No apologies, that's a good find. How did you test the library? What
version of gmime are you working with?
Aaron
On Oct 17, 2009, at 2:03 PM, N Sj namai...@yahoo.com wrote:
I was able to further narrow down the problem to gmime (not dbmail),
which changes Mime-Version to uppercase
Welcome! Please update anything in the wiki that appeared to be
inaccurate, and add any helpful information you learned along the way. It
is greatly appreciated!
On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:15:10 +0200 (CEST), Rene Bartsch m...@bartschnet.de
wrote:
Hi,
having a lot of trouble with getting Postfix,
There's never a question that nobody else will ask (or search for in the
archives); when you figure out an answer yourself, please let the list know
what you learned!
On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 20:35:57 +0100, Jorge Bastos mysql.jo...@decimal.pt
wrote:
Already found out!
Thanks :P
From:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:52:24 +0200, Michael Monnerie
michael.monne...@is.it-management.at wrote:
On Donnerstag 17 September 2009 Jonathan Feally wrote:
FTI would help searching greatly, however on MySQL the default is to
only index words 4 chars or longer. Thus it makes it unreliable when
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:21:30 +0100, Jon Duggan j...@host-it.co.uk wrote:
Thanks paul,
I would need to see the full query, and the one just before this one.
You'll need to run at trace_errlog=5 to get at them, or use your mysql
logs if you have them.
I'll get some better logs and post to
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:54:09 +0200, Michael Monnerie
michael.monne...@is.it-management.at wrote:
Dear list,
I have vacation via sieve scripts in the form of:
require vacation;
vacation :days 5
:subject Abwesenheitsnotiz
Danke für Ihre Nachricht.
Now we have a customer who have a lot
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:55:23 -0700, Jonathan Feally
vult...@netvulture.com
wrote:
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Some kind of replication of the dbmail_users table across database
servers would still be required, like we do now between ldap and sql.
That would allow *any* of the database backends to
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 23:20:14 +0100, Jorge Bastos mysql.jo...@decimal.pt
wrote:
Since we are now using libzdb, we really only need to provide each
program with the connection string. It would dictate what database
type,
host, user/pass, db name, etc. That would make our dbmail.conf real
simple
Please read the DBMail config file's [LDAP] section. It is designed to
interact with essentially arbitrary schemas, you simply tell it what the
field names are it'll use them. You are encouraged to use your existing
schema as much as possible.
There's no need to convert your users over to
Many mobile users I know really like this feature, so that they can quickly
download messages and simply see links to the attachments. IBM Lotus Domino
does this, perhaps only to the extent that it is a form of single-instance
storage, but I recall being shown an IBMer's Blackberry where an
I've noticed this, too. It's not an added header, it's a mis-decoded
header. I suspect a GMime bug; perhaps Paul has identified which versions
of GMime are buggy in this way?
Aaron
On Wed, 6 May 2009 15:19:41 +0200, Marc Dirix m...@electronics-design.nl
wrote:
Hi
I'm on 2.2.11.
Often
You could do this with a script or small LMTP server that sits between the
MTA and DBMail, and removes certain MIME attachments and replaces them with
e.g. a url to a web server where the attachment is now stores. I know of at
least one commercial product that does this, and there might be some
Yavor and Petteri, could you each send me a Received header from your
system so that I have something to debug the regex against?
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 05:15:10 -0800 (PST), petteri larjos p...@etla.fi
wrote:
I'll have exactly the same problem. I am running dbmail 2.2.8 and
horde-webmail v1.2.2.
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:46:07 +1300, Simon grem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Simon grem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi There,
Our dbmail 2.0 running on debian sarge was damaged last night.
We are currently building a new VM with debian etch and dbmail 2.2.
The innodb mysql
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:14:58 +1300, Simon grem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Aaron Stone aa...@serendipity.cx
wrote:
Our dbmail 2.0 running on debian sarge was damaged last night.
We are currently building a new VM with debian etch and dbmail 2.2.
The innodb mysql
On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 09:30 +0100, Paul Stevens wrote:
Bokhan Artem wrote:
That probably means that during that seconds your cpu is 100% busy. I
have about 200k accounts per server, and that behavior is very risky.
Do not forget about imap webmail clients, which log in every time they
In my opinion, this should have been made a standard the same way the Inbox
is standard. At this point, different mail programs have different sets of
default Sent, Drafts, and Trash folders -- and in other languages,
translations of those as the folder names -- that formal standardization
isn't
.
I'm using both Outlook 2007 and 2003. And, indeed, RoundCube is least
of my worries now, I'm sure if I get outlook to work, roundcube will
follow easily. :)
Quoting Aaron Stone : In my opinion, this should have been made a
standard the same way the Inbox
is standard. At this point, different
Without getting into the implementation details, it sounds like you want a
disable email for this user option?
Aaron
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:26:24 -0800, Carlos Hanson carlos.han...@gmail.com
wrote:
Greetings,
I am testing DBMail as a replacement to our Postfix maildir setup. All
our
permanently without the desire to purge all
email and mailboxes.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Aaron Stone aa...@serendipity.cx wrote:
Without getting into the implementation details, it sounds like you want a
disable email for this user option?
Aaron
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:26
There's no support for global filters (yet), sorry.
Aaron
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:10:08 -0800, Daniel Bakken
dan...@economicmodeling.com wrote:
Can dbmail do global server-side filtering? I want all messages with
X-Spam-Flag: YES to go into a Spam folder.
I'm currently using procmail to
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 01:35 +0100, Andrea Brancatelli wrote:
Il giorno ven, 23/01/2009 alle 07.33 +1100, Dan ha scritto:
With power like that, all you really need locally is a front-end. No?
I use RoundCube ( http://roundcube.net/ ) . It caches things in a database
I have big problems
What version of libsieve does that package correspond to? I recall
fixing an address parsing bug in the last revision, 2.2.7.
This is very old:
http://packages.debian.org/source/etch/libsieve
Aaron
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 15:16 +, James Greig wrote:
Hi,
We're having some issues with
Quick Resync is a new extension that sort of addresses this issue.
Mailboxes aren't versioned in a deep way, and bolting on version/date
tracking of changes requires storing a lot of additional information.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5162
Aaron
On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 19:36 +0100, Marc Dirix
Not yet. This is something I've wanted to do for a while, but haven't had
time to write the code yet :-|
Aaron
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009, James Greig ja...@host-it.co.uk said:
Hi guys,
Just a quick question, is there any way to have a global sieve script in
dbmail? We're currently inserting a
is going to be
inserted, to the _anyone_ user?
-Original Message-
From: dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-boun...@dbmail.org] On
Behalf Of Aaron Stone
Sent: sexta-feira, 9 de Janeiro de 2009 17:44
To: DBMail mailinglist
Subject: Re: [Dbmail] dbmail sieve
Not yet
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 14:55 -0600, Cody Stewart wrote:
How do you figure doing that?
I have written some code in php to encrypt each message dynamically. I
am looking to implement this code in dbmail so I gain imap support.
Why not encrypt the body before feeding it to dbmail? That way you
The original code assumes no foreign keys for purposes of cleaning up
disconnected message data. Your main query:
DELETE FROM %smessages WHERE status=%d,DBPFX,
MESSAGE_STATUS_PURGE);
relies on foreign keys to remove the dependent data, or a subsequent run
of dbmail-util to clean
It's a SASL string, so you have to generate a base64 from the
concatenation of: nul username nul password
Try this:
perl -MMIME::Base64 -e \
'print encode_base64(\x00username\x00password);'
Aaron
On Thu, 2008-12-11 at 21:52 +, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Well I've been trying to create a
Yes, this is planned for the next libSieve branch, which I've finally
had some time to work on recently and have already got into a mostly
thread-safe state, along with some improvements in parsing strategy.
I don't have any estimate for when I'll have variables support ready;
it's probably a 2-3
I see no problem enabling additional hashes for SQL auth that are not
supported on LDAP auth. We would simply need to document this.
Aaron
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 15:08 -0800, Daniel Bakken wrote:
Problems which make mhash support difficult to implement for LDAP:
Currently the authldap module
Congrats on this milestone. Welcome and congrats to new developers!
On Nov 14, 2008, at 5:48 AM, Paul J Stevens wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
It is with great pleasure that I'm announcing the availability of
DBMail
version 2.3.4, the latest in the
Yes, but starting with Glib 2.14:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/stable/ix09.html
Aaron
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008, Larry Low [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is 'g_string_append_vprintf' supposed to be in Glib2? Using 2.12 but it does
not seem to be in there on CentOS 5.
Oddly I was also having
Congrats on this milestone. Welcome and congrats to new developers!
On Nov 14, 2008, at 5:48 AM, Paul J Stevens wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
It is with great pleasure that I'm announcing the availability of
DBMail
version 2.3.4, the latest in the
On Oct 6, 2008, at 4:10 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Paul J Stevens wrote:
Casper,
No worries. I'll do a rc2 later today or early tomorrow. Debian
packages
will follow immediately after that.
If this rc2 release doesn't introduce any regressions - I depend on
you
guys to verify this -
On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 4:10 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
If something matches we examine every forward destination. If it
is an
email address of the form:
*[EMAIL PROTECTED] - we just forward
*[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Oct 6, 2008, at 2:02 PM, Paul J Stevens wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
I've just implemented the first bit of missing logic, and will post a
patch to the list shortly. Since I've been inactive for a while, Paul
should manage including this patch.
No problem of course, but:
Use git please
On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:29 PM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 4:10 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
If something matches we examine every forward destination. If it
is an
email address
On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:58 PM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 3:29 PM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Oct 6, 2008, at 4:10 AM, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
If something
It should always be Unicode / UTF-8. Forward the script and message to
me and I'll check if there's something out of sorts.
Aaron
On Aug 30, 2008, at 3:07 AM, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Hi,
This may be to Aaron.
When setting an auto-reply via sieve, when dbmail reply’s to the
sender with the
On Aug 29, 2008, at 12:51 AM, Paul J Stevens wrote:
Uwe Kiewel wrote:
Hi,
is there any roadmap for moving dbmailv2.3 to the production
status? I
expect, it will be dbmail v2.4.
There is only my 'internal' todo list:
- fix threadsafety in the server core.
- tls/ssl support (finish and
On Sep 2, 2008, at 9:08 AM, Prashanth wrote:
Hi,
I want to push all the incoming mail to db even though the
sender address or the receiver address is not dbmail user or unix
user. I tried doing this dbmail rejects the mail. how to do this?
DBMail matches incoming mail against the
On Aug 29, 2008, at 8:45 AM, Marc Dirix wrote:
altough I understand very well that this is not a dbmail issue
and I also
know why it's happening, I was wondering is there's something
dbmail could
implement to avoid the common problem of having duplicated
folders when
using
On Aug 20, 2008, at 12:53 AM, Uwe Kiewel wrote:
Daniel Urstöger schrieb:
Hi Uwe,
that is the new DB library dbmail 2.3 is using:
http://www.tildeslash.com/libzdb/
Perfect. It works. I was on the wrong track. Thanks.
zdb is not the same as libzdb
Info:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Aaron Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Note that if the password is stored as WHIRLPOOL, then the client
must
authenticate using a plaintext password in IMAP, since you cannot
match one
hash against another hash. But then again, I don't recall DBMail
IIRC = If I Remember Correctly :-)
On Aug 13, 2008, at 1:21 PM, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Can I make a question?
ASAP stands for: as soon as possible
And what about IIRC?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dbmail-dev-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Stone
Sent
?
Daniel
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Aaron Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The dbmail-users tool has options to specify which hash method to
use when
storing a password. The hash method is stored in the password column,
followed by the password, so that the correct comparison method
Note that if the password is stored as WHIRLPOOL, then the client must
authenticate using a plaintext password in IMAP, since you cannot
match one hash against another hash. But then again, I don't recall
DBMail supporting anything but plain logins at the moment (and if this
changed in
Jorge,
You're cleaning out messages, but you're not reclaiming the table space.
In your first reply in this thread, you wrote:
MySQL,
Yes, nightly maintainance.
---
/usr/local/sbin/dbmail-util -d -y
/usr/local/sbin/dbmail-util -p -y
/usr/local/sbin/dbmail-util -ty
---
You need to run
normal behavior.
Aaron
On Aug 2, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Going to do that test.
Dbmail-util -cy doesn't reduce the size of the db, in fact it run's
in about
10 seconds
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Aaron Stone
This is intentional. Mail is rotated from deleted state to purge, then
purged on the following run.
Aaron
On Jul 23, 2008, at 12:10 PM, hinote wrote:
hi there,
is there any reason for dbmail-util to purge messages with delete
status
before it sets this status to the messages that are
On Jun 25, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Paul,
Don't use it for anything other than testing. There are still some
pretty fundamental issues to iron out.
Thanks for the warning. 2.2 it is. Now, if only Ubuntu would
update the $%@ packages ...
2) If I run queries against the
It's extremely easy, read the dbmail-user man page to see about aliases.
Aaron
On Jun 19, 2008, at 10:53 AM, Naz Gassiep wrote:
Hi all,
Can a single instance of DBMail handle multiple domains easily? I
would like to set up my own personal IMAP server for just myself and
my friends, but
I'll check this script today to see what's failing. Thanks for the
report!
Aaron
On Jun 18, 2008, at 9:43 AM, Yavor Shahpasov wrote:
I am ahving problems getting horde ingo to work for me.
When I enable the date range the vacation filter stops working. If I
get rid of the dates is starts
On Jun 6, 2008, at 12:41 AM, Paul J Stevens wrote:
I'm sorely tempted to write a
dbmail-migrate tool as part of dbmail itself that will do simple:
select from
store1 - insert into store2. Doing this for a complete store will
not be
difficult at all. Being able to migrate a whole store, or
I haven't looked at whether this applies, but if the dbmail binary was
linked with the sqlite binary, via an *internal* libzdb object, then
it will fail to load at runtime without sqlite present. The database
driver object / shim driver which connects dbmail with the database
library needs
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 13:32 +0200, Michael Mayer wrote:
But who could have such a large mailbox? Anyone here on this list? Then,
you should think about creating an archive ;)
My Inbox has 36,881 messages right now. DBMail holds up quite well for
me. Personal stress test, eating my own dog
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 14:14 +0200, Daniel Urstöger wrote:
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 13:32 +0200, Michael Mayer wrote:
But who could have such a large mailbox? Anyone here on this list?
Then,
you should think about creating an archive ;)
My Inbox has 36,881 messages right now.
On May 13, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Paul J Stevens wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On May 13, 2008, at 6:01 AM, Paul J Stevens wrote:
Bert Slagter wrote:
As far as I understand from the man pages dbmail-smtp allows me
to let
dbmail deliver a message to a user. So I'm afraid this doesn't
really
solve
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008, Marc Dirix [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Since I'm doing this on my own, don't expect a final 2.4 release before
october, unless a sponsorship deal comes along...
Maybe as a side/note suggestion. If redoing the message delete
funcions, it maybe is possible to replace the
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008, Paul J Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Naz Gassiep wrote:
May I ask, how many people work on DBmail? I cannot help directly, but
if it would assist I'd be happy to donate to the project, given how much
easier DBMail will be making my life. I can't afford to sponsor the
of the mailbox they were in is there as well, so if need be, that can be
reconstructed?
- Naz.
Aaron Stone wrote:
This is already the case for normal message deletion. The dbmail-util
tool is used to actually purge messages from the database.
The exception is if a user removes a mailbox
was not taken? Is there an easy way for me to implement
this? We really do need a comprehensive perpetual record of messages.
- Naz
Aaron Stone wrote:
Sorry for the jargon response. The schema is described here:
http://dbmail.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=er-model
users - mailboxes - messages
Yes, DBMail provides very complete IMAP support.
Accounts can be managed natively by DBMail in its users table, or
externally via LDAP. No system accounts are required for DBMail users.
Aaron
On Apr 13, 2008, at 11:32 PM, Naz Gassiep wrote:
I'm looking for a solution for an IMAP system, but
Sure, when you write your web interface, make sure it doesn't do any
write operations ;-)
Better still, you can change the permissions on the mailbox. Note that
you cannot change permissions on a mailbox that you own, if you own
it, you're always have full admin privs.
So, create a
By default, all mailboxes are exported. If you want to export a
specific tree, you can do one of two things:
dbmail-export -m Mail/Box/Tree -r
it will then export Mail/Box/Tree and everything below it, e.g. Mail/
Box/Tree/Something/Else. This should be clearly documented already in
the
On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 08:53 +0100, John Fawcett wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aaron Stone wrote:
That's because there are no such defined variables... it's done with
matching now.
See section 3.2 of RFC 5229: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5229.txt
The only
That's because there are no such defined variables... it's done with
matching now.
See section 3.2 of RFC 5229: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc5229.txt
The only right place for this code is in the interpreter itself. I
more than welcome work on libSieve! It's great to new people
submitting
This requires the sieve variables extension, which libSieve does not
currently provide.
It was just this month published as an RFC: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/
rfc5229.txt
Aaron
On Feb 21, 2008, at 9:34 AM, Yavor Shahpasov wrote:
Is it possible to use the original subject in the vacation
The biggest problem is that the syntax of the notify extension has
changed in the final RFC. I need to update libSieve to reflect it.
Aaron
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 06:59 +0100, John Fawcett wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I took a look at the code for sieve notify.
It
On Wed, 2008-02-20 at 08:28 +0100, Marc Dirix wrote:
This makes all e-mail sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] appear on the dbmail
user [EMAIL PROTECTED], as well as a forward on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Simple.
BUT if now he has an alias
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
this was already replaced
Just spent some time reading code. Looks awesome! Well done!
What I'm gathering is that at the moment we're still single threaded,
but because of libevent, we never have to worry about managing
non-blocking -- calls to eventbuffer_write never block, and
dbmail_imap_session_set_callbacks sets up
With the new architecture, I think that a completely different approach
to status monitoring makes more sense, dedicating a thread to talking to
the monitoring agent (i.e., dbmail-top) -- but yes, Paul's been moving
much faster on the fantastic threading than I have even had time to look
at it, so
I doubt it's much. I'd guess that in most of my email the headers are
1/3 of the total messages bytes.
On Feb 14, 2008, at 11:25 PM, Vladimir Likhachev wrote:
Maybe, indexes use a lot of space in dbmail_headervalue?
Will You try to select
(tablesizes+toastsizes)
and
On Wed, 2008-02-13 at 09:34 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote:
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 19:42 -0700, Bryan Rehbein wrote:
I have been following the dbmail development for about a year now and
have finally starting working on migrating email accounts to dbmail.
I have one
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 19:42 -0700, Bryan Rehbein wrote:
I have been following the dbmail development for about a year now and
have finally starting working on migrating email accounts to dbmail.
I have one major issue:
My users authenticate using their email address as a user name, I
On Wed, 2008-02-06 at 11:59 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Description:
I had to do a few changes in modules/authsql.c to make aliases work with
PostgreSQL 8.3RC2 . The error is it cannot compare deliver_to (varchar) to
an int user id. So you need to change deliver_to = %llu to deliver_to
It's true and it's nothing new - always been this way. When using
LDAP auth, all aliases and forwards are also looked up in LDAP. The
errors below indicate that you have not quite gotten your dbmail.conf
LDAP options right.
Aaron
On Feb 6, 2008, at 11:48 AM, Daniel Durgin wrote:
Hello,
, so I wasn't surprised by the
messages.
Thanks again.
-Dan
Aaron Stone wrote:
It's true and it's nothing new - always been this way. When using
LDAP auth, all aliases and forwards are also looked up in LDAP.
The errors below indicate that you have not quite gotten your
dbmail.conf LDAP
No, sorry, that extension is not available yet.
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008, marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi,
Does recent libsieve currently support addheader (my current install
does not seemingly), if so I need to upgrade.
/Marc
___
DBmail
It's been on the todo-list for a long time to have a group quota that
keys off the client_id field in the user table. I think that would cover
the scenario you've described here.
Aaron
On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 22:37 +, Jorge Bastos wrote:
Hi Paul/Aaron,
I’d like to make a new idea for a
On Tue, Jan 8, 2008, marc [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Is it possible to create mailbox aliases?
e.g. having 1 mailbox with multiple names?
This is really nice for when Outlook forces Sent Items while mail.app
Sent Messages and I prefer Sent in mutt, which now are three
seperate mailboxes.
Is
There have been a couple of known crash bugs with very badly formatted
email addresses, although I don't think there were any in 2.2.7...
Do you have any sieve scripts? There are definitely some crash bugs in
libSieve 2.2.6 with badly formatted email addresses.
Aaron
On Wed, Jan 9, 2008,
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007, Arnt Gulbrandsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Peter Rabbitson writes:
James Cloos wrote:
Jani == Jani Partanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jani Every time when you hash something what is bigger than your
Jani returned hash, there can be collision.
You still talking about
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007, James Cloos [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Aaron == Aaron Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aaron I think a separate column for the IMAP uid is important.
Aaron My favorite plan for clustering is to lazy-write the IMAP
Aaron uid from a single master while other operations
On Wed, Dec 26, 2007, Jake Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This issue has been discussed fully and debated to death several times.
This is a good idea for uniqueness, but it won't work at all for IMAP
due to protocol restrictions and client behavior. Please search the
mailing list archives
On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 13:48 +0100, Patrick de Ruiter wrote:
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens
Aaron Stone
Verzonden: vrijdag 21 december 2007 19:17
Aan: DBMail mailinglist
Onderwerp: Re: [Dbmail] enormous DB Traffic using imapsync
On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 15:42 +0100, Marc Dirix wrote:
Hmm,
Looks like you guys should consider mysql clustering, this should
resolve
most of these kind of troubles.
MySQL clustering is like trying to create an industrial robot with
LEGO mindstorms.
Also the serial problem, of
Please include more context. At the very least, what's the (possibly very
long) compiler line immediately above these errors?
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007, Beryl Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am trying to compile DB-mail.
I can run the configure script fine but, when i run make all I get
these
Oh yeah, that is definitely not a case I had in mind, I'm not surprised it
doesn't work right :-x I'll work on a fix.
Aaron
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007, Paul J Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I did some quick testing.
looks like:
x create #Public/newfolder
works just fine.
But:
x
This often happens with multiple subscriptions to mailing lists,
overlapping mailing lists, and mail bombs (like that time your coworker
really wanted you to pay attention their new project... :-P)
Aaron
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Sorry I am not very deeply knowledgeable
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007, Paul J Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Matija Grabnar wrote:
If you examine the mathematical theory, no matter how good the checksum
algorithm, if your checksum
number is smaller than the files you are calculating it over (and it
usually is), then you will have a large
On Tue, Dec 18, 2007, Matija Grabnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Aaron Stone wrote:
I'm a big fan of double digest. I don't think the algorithm matters much,
just as long as the two are very different. Even just MD5 and SHA1 should
be plenty good, IMHO.
No, not more than some checksum
Of course it's based on hashing and not on filename. Some MIME parts don't
even have names. Doesn't matter. The whole MIME part gets hashed.
Cheers,
Aaron
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007, Jake Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I believe the files are MD5 hashed or similar, coupled with file length
The script is working, but DBMail does not generate bounce messages,
rather it rejects the messages via 5xx codes in LMTP and return codes on
dbmail-smtp.
Incidentally, headers are pulled in case-insensitively, so [To, TO]
is redundant.
Aaron
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 05:47 +0100, Simon Lange
+ sieve - got a perlscript for it! use it
if u want
Hi Aaron, any news on this?
On Montag, 26. November 2007 Michael Monnerie wrote:
On Mittwoch, 21. November 2007 19:36 Aaron Stone wrote:
I'll hack on it a bit this week.
Hi Aaron, is there any update about the script? I'd love to have
dbmail-export already does all of this, albeit with the overhead of
dumping the messages (to /dev/null, if you'd like).
Aaron
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 17:22 -0600, Eric Hiller wrote:
Would this work? I am trying to get it down to a single statement.
UPDATE dbmail_messages SET status=2 WHERE
, Aaron Stone wrote:
Ack. I'll fix this in libSieve SVN. It's harmless, shame that it's an
'error' and not a 'warning' in this case.
Aaron
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 18:12 +0300, Eugene Prokopiev wrote:
Hi,
I got this message while compiling libsieve 2.2.6:
/bin/sh ../libtool --tag
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007, James Cloos [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Aaron == Aaron Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aaron I would be absolutely shocked if someone could find a real-world
Aaron performance difference for DBMail running in 32 or 64 mode on the
Aaron same chip. We just don't do enough
I would be absolutely shocked if someone could find a real-world
performance difference for DBMail running in 32 or 64 mode on the same
chip. We just don't do enough integer calculation to matter a hoot, I
believe.
The underlying database may perform differently. The operation system may
perform
1 - 100 of 1595 matches
Mail list logo
