Bug#675117: add pastix support to petsc

2012-05-29 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:petsc Severity: wishlist Hello Christophe, On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 17:07 +0200, trophime wrote: Hi, I manage to package pastix for debian (see Debian Science repository). Moreover I have rebuild petsc to enable pastix support (see the attached debian/rules). To perform test just :

Bug#669478: illuminator: FTBFS: build-dependency not installable: libpetsc3.1-dev

2012-04-20 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 21:35 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: Source: illuminator Version: 0.11.0-13 Severity: serious Tags: wheezy sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20120419 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your

Bug#669150: RM: liboce-*1 -- RoM

2012-04-18 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 21:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 15:25 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Please remove all of the OCE shared libraries with library version 1, such as liboce-foundation1 (i.e. upstream version 0.8.0). It seems they are blocking the transition

Bug#669150: nmu netgen_4.9.13.dfsg-4 . armhf . -m 'Rebuild against new liboce-*2'

2012-04-18 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Please binNMU netgen on armhf to link against new OCE libraries. Thanks, Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#669150: RM: liboce-*1 -- RoM

2012-04-18 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Brief update... On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 09:10 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 21:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 15:25 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Please remove all of the OCE shared libraries with library version 1, such as liboce-foundation1

Bug#660894: Patch for the 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-5.1 NMU of elmerfem

2012-04-18 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hello Christian, On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 06:57 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Adam C Powell IV (hazel...@debian.org): Thank you for your notes of March 29 and April 5. I have been unusually busy for an unusually long period of time, and have not been able to spend the time I

Bug#660894: Patch for the 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-5.1 NMU of elmerfem

2012-04-17 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Dear Christian, Thank you for your notes of March 29 and April 5. I have been unusually busy for an unusually long period of time, and have not been able to spend the time I otherwise would on my Debian packages. Let me confirm now that I approve of your NMU for fixing elmerfem debconf l10n

Bug#669150: RM: liboce-*1 -- RoM

2012-04-17 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: ftp.debian.org X-DebBugs-CC: Anton Gladky gladky.an...@gmail.com, debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org Greetings, Please remove all of the OCE shared libraries with library version 1, such as liboce-foundation1 (i.e. upstream version 0.8.0). It seems they are blocking the

Bug#662707: RM: slepc [armel, kfreebsd-i386, kfreebsd-amd64] -- RoM

2012-03-05 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: ftp.debian.org X-DebBugs-CC: debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org Hello, Apparently petsc, slepc, and their reverse depends will not transition until binary slepc packages libslepc3.1, libslepc3.1-dev and libslepc3.1-dbg have been removed for the armel and kfreebsd-*

Bug#661936: RM: petsc [armel, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386] -- RoM; doesn't build on these arches

2012-03-02 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: ftp.debian.org X-DebBugs-CC: debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org Hello, petsc has built on and off (mostly off) on armel, and there's a new upstream bug which makes it not work on kfreebsd-*. The presence of old packages is preventing petsc 3.2 and a bunch of rdeps from

Bug#659898: coinor-ipopt: FTBFS during doxygen latex step

2012-02-29 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 09:31 -0500, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 05:51:14PM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 21:05 +0100, trophime wrote: Hi, with the following patches the package builds fine. Thanks very much Christophe! This is incredibly

Bug#656838: oce FTBFS on Alpha: Alpha Linux is misdetected as Alpha OSF1 Unix

2012-02-27 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Denis, On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 08:54 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 09:29 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: Le 26 février 2012 06:29, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org a écrit : Would you like me to upload the new oce with this change, or wait for a new upstream or other

Bug#659898: coinor-ipopt: FTBFS during doxygen latex step

2012-02-27 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 21:05 +0100, trophime wrote: Hi, with the following patches the package builds fine. Thanks very much Christophe! This is incredibly helpful. Roberto, can you take care of applying these patches and uploading, or do you want me to do an NMU? This is holding up a pretty

Bug#660894: [INTL:da] Danish translation of the debconf templates elmerfem

2012-02-27 Thread Adam C Powell IV
tags 660894 pending thanks On Wed, 2012-02-22 at 17:54 +, Joe Dalton wrote: Package: elmerfem Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n patch Please include the attached Danish elmerfem translations. joe@pc:~/over/debian/elmerfem$ msgfmt --statistics -c -v -o /dev/null da.poda.po: 3 oversatte

Bug#661126: elmerfem: [INTL:nl] Dutch translation of debconf templates

2012-02-27 Thread Adam C Powell IV
tags 661126 pending thanks On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 12:01 +0100, Jeroen Schot wrote: Package: elmerfem Severity: wishlist Tags: patch l10n Hello, Attached is the Dutch translation of the elmerfem debconf templates. Please include it in your next upload. Thank you very much, I have

Bug#656838: oce FTBFS on Alpha: Alpha Linux is misdetected as Alpha OSF1 Unix

2012-02-27 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hello, On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 15:45 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: Le 27 février 2012 15:24, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org a écrit : On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 08:54 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: [snip] There are a couple of issues in the git repository though. I accidentally merged

Bug#656838: oce FTBFS on Alpha: Alpha Linux is misdetected as Alpha OSF1 Unix

2012-02-26 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hello, On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 09:29 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: Le 26 février 2012 06:29, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org a écrit : Would you like me to upload the new oce with this change, or wait for a new upstream or other changes? Hello Adam, You can upload, yes, but please

Bug#586149: Please consider the usage of update-alternatives for hdf5 libraries

2012-02-25 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi, There's a better way to do this by just having different shared library file names and sonames for each of the shared library packages. Then the -dev packages can conflict, while one can install multiple packages using the different shared libraries simultaneously, not one-at-a-time as

Bug#661301: src:med-fichier: FTBFS due to hdf5-tools conflict with libhdf5-mpi-dev

2012-02-25 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:med-fichier Version: 3.0.3-3 Severity: serious This requires hdf5-tools and libhdf5-mpi-dev to build, but they conflict because they depend on conflicting HDF5 shared library packages. -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering

Bug#656838: oce FTBFS on Alpha: Alpha Linux is misdetected as Alpha OSF1 Unix

2012-02-25 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hello Denis, Would you like me to upload the new oce with this change, or wait for a new upstream or other changes? -Adam On Sat, 2012-02-25 at 00:04 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: tags 656838 pending thanks Le 22 janvier 2012 04:37, Michael Cree a écrit : Source: oce Version: 0.8.0-1

Bug#586149: Please consider the usage of update-alternatives for hdf5 libraries

2012-02-25 Thread Adam C Powell IV
severity 586149 serious retitle 586149 Conflict between hdf5-tools and libhdf5-mpi-dev prevents several packages from building block 661301 by 586149 thanks Hi again, Because this causes other packages to FTBFS, it really needs to be an RC bug. -Adam On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 00:12 -0500, Adam C

Bug#529807: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#529807: libtrilinos: Missing library links

2012-02-21 Thread Adam C Powell IV
at 10:05 -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Hi Christophe, Thanks, I understand that the full library list is needed for now, but would like it to be otherwise. Would you accept a patch to link the libraries? It looks like you generate the shared libs in debian/rules, so I could add something

Bug#660241: libhypre-2.4.0: should be two packages: libhypre-openmpi and libhypre-mpich2

2012-02-21 Thread Adam C Powell IV
tags 660241 moreinfo thanks Hello, On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 09:37 -0600, Edscott Wilson Garcia wrote: Package: libhypre-2.4.0 Version: 2.4.0b-7 Severity: important Hypre works fine with mpich2. Instalation via debian package invariably ties it up with openmpi. When target user has a

Bug#529807: [Pkg-scicomp-devel] Bug#529807: libtrilinos: Missing library links

2012-02-21 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 15:27 +0100, Johannes Ring wrote: Hi Adam, Trilinos 10.8.5 has been packaged in svn: svn://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-science/packages/trilinos/trunk Please check if this bug is still present there. Thank you, I will do that in the next couple of days. -Adam --

Bug#660241: libhypre-2.4.0: should be two packages: libhypre-openmpi and libhypre-mpich2

2012-02-21 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org tags 660241 moreinfo thanks Hello, On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 09:37 -0600, Edscott Wilson Garcia wrote: Package: libhypre-2.4.0 Version: 2.4.0b-7 Severity: important

Bug#659960: [med-fichier] Please upgrade to 3.0.4

2012-02-15 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Christophe, On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 11:52 +0100, trophime wrote: Package: med-fichier Version: 3.0.3-3 Severity: wishlist It will be great to upgrade med to 3.0.4 as it is required for Salome and latest Code Aster I just got med-fichier 3.0.4 and tried to build it. Unfortunately it

Bug#659898: coinor-ipopt: FTBFS during doxygen latex step

2012-02-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:coinor-ipopt Version: 3.10.1-1 Severity: serious When I try to build this package, it FTBFS in latex while making doxygen docs: This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (TeX Live 2009/Debian) entering extended mode (./_formulas.tex LaTeX2e 2009/09/24 Babel v3.8l and hyphenation

Bug#659190: libelmer-dev: fails to upgrade from squeeze - trying to overwrite /usr/bin/elmerf90

2012-02-13 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi again, On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 22:30 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: On 2012-02-09 22:25, Adam C Powell IV wrote: One thing though: do you mind if we downgrade the severity temporarily? There's a big transition about to happen [...] Adjust as you need it ... Turns out I'm wrong: elmerfem

Bug#659245: deal.ii: FTBFS with PETSc/SLEPc 3.2

2012-02-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:deal.ii Version: 7.0.0-3 Severity: serious This needs an upgrade for PETSc/SLEPc 3.2. 7.1.0 is almost there, but the version in alioth doesn't quite work with the new SLEPc interface. -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering

Bug#659245: deal.ii: FTBFS with PETSc/SLEPc 3.2

2012-02-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Christophe, On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 16:01 +0100, trophime wrote: On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 09:25 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Package: src:deal.ii Version: 7.0.0-3 Severity: serious This needs an upgrade for PETSc/SLEPc 3.2. 7.1.0 is almost there, but the version in alioth doesn't

Bug#659190: libelmer-dev: fails to upgrade from squeeze - trying to overwrite /usr/bin/elmerf90

2012-02-09 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 00:38 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: Package: libelmer-dev Version: 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-4 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package fails to upgrade from 'squeeze'. It installed

Bug#659132: netgen: Please switch from deprecated opencascade to oce

2012-02-08 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:netgen Hello, Due to the slow (or often nonexistent) responsiveness of OpenCASCADE to user feedback, patches, etc., users created the OpenCASCADE Community Edition, or OCE. Debian has adopted OCE as its standard OpenCASCADE implementation, and there is an OCE package now. Please

Bug#659133: freecad: Please switch from deprecated opencascade to oce

2012-02-08 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:freecad Hello, Due to the slow (or often nonexistent) responsiveness of OpenCASCADE to user feedback, patches, etc., users created the OpenCASCADE Community Edition, or OCE. Debian has adopted OCE as its standard OpenCASCADE implementation, and there is an OCE package now. Please

Bug#657433: RM: salome -- ROM; Not maintained and too much issues

2012-01-26 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 12:30 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: Hi! * Sylvestre Ledru sylves...@debian.org [120126 09:49]: Could you remove salome from Debian ? Sure, as there are no reverse depends. It has many RCs (10). However, due to the multiple versions in the archive,

Bug#656189: petsc: Please disable hcp of the mpicc implementation

2012-01-19 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 10:36 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 12:03 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Source: petsc Severity: important Tags: patch Hello, It would be nice if you could apply the attached patch. It disables the search of mpicc as hcp

Bug#656189: petsc: Please disable hcp of the mpicc implementation

2012-01-19 Thread Adam C Powell IV
tags 656189 pending thanks On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:58 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Le jeudi 19 janvier 2012 à 08:56 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit : On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 10:36 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 12:03 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Source: petsc

Bug#655940: Please enable Alpha as allowable arch on petsc

2012-01-19 Thread Adam C Powell IV
tags 655940 pending thanks Hello, I'd be glad to re-add alpha, sorry I left it out. I just took the buildd list and omitted arches with intractable problems. I'm sure there are a couple of other arches I'll need to add as well. The fix is in alioth. I'll upload when PETSc gets into testing

Bug#642439: Compile with support for CHOLMOD

2012-01-19 Thread Adam C Powell IV
tags 642439 pending thanks On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 18:23 +0200, Mikael Öhman wrote: Package: libpetsc3.1 Version: 3.1.dfsg-11 Severity: wishlist The CHOLMOD package is supposedly excellent, and is already available (libcholmod1.7.1) so I see no reason not to include it, at least for the 3.2

Bug#642439: Compile with support for CHOLMOD

2012-01-19 Thread Adam C Powell IV
reassign 642439 libpetsc3.2 thanks Sorry, forgot to switch this to 3.2. On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:59 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: tags 642439 pending thanks On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 18:23 +0200, Mikael Öhman wrote: Package: libpetsc3.1 Version: 3.1.dfsg-11 Severity: wishlist

Bug#654865: petsc: please add shared libraries to debug package

2012-01-19 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hello Christophe, On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 13:26 +0100, Christophe Trophime wrote: Source: petsc Version: 3.0.0.dfsg-5.1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, it will be nice to have shared librairies in the debug package as well (if possible) thanks At some point I'm considering

Bug#656189: petsc: Please disable hcp of the mpicc implementation

2012-01-18 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hello Sylvestre, On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 12:03 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Source: petsc Severity: important Tags: patch Hello, It would be nice if you could apply the attached patch. It disables the search of mpicc as hcp. For an unclear reason, it fixes the bug #624671. slepc fails

Bug#653616: libmpich2-dev: Missing library linkage for libmpich.so on MIPS(el) and S390

2012-01-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 11:15 -0600, Pavan Balaji wrote: On 01/12/2012 08:18 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Just tested a build, it seems to set the link properly, thanks very much. Do you have a timetable for the release of 1.5.x? 1.5 GA will be released this summer, but alpha/beta/RC

Bug#653616: libmpich2-dev: Missing library linkage for libmpich.so on MIPS(el) and S390

2012-01-12 Thread Adam C Powell IV
/debian/changelog 2011-08-27 03:06:32.0 -0400 +++ mpich2-1.4.1/debian/changelog 2012-01-12 16:56:38.0 -0500 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +mpich2 (1.4.1-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low + + [ Adam C. Powell, IV ] + * Link shared libraries with their dependencies (closes: #653616). + + -- Adam C. Powell

Bug#653616: libmpich2-dev: Missing library linkage for libmpich.so on MIPS(el) and S390

2012-01-11 Thread Adam C Powell IV
for any released version to figure out what all flags/libs are being set. -- Pavan On 01/07/2012 08:19 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote: That may be true, but it is a goal of Debian to be able to build the archive using binutils-gold, which requires each ELF object (shared library

Bug#653616: libmpich2-dev: Missing library linkage for libmpich.so on MIPS(el) and S390

2012-01-11 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hello Pavan, On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 12:49 -0600, Pavan Balaji wrote: Hi Adam, On 01/11/2012 12:26 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote: But since we made that switch that switch in early December, MPICH2 has been breaking a number of package builds now which used to work with LAM, and some

Bug#617613: FreeCAD OCTPL

2012-01-10 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 12:05 +0100, Juergen Riegel wrote: Hi together, I'm, together with Werner, the maintainer of FreeCAD. Based on the long history of license struggle with OCTPL I do not think they will change the license soon. So I decided to go for GPL free for the 0.13 release of

Bug#652061: elmerfem: FTBFS missing build-dependencvy?

2012-01-10 Thread Adam C Powell IV
. ScaLAPACK works around this by explicitly linking to all of the MPICH2 libraries, and its dependencies (MUMPS, PETSc etc.) inherit this linkage so they don't break. To test I'll need to log into an s390 or mips test machine at some point... -Adam On Sat, 2012-01-07 at 11:54 -0800, Adam C

Bug#652061: elmerfem: FTBFS missing build-dependencvy?

2012-01-07 Thread Adam C Powell IV
tags 652061 pending thanks On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 12:11 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote: * Christoph Egger christ...@debian.org, 2011-12-14, 16:01: Your package failed to build on the buildds: checking for dseupd_ in -larpack... yes configure: WARNING: No parallel arpack found. checking for

Bug#653616: libmpich2-dev: Missing library linkage for libmpich.so on MIPS(el) and S390

2012-01-07 Thread Adam C Powell IV
is libmpich, libmpl and libopa, if you are using generic TCP/IP and shared memory support. But if you enable other modules, more libraries might be required. -- Pavan On 12/29/2011 01:48 PM, Adam C Powell IV wrote: X-DebBugs-CC: 653...@bugs.debian.org Package: libmpich2-dev

Bug#653647: libscotchparmetis-dev: Please add ParMETIS_V3_Mesh2Dual

2012-01-01 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 18:26 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Package: libscotchparmetis-dev Severity: wishlist PETSc cannot use libscotchparmetis-dev for matrix partitioning because it is missing the ParMETIS_V3_Mesh2Dual function. Please implement it in the interface (assuming its

Bug#653610: scalapack: FTBFS on mips(el) and s390

2011-12-30 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Thanks Muammar, it looks like everything worked and it built everywhere, except s390x which is waiting for a fix to PVM. I uploaded the new MUMPS, PETSc will go in as soon as MUMPS is ready. Thanks again! -Adam On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 20:39 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote: Source: scalapack

Bug#653610: scalapack: FTBFS on mips(el) and s390

2011-12-29 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:scalapack Severity: serious Tags: patch Hi Muammar, I'm afraid scalapack FTBFS again on three platforms. On all three the failure mechanism is the same: libmpich2.so is not linked to libmpl.so . The workaround is in the attached patch: if you explicitly link -lmpich -lmpl it

Bug#653616: libmpich2-dev: Missing library linkage for libmpich.so on MIPS(el) and S390

2011-12-29 Thread Adam C Powell IV
X-DebBugs-CC: 653...@bugs.debian.org Package: libmpich2-dev Version: 1.4.1-1+b1 Greetings, On mips(el) and s390, the scalapack build fails with: gfortran -o /build/buildd-scalapack_1.8.0-8-mipsel-D7TgwK/scalapack-1.8.0/TESTING/xspblas1tst psblas1tst.o psblastst.o slamch.o pblastst.o

Bug#653618: slepc: Please package new upstream version 3.2

2011-12-29 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:slepc Severity: wishlist Hello, Upstream is now at version 3.2, which uses PETSc 3.2. My petsc package is ready and awaiting uploads of scalapack and mumps to fix bugs 653610 and 653032 and you can find it at: http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/petsc/ (it will probably be in the archive

Bug#653647: libscotchparmetis-dev: Please add ParMETIS_V3_Mesh2Dual

2011-12-29 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: libscotchparmetis-dev Severity: wishlist PETSc cannot use libscotchparmetis-dev for matrix partitioning because it is missing the ParMETIS_V3_Mesh2Dual function. Please implement it in the interface (assuming its functionality is somewhere in Scotch). -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D

Bug#650804: Bug#652313: Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

2011-12-27 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 20:50 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote: Hi Adam, On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 14:41, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote: Hi Muammar, On Fri, 2011-12-23 at 11:59 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote: On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 23:28, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org

Bug#652313: Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules

2011-12-27 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Muammar, Reducing the recipients list as this concerns technical details. On Sun, 2011-12-25 at 20:31 +0100, Muammar El Khatib wrote: Source: scalapack Followup-For: Bug #652313 Hi, I have prepared a new revision of scalapack, but I have a doubt which is: do I have to provide a new

Bug#653032: mumps: clean removes patches, nothing re-applies them

2011-12-23 Thread Adam C Powell IV
tags 653032 patch tags 653032 pending block 653032 by 652312 block 653032 by 652313 thanks This is fixed in alioth and I'll upload it when 652312 and 652313 are fixed. -Adam On Thu, 2011-12-22 at 18:00 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Package: src:mumps Version: 4.10.0-1 Severity: serious I

Bug#650804: Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

2011-12-22 Thread Adam C Powell IV
tags 652313 patch thanks On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 13:23 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: retitle 652313 Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules block 652313 by 652312 thanks Hi Julien, On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 21:03 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 08:43:12 -0500, Adam C

Bug#652900: scotch: New upstream available

2011-12-21 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:scotch Severity: wishlist Bug title says it all. -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#650804: Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

2011-12-21 Thread Adam C Powell IV
retitle 652313 Needs mpich2 targets in debian/rules block 652313 by 652312 thanks Hi Julien, On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 21:03 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 08:43:12 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 17:32 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Dec 16

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

2011-12-19 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Sat, 2011-12-17 at 17:32 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 08:00:15 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: I think blacs-mpi, scalapack and suitesparse make sense for no-change rebuilds. But I've been procrastinating maintenance on the rest (just took care of spooles last

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

2011-12-16 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Fri, 2011-12-16 at 09:57 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: Hi, On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 19:45:47 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Found the problem. PETSc built on November 16 with mpi-defaults 0.6 which depended on LAM on non-openmpi arches. Now mpi-defaults 1.0.1 released 12/4 depends

Bug#652061: elmerfem: FTBFS missing build-dependencvy?

2011-12-15 Thread Adam C Powell IV
clone 652061 -1 reassign -1 libarpack2-dev retitle -1 Removed symbols needed by other packages found -1 3.0.1-1 block 652061 by -1 thanks On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 14:31 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Hi Sylvestre, On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:50 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Le mercredi 14

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

2011-12-15 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 09:55 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: reopen 651452 found 651452 0.11.0-12 thanks Hi! * Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org [111214 15:33]: Better to rip out the -llam and replace LLAM in the patch with -lmpi. I'll test then upload -12

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

2011-12-15 Thread Adam C Powell IV
-9 by -8 thanks On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 14:36 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 09:55 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: reopen 651452 found 651452 0.11.0-12 thanks Hi! * Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org [111214 15:33]: Better to rip out

Bug#617613: FreeCAD not in Testing

2011-12-15 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 18:15 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: Hi as we have been asked about this license problem and not yet provided an answer: Either the licensing is changed so that the incompatibility no longer is there (by either getting the license changed, or exceptions in the other

Bug#617613: FreeCAD not in Testing

2011-12-15 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Francesco, On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 19:30 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: On Sun, 13 Nov 2011 11:49:10 -0500 Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 15:20 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] Yes, but I think freecad should not be released in a stable version (again

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

2011-12-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Alexander, On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 10:09 +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: reopen 651452 retitle 651452 illuminator: FTBFS on archs where petsc uses liblam (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte') found 651452 0.11.0-8.2 clone 651452 -1 retitle -1 illuminat:

Bug#652058: src:deal.ii: Please change debug packages to new Debian style to reduce build time and bloat

2011-12-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:deal.ii Version: 7.0.0-3 Severity: wishlist The upstream debug method takes twice as long to build and uses a lot more disk space than the Debian method of stripping debug symbols into a separate file. Please change it to the Debian way. -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B

Bug#652057: src:deal.ii: Please package new version 7.1.0

2011-12-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:deal.ii Version: 7.0.0-3 Severity: wishlist Subject says it all. -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#652061: elmerfem: FTBFS missing build-dependencvy?

2011-12-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Christoph, On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 16:01 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: Package: src:elmerfem Version: 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-3 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the

Bug#652101: src:petsc: Please package Version 3.2

2011-12-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:petsc Severity: wishlist Subject says it all. -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#652061: elmerfem: FTBFS missing build-dependencvy?

2011-12-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Sylvestre, On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:50 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Le mercredi 14 décembre 2011 à 11:58 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit : Hi Christoph, On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 16:01 +0100, Christoph Egger wrote: Package: src:elmerfem Version: 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-3 Severity

Bug#651452: illuminator: FTBFS on sparc (tsview-tsview.o: undefined reference to symbol 'lam_mpi_byte')

2011-12-12 Thread Adam C Powell IV
X-Debbugs-Cc: Alexander Reichle-Schmehl alexan...@schmehl.info, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org Dear Alexander and Julien, Please accept my apologies for uploading just now without incorporating yoru recent changes. I had not seen your NMU uploads because they came via the BTS system to

Bug#651905: src:illuminator: FTBFS everywhere due to build: build-arch build-indep

2011-12-12 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:illuminator Version: 0.11.0-10 Severity: serious The conversion to build-arch and build-indep targets caused illuminator to FTBFS, because buildds do debian/rules build which triggers build-indep without installing the Build-Depends-Indep packages. Temporary workaround: change to

Bug#651105: Fixed in git repo

2011-12-12 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 18:52 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: tags 651105 + pending thanks Adam, can you please upload? Dependencies should be fine now, I checked with pbuilder. It's building now, will upload in 12 hours or so. Thanks, Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F

Bug#651905: src:illuminator: FTBFS everywhere due to build: build-arch build-indep

2011-12-12 Thread Adam C Powell IV
tags 651905 pending thanks The fix is in alioth, will build and upload within 12 hours or so. On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 19:32 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: Package: src:illuminator Version: 0.11.0-10 Severity: serious The conversion to build-arch and build-indep targets caused illuminator

Bug#644943: Please switch source package to OCE

2011-12-04 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Denis, On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 23:13 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/21 D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/21 Adam C Powell IV: On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 07:49 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: Thanks Adam for your upload. You're welcome, sorry it took so long. There's a problem with the package

Bug#644943: Please switch source package to OCE

2011-12-04 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Sun, 2011-12-04 at 10:10 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 23:13 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/21 D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/21 Adam C Powell IV: On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 07:49 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: Thanks Adam for your upload. You're welcome, sorry

Bug#644943: Please switch source package to OCE

2011-11-20 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hi Denis, On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 07:49 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: Thanks Adam for your upload. You're welcome, sorry it took so long. There's a problem with the package copyright, see the attached. I think this will only require a simple patch to debian/copyright, and can get to it in a couple

Bug#644943: Please switch source package to OCE

2011-11-15 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 20:19 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/13 Adam C Powell IV wrote: [...] But can't seem to be able to push my one change: $ git push --all origin Enter passphrase for key '/home/hazelsct/.ssh/id_rsa': Counting objects: 7, done. Delta compression using up to 2

Bug#644943: Please switch source package to OCE

2011-11-13 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Sat, 2011-11-12 at 01:40 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/11 Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 07:51 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:57 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/5 D. Barbier wrote: [...] Hello again, Current master looks

Bug#617613: FreeCAD not in Testing

2011-11-13 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 15:20 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:18:01 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote: Can we decrease the severity of this bug to return the freecad back to testing? Why? I think the bug is still unfixed and still serious, unfortunately. The bug filed on

Bug#644943: Please switch source package to OCE

2011-11-13 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 17:49 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/13 Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org: [...] I know, I used pristine-tar to generate .orig.tar.gz for my build. But as a formality, when sponsoring or otherwise uploading packages, I like to verify that it's the same

Bug#617613: FreeCAD not in Testing

2011-11-13 Thread Adam C Powell IV
issue is not resolved we will request deletion of freecad from unstable? Thanks. Anton On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Adam C Powell IV hazel...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, 2011-11-13 at 15:20 +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:18:01 +0100 Anton Gladky wrote: Can

Bug#644943: Please switch source package to OCE

2011-11-11 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:57 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/5 D. Barbier wrote: [...] Hello again, Current master looks good to me, it can IMO be uploaded. There is a pristine-tar branch, one can run pristine-tar checkout ../oce_0.7.0.orig.tar.gz to generate upstream tarball.

Bug#644943: Please switch source package to OCE

2011-11-11 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 07:51 -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 23:57 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/5 D. Barbier wrote: [...] Hello again, Current master looks good to me, it can IMO be uploaded. There is a pristine-tar branch, one can run pristine-tar

Bug#644943: Please switch source package to OCE

2011-11-04 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 16:31 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/2 Adam C Powell IV wrote: On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:58 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/1 D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/1 Adam C Powell IV wrote: [...] That's a good question. I could go either way: 1. tart

Bug#644943: Please switch source package to OCE

2011-11-02 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hello Denis, On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 18:54 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/1 Adam C Powell IV wrote: [...] Hello, I just pushed a db/debian branch into upstream repository https://github.com/tpaviot/oce/tree/db/debian It will not be merged into our trunk, I pushed it there since I

Bug#644943: Please switch source package to OCE

2011-11-02 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 14:58 +0100, D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/1 D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/11/1 Adam C Powell IV wrote: [...] That's a good question. I could go either way: 1. tart a brand new repository, since it's a new package with new names -- but then start with a new

Bug#644943: Please switch source package to OCE

2011-11-01 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Hello Denis et al., Apologies for the delay and for generally being out-of-pocket recently. On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 09:56 +0200, D. Barbier wrote: On 2011/10/13 Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Le jeudi 13 octobre 2011 à 10:08 +0200, D. Barbier a écrit : On 2011/10/11 Adam C Powell IV wrote: Dear

Bug#646770: src:salome: New upstream version 6.3.1

2011-10-26 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:salome Severity: wishlist Please package the new upstream version, which should have a lot of the patches merged. -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6 Engineering consulting with open source tools http://www.opennovation.com/ signature.asc

Bug#645930: src:med-fichier: FTBFS due to git checkout in clean target

2011-10-19 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:med-fichier Version: 3.0.3-1 Severity: serious Greetings, The git checkout in the clean target makes this package FTBFS. What blithering idiot could have thought that one up? Get rid of it at once! -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Bug#644943: Please switch source package to OCE

2011-10-11 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Dear Denis, On Tue, 2011-10-11 at 01:20 +0200, D. Barbier wrote: Package: src:opencascade Version: 6.5.0.dfsg-2 Severity: wishlist Hello Adam, As you know, several community members have launched a fork called OpenCascade Community Edition (OCE) https://github.com/tpaviot/oce I am a

Bug#638214: Fails to build from source: libqwt5-qt4-dev no longer exists

2011-08-30 Thread Adam C Powell IV
changed by Adam C. Powell, IV hazel...@debian.org dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture amd64 dpkg-source --before-build elmerfem-6.1.0.svn.5272.dfsg dpkg-checkbuilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: libqwt5-qt4-dev dpkg-buildpackage: warning: Build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied

Bug#637845: deal.ii: FTBFS: arch-dependent build runs debian/rules build-doc target without Build-Depends-Indep packages installed

2011-08-14 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:deal.ii Version: 7.0.0-2 Severity: serious For some reason, arch-dependent builds on the buildds are triggering the build-doc target, but doxygen is not installed because it's in Build-Depends-Indep but not Build-Depends. I can't figure out why it's doing this, and can't reproduce

Bug#637655: deal.ii: Please link with ARPACK and MUMPS

2011-08-13 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: src:deal.ii Version: 7.0.0-2 Severity: wishlist Version 7.0.0 can now link with ARPACK, and MUMPS linking has been supported for a while. Please fix the configure/build system to recognize them in their Debian places and link properly. -Adam -- GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B

Bug#637352: libtrilinos-dev: Sacado_cmath.hpp redefines cmath functions

2011-08-10 Thread Adam C Powell IV
Package: libtrilinos-dev Version: 10.4.0.dfsg-1 Severity: important Greetings, Between g++ 4.5 and 4.6, cmath has added the std::acosh, std::asinh and std::atanh functions for floats and doubles, so compiling with Sacado.hpp, which indirectly includes Sacado_cmath.hpp, fails with conflicts with

Bug#458812: ITP: aster -- Finite Element Analysis (FEA) software for engineering simulations

2011-05-10 Thread Adam C Powell IV
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 10:36 +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: Hello, I would like to help in packaging the Code Aster software[1] for Debian. Thanks for your interest in the packaging of Code Aster. You are more than welcome to help. If it is not the case now, you could join the Debian Science

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >