reopen 1020290
stop
> > This effectively makes these packages Essential by stealth. Debian's
> usrmerge
> > FAQ says:
> >
> > * Is it mandatory to install this package?
> > No.
>
> That is correct - new installations are already merged-usr so there's no
> need for that package, hence the
init systems are
welcome to include their helpers in this package.
craig
ps: I'm annoyed enough that this tried to install usr-is-merged and failed.
I would have been furious if it had successfully installed usrmerge and
irreversibly fucked with my filesystems without warning and especially without
my CONSENT.
-10:00"), '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S.%f%z')
datetime.datetime(2022, 9, 8, 21, 26, 9, 706263,
tzinfo=datetime.timezone(datetime.timedelta(days=-1, seconds=50400)))
I can provide a patch if required.
- Craig
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.4
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable'),
Hi,
Im not seeing this issue at all in 5.9.3
cat crash-79988d8886068ffd86a3f3efc90d420f5284c45f | xargs agentxtrap
1: Bad value notation (bs)
$ agentxtrap -V
NET-SNMP version: 5.9.3
>
essage looks like security-type fixes:
- Posts, Post Types: Escape output within `the_meta()`.
- General: Ensure bookmark query limits are numeric.
- Plugins: Escape output in error messages.
- Build/Test Tools: Allow the PHPCS plugin in Composer configuration.
- Craig
the following in /usr/share/dh-exec/dh-exec-install-rename
if (defined ($ENV{"DH_INTERNAL_OPTIONS"}) &&
$ENV{"DH_INTERNAL_OPTIONS"} =~ /-[ai]/) {
$noop = 0;
}
I'm not really sure why this causes the problem, but it definitely sets
something off.
- Craig
On Fri, 12 Aug
Do you have capacity to prepare updates for bullseye?
>
Yes, see attached debdiff for review. It's just those two patches.
- Craig
diff -Nru net-snmp-5.9+dfsg/debian/changelog net-snmp-5.9+dfsg/debian/changelog
--- net-snmp-5.9+dfsg/debian/changelog 2020-09-25 09:10:00.0 +1000
+++ ne
net-snmp/commit/9a0cd7c00947d5e1c6ceb54558d454f87c3b8341
Both sets of commits look pretty clear and simple to implement. I've asked
upstream to confirm these are the only two patches.
- Craig
On Sun, 17 Jul 2022 at 21:12, Craig Small wrote:
> Why, after 10 years, has the mass-rebuild triggered it?
>
Because after even more years of printing a useless warning Dejagnu now
makes it an error[1].
- Craig
1:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=dejagnu.git;a=co
ribute the
referenced file or b) use something always there, such as /dev/null.
psmisc does neither of these as the configure.ac references
global-conf.exp[2]
It's a pretty simple change, don't use global-conf.exp but use /dev/null
instead. I've got that for upstream[3] so next is the Debian package
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 04:01:38AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jul 2022, Craig Sanders wrote:
>
> > and, of course:
> >
> > apt-mark hold sysvinit-core
> >
> > To prevent systemd from being auto-installed in some future upgrade.
>
> You
On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 02:35:33PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2022 at 11:07:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > A little more investigation reveals that it's udev.
> >
> > udev 2.51.3-1 (Wed, 13 Jul 2022 23:05:40 +0200) now depends on 'systemd |
> > s
Jul 16, 2022 at 06:34:35PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
>
> I can't immediately see the package that might be causing the conflict here.
A little more investigation reveals that it's udev.
udev 2.51.3-1 (Wed, 13 Jul 2022 23:05:40 +0200) now depends on 'systemd |
systemd-tmpfiles'.
The prev
if it
wasn't trying to do things an init system has no business doing, if
you didn't have to carefully check it on every upgrade to disable the
next thing it's incompetently trying to take over.
craig
--with specifies, or
subst,install then strip.
That means the current packages specify install, but mean
filter,install,strip. If I make this change, then it will only do install.
I think only doing install is the right answer, but not sure if there is a
way of doing this but not breaking ever
ut didn't find anything.
> ("Nvidia probably knows a reason for the existence of this library."
> wouldn't be helpful either.)
Maybe something like "Nvidia hasn't bothered documenting what this library is
for" might encourage them to volunteer some details :)
craig
--
craig sanders
her packages with descriptions that
are just "package foo provides foo". It's not even the only nvidia-related
package with a useless description. That doesn't excuse this package, it just
means that many other packages have the same bug.
craig
ps: to make matters even worse, even after in
cture[1] I'm not sure if this is still
an issue. I'm about to upload a new version of net-snmp that fixes the
FTBFS with openssl 3.0 so maybe that one can be tried?
- Craig
1:
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/libbsd/libbsd/-/blob/main/include/bsd/nlist.h#L36
INITRD, while
nvidia-kernel-dkms does not, but the warning is printed on the nvidia lines
too.
craig
or anything
similar, or to anything even related to nvidia. Here's it's debian/control
file:
$ cat debian/control
Source: dlocate
Section: utils
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Craig Sanders
Standards-Version: 3.7.2.1
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 13)
Package: dlocate
Architecture: all
Depends: dctrl-to
. If there was an easy proof of concept
that is even better but this looks like its a timing issue with
delayed responses. The information helped get a resolution for me
pretty quickly.
- Craig
1:
https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/blob/V5-9-patches/snmplib/snmp_api.c#L5772
Upstream should have a new version of net-snmp that compiles with
OpenSSL v3.0 in May. I've tested the RC1 release and it compiles
fine.
https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/mailman/message/37642006/
- Craig
ries-only`. It could be based on the mkbmdeb code
removed from dkms.
ditto for `dkms-mkdeb` and `dkms-mkdsc` scripts.
Having separate scripts would also make it easier to keep dkms up-to-date with
upstream without having to patch it on every build.
craig
PS: not having to have the linux headers
ion 2 -p Type
Type=wayland
I ran a strace but couldn't find anything that was obviously wrong.
I suspect it is the same issue as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2068041
ii xdg-desktop-portal-gnome 42.0.1-1 amd64GNOME portal backend for
xdg-desktop-portal
Same version a
Hi Katharina,
Thanks for the bug report. Only the minimised file needs changing and it
needs to remove two characters. There is a single icon that makes a remote
call that needs to be removed and I missed the ', from it.
- Craig
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 at 23:45, Katharina Drexel
wrote
it.
Otherwise, I can close this bug and keep pidof out of procps.
- Craig
1: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810018#67
but cannot confirm this.
- Craig
1:
https://wordpress.org/news/2022/03/wordpress-5-9-2-security-maintenance-release/
2:
https://core.trac.wordpress.org/changeset?sfp_email=_mail===52874%40branches%2F5.9=52786%40branches%2F5.9_email=_mail=
3: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/changeset/52803
memory?
Assuming argv[0] is some value is a reasonable assumption I would have
thought.
- Craig
On Wed, 2 Mar 2022 at 17:39, bi bi wrote:
> Package: snmp
> Version: 5.9.1 (Previous versions should also have these vulnerabilities)
>
> We found one bug in snmp by f
;/snmplib
>
At the very least I'll just remove the code within the ifndef as its a
*backport* of the OpenSSL 1.1.1e function.
I'll look at
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63942436/determining-openssl-version-with-ifdef
or something like that to properly check the result.
- Craig
On Sat, 12 Feb 2022 at 20:35, intrigeri wrote:
> Would one of you be interested in proposing this upstream?
>
Done
https://gitlab.com/apparmor/apparmor/-/merge_requests/852
Not sure if Debian BTS handles forwards to MR, I've only ever done it for
issues.
- Craig
elf so I'm not a good person to work on this.
>
Sure, any idea how I do this?
- Craig
Hi Michael,
Bug 100908 is a duplicate of 982436. 982436 suggested the 99 instead of
10.
I think the logic here is originally these settings were in
/etc/sysctl.conf and that's the last loaded file, so a 99 prefix puts it
"lastish".
- Craig
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 21:00, Michae
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 03:33:21PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:29:48 +1000 Craig Sanders wrote:
> > Package: chromium
> > Version: 90.0.4430.212-1
> Can you please tell me if you see this with chromium 97 or above? This
> sounds like a bug related
":i386" rather than "1.0.32-4:i386")
I have dlocate 1.10 almost ready to upload but just want to verify that it
will work properly in a context I'm unable to test myself.
craig
apt-cache show' and collects its output into an array.
BTW, the package list doesn't really need to be NUL separated. Using newline
(option "-d '\n'" with xargs instead of `-0`) or even spaces (xargs default)
as the separator for package names is fine, as package names don't and can't
conta
Hi Drew,
I've read this a few times, is there something we can do to fix this?
Should the commit be rolled back?
On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 at 07:30, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Hi Craig, Commit 4ad43078 applied a patch for Bug#996245 to make the
> sample debian/rules for python packages suggest
Package: wordpress
Version: 5.8.2+dfsg1-1
Severity: grave
Tags: security upstream
Justification: user security hole
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
WordPress have released version 5.8.3 which fixes 4 security bugs.
https://wordpress.org/news/2022/01/wordpress-5-8-3-security-release/
* An
ve some line for this. I suspect it
is possible to ptrace apache when in the non-idle hat; my webserver is
just not very busy.
- Craig
che is the only one to complain about this even though other
daemons listed have their own apparmor profiles.
I had to add the following line to the HANDLING_UNTRUSTED_INPUT stanza:
ptrace readby peer=/bin/ss,
- Craig
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.2
APT prefers stable
APT p
upgrade to 3.x - or avoid using
> "include if exists" as long as you use 2.13.x.
>
Cheers, thanks for the answer. Not 100% what I want but understand why it's
like that.
- Craig
is it needed? You may make the upload and theme directories
different (I do) for different websites.
I've put it affects wordpress just in case people come across it and
gives them a place to follow.
- Craig
1:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/wordpress/-/blob/master/debian/apparmor/wordpress
2020 I orphaned the lprng-doc package. It's basically had
nothing done to it for ages. I'd like lprng-doc removed.
- Craig
nt to an apache configuration problem.
- Craig
rdpress/wp-content/uploads/2021/12
WordPress should be uploading them to ${WP_CONTENT_DIR}/uploads and
WP_CONTENT_DIR is set to /var/lib/wordpress/wp-content in
/etc/wordpress/config-default.php
- Craig
e other dialogs
I looked at.
I don't know if it happened in earlier versions of LO or not.
In case it's relevant, I'm running Xfce 4.16
craig
ler thing to check and ignore.
Running a strace on the sysctl program in an LXC container and finding the
return code of the open (it might be a fopencookie() or an openat()
instead) on the offending key should clear it up pretty quickly.
- Craig
Hi Andreas,
I think Charles got to them all today but they were on the Debian wiki
page https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata if you want to check.
The ones I noticed have been fixed anyway.
- Craig
On Wed, 13 Oct 2021 at 15:49, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 07:37:3
I have pushed the test_process one to upstream as well.
- Craig
Hi Romain,
It was more that the main system [1] that used this data seemed to be
offline as well as the debian med one [2] too.
If these fields are important to someone then I'm happy to add that file,
it's more that it will actually be used by someone somewhere.
- Craig
1: http://upstream
Hi,
I tried looking at http://upstream-metadata.debian.net/ but its down, is
this a current need?
On Sun, 3 Oct 2021 at 21:18, Romain Porte wrote:
> Package: dh-make
> Version: 2.202102
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-Cc: deb...@microjoe.org
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package net-snmp
[ Reason ]
net-snmp is not moving into bookworm due to a regression with
pyagentx. However there is reason to believe this is due to
a race condition in
Package: pcmanfm
Version: 1.3.1-1
In the menu _Go_, there is an option, Parent Folder (alt+up).
This hotkey does not work.
The choice of alt+up is a good one for the parent functionality. It
complements the alt+left and alt+right hotkeys; it is consistent with
Windows explorer.
Recommended
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I have now updated net-snmp to use the new style teams. You'll see that
the control file is now:
Maintainer: Debian SNMP Team
Uploaders: Craig Small ,
Thomas Anders ,
Noah Meyerhans
You can use the same maintainer if you like, its
-create-v3-user
which is not that a common combination I'd expect.
Recommends means "it really should be there but if you don't want to
install it then that's ok".
- Craig
On Fri, 10 Sept 2021 at 00:27, Sophie Brun
wrote:
> Package: snmpd
> Version: 5.9+dfsg-3
> Severit
at a
time and have dozens of windows with hundreds of tabs. I have Adblock Origin
and uMatrix and several other extensions installed, but allow most js on stack
exchange sites (they won't work without it).
Sorry for the lack of details and the lack of any easy or consistent way to
reproduce the b
That appears to have done it, about halfway through installing right now.
Will let you know if that changes.
On Sun, Sep 5, 2021 at 7:21 AM Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Hi again Craig!
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 06:51:40PM -0600, Craig Norborg wrote:
> >I used software called "
Thanks for looking after this Raphael! This will stop a lot a bug reports
about why does the process not get found.
- Craig
On Sun, 5 Sep 2021, 01:01 Raphael Hertzog, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, 04 Sep 2021, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-08-16 at 12:02 +0200, Raphae
I used software called "Rufus". screen cap below of the options. Same
exact drive when I did it with Ubuntu.
[image: image.png]
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:29 PM Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> Craig Norborg (2021-08-31):
> > Comments/Problems: I played aroun
eam works).
I don't think it would be a good idea to make a new package use an
old-style team.
I'm not sure of your timings, but I probably should actually start to move
net-snmp onto the new style team. It would have been nice to do this before
the freeze but we are here now.
- Craig
-
but do what you do for restart".
So its changed from a mandatory has to be there restart to an optional
reload.
Which makes zero sense for procps which has no daemon. Why would you change
from restart to reload in this case?
- Craig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: FlowCrypt Email E
I can add an alias easily enough. Using reload is very wrong so corekeeper
do the right thing but it's a one line change for procps.
- Craig
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021, 12:31 Paul Wise, wrote:
> On Fri, 2021-07-16 at 02:25 +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> > … this isn’t right. This
/share/games/minetest/builtin/game/falling.lua:154: attempt to perform
arithmetic on field 'param2' (a nil value)
I'm not sure why param2 is not defined but its a simple fix, see patch.
- Craig
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.10
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500
't want Perl then your system will still allow it. I'll also look into
patching mib2c so the error message is more specific about Debian rather
than saying download something from the net-snmp website.
- Craig
Hi All,
I'm still not sure if procps and psmisc need to be updated to cater for the
later version of manpages-de.
I think the issue is that some of the conflicting manpages made it back
into that package, so I need to update psmisc/procps?
- Craig
On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 at 05:39, Helge
/usr/share/man/de/man1/prtstat.1.gz
There's about 20 "new" files and 20 removed files.
For some reason, the backport version included files that clash with the
procps and psmisc packages. The sid version on 4.9.3-4 doesn't have those
conflicting files.
- Craig
ight version.
I agree with Axel, it looks like 4.9.3-4 is the right one to aim for now.
I assume that the just imported 4.10.0 won't have these files (again).
- Craig
f
direct.
The main issue is the "check direct is safe" code is setting off some false
positives so then tries to use other methods which fail.
As the administrator is free to change it to whatever they want after the
initial installation, the default should be the least surprising setup,
such as direct.
- Craig
ou referring to here? Is this the SC_ARG_MAX related bug or
something else?
Also, I'm not sure what the test is testing here (partly because I'm not
sure of the original bug). With just looking for bash, it will find other
processes that have bash within their names, including other shells.
- Craig
- Craig
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 21:15, Debian Bug Tracking System <
ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote:
> Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
>
> You can follow progress on this Bug here: 987084:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=987084.
>
> This is an
in #987084 which I think is the best
outcome for future maintenance.
- Craig
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 16:37, Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 08:32:35AM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> > Should CVE-2021-29447 [1] be also listed against this bug? I'
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Please unblock package wordpress
Currently Wordpress in Bullseye is 5.6.1 and is vulnerable to CVE-2021-29450
reported in bug #987065
Should CVE-2021-29447 [1] be also listed against this bug? I'll be putting
it in the changelog.
How good is it when WordPress raise their own CVEs! One glorious day they
will put them in their announcements too.
1:
+++ procps-3.3.17/debian/changelog 2021-04-06 17:17:53.0 +1000
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+procps (2:3.3.17-5) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Add break/replace for conflicting manpages-fr-extra Closes: #986276
+
+ -- Craig Small Tue, 06 Apr 2021 17:17:53 +1000
+
procps (2:3.3.17-4) unstable
uploaded today too.
- Craig
hould delete all symlinks in /usr/share/grc. e.g.
if [ -z "$GRC_ALIASES" ] || [ "$GRC_ALIASES" = "none" ] ; then
find /usr/share/grc/ -maxdepth 1 -type l -delete
fi
3. List /usr/share/grc/conf.* as conffiles. None of them are currently
conffiles in th
On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 18:07, Andreas Laut wrote:
> root@test-host-deb11:~# cat /proc/1362/cgroup
> 0::/lxc.payload.vs-lxc-test
>
OK, so "lxc.payload." is one of the ones we check for.
That should be returning vs-lxc-test for process 1362.
- Craig
set by procps or that the kernel no longer seems to behave correctly?
I'm trying to understand why this is a procps bug.
If you run the command (assuming this is what you are setting)
cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
does the value you set appear there?
- Craig
uld do
socket activation for snmptrapd only, but I think you are only targeting
that one anyway.
A merge request on salsa seems the easiest way for me. If its not too big
an impact then it might be able to get it in before the freeze.
- Craig
you pick one process you expect to see the lxc output for and send me
the output of /proc//cgroup ?
- Craig
1: https://gitlab.com/procps-ng/procps/-/blob/master/proc/readproc.c#L894
se reading this) has some
precedent where a sysctl file in /usr/lib is renamed then I'm happy to hear
about it.
- Craig
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 21:09, wrote:
> I have set fs.protected_fifos=2 in /etc/sysctl.conf.
> My intent is to override procps' protect-links.conf,
> which sets fs.protected_fifos=1.
>
> Under systemd, /etc/sysctl.conf is actually loaded via the
> /etc/sysctl.d/99-sysctl.conf symlink, which sorts
alternative in the prerm script does not work,
> because dpkg runs the old version's prerm on upgrades, not the new one.
> This should be done in the postinst instead.
>
Yep, makes sense.
- Craig
OK, found a minor problem. The procps version needs an epoch to correctly
match. Not 3.3.17-1 but 2:3.3.17-1
- Craig
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 08:03, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 9:50 PM Craig Small wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 a
Hi,
Looks like I missed the epoch for manpages-pl. It Breaks/Replaces <<
4.9.1-2 but should be << 1:4.9.1-2
- Craig
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 at 09:48, Robert Luberda wrote:
> Package: procps
> Version: 2:3.3.17-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: file conflict
e relevant .po file because po4a will only translate a file if it is at
least 80% translated.
In short, its a massive pain, but I think its ok now; or at least its no
longer conflicting.
I'm not sure what you mean by duplicates here.
- Craig
For testing this I installed Procps and *all*of the generated man pages and
that seemed to be fine.
That's slightly different to the patch I put in the bug report but I
emailed Helge the difference.
- Craig
Thanks for noticing that, procps should be installing those manpages but is
not. I'll fix that.
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 20:28, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2021 21:49:29 +1100 Craig Small wrote:
> > Source: manpages-l10n
> > Severity: important
>
> I rai
The issue is you won't be able to install manpages-de afterwards (the fix
is one-way). See #982355 for the other half to this.
- Craig
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 03:39, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> [ CC Helge & Craig ]
>
> With the attached debdiff on top of Helge's 4.9.1-1 tarball I was
Source: manpages-l10n
Severity: important
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Similiar to the psmisc issue, procps will have its own manpages and
there will be a conflict. I'll add in some lines to procps to help
but some files will need to be removed.
I used the
) for sid
gbp:error: upstream/4.9.1 is not a valid treeish
"not valid teeish" = cant find the tag.
For your problem, I think you've not included some file, but can't see the
problem myself as I need the tag.
Don't give up, it does look all bewildering but you'll get there in the
end.
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 at 05:16, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 04:51:14PM -0500, Craig Small wrote:
> > I think you have the control lines wrong. You have both the lines from
> > psmisc and manpages-de there.
> >
> > Breaks: manpages-de (&l
The new psmisc replaces files in the old manpage-de
manpages-de *only* needs the Breaks psmisc bit.
The Breaks line sort of force an update of the other package too.
- Craig
On 2021-02-07 at 17:17, deb...@helgefjell.de wrote:
> tags 982059 + pending
> thanks
>
> Hello Craig,
>
> However, as Tobias is busy with real life and manpages-l10n needs to
> go through new (as new langauges are contained) I cannot proceed any
> further, as a DM I'm not allowed to upload to NEW.
>
> Any help from a DD appreciated on this.
>
I can help here, I'm a DD.
- Craig
1:
for both is
planning on doing.
- Craig
1:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/manpages-l10n/-/blob/master/debian/copyright#L1890
2: https://gitlab.com/psmisc/psmisc/-/issues/22
On Sat, 6 Feb 2021 at 16:48, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Package: manpages-de,psmisc
> Severity: serious
> Version: ma
I missed this. I'm uploading now although with the freeze it might not
matter anyway.
- Craig
On Thu, 24 Dec 2020 at 16:52, Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> Hi Craig,
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 07:09:29PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> >
&
is that it **doesn't** look like Gnome 3. There's
not really much point if they're just going to copy gnome's mistakes.
craig
ps: I use TraditionalOk from mate-themes but I tried several other xfce4
specific
themes. Same grotesque result.
Ah I see now, you were just pointing it out, ok.
I'm about (like its happening in another window) to upload 5.6 but if
you're sure the two versions won't come unstuck then go ahead with a 5.5.3
upload.
- Craig
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 22:21, peter green wrote:
> On 17/12/2020 10:29, Cr
it
to testing.
So its needs a binary upload and then a 5.6-2 purely because of these
rules, no other reason.
- Craig
On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 10:21, peter green wrote:
> Package: wordpress
> Version: 5.5.3+dfsg1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> The release team have decreed that non-buil
}
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 17 13:41 /proc/99201/cwd ->
/srv/chroot/bullseye
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 17 13:41 /proc/99201/exe ->
/srv/chroot/bullseye/usr/bin/bash
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 17 13:41 /proc/99201/root ->
/srv/chroot/bullseye
>
> HTH best regards
>
>
> This is a courtesy reminder that your Debian key is expiring on 2021-02-01.
>
For once in many many years, I have not uploaded something after my key has
expired and wondered why it bounced.
Thanks for the note.
- Craig
101 - 200 of 1766 matches
Mail list logo
