On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 05:54:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Denis Barbier wrote:
Update of /cvsroot/d-i/debian-installer/main-menu/debian
In directory quantz:/tmp/cvs-serv16866/debian
Modified Files:
changelog
Log Message:
When a package is reconfigured, set debconf/showold to
Quoting Andree Leidenfrost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I would like to propose the use of apt-spy to automatically determine
the fastest source for network installs. This has been discussed on
debian-boot before in July 2001. Maybe the time has finally come... ;-)
This is really an interesting
Package: choose-mirror
Severity: wishlist
Quoting Andree Leidenfrost mail to -boot:
Dear d-i developers
I noticed that you are discussing ways to bring down the number of
configuration screens during the install process. Here's my 2 cents
contribution:
I would like to propose the use of
Quoting Konstantinos Margaritis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: choose-mirror
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n
I have used Greek language, but I have not found it even in the other
..po files, it's only mentioned in the .templates file so I guess it was
overlooked.
You're right. I'm correcting
On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, Eric Bus wrote:
I have the same problem with d-i images from 20040131 and up. But I can
install the kernel from tty2. I have no idea why it skips it during
base-system-installation.
Well - I trried that as well but I'm not clever enough to do it without
dpkg-. I tried to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 231617 +pending
Bug#231617: The message Downloading the Release file is not localized
Tags were: l10n
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
retitle 231634 yesno box does not wrap text lines
severity 231634 grave
severity 224333 grave
reassign 224333 whiptail
reassign 231634 whiptail
merge 231634 224333
thanks
--
Seid realistisch - fordert das Unmögliche.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
retitle 231634 yesno box does not wrap text lines
Bug#231634: modconf dialog has broken text
Changed Bug title.
severity 231634 grave
Bug#231634: yesno box does not wrap text lines
Severity set to `grave'.
severity 224333 grave
Bug#224333: modconf:
Here goes: debian-installer/retriever/choose-mirror/debian/po/pt.po
please commit.
msgfmt -o /dev/null --statistics pt.po
82 translated messages.
--
Miguel Figueiredo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.DebianPT.org
http://www.fabricadasideias.com
choose-mirror
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 10:24:59PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
I attach the current list. It don't list required packages and
dependencies which will be installed automaticaly.
I just installed sid in saw, that inetd opens some unneeded ports by
default. Until this is fixed i drop it and any
I think the logo by Mark Riedesel (the first in the page[1]), is the
best. It's stylish/modern but quite simple, it's nice.
The second has the `Debian Linux' write too embossed, while the third
looks too much like `Alien'... :P
Greetings,
Federico
[1] http://sloth.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i-logos/
needed if only to stop geeks shoulder surfing and grokking my weird
collection of hardware. Suggest use F2 for verbose mode (a la SuSe).
Like the Volkan Yazici paper.
Chris Gale
--
christopher gale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
[Bastian Blank]
I just installed sid in saw, that inetd opens some unneeded ports by
default. Until this is fixed i drop it and any dependencies from the
list.
What do you mean? inetd is supposed to listen to some ports by
default.
I do not care much about the sid profile, but have more
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040102
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/20040102
Date: 07 Feb 2004
Method: Boot from floppies
Boot floppies worked well. I could not continue installation,
because I have only ppp (modem) connection to the
Well - I trried that as well but I'm not clever enough to do it without
dpkg-.
I used apt-get to install kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686. When you get the
LILO (or GRUB) configuration screen, press ALT-F2, Enter (which will
give you an linux prompt). Type 'apt-get install
kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Some comments on the three posible boot-screens.
Screen #1
I don't like it. Not that it isn't good, but it's not my style.
Screen #2
The font is a bit too big. And because it uses the same color-scheme as
the first screen, it's not really my style
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Eric Bus wrote:
I used apt-get to install kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686. When you get the
LILO (or GRUB) configuration screen, press ALT-F2, Enter (which will
give you an linux prompt). Type 'apt-get install
kernel-image-2.4.24-1-686' (or change 686 to another arch if you're
Joshua Kwan wrote:
[ snip ]
Send feedback to the authors and remember to tell everyone which logo(s)
you like the most!
The one by Mark Riedesel gets my vote.
--
Frederik Dannemare
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:52:46AM -0500, Erik Dykema wrote:
Hello boot-meisters:
This morning I had the following brilliant idea;
Would it be possible to connect two computers, perhaps a (desktop ||
server) system, and a (laptop || portable) with a USB cable, and have
one of
http://sloth.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i-logos/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please ignore last mail, IM get's me used to ctrl+enter.
Re: http://sloth.voxel.net/~joshk/d-i-logos/
I'd suggest the first one of these as it is the more consistent with the
Debian logo and graphics in general. We already use the logo, and the
pink/red colour as a distinguishable look
Package: install
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When I installed Sarge with the business card official CD, it installed
the base system correctly, but it did not install a kernel with it. Then,
lilo failed as a consequence of the lack of a kernel.
-- System Information:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 02:12:17AM +1100, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
Just thought I send a screenshot to demonstrate what I'm talking about.
Hope it's appropriate to do this against #231083. I can file a new bug
against mandb if this is of any help.
I think this must be a bug in debconf. Joey,
For sparc, I've found I need to build two separate cd-initrd.gz's: one
for sun4cdm (sparc32) and another for sun4u (sparc64). Currently this
means running fakeroot make clean sparc?? fakeroot make image
twice for sparc and moving the created files, once for each of sparc32
and sparc64. Is there
Everyone is running into this missing kernel thing. Can someone get a
debug trace of base-installer/apt-install and find out why it's failing
to install the kernel?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Colin Watson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 02:12:17AM +1100, Andree Leidenfrost wrote:
Just thought I send a screenshot to demonstrate what I'm talking about.
Hope it's appropriate to do this against #231083. I can file a new bug
against mandb if this is of any help.
I think this must
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 11:42:59AM +0100, Federico Quagliata wrote:
I think the logo by Mark Riedesel (the first in the page[1]), is the
best. It's stylish/modern but quite simple, it's nice.
The second has the `Debian Linux' write too embossed, while the third
looks too much like `Alien'...
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 12:00:19PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
I think this must be a bug in debconf. Joey, does the lack of an
extended description in the screenshot in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=231083#msg19 make any
sense to you?
Yes, that's
[ I am not subscribed to debian-boot ]
Hi,
and do tell [EMAIL PROTECTED] about which one(s) you like
best!
Here I am :)
I like the first best since that is the normal swirl and the known
debian text.
The second is bogus because we don't call us Debian Linux but Debian
GNU/Linux and the text
Hi Joey,
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-08 01:34]:
| I'd like to do whatever is necessary to fix bug #226447, but I am not in
| a position to work on it as it s a powerpc problem needing a fixed
| ofboot.b. Could someone please verify the fix, and apply it, or close
| the bug if it was
* Mark Riedesel
I vote for that one.
It is the closest tto the one currently offered as logo for lilo
in sarge.
The one from Volkan YAZICI is really nice but lacks an evident swirl.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 11:42:59AM +0100, Federico Quagliata wrote:
I think the logo by Mark Riedesel (the first in the page[1]), is the
best. It's stylish/modern but quite simple, it's nice.
The second has the `Debian Linux' write too embossed, while the third
looks too much like
Quoting Eugen Meshcheryakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hello all.
Attached file contains Ukrainian translations for debian-installer.
Information about language for languagelist file (also contained in
languagelist_uk file):
Ukrainian;uk_UA.KOI8-U;uk;UA
Information for languagelist.i10n
2004 02 08 11:42 +0100, Federico Quagliata ra:
I think the logo by Mark Riedesel (the first in the page[1]), is the
best. It's stylish/modern but quite simple, it's nice.
I absolutely agree and vote for this logo.
--
Kstutis Bilinas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | GnuPG-Key ID: 6E0695DD
Fingerprint:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 231216 pending
Bug#231216: discover-data: 11ab:4320 ethernet sk98lin SK-98xx Gigabit Ehernet Adapter
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
Hello, I'm new to this list.
First, d-i works really great! Really impressive and important work you've
done!
Now, there is one thing, when I create an ext2-filesystem. 5% is by default
reserved for the super-user. This means that on a 80GB harddisc, 4GB will be
lost for the users. Perhaps this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joey Hess wrote:
| Everyone is running into this missing kernel thing. Can someone get a
| debug trace of base-installer/apt-install and find out why it's
| failing to install the kernel?
The machine I used to test the floppy installer will be
Quoting Eugen Meshcheryakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Hello all.
Attached file contains Ukrainian translations for debian-installer.
Information about language for languagelist file (also contained in
languagelist_uk file):
Great . This is commited (except changelogs currently).
However, you
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 07:30:08PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
* Mark Riedesel
I vote for that one.
ME TOO
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 119449 moreinfo
Bug#119449: discover-data: various VIA devices
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo
Thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 230657 -1
Bug#230657: rootfs is not replaced correctly
Bug 230657 cloned as bug 231755.
reassign -1 partman
Bug#231755: rootfs is not replaced correctly
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
retitle Does not replace
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 230842 -1
Bug#230842: /etc/resolv.conf doesn't contain domain ... after install
Bug 230842 cloned as bug 231756.
reassign -1 base-config
Bug#231756: /etc/resolv.conf doesn't contain domain ... after install
Bug reassigned from package
Your message dated Sun, 8 Feb 2004 14:04:04 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 8 Feb 2004 14:08:21 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 231372 pending
Bug#231372: discover-data: nvidia ethernet and nvidia firewire
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
tag 226110 pending
Bug#226110: discover-data: tarball contain junk file .pci.lst.swp
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 20:20:36 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Shane Wegner wrote:
I am trying to get a Debian sarge installation CD built
using a custom kernel. I am new to d-i so am not really
sure of the best place to start. I am familiar with
building kernel debs with kernel-package but am not sure
what special considerations if any need to be
On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 11:57, Blars Blarson wrote:
For sparc, I've found I need to build two separate cd-initrd.gz's: one
for sun4cdm (sparc32) and another for sun4u (sparc64).
Why do you need to do this? All the userspace stuff should be the same
- Only the kernel modules would be different.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 231682 -1
Bug#231682: installation report: Failure
Bug 231682 cloned as bug 231766.
reassign -1 anna
Bug#231766: installation report: Failure
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `anna'.
retitle -1 Please include mounted file
Your message dated Sun, 8 Feb 2004 15:23:15 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 231767 install-doc
Bug#231767: Please include INDEX file of floppy images
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `install-doc'.
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking
tag 221879 + pending
thanks
This bug has been fixed in CVS.
Denis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 221879 + pending
Bug#221879: cdebconf - debconf-loadtemplate don't fail if it can't write the template
files
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 231601 -1
Bug#231601: Package: installation-reports
Bug 231601 cloned as bug 231782.
reassign -1 partconf
Bug#231782: Package: installation-reports
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partconf'.
retitle -1 Various issues
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 231361 -1
Bug#231361: Problem in boot loader installation with beta2 network installer
Bug 231361 cloned as bug 231784.
reassign -1 base-installer
Bug#231784: Problem in boot loader installation with beta2 network installer
Bug reassigned from
Your message dated Sun, 8 Feb 2004 16:52:33 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Sun, 8 Feb 2004 16:56:36 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 231178 -1
Bug#231178: (no subject)
Bug 231178 cloned as bug 231788.
reassign -1 kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386
Bug#231788: (no subject)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386'.
retitle -1 Please include
Your message dated Sun, 8 Feb 2004 17:05:43 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line This Installation Report Has Been Processed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004 20:51:09 +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:31:49AM +0100, Herbert Kaminski wrote:
saying: modprobe -k ini9100u . /lib/modules of the initrd
does not contain any file with this name, but there is initio.o,
and also all other moules loaded in
Eduard Bloch wrote:
severity 227691 serious
thanks
[...]
Something that must be fixed before the Sarge release.
Do you think that this bug is so severe that if it is not fixed then
the package had better not be released with Sarge?
If so then the severity should be grave, not serious.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 231767 debian-installer
Bug#231767: Please include INDEX file of floppy images
Bug reassigned from package `install-doc' to `debian-installer'.
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tags 230122 + pending
Bug#230122: discover-data-udeb: PCI ID 14e4170d uses ethernet module tg3
Tags were: d-i patch
Tags added: pending
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#229402: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#228964: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#228370: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#227343: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#203642: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#215388: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#231372: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#229123: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#228694: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#226110: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#148974: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#216895: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#231216: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#226104: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 18:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#228850: fixed in discover-data 1.2004.02.08-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
#include hallo.h
* Thomas Hood [Mon, Feb 09 2004, 12:11:42AM]:
Eduard Bloch wrote:
severity 227691 serious
thanks
[...]
Something that must be fixed before the Sarge release.
Do you think that this bug is so severe that if it is not fixed then
the package had better not be released
Hi,
today, I re-tried to build netboot image from new system, and I found
that my patch was a mistake. I'm sorry, it's not needed. Since there is
no sparc autobuild yet, I hope that it caused no real harm.
since kernel image for sparc are gzip, it needs to gunzip them, so this
patch must be
Package: installation-reports
Version: 20040102
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: debian/dists/sarge/main/installer-i386/20040102
Date: 08 Feb 2004
Method: Boot from floppies, packages from local network
Machine: Home assembled PC
Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2200+ 1800 MHz
Memory: 256
--- The message cannot be delivered to the following address. ---
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Mailbox unknown or not accepting mail.
551 Relay disabled, recipient refused: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reporting-MTA: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Action: failed
Status: 5.1.1
On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 07:44:40PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Blars Blarson wrote:
227853 debian-installer
debian-installer: [PATCH] small fix for sparc, installs discover-udeb
228519 debian-installer
[PATCH] tftpboot.sh for sparc
Both of these are long fixed
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--=-pLWLHV+/Tgl1EM3GVs6Y
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 11:57, Blars Blarson wrote:
For sparc, I've found I need to build two separate cd-initrd.gz's: one
for sun4cdm (sparc32)
I think that there is a error with genromfs in build/Makefile
I was building netboot image for sparc and I got a error.
the -f flag is missing.
In old build system, it was present (
ddetect_0.67_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_0.67.dsc
ddetect_0.67.tar.gz
hw-detect_0.67_all.udeb
ethdetect_0.67_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.67_all.udeb
archdetect_0.67_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
Thomas Poindessous wrote:
Hi,
today, I re-tried to build netboot image from new system, and I found
that my patch was a mistake. I'm sorry, it's not needed. Since there is
no sparc autobuild yet, I hope that it caused no real harm.
since kernel image for sparc are gzip, it needs to gunzip
Geert Stappers wrote:
On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 07:44:40PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Blars Blarson wrote:
227853debian-installer
debian-installer: [PATCH] small fix for sparc, installs discover-udeb
228519debian-installer
[PATCH] tftpboot.sh for sparc
Accepted:
archdetect_0.67_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.67_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.67.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.67.dsc
ddetect_0.67.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.67.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.67_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.67_all.udeb
Your message dated Sun, 08 Feb 2004 19:47:02 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#220971: fixed in ddetect 0.67
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
languagechooser_1.10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
languagechooser_1.10.dsc
languagechooser_1.10.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.10_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 2/7/04 daily build
uname -a: sorry, never got it to boot up
Date: 2/7/04 tried whole day
Method: install off netinst CD
Machine: home made Athlon 800, VIA K7T Pro2
Processor: Athlon 800
Memory: 512
Root Device: IDE hda
Root Size/partition
Accepted:
languagechooser_1.10.dsc
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.10.dsc
languagechooser_1.10.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.10.tar.gz
languagechooser_1.10_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/languagechooser/languagechooser_1.10_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Daily build, 2/8/2004
Machine: Toshiba 2060CDS Laptop
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked:[O]
Comments/Problems:
Hung in 'Detecting Hardware', at 95% complete, with message
'skipping unavailable module
I'm trying to figure out why depmod, insmod, and modprobe are give the
error that the sparc64 kernel modules are not for this architecture on
my latest d-i boot cds. I'm using the ones in the modutils-full udeb,
uname -m reports sparc64, and they match the kernel version. (The
busybox version is
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 06:35:21PM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
I'm trying to figure out why depmod, insmod, and modprobe are give the
error that the sparc64 kernel modules are not for this architecture on
my latest d-i boot cds. I'm using the ones in the modutils-full udeb,
Where *are* the
Same thing with -beta2. Tried various debugging options and 'expert'
method, but can't get any more info.
Note: Mandrake hangs when attempting to start pcmcia system on this
thing. Only known problem (just got it). Laptop does have a built-in
floppy.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Thomas Poindessous wrote:
I think that there is a error with genromfs in build/Makefile
I was building netboot image for sparc and I got a error.
the -f flag is missing.
Seems I lost this somehow.
In old build system, it was present (
Package: boot-floppies
Version: N/A; reported 2004-02-09
Severity: normal
Despite choosing the UK keyboard option during installation, the key-combo
Shift-3 produces #/n (Octothorpe/linefeed) instead of the correct £ (Pound)
sign at the console.
loadkeys uk
fails to fix the problem.
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040209
Method:floppies boot,root,net-drivers
hello
after selecting, language and keyboard, the net modules list does not contain 'plip'.
i have to select 'non of the above' and reselect 'Load drivers from floppy' , i have a
new screen
100 matches
Mail list logo
