not quite as pristine, desktop (eg. wine, open
office 2,
flash, many 32bit codecs all work with painless installs). I do miss apt-get.
Bottom line, old and/or broken installers cost users.
Thanks,
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
/perl5/Debconf/Db.pm line 7.
Compilation failed in require at /usr/share/debconf/frontend line 6.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/debconf/frontend line 6.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
suspect you have almost everything built into your kernel. Here my 2.6
kernel is about 1.6m (vs your 7.2m).
I don't understand this. Am I doing something wrong? or is lilo wrong?
Can anyone tell me the correct way to compile a kernel if I have been
doing it wrong.
Luck
Ed Tomlinson
the issue by doing a 'modprobe mousedev' which
causes
the input dir to be created and lets X start without errors.
Luck,
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dependencies _will_ change.
Have you tried the video4linux module? If it works with your ivtv stuff
its probably your best bet.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 10 November 2005 07:25, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Hi,
2.6.14.2 should be out this weekend. The .1 fixes a security issue,
.2 fixes bind (0 sized icmp packets) and several other bugs.
Might be worth waiting. It also is worth trying to boot with apci disabled.
Ed Tomlinson
Hi,
2.6.14.2 should be out this weekend. The .1 fixes a security issue,
.2 fixes bind (0 sized icmp packets) and several other bugs.
Might be worth waiting. It also is worth trying to boot with apci disabled.
Ed Tomlinson
On Thursday 10 November 2005 06:50, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
Hello
On Monday 31 October 2005 15:58, Marcin Dębicki wrote:
Hamish Moffatt kiedys napisal:
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 08:22:31AM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On Monday 31 October 2005 05:28, Dalibor Topic wrote:
The packagers used a specific free runtime to make the eclipse package
build
problem is - it make take a bit to understand
what strace is telling you.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 02 October 2005 10:44, Aritz Beraza Garayalde [Rei] wrote:
2005/10/2, Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi
Is there a problem or is it just me?
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://amd64.debian.net sid/main
Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/amd64
: The following signatures
couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY
E415B2B4B5F5BBED
I would be nice to have aptitude install without complaining about keys...
TIA
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 03:11, Marko Kaiser wrote:
Hello,
get dists/sid/Release.gpg and add that key via apt-key add.
Bye,
Marko
grover:/home/ed# apt-key add marillat_Release.gpg
gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
grover:/home/ed# cat marillat_Release.gpg
-BEGIN PGP
away in the Doc/feature-removal-schedule.txt file
in the kernel source.
Debain has just been slow to adapt.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status 2
I've reinstalled 2.69 and held the package. For some reason aptitude, without
any messages why, ignores
my instructions to hold the pack and keeps trying 2.70 (probably something
requires 2.70 - when/if aptitude
overides my instructions it SHOULD tell me why!)
Ideas
Ed Tomlinson
Forget this.
I did a second update/upgrade cycle (about 5 minutes after the first)
and 2.71 was found - it fixes this problem.
Thanks
Ed
On Friday 19 August 2005 18:13, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Hi,
Got back from vacation. Updating gets the following:
Setting up base-config (2.70) ...
/var
them has no effect
on the problem.
Ideas?
TIA,
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 21:13, Michal Schmidt wrote:
Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Hi,
With Xorg I get:
(==) RADEON(0): Write-combining range (0xd000,0x800)
drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0
drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such device)
drmOpenDevice: open result
Hi,
Dual core support is not distro specific. It depends on the kernel used.
I believe that debian, with a recent (2.6.12.3+) kernel should be fine.
Ed Tomlinson
On Monday 18 July 2005 01:36, Faheem Mitha wrote:
Dear People,
My bioinformatics research group at Duke is buying a server
with the new package arch?
TIA,
Ed Tomlinson
On Monday 18 July 2005 09:03, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Ed Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sunday 17 July 2005 13:28, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Package fetching is done by reprepro and turning it more verbose gives
some more messages but not a download progress for files
On Wednesday 13 July 2005 05:59, v0n0 wrote:
Since yesterday night, X.org 6.8.2 is in Debian unstable. Be aware if
you dist-upgrade you will get X.org installed over Xfree.
Is this bad? If so what has to be done to upgrade to X.org safely?
TIA
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
thing I had to do was to download
the sound driver from nvidia's site (possibly another way to get sound
working...but this worked).
No problems here - The kernels alsa drivers support the sound card too.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
82, in open
mod = __import__(result)
File /usr/lib/python2.3/dbhash.py, line 5, in ?
import bsddb
File /usr/lib/python2.3/bsddb/__init__.py, line 40, in ?
import _bsddb
ImportError: No module named _bsddb
TIA,
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi
I also use 1.5.0_03 / 2.3.0.2 with very good results. I found that the default
setup enables UPnP by default. Here I have to turn if off or azureus
stalls ( use tools / options / Plugins / UPnP and unclick and apply).
Luck
Ed
On Sunday 12 June 2005 14:30, Rupert Heesom wrote:
I've
On Friday 13 May 2005 23:21, Bob Proulx wrote:
Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Looks like the bind9-host package is sticky...
Or has two different sources.
grover:/home/ed# aptitude update
...
grover:/home/ed# aptitude upgrade
...
The following packages will be upgraded:
bind9-host
Hi,
Try disabling micro PnP suport. Think you have about a minute to get to the
options, turn off the pluging, save and exit.
Ed
On Saturday 14 May 2005 06:41, Gerhard Gauling wrote:
Package: azureus
Version: 2.3.0.0-2
Severity: important
*** Please type your report below this line ***
information
Initializing package states... Done
Reading task descr
Notice that it still thinks bind9-host needs to be installed. How do I find
out why? Alternately, how
do I fix it?
TIA,
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble
On Friday 13 May 2005 18:35, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 06:12:55PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Notice that it still thinks bind9-host needs to be installed. How do I
find out why? Alternately, how
do I fix it?
grover:/home/ed# apt-get clean
grover:/home/ed# apt
to agree with Ed - the problem are political... Which is the bane of
debian.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 08 May 2005 09:27, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
On 10283 March 1977, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Whats going on == someone needs to check it. Thats it.
That was the point made by Ed Cogburn. Its already been checked in the
other
arch! If this is not the case please explain why. Without
Hi,
Where would I find source for the experimental glade 2.5 stuff that I can built
for amd64?
Second whats the process to build the binary package (or point me to an faq).
TIA
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
but in
64 bit playback is lagguy and blocky, it's totaly unuseable.
I don't know if it's a problem with libdv or kino itself.
I've also noticed that when encoding it fails to use sse and so is much slower
than 32bit.
Ed Tomlinson
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi,
Thought the advice was to use aptitude because it will remove unused
packages... Well
it seems to think xfs is unused, guess that ps is must be wrong... Me thinks
I'll revert to
apt-get - aptitude seems very broken.
Anyone else see this sort of error on pure64?
Ed
grover:/usr/bin#
On Saturday 05 March 2005 17:31, Mike Reinehr wrote:
Ed,
There are times that I certainly wondered what the h___ was going on!
The first thing that comes to mind is that xfs was installed automatically to
satisfy a dependency of some other program, which subsequently has been
removed.
35 matches
Mail list logo
