Re: 5/15/77

Perhaps. I transcribed the info I was given. It could have been written poorly or it could be a flat-out mistake. I'm not up on mics model numbers. Charlie Miller wrote: > Shouldn't that be Sony ECM-99P??? > > cm > > > - Original Message - > > *From:* David Hollister

Re: 5/15/77

Shouldn't that be Sony ECM-99P??? cm     - Original Message - From: David Hollister To: Thomas Newman Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:25 PM Subject: Re: 5/15/77 I know of two:Keith Gatto's recording... Shure SM96 / Sony TC-152Steve Mai

Re: 5/15/77

I know of two: Keith Gatto's recording... Shure SM96 / Sony TC-152 Steve Maizner's w/ Sony ECM-99Os / TC-153 Both are good. I don't know a way to distinguish between them off-hand. Both circulate as A:MCass>DAT(>CD) flavors. Thomas Newman wrote: > Hello all, > > I recently listened to a

http://www.deadlists.com

Hi I visited http://www.deadlists.com, and noticed that you're not listed on some search engines! I think we can offer you a service which can help you increase traffic and the number of visitors to your website. I would like to introduce you t

Re: 3/18/88

At 9:08 PM -0700 5/14/02, Jim Powell wrote: >that's the one -- great uncle john, great conclusion to a magnificent run He's right, you know. -- David Gans [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.trufun.com/perfectible Truth and Fun, Inc., 484 Lake Park Ave #102, Oakland CA 94610

Re: 3/18/88

that's the one -- great uncle john, great conclusion to a magnificent run

RE: 3/18/88

> > Kevin, when will updates uploaded to the parsing site be posted > to the web > site? > thanks Paul. Message to ALL caretakers: please post to the list that you have updated your year. this process has not changed. since i also take care of ensuring the text files are loaded to the CURREN

Re: 3/18/88

Guys, 3/18/88 is in the database update. My last update was May 9th. Here is what I have: DATE 03/18/88 VENUEHenry J. Kaiser Auditorium CITY Oakland State CA SET1 Iko Iko [7:53] ; Little Red Rooster [11:00] ; Brown-Eyed Women [5:46] ; When I Paint My Masterpiece [5:28] ; Bird S

RE: 3/18/88

the new site has nothing to do with caretaker responsibilities, i'm sorry to say... so one should not equate the new database interface with sudden data accuracy. kw > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Charlie > Miller > Sent: Tuesday

Re: 3/18/88

I remember the post which is why I am supprised the new site doesn't list it..cm - Original Message - From: Jim Powell To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 6:40 PM Subject: Re: 3/18/88 I posted to this list several months ago that 3/18/88 is missing fro

Re: 3/18/88

I posted to this list several months ago that 3/18/88 is missing from the 1988 lists. Still MIA, apparently.

3/18/88

I noticed that the beta deadlists is also missing 3/18/88. It seems that this show is going to be forgotten :(

5/15/77

Hello all, I recently listened to a very enjoyable and clear AUD of 5/15/77 St. Louis. Not sure how many different AUDs circulate for this, but this one was very well recorded. Does anyone know a possible lineage, type of gear used, or Taper. Thanks, Tom __

RE: BETA version feedback

hey, that was easier than i thought. jim, it appears that Lynx reads all the database scripting just fine. i changed the 1965-1969 links on the following page: http://www.shallwego.net/deadlists/year_menu.htm to read directly from the database. i was then able to use "P) Print To File" for o

RE: BETA version feedback

Roger that. At 9:40 AM -0700 5/14/02, Kevin Weil wrote: >jeff, that's easy enough. could you please modify the text file so that each >FIELD is on it's own line? i will import it into the database. > >thanks. > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

RE: BETA version feedback

jeff, that's easy enough. could you please modify the text file so that each FIELD is on it's own line? i will import it into the database. thanks. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jeff > tiedrich > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:32

RE: BETA version feedback

That's my "year," the pre-dead. Is there something I need to be doing to get that info into the database? At 9:27 AM -0700 5/14/02, Kevin Weil wrote: >well, there outta be, shouldn't there? that information is not currently in >the database, so i'll have to work something to pull the text file

RE: BETA version feedback

well, there outta be, shouldn't there? that information is not currently in the database, so i'll have to work something to pull the text file for that information instead. thanks > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McLeod, > Iver J >

RE: BETA version feedback

absolutely. one step at a time thanks > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jeff > tiedrich > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Jim Powell; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: BETA version feedback > >

RE: BETA version feedback

Kevin, will there be a link to the "pre-dead" page/dates? Or did I just not see it? Thanks

RE: BETA version feedback

Instead of maintaining/updating text files, wouldn't it be easier to write a database query that created a full text dump at runtime, whenever a user requested a full year? At 9:12 AM -0700 5/14/02, Kevin Weil wrote: >okay, i made some changes to the PILOT site so that it performs in much the >

RE: BETA version feedback

okay, i made some changes to the PILOT site so that it performs in much the same way as current site in allowing those using text-based browsers to access the year menu and the text files. i tested this using a Lynx version 2.8.3 which works under Win32. if you're using DOS 386, i can't test fo