tag 627134 +pending
thanks
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:59:53AM +0300, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.20-9+squeeze1
> Severity: normal
> File: /usr/lib/mime/packages/mutt
>
[...]
>
> Thus, if Mutt registers itself as a mailcap handler for
> message/rfc822, it should
tag 688448 +moreinfo
thanks
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:45:12AM -0700, Paul Vojta wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.21-6.2
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> When I'm reading INBOX, new mail arriving in INBOX doesn't show up
> when I do '.' (or 'j' or 'k'). It only shows up after I
tag 673374 +moreinfo
thanks
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 09:15:51AM +0200, anonymous coward wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.20-9+squeeze2
> Severity: normal
>
>
> This version of mutt now reports new mail on mbox files where mail was
> already read. The "N" marker is cleared upon opening a
tag 834818 +pending
thanks
On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:18:55PM +0100, Richard Russon wrote:
> This is fixed in commit:
> https://github.com/neomutt/neomutt/commit/9f06971bc0a1de06ef2db8d3d3f51baf0a2370dc
>
> This will be included in the next release of NeoMutt.
> The release was planned for
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 09:11:57PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 13:00 +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > > * Package name: neomutt
>
> Please don't. We don't need another mutt fork in Debian.
>
> > > Did you talk to the current mutt maintainers about
tag 434235 +pending
thanks
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 03:14:54PM -0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
> FYI. This is fixed upstream in https://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/rev/a4d885bb36ab
Thanks Kevin, we have the patch ready to ship for 1.5.24-2
forwarded 545814 http://bugs.mutt.org/3807
severity 545814 wishlist
tag 545814 -pending
thanks
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 02:48:32PM +0400, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version 1.5.20-2
> Tags: l10n
>
> Now I've attached at LDAP-address-book and added instruction
> set query_command
Package: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.7.2
Severity: important
This problem compromises our ability to use git-buildpackage to manage quilt
patches.
It seems that "gbp pq export" incorrectly drops the "Gbp-Pq: Topic" strings that
are set in the patches.
Additionally if a new patch is created and
tag 694992 +moreinfo
thanks
On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 03:07:49AM +, Tom Jones wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.21-6.2
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I have:
>
> set smtp_authenticators = 'gssapi'
Hi Christian && Tom,
do you have a way to reproduce this for me?
tag 803405 +pending
thanks
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 01:57:20PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.24-1
> Severity: normal
>
> Before upgrading to mutt 1.5.24, I could run mutt, press 'q' and
> the shell prompt was the same color as it was before mutt ran.
> Now, after
tag 678596 +pending
thanks
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:08:11AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Anyway, there is no reason for mutt to set NoDisplay=true by the file
> provided by the packaging at /debian/extra/mutt.desktop
>
> As the same reason as discussed for evince below, we should not use
> this:
tag 741213 +pending
thanks
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 01:25:10AM +0100, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> As signing-party's pgpring, Mutt's does not look at the right field as
> key lengh for DSA and Elgamal keys, which results to an incorrect
> output similar to that reported in
tag 695220 +pending
thanks
The upstream patch was added in commit 1d7c7740987a77eb3281a260b5decc73cb96dff5.
This will be shipped with the next version of mutt in Debian.
Ok thanks, closing as agreed.
tag 695263 +moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 12:29:57PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Package: mutt
> Version: 1.5.21-6.2
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> Here is what I did:
>
> 1) Opened IMAP mailbox.
> 2) Joined two threads (with one message in each of them and different
>
On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 07:45:02PM +0100, Christian Böhme wrote:
> Writing a configuration file (/the/config/file) containing
>
> send-hook '~t (ab|cd)$''set my_var = xyz'
>
> at line 123.
>
>* What was the outcome of this action?
>
> Upon startup, mutt complains
>
> Error in
On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 02:12:30PM +0100, Marco Balmer wrote:
>
> Special in this part, the e-mail was only 3KiB. But I think it is the same
> case.
> I can reproduce it every time.
> Let me know, if necessary, how I can help.
Can you reproduce always with the same mail? Or do you need a big
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 02:31:41PM +0100, Marco Balmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can confirm exactly described behaviour in my mutt environment.
>
> $ dpkg -l mutt
> ii mutt 1.5.23-3 amd64
>
> $ mutt -d 5
> [2015-12-01 14:03:00] 5< a0064 OK Fetch completed.
> [2015-12-01 14:03:00] IMAP
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 07:55:52AM +, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Hi Antonio!
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:42 PM Antonio Radici <anto...@dyne.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot Matteo!
> > I'll take care of the NMU as soon as I get home today
> >
>
>
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:17:43PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Hi Antonio!
>
> On 2015-09-15 at 15:50 (CEST), Antonio Radici wrote:
> > Matteo, is the new release 1.5.24 or are you talking about the NMU?
>
> The new release 1.5.24; working on it right now.
>
Th
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 12:08:27PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 09:54:56 +0000 Antonio Radici <anto...@dyne.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > sorry for the delay but I wasn't in Ireland for a while; do you need a
> > sponsor
> > for this?
> >
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 03:23:29PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Antonio Radici <anto...@dyne.org> wrote:
> > can you make sure it's in git.debian.org afterwards?
>
> Thanks to myon, I have commit powers on mutt's
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 12:23:03PM +0200, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 2015-09-02 at 10:15 (CEST), Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > 1.5.24 has been rolled out. So it seems not to be necessary to patch
> > 1.5.23?
>
> Working on that right now.
>
> I hope to get through the messy patchset
Hi,
sorry for the delay but I wasn't in Ireland for a while; do you need a sponsor
for this?
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 03:01:33PM +0200, Ruben Undheim wrote:
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> I've prepared an NMU for mutt (versioned as 1.5.23-3.2) and
> will soon ask a sponsor to upload it to the DELAYED
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 09:14:51AM -0700, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
I'm not a good judge of what is an RC bug, but this patch would be
*really* nice to have in Jessie+1. It's a very low risk patch and stops
an easy to hit segfault.
-Kevin
I think it makes sense, I will rebuild mutt this
-9116-jessie.patch thanks to Salvatore
+Bonaccorso; now it correctly fixes the CVE and does not affect other
+ functionalities of mutt (Closes: 771674)
+
+ -- Antonio Radici anto...@dyne.org Thu, 04 Dec 2014 21:09:07 +
+
mutt (1.5.23-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Created upstream
On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 07:05:14PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi all,
(disclaimer, not the maintainer here, just proposing a possible
debdiff).
I think this is what we should do, I'll apply the patch tonight.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
-jessie.patch to address
+CVE-2014-9116; the patch prevent mutt_substrdup from being used in a way
+that can lead to a segfault.
+
+ -- Antonio Radici anto...@dyne.org Sat, 29 Nov 2014 18:13:56 +
+
mutt (1.5.23-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
diff -Nru mutt-1.5.23
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 02:49:27PM +1100, Murray McAllister wrote:
Good morning,
Jakub Wilk reported a crash in mutt:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771125
Looking in mutt-1.5.23-2.fc20.x86_64:
[...]
I'll have a patch/solution ready for this by tonight; thanks for
Hi,
this patch fixes the buffer overflow + RCE in the mutt version that is
currently in stable; I have already got the packages built and ready to be
uploaded.
Bug: http://bugs.debian.org/771125
CVE: CVE-2014-9116
Debdiff of the *dsc against the current version in stable is attached; let me
know
And the attachment is now, actually, attached :)
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:13:39PM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes the buffer overflow + RCE in the mutt version that is
currently in stable; I have already got the packages built and ready to be
uploaded.
Bug: http
A better debdiff is included, this does not include two vim artifacts at the
end of the first patch, sorry for the inconvenience.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:26:37PM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
And the attachment is now, actually, attached :)
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:13:39PM +, Antonio
notfound 771125 mutt/1.5.23-1.1
thanks
It seems that the bug is not reproducible on the latest version in
unstable/testing.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 10:42:35PM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
A better debdiff is included, this does not include two vim artifacts at the
end of the first patch, sorry for the inconvenience.
Again, another debdiff; this time the patch has been modified to correctly skip
the case where end
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 08:08:11AM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Control: found -1 1.5.23-1.1
Hi Antonio
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 11:09:08PM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
notfound 771125 mutt/1.5.23-1.1
thanks
It seems that the bug is not reproducible on the latest version
reopen 766873
retitle 766873 Please unblock cfengine 3.6.2-4
thanks
Reopening this bug, it seems that the package didn't make the freeze, despite
that the fact that the calculation in the previous correspondence seems to be
correct; can you please unblock it?
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
: Antonio Radici anto...@dyne.org} [release.debian.org]
release.debian.org: Please reduce age for cfengine3
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #766873 to the same values
previously set
retitle 766873 Please unblock cfengine 3.6.2-4
Bug #766873 [release.debian.org
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I recently packages the latest version of cfengine3 (3.6.2) and I uploaded it in
time before freeze (more than 10 days), unfortunately this version did not build
on sparc and kfreebsd so I spent the past two days on porterboxes
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 08:07:45PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Hi,
Antonio Radici wrote:
The latest version (3.6.2-4) is building everywhere and it will be really
great
if you could reduce its age to 6 days so that we can have it in Jessie,
since
the existing version is quite
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 02:57:20PM -0700, Matt Rechkemmer wrote:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.21-6.2+deb7u2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation? I was attempting to use mutt's spam
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 04:13:28PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
Control: tag -1 + fixed-upstream
Hi,
Geoff Crompton wrote on 22 May 2014:
A fresh install of postgrey on two Wheezy machines fails to start. Much like
was the case in debian bug #722136, starting the postgrey daemon on the
:
https://github.com/Webhuis/Cfengine-debian/wiki
I don't know, whether there have been trials to contact the current (MIA?)
maintainer of cfengine3, Antonio Radici. I'll send a MIA request to debian-
devel right after this mail
@DebianPackagingTeam: Do you need any help? I'm not a DD, so I
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 06:07:57PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.21+hg20101013-0lxtec4
Severity: wishlist
Is there a chance to package 1.5.22 in the near future?
Yes, will prepare the package in the coming days and will upload it within this
week.
Sorry for
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 10:42:23AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
As for options on how to move on, I suspect rewriting battery-stat as
a script and dropping the C daemon as I suggested in bug #720338 is
the best way forward. The task at hand do not really need much code.
I'll check what's
On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 10:24:21PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:09:46AM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 07:11:58PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 05:16:16PM +0200, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
Attached is an updated version
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:01:28AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
Hi,
Since I was fixing this in Ubuntu I thought I'd help out and fix it
directly in Debian too.
I've prepared an NMU for mutt (versioned as 1.5.21-6.3) and uploaded it
to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 07:11:58PM +0200, Evgeni Golov wrote:
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 05:16:16PM +0200, Nikolaus Schulz wrote:
Attached is an updated version of
584138-mx_update_context-segfault.patch that seems to fix the problem.
Copied from upstream changeset 0e4f1782ea2e.
This bug
tag 701864 +accepted
thanks
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 09:41:42AM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
Package: cfengine3
Version: 3.0.5+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
The copyright file of cfengine3 version 3.0.5+dfsg-1 misses the full text of
the Frontier Artistic License, violating Debian Policy 12.5. A
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 08:55:37AM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
tags 683893 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for mutt (versioned as 1.5.21-6.2) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
It looks good to me, thanks for
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 01:06:19AM -0500, Luis Mochan wrote:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.21-6.1
Followup-For: Bug #626294
Dear Maintainer,
For some unknown reason my gnome-shell session crashed. At the time I was
using
mutt. The next few times I started, mutt crashed while getting headers
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:34:37AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi Antonio,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011, Antonio Radici wrote:
tag 618425 +pending
tag 622145 +pending
tag 620945 +pending
tag 578098 +pending
tag 539737 +pending
thanks
Do you mean that you have fixes for these bugs
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:20:39PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
What's the status? The freeze is really soon now.
Sorry for the continuous delay, I'll have the update ready tonight; if
this bug is not updated by tonight feel free to NMU.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:20:39PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 09:23:27AM +0200, Antonio Radici wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 06:58:59PM +0200, Antonio Radici wrote:
Sorry I missed this message; I'll have an upload ready for tomorrow.
I haven't forgotten
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 06:58:59PM +0200, Antonio Radici wrote:
Sorry I missed this message; I'll have an upload ready for tomorrow.
I haven't forgotten this message, I'll have the upload ready for this
weekend, sorry for the delay.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 06:48:03PM +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 02:59:28AM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.21-5
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Please enabled hardened build flags through dpkg-buildflags.
Patch attached.
On Sun, Apr 01, 2012 at 09:16:06PM +0200, Jimmy Thrasibule wrote:
Hi,
What is the status of this bug? The given workaround doesn't work for me
and I had to switch to the testing package.
We will have a solution to use the stable package?
It seems that there is a patch, I'll try to apply
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 06:43:28PM +0100, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
Hello Antonio,
On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 09:58:59AM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 03:42:58PM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
can you please verify my notes on #610720 and resubmit an amended .po
tag 658945 +confirmed pending
thanks
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 04:22:11PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
Dear maintainer,
As I would like to get all of the Perl4::Corelibs issues sorted out
before wheezy releases, to ease the transition for perl 5.16 in
wheezy+1, I intend to file NMUs for
tag 664636 +confirmed
thanks
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 02:37:16PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Package: cfengine3
Version: 3.2.4-1
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to purge.
From the
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:11:05PM +0100, Agustin Martin wrote:
Seems there was a typo in bug number. Re-sending to apparently correct bug
it looks good to me, thanks for taking care of this.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
retitle 616131 RFA: lsb -- Linux Standard Base 3.2 support package
noowner 616131
thanks
Sorry for answering this late but unfortunately I don't have time to
maintain this package, it was an oversight to get the ITA, so I'm
setting this back to RFA.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 08:03:45AM +0930, Kevin Shanahan wrote:
Hi,
Sorry to pester, but any idea when we might see the updated mutt
package including this patch? It would be nice to get rid of this
little annoyance.
I will prepare an upload in the coming weekend.
Cheers
Antonio
--
tag 626294 +pending
thanks
Hi,
thanks for the patch, this will be included in the next version of mutt
and I will certainly send it upstream.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
tag 626647 +confirmed pending
thanks
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 01:28:51AM +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
Package: src:cfengine3
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hi!
Seems the patch below would make cfengine3 build on kfreebsd (tested on the
-amd64 variant).
Thanks
I will include the patch
tag 626280 +confirmed pending
thanks
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:39:18AM +0600, Andrey Bondarenko wrote:
Tags: patch
Here is a debdiff with modified debian/patches/fhs-compliance on top
of git commit 826a741f45aa0617336583bd5c2d01db2ad994b1.
The fix works for me. Please consider including it
tag 626294 -moreinfo
thanks
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 01:38:25PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.21-5
Followup-For: Bug #626294
Hi,
I'm also getting a segfault on every second or third imap folder I want
to open. My server however is dovecot 1:2.0.12-1.
I'm
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 01:38:25PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.21-5
Followup-For: Bug #626294
Hi,
I'm also getting a segfault on every second or third imap folder I want
to open. My server however is dovecot 1:2.0.12-1.
I'm attaching the .muttrc,
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 07:03:21PM +0200, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
Just realized this, another machine using the same imap server does not
crash. That one has mutt 1.5.21-4 install (and mutt-patched as well).
At a first glance the culprit seems
tag 626294 +moreinfo
severity 626294 important
thanks
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 05:52:01PM +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote:
Package: mutt
Version: 1.5.21-5
Severity: grave
Hello,
Since the upgrade to mutt 1.5.21-5, mutt occasionally crashes with a
segmentation fault at opening a IMAP maildir
tag 569038 -moreinfo
tag 569038 +confirmed pending
thanks
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 05:10:23AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi,
An evil, evil workaround is to attach to mutt with gdb, use bt to
list frames, use the frame command to enter a frame representing the
read or recv call, and then
tag 88860 +moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Is this still reproducible? If it is, can you please attach a digest
message where this is reproducible?
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
tag 620945 +pending
thanks
The documentation is going to be updated on 1.5.21-5.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 625697 +confirmed pending
thanks
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 09:08:06AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi
There is a new upstream version of postgrey available. It would be
great if you could update it. It too solves one goal of the Debian
Perl Group to drop the libdigest-sha1-perl
tag 584581 +confirmed pending
thanks
This should be fixed by debian/patches/mutt-patched/sidebar-utf8 which is going
to be released with 1.5.21-5 (next upload), the patch performs more boundary
checks in the function that crashes so we shouldn't see this segfault anymore.
We will see something
forwarded 611412 http://bugs.mutt.org/3514
tag 611412 +upstream
thanks
Fix in git, patch submitted upstream
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
found 502627 1.5.21-4
tag 502627 +confirmed pending
thanks
reproducible with 1.5.21-4, I will try to fix this for 1.5.21-5
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 584581 +confirmed
thanks
From the backtrace is not clear where the failure in realloc() is coming
from, I'm wondering if this is still happening, anyway I don't want you
to test this again until we have 1.5.21-5, which will include a
re-worked sidebar patch.
I hope to have the upload ready
tag 603287 +confirmed moreinfo pending
thanks
Hi Julien,
can you please provide me with two maildirs (even if empty) that
represents your use-case? I have a patch in mind (basically using
mbstowcs(NULL, s, 0) rather than strlen(s)) and I will include it in
1.5.21-5 but I want to be really sure
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 02:28:18PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Hi,
Since the bug was just about breakage in the existing sidebar-newonly
patch, I think you've already fixed it in 2009 (in 1.5.20-4, by no
longer applying the sidebar-newonly patch).
Sorry for the pedantry. Thanks for
tag 494735 +pending
thanks
The attached patch should fix the problem, I'm currently testing it, if
it works fine I will include it in the next upload.
Cheers
Antonio
From 15c23e502a2dcbc20bd179107bb384c99d30dc9d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antonio Radici anto...@dyne.org
Date: Sat, 30 Apr
forcemerge 499596 499985
thanks
force-merging 499985 on 499596 as they are siilar issues both related to
displaying continuation chars when the lines are wrapped.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
tag 586454 +confirmed pending
thanks
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 07:37:39PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
Could you please include the patch patch-1.5.4-ow.multiple-fcc.2
from http://www.mandarb.com/mutt/ (direct link
http://www.mandarb.com/mutt/patch-1.5.4-ow.multiple-fcc.2) in the
mutt-patched
Included in git commit 007cfc9
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
the part that was reproducible before is still reproducible with
1.5.21-4 when menu_scroll is set. The flash is not reproducible.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
forwarded 620945 http://bugs.mutt.org/3460
tag 620945 +confirmed upstream
tag 620945 -pending
thanks
Given the new behavior this does not sound like a bug but rather a
documentation request.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
found 610720 1.5.21-4
tag 610720 +confirmed pending
thanks
To be addressed in the next upload.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
found 612263 1.5.21-4
tag 612263 +confirmed pending
thanks
To be addressed in the next upload.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tag 494735 +confirmed
found 494735 1.5.21-4
thanks
confirmed and reproducible against 1.5.21-4
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:26:01AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
At least one person upstream seemed to agree with the bug. I've poked
the upstream bug, following up to that comment.
I still consider this a data-loss bug.
OK,
thanks for following up with upstream, we will keep this open
tag 624085 +confirmed pending
tag 624058 +confirmed pending
thanks
The patch for these bugs will be written for 1.5.21-5 and will be
uploaded accordingly.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
tag 619216 +confirmed pending
thanks
There is a patch, I've asked Michael Elkins if we can apply it (and if
he can commit it).
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
reassign 539737 reportbug
tag 539737 -moreinfo pending
thanks
Hi,
I'm reassigning this bug to reportbug because I haven't received a reply
after 10 days and I believe that this is not a mutt bug.
Please see my last correspondence for the details; long story short:
mutt supports RFC-1522 encoded
reopen 624111
tag 624111 +confirmed upstream
retitle 624111 mutt: should error if the imported mbox is invalid
thanks
After re-reading your message it seems that you're looking for a
different thing, sorry for closing this bug with the wrong reason.
I'm reopening this bug, accept it and set it
tag 585386 +confirmed wontfix
thanks
Hi Morty,
honestly I think that this bug is a wontfix, mutt should be conservative
in what it sends and liberal in what it accepts, as far as I understand
mutt is able to decrypt messages sent by outlook but it will send
encrypted inline text messages only in
tag 585559 -moreinfo unreproducible
tag 585559 +pending
thanks
We need to find a solution for this, I will run some benchmarks this
weekend and see when and where this is reproducible. At that point I
will be able to take a better decision with the proper data.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To
tag 603291 +confirmed upstream
forwarded 603291 http://bugs.mutt.org/3513
thanks
The feature request has been forwarded upstream.
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
tags 556496 + pending
tags 609115 + patch
tags 609115 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for tokyocabinet (versioned as 1.4.37-6.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/10. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Cheers,
Antonio Radici
diff -Nru tokyocabinet-1.4.37
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:16:57PM +, Antonio Radici wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 05:41:12PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
Hey Antonio,
attached is the gdb backtrace. I anonymized some parts of it
in order not to leak my mails and the imaps server I used,
but this should not matter
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 04:05:19PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
[...]
* Antonio Radici anto...@dyne.org [2011-04-19 13:39]:
(in case you need to cast to the type, it is COLOR_LINE or 'struct
color_line', but you shouldn't need to)
Right done, the problematic patterns are:
color index
I completely lost this bug from my radar, we need to fix this as soon as
possible because at the moment the policy is being violated.
I will prepare the NMU this week (this time for sure).
Cheers
Antonio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
201 - 300 of 745 matches
Mail list logo
