RE: BETA version feedback

2002-05-14 Thread Kevin Weil
retrieving the database info, but i just accept it and it processes normally. kevin > -Original Message- > From: jeff tiedrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Jim Powell; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: BETA ve

RE: BETA version feedback

2002-05-14 Thread jeff tiedrich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jeff >> tiedrich >> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:32 AM >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Cc: McLeod, Iver J; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Subject: RE: BETA version feedback >> >> >> That

RE: BETA version feedback

2002-05-14 Thread Kevin Weil
: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: McLeod, Iver J; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: BETA version feedback > > > That's my "year," the pre-dead. Is there something I need to be doing > to get that info into the database? > >

RE: BETA version feedback

2002-05-14 Thread jeff tiedrich
something to pull the text file for that >information instead. > >thanks > >> -Original Message- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of McLeod, >> Iver J >> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:17 AM >> To

RE: BETA version feedback

2002-05-14 Thread Kevin Weil
Of McLeod, > Iver J > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:17 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: BETA version feedback > > > Kevin, will there be a link to the "pre-dead" page/dates? Or did > I just not > see it? > > Thanks >

RE: BETA version feedback

2002-05-14 Thread Kevin Weil
absolutely. one step at a time thanks > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jeff > tiedrich > Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 9:17 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Jim Powell; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: R

RE: BETA version feedback

2002-05-14 Thread McLeod, Iver J
Kevin, will there be a link to the "pre-dead" page/dates? Or did I just not see it? Thanks

RE: BETA version feedback

2002-05-14 Thread jeff tiedrich
Instead of maintaining/updating text files, wouldn't it be easier to write a database query that created a full text dump at runtime, whenever a user requested a full year? At 9:12 AM -0700 5/14/02, Kevin Weil wrote: >okay, i made some changes to the PILOT site so that it performs in much the >

RE: BETA version feedback

2002-05-14 Thread Kevin Weil
okay, i made some changes to the PILOT site so that it performs in much the same way as current site in allowing those using text-based browsers to access the year menu and the text files. i tested this using a Lynx version 2.8.3 which works under Win32. if you're using DOS 386, i can't test fo

Re: BETA version feedback

2002-05-10 Thread David Gans
At 1:02 PM -0700 5/10/02, Jim Powell wrote: >I would not want to lose the ability to download year files, and I really >want to see the lists remain accessible via lynx and the like. What he said! -- David Gans [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.trufun.com/perfectible Truth and Fu

RE: BETA version feedback

2002-05-10 Thread Kevin Weil
good idea with being able to download the information as a text file. -- i'm working on the lynx / cross-browser compatibility stuff and definitely see that as a requirement if the site was converted to the new format. for now, the PILOT site is compatible with Netscape 4.7x and up and IE 4.x