that has 5 instances 20 minutes apart but does not give a
> star
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 09:04:14AM -1000, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
> Looks good Ben. The timezone stuff must have been fun. :)
Fun in which sense of the word :-)
> I ported a small piece of code (in production though) from Date::Manip to DT not
> long ago. I've been meaning to post the diffs an
Looks good Ben. The timezone stuff must have been fun. :)
I ported a small piece of code (in production though) from Date::Manip to DT not long
ago. I've been meaning to post the diffs and the benchmarks to the list. I'll do it
as soon as I'm back on a fast connection.
> Sometime I want to f
Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
This question has crossed 3 lists that I'm on in various forms (datetime, pdx.pm, plug) and probably a few others. Maybe an out of town geek page would be a good idea?
Add anything that you find missing here:
http://oscon.kwiki.org/index.cgi?HomePage
John (who saw this li
This question has crossed 3 lists that I'm on in various forms (datetime, pdx.pm,
plug) and probably a few others. Maybe an out of town geek page would be a good idea?
I'd volunteer to do it but I count as out of town now. :)
Things to list:
hotels with connectivity
links to the freenode/pers
> > How about a DT::Duration::Set class?
> >
> > add() pushes a duration object into a DT::D::Set object
> >
> > _collapse() would call a 'sum' method on a DT::D::Set object
> >
> > _collapse_to_datetime() would call _collapse (or the 'sum' method
> > directly) on a DT::D::Set object and add the re
Hi Dave,
>
>
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Hill, Ronald wrote:
>
[snipped]
> Hmm, the recent releases of Archive::Tar are totally
> rewritten in Perl, primarily in order to work
> consistently across all platforms. What
> version do you have?
I curently have version 0.23
I checked th eBuild.pl fi
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Hill, Ronald wrote:
> >
> > You can do "./Build dist". The latest Module::Build beta
> > (0.18_02) also
>
> I tried this. Here is the result.
> Creating DateTime-TimeZone-0.21.tar.gz
> Can't locate object method "create_archive" via package "Archive::Tar" at
> F:\pe
> ild/Base
Hill, Ronald wrote:
Yes, they are out of date. There is a good reason for this. We were having
problems with DateTime compiling on Win32 for quite some time.
Didn't mean to cast aspersions, I figured it was something like this
based on my troubles with 0.12.
Has anyone volunteered to keep up wit
Hi Dave,
[snipped]
>
> You can do "./Build dist". The latest Module::Build beta
> (0.18_02) also
I tried this. Here is the result.
Creating DateTime-TimeZone-0.21.tar.gz
Can't locate object method "create_archive" via package "Archive::Tar" at
F:\pe
ild/Base.pm line 1323.
I then checked the
We could add an optional parameter to DateTime::Set
recurrence constructor:
$r = new DT::Set {
recurrence => sub { next_day($_) },
as_ical_string => "RRULE:FREQ=DAILY",
}
DT::E:Cron, DT::E:Recurrence, DT::E:ICal can use
this to setup a valid ICal string.
In some case
I mentioned this to Dave offlist and he suggested I post a message
here. The next release of OpenInteract relies on DateTime so I'm
interested in keeping up-to-date PPM builds for Win32 folks. The
links to the PPM repository from the datetime.perl.org site seem a
bit out of date, particularly w
21 matches
Mail list logo
