Processing control commands:
retitle -1 debian-installer: 'Auto install' does not delay questions when
DHCP sends preseeding url
Bug #759290 [debian-installer] debian-installer: 'Automated install' does not
delay the locale and keyboard questions
Changed Bug title to 'debian-installer: 'Auto
Control: retitle -1 debian-installer: 'Auto install' does not delay questions
when DHCP sends preseeding url
Control: tag -1 - unreproducible
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Hi Samuel,
thanks for your quick reply!
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:52:17AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Andreas B.
Andreas B. Mundt, le Tue 26 Aug 2014 08:16:01 +0200, a écrit :
Before, I was using the method B.2.5. Using a DHCP server to specify
preconfiguration files described in [1]. Is there a reason not to
delay the questions with that method?
Probably not, and then it's a bug indeed.
Samuel
--
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hello,
Andreas B. Mundt, le Tue 26 Aug 2014 08:16:01 +0200, a écrit :
Before, I was using the method B.2.5. Using a DHCP server to specify
preconfiguration files described in [1]. Is there a reason not to
delay the questions with that method?
This apparently takes
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #759290 [debian-installer] debian-installer: 'Auto install' does not delay
questions when DHCP sends preseeding url
Added tag(s) pending.
--
759290: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=759290
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: network (PXE with preseeding)
Image version:
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/netboot/netboot.tar.gz
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 12:12:17 +0200
Machine: selfmade PC
Processor: AMD Athlon II X2 250
Memory: 2 GiB
Partitions: automatic
Hi,
yesterday I joined the videostream of the installer BoF at DebConf[1].
I also became a bit involved via IRC. Joey Hess raised the question
about the criteria to add a Blend or not. I answered all in the list
of the bug report #758116 which IMHO fits the criterion of actively
maintained and
On 08/26/2014 01:27 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
I think it should be also a criterion that the team behind the Blend
confirms that they are interested and so I'm hereby pinging all lists in
question to ask you for confirmation.
I second the inclusion of Debian GIS tasks, as I would love for the
Le Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:27:23PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
Hi,
yesterday I joined the videostream of the installer BoF at DebConf[1].
I also became a bit involved via IRC. Joey Hess raised the question
about the criteria to add a Blend or not. I answered all in the list
of the bug
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20140802
Severity: important
On 13/08/14 02:55, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
(Looking at syslog when I can, it seems anna is the tool running into a
full partition, which isn't surprising.)
[...]
I'm very concerned to see that Jessie Alpha 1 images were already
On 26/08/14 06:40, Christian PERRIER wrote:
While adding i18n to partman-iscsi, I noticed that it is a sta,ndard
component of D-I. My understanding of iSCSI devices is that this is
quite a corner case for installation. Therefore, shouldn't the package
be priority: optional. [...]
I agree,
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 26 Aug 2014 13:48:53 +0100, a écrit :
Using:
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/mini.iso
wheezy install guide suggests a minimum of 80MB RAM to run d-i. But
even with 128MB RAM, not choosing any additional
Greetings, Fellow Debianites,
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 01:27:23PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I joined the videostream of the installer BoF at DebConf[1].
I also became a bit involved via IRC. Joey Hess raised the question
about the criteria to add a Blend or not. I answered all
On 26/08/14 14:00, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 26 Aug 2014 13:48:53 +0100, a écrit :
Using:
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/mini.iso
wheezy install guide suggests a minimum of 80MB RAM to run d-i. But
even with
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 26 Aug 2014 14:10:51 +0100, a écrit :
I should be able to help with that, I'll already be testing lots of
low-memory installs, in order to find a good size for the kfreebsd d-i
ramdisks.
Well, the testing has to be done for each architecture, since that
change quite
During Steve's talk it was mentioned that cloud/VPS installs often don't
use d-i, and that means lots of questions do not get asked and
configuration generated as a result. Some people would like to still
have that.
This seems like another reason for userland bits of d-i to be able to
run
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 26 Aug 2014 14:10:51 +0100, a écrit :
It's odd that there still seemed to be ~50% free memory when this
problem happened, though. Is there some maximum size that the
linux-i386 root ramdisk can grow to?
There seems to be something odd somewhere indeed. Just trying
Hi,
On 26/08/14 14:15, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 26 Aug 2014 14:10:51 +0100, a écrit :
I should be able to help with that, I'll already be testing lots of
low-memory installs, in order to find a good size for the kfreebsd d-i
ramdisks.
Well, the testing has to be
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 26 Aug 2014 15:46:25 +0200, a écrit :
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 26 Aug 2014 14:10:51 +0100, a écrit :
It's odd that there still seemed to be ~50% free memory when this
problem happened, though. Is there some maximum size that the
linux-i386 root ramdisk can grow
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 26 Aug 2014 14:48:30 +0100, a écrit :
On 26/08/14 14:15, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Steven Chamberlain, le Tue 26 Aug 2014 14:10:51 +0100, a écrit :
I should be able to help with that, I'll already be testing lots of
low-memory installs, in order to find a good size
Samuel Thibault, le Tue 26 Aug 2014 15:49:32 +0200, a écrit :
In /proc/mounts, one can read for the rootfs on / a size= value, which
seems to be half the memory size. That's probably the culprit, perhaps
it can be worked around somehow for d-i at least.
Indeed:
static unsigned long
On 26/08/14 15:05, Samuel Thibault wrote:
[...] We can however do this early at boot:
mount / -o remount,size=$(( $(grep ^MemTotal: /proc/meminfo | { read x y z;
echo $y; }) * 1024 )
notably before unpacking .udebs, S15lowmem would probably be a fine
place for this? (it notably already
Hello! (sorry for top posting)
DebianParl is a blend that could also be in taskel, no?
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianParl
Best regards.
//Erik
-Original Message-
From: Charles Plessy [mailto:ple...@debian.org]
Sent: 26 August 2014 14:09
To: 758...@bugs.debian.org;
On 26.08.2014 13:27, Andreas Tille wrote:
[...}
I think it should be also a criterion that the team behind the Blend
confirms that they are interested and so I'm hereby pinging all lists in
question to ask you for confirmation. I have set Reply-To to the bug
report and the general Blends list
[ replying only to bug + list - hope all are subscribed ]
Quoting JOSEFSSON Erik (2014-08-26 16:27:43)
Hello! (sorry for top posting)
Feeling sorry is no use. Consider at least strip fullquote next time.
DebianParl is a blend that could also be in taskel, no?
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 21:26 -0700, Bill MacAllister wrote:
[...]
E: Couldn't find any package by regex
'usb-storage-modules-3.10-3-alpha-generic-di'
Seems like I need to create those packages for Alpha. How do I do that?
Those should all come from the kernel packaging. I expect alpha
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (2014-08-26):
While adding i18n to partman-iscsi, I noticed that it is a sta,ndard
component of D-I. My understanding of iSCSI devices is that this is
quite a corner case for installation. Therefore, shouldn't the package
be priority: optional. The
Control: retitle -1 installation fails with acl/bzcat dependency error
Christof Boeckler pos...@jamesie.de (2014-08-26):
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: network (PXE with preseeding)
Image version:
http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/netboot/netboot.tar.gz
Date: Tue,
Processing control commands:
retitle -1 installation fails with acl/bzcat dependency error
Bug #759327 [installation-reports] (no subject)
Changed Bug title to 'installation fails with acl/bzcat dependency error' from
'(no subject)'
--
759327:
Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk (2014-08-25):
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 14:11 -0300, Breno Leitao wrote:
HI Ben,
Do you still have any feedback about the new patch?
I have no objections, but I am not a maintainer for this package so
it is not for me to apply.
I suppose I could blindly
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2014-08-26):
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (2014-08-26):
While adding i18n to partman-iscsi, I noticed that it is a sta,ndard
component of D-I. My understanding of iSCSI devices is that this is
quite a corner case for installation. Therefore,
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:57:45 +0200
with message-id 20140826175745.gi15...@hall.aurel32.net
and subject line Re: Bug#752410: libdebian-installer: ppc64el support
has caused the Debian Bug report #752410,
regarding libdebian-installer: ppc64el support
to be marked as done.
This
Hi,
FWIW I've just added Baptiste (in Cc) to the d-i group. Welcome!
Quoting the request mail:
| Hi,
|
| I'm involved in -l10n-french team and I'm updating the french translation of
d-i manual.
| I'd like to migrate it from xml to poxml.
|
| Thank's
|
| Baptiste
I trust you're in touch with
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-08-25):
On 25/08/14 04:55, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
* Architecture support: my own, limited testing made me discover how
badly broken d-i on GNU/kFreeBSD was, and I shared my concerns some
days ago with BSD people and the release team. I
reopen 759189
Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net (2014-08-26):
close 759189
thanks
I see you've fixed the bug in your package:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/commit/?id=a212be5de579ed41643e4eaf1a03775839608ff5
so this bug can be closed
Your message dated Tue, 26 Aug 2014 21:01:33 +0200
with message-id 20140826210133.769ea98f9b1f9a7f34c36...@mailbox.org
and subject line Re: Bug#759148: d-i manual: loop-AES no longer supported -
update docs
has caused the Debian Bug report #759148,
regarding d-i manual: loop-AES no longer
close 759189
thanks
I see you've fixed the bug in your package:
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/commit/?id=a212be5de579ed41643e4eaf1a03775839608ff5
so this bug can be closed here, #751731 is enough to track it on your end.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann,
On 23/08/14 23:00, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
I only picked 'standard' and 'SSH server' tasks so was surprised
to see these installed:
libcairo2 libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-glx libgtk2.0-0 libgtk2.0-bin
libgtk2.0-common libpangocairo-1.0-0 pinentry-gtk2
This is now a well-known issue,
Hi Andreas,
Yes. It is a great idea to be able to choose your blend at
installation time. Most of my machines are used for different
purposes, and not to have to remember the name of a meta-package to
install after the initial installation would be fantastic.
It is much easier to tell someone
Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net (2014-08-26):
On 08/26/2014 09:07 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Not until it's uploaded, and I'm not going to upload
debian-installer just for that.
since this is not a bug in isolinux, can you explain why should it
be kept open?
Sure:
On 08/26/2014 09:07 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Not until it's uploaded, and I'm not going to upload debian-installer
just for that.
since this is not a bug in isolinux, can you explain why should it be
kept open?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:
Hi,
Holger Wansing hwans...@mailbox.org wrote:
Defaulting to a graphical (gtk) frontend on i386 and amd64 would mean
that it becomes the regular frontend, unless it is desired to credit the
newt frontend with some special status.
From a global point of view, the graphical
On 08/26/2014 10:29 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Sure: breaking reverse dependencies is a bug; a quite nasty one when
that happens in an uncoordinated and deliberately disruptive manner.
i do disgree with that interpretation which can be seen in the previous
mail, but insisting on that would not
--On August 26, 2014 at 4:22:35 PM +0100 Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 21:26 -0700, Bill MacAllister wrote:
[...]
E: Couldn't find any package by regex
'usb-storage-modules-3.10-3-alpha-generic-di'
Seems like I need to create those packages for Alpha.
package: os-prober
version: 1.64
Os-prober doesn't notice initrd files other than debian's one.
In a partiion I've Slackware. I created a initd.gz for slaclware
(generic kernel needs a initrd for ext4 module, if not I receive
a kernel panic) and tried to make grub set it from debian.
Please,
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
unarchive 537656
Bug #537656 {Done: Daniel Baumann daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net}
[di-netboot-assistant] Please update tftp server root directory
Unarchived Bug 537656
reopen 537656
Bug #537656 {Done: Daniel Baumann
Hi all,
just tried to install using PXE environment latest (jessie).
netboot.tar.gz from there:
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/
version dated 02-08-2014
tried both amd64 and i386 versions.
first hit ldlinux.c32 issue (bug #750586)
Hi, and thanks for your mail.
Gasha ga...@pie-dabas.net (2014-08-27):
just tried to install using PXE environment latest (jessie).
netboot.tar.gz from there:
http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/
version dated 02-08-2014
tried both
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 14:44 -0700, Bill MacAllister wrote:
--On August 26, 2014 at 4:22:35 PM +0100 Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 21:26 -0700, Bill MacAllister wrote:
[...]
E: Couldn't find any package by regex
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 1:27 PM, Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu wrote:
Hi,
yesterday I joined the videostream of the installer BoF at DebConf[1].
I also became a bit involved via IRC. Joey Hess raised the question
about the criteria to add a Blend or not. I answered all in the list
of the
Package: src:debian-installer
Tags: patch
Hi,
Would you have any news/comments about the patch attached in this bug?
We would like to switch the kernel on ppc64el to vmlinuz starting with
3.16 (introduction of zImage support for 64el).
I am attaching an interdiff for that, on top of the
Hi,
and thanks for both the bug report and the patch.
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira mauri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com (2014-08-26):
Would you have any news/comments about the patch attached in this bug?
I'll rather let Aurelien comment on ppc64el patches. (Also, some bits
could probably be shared
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 01:32:32AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi,
and thanks for both the bug report and the patch.
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira mauri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com (2014-08-26):
Would you have any news/comments about the patch attached in this bug?
I'll rather let
On 08/26/2014 08:32 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
and thanks for both the bug report and the patch.
Sure; my pleasure.
Mauricio Faria de Oliveiramauri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com (2014-08-26):
Would you have any news/comments about the patch attached in this bug?
I'll rather let Aurelien comment
Are you saying XFCE is the problem? Is there going to be
an updated installer you want me to test again, or what do
you suggest to get ORCA working??
Thanks for looking into this.
On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:52:38 +0200
Samuel Thibault sthiba...@debian.org wrote:
Cyril Brulebois, le Fri 22 Aug 2014
cstrobel, le Tue 26 Aug 2014 20:31:55 -0400, a écrit :
Are you saying XFCE is the problem?
Yes.
Is there going to be an updated installer you want me to test again,
or what do you suggest to get ORCA working??
You can use a gnome image, such as
--On August 27, 2014 at 12:19:13 AM +0100 Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
wrote:
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 14:44 -0700, Bill MacAllister wrote:
--On August 26, 2014 at 4:22:35 PM +0100 Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
wrote:
On Mon, 2014-08-25 at 21:26 -0700, Bill MacAllister wrote:
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 19:13 -0700, Bill MacAllister wrote:
--On August 27, 2014 at 12:19:13 AM +0100 Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
wrote:
On Tue, 2014-08-26 at 14:44 -0700, Bill MacAllister wrote:
--On August 26, 2014 at 4:22:35 PM +0100 Ian Campbell
i...@hellion.org.uk wrote:
--On August 27, 2014 at 3:25:16 AM +0100 Ian Campbell i...@hellion.org.uk
wrote:
Judging from ftp://ftp.debian-ports.org/debian/pool-alpha/main/l/linux/
(assuming you are building against debian-ports) the kernel isn't
building any udebs for alpha. I've no idea why that should be, but you
59 matches
Mail list logo
