Bug#688845: texlive-fonts-extra: Please demote all additional Depends to Recommends

2013-01-15 Thread Frank Kuester
Fabian Greffrath writes: > *But I would like to suggest to split t-f-e into > two parts, one without external dependencies and one with them.* [...] > I think the t-f-e package is somehow special in this regard, since its > dependencies are really exhaustive. I don't see any other texlive > packa

Bug#688845: texlive-fonts-extra: Please demote all additional Depends to Recommends

2013-01-14 Thread Frank Kuester
Fabian Greffrath writes: >> Did you check that *none* of the other files distributed by TeX Live >> in the texlive-fonts-extra package require any of the font packages >> that it depends on? > > No, and I am even sure that some other files in texlive-fonts-extra > *do* require some of the fonts t

Bug#697353: binutils: FTBFS with texinfo from experimental

2013-01-10 Thread Frank Kuester
Norbert, did you notice this? Any ideas? Frank Paul Wise writes: > Source: binutils > Version: 2.23.1-1~exp3 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-tex-ma...@lists.debian.org > > binutils 2.23.1-1~exp3 FTBFS with texinfo 4.13.92.dfsg.1-1 from > experimental. There are some warnings that se

Bug#534641: Processed: Re: mendexk: mendex fails to process styling macro specifier in indexentry

2013-01-08 Thread Frank Kuester
tags 534641 upstream thanks Hisashi Morita writes: > The reason I assumed this issue is relevant to texlive-binaries is as > follows: > > $ which mendex > /usr/bin/mendex > $ dpkg -L texlive-binaries | grep bin/mendex > /usr/bin/mendex > $ dpkg-query -W texlive-binaries > texlive-binaries

Bug#534641: Processed: Re: mendexk: mendex fails to process styling macro specifier in indexentry

2012-12-30 Thread Frank Kuester
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > >> reassign 534641 texlive-binaries 2012.20120628-4 > Bug #534641 [mendexk] mendexk: mendex fails to process styling macro > specifier in indexentry I have no idea what this is about a

Bug#695340: auctex: xdvi does not understand synctex

2012-12-09 Thread Frank Kuester
"Davide G. M. Salvetti" writes: > `TeX-evince-sync-view' uses D-BUS to communicate with Evince. This is > worth investigating, if we could use evince for DVI files with SyncTeX > support. I will try something as soon as I have some more time, do the > same yourself, please. Just a side note:

Bug#631271: texlive-binaries: xdvi no longer uncompresses .gz and .bz2 files

2012-12-05 Thread Frank Kuester
Samuel Bronson writes: > Control: severity -1 important > Control: block -1 by 583188 > Control: tag -1 + confirmed > Control: found -1 texlive-binaries/2012.20120628-4 > > Vincent Lefevre writes: > >> Package: texlive-binaries >> Version: 2009-8 >> Severity: normal >> >> xdvi no longer uncompre

Bug#694324: Bug#694323: [gsfonts] Fonts include copyrighted adobe fragment all right reserved

2012-11-27 Thread Frank Kuester
Hi Bastien, hi Norbert, Norbert Preining writes: >> The Debian orig.tar.gz doesn't seem to contain the source archive's >> contents. I'm not familiar with font generation, but it seems to me >> that, in order to be able to generate corrected Type1 files with a fixed >> fontforge version, we wou

Bug#694323: Bug#694324: Fonts include copyrighted adobe fragment all right reserved

2012-11-25 Thread Frank Kuester
bastien ROUCARIES writes: > Package: tex-gyre > Version: 2.004.1-4 > Severity: serious > control: block -1 by 694308 > > This package include copyrighted font hinting from adobe. Do I understand correctly that we're not supposed to do anything, but just wait until fontforge is fixed? Hm, I'm

Bug#690697: texlive-base: [INTL:ja] New Japanese translation

2012-10-30 Thread Frank Kuester
Norbert Preining writes: > 皆様 > > On Mi, 17 Okt 2012, victory wrote: >> Here's Japanese po-debconf template translation (ja.po) file that >> reviewed by several Japanese Debian developers and users. > > 了解です。ギット・レポシトリーにアップしました。 > > 宜しくお願いします > > ノルベルト You guys have seen #683127? Regards, Fra

Bug#691690: texlive-extra-utils: missing dependencies

2012-10-28 Thread Frank Kuester
forcemerge 691690 686675 stop Ian Bruce writes: > It turns out that the required files are /usr/bin/pdflatex , and > /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/pdfpages/pdfpages.sty , > from the packages texlive-latex-base , and texlive-latex-recommended , > respectively. > > Shouldn't these packag

Bug#688041: Please confirm

2012-10-15 Thread Frank Kuester
Thomas Kremer writes: >>> By a new configuration option in all/debian/tpm2deb.cfg selected >> ... >>> be automated in the scripts tpm2deb-source.pl and >>> all/deb/tpm2debcommon.pm. Those scripts have access to any dependency >> >> Are as commonplace as possible. > > You're mistaking abstraction

Bug#483217: marked as done (texlive-latex-base: Files by Donald Arseneau: Lacking license statement, or nosell and such)

2012-10-11 Thread Frank Kuester
ow...@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes: > Your message dated Thu, 11 Oct 2012 15:57:58 +0900 Many thanks for this. > * chapterbib.sty: no license information > > there is a README that states: > They are all released under a very simple permissive license in >

Bug#688041: Please confirm

2012-10-11 Thread Frank Kuester
Thomas Kremer writes: > Now, if you insist on keeping the debian package == Tex Live collection > correspondence, We do not insist. We already have implemented docsplitting. > no matter what inconveniences might occur from that > decision, then you can close this bug as "wontfix", since any s

Bug#689515: texlive-latex-base: Option a4paper in includeclass does not work with pdflatex.

2012-10-05 Thread Frank Kuester
Norbert wrote > I just say > \usepackage{geometry} alternatively, for a system-wide and solution for every document, paperconfig -p a4 Regards, Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb

Bug#688382: texlive-base: missing conffiles after squeeze->wheezy upgrade

2012-10-05 Thread Frank Kuester
Norbert Preining writes: > Maybe one can completely drop the ucf file? Maybe the files were never > added to the ucf database and this crept in somehow? I'm not competely sure without checking out older versions, but I _think_ that they are conffiles in squeeze, but they were managed by ucf in t

Bug#688845: Acknowledgement (texlive-fonts-extra: Please demote all additional Depends to Recommends)

2012-09-26 Thread Frank Kuester
Fabian Greffrath writes: > Furthermore, AFAICT the additional font packages pulled in by > texlive-fonts-extra contain fonts in TTF or OTF formats and are thus > only useful for xetex and the like, not for standard plain pdflatex. One can use TTF with pdftex. Not that I know how it works, but I

Bug#683943: luatex: fontconfig overridden by OSFONTDIR in default settings

2012-08-20 Thread Frank Kuester
Reuben Thomas writes: > On 19 August 2012 20:43, Frank Kuester wrote: >> As far as I read the text quoted above, OSFONTDIR is _not_ meant for >> this. It is meant to access fonts outside the TEXMF trees, and if an >> engine has a better way to achieve this, I don&

Bug#683943: luatex: fontconfig overridden by OSFONTDIR in default settings

2012-08-19 Thread Frank Kuester
Reuben Thomas writes: > On 12 August 2012 11:31, Frank Kuester wrote: >> >> Anyway, what I am not sure about is what we should do about this. The >> documentation in texmf.cnf says: >> >> % OSFONTDIR is to provide a convenient hook for allowing TeX to find &

Bug#683567: [tex-live] Bug#683567: texlive-pictures: Dependency error while using latex package adjustbox from this package

2012-08-12 Thread Frank Kuester
Hi Norbert, k...@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) writes: > 1. I moved adjustbox to collection-latexextra. I guess we don't need to do anything about this, because as soon as we start developing for jessie you will update the orig.tar.gzs? Regards, Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-d

Bug#683944: texlive: Please set TEXMFCNF by default

2012-08-12 Thread Frank Kuester
Reuben Thomas writes: > On 8 August 2012 20:56, Frank Kuester wrote: >> Reuben Thomas writes: >> root@riesling:/# grep TEXMFCNF /usr/share/texlive/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf >> %TEXMFCNF = {\ >> %TEXMFCNF = >> {$SELFAUTOLOC,$SELFAUTODIR,$SELFAUTOPARENT}{,{/share,}/

Bug#683943: luatex: fontconfig overridden by OSFONTDIR in default settings

2012-08-12 Thread Frank Kuester
Reuben Thomas writes: > On 8 August 2012 20:53, Frank Kuester wrote: >> Hm, I just installed luatex and texlive-base in a chroot and get: >> >> root@riesling:/# kpsewhich --var-value=OSFONTSDIR > > It's "OSFONTDIR", not "OSFONTSDIR". I s

Bug#684409: texlive-lang-french: missing dependencies for facture class

2012-08-12 Thread Frank Kuester
Gabriel Kerneis writes: > the texlive-lang-french provides (among others) the facture class. To be > used, this class requires the following packages: > - texlive-xetex, for the xetex/xelatex binary > - texlive-latex-extra, for makecmds.sty > - etoolbox, for etoolbox.sty > - texlive-generic-extr

Bug#683944: texlive: Please set TEXMFCNF by default

2012-08-08 Thread Frank Kuester
Reuben Thomas writes: > Package: texlive > Version: 2012.20120611-3~ubuntu12.04.1 > Severity: wishlist > > In order to make per-user settings for TeXLive, the user has to both > discover that they should be placed in ~/.texmf-config, and then set > an environment variable TEXMFCNF. Please conside

Bug#683943: luatex: fontconfig overridden by OSFONTDIR in default settings

2012-08-08 Thread Frank Kuester
Reuben Thomas writes: > Package: texlive-luatex > Version: 2012.20120611-3~ubuntu12.04.1 > Severity: normal > > As far as I can tell, luatex uses fontconfig to find fonts if no > OSFONTDIR is configured (at least, the binary is linked against > libfontconfig!). > > OSFONTDIR is, however, set in t

Bug#683567: texlive-pictures: Dependency error while using latex package adjustbox from this package

2012-08-08 Thread Frank Kuester
forwarded 683567 TeXLive Mailing List stop Dear TeX Live Team, we got a report about a missing dependency between collections: Saulo Soares de Toledo writes: > Latex package adjustbox is inside texlive-pictures > While trying use "\usepackage{adjustbox}", we receive the error > "collectbox.s

Bug#373605: [latex-b...@latex-project.org] Re: babel/3875

2012-08-08 Thread Frank Kuester
notforwarded 373605 stop --- Begin Message --- Synopsis: Problematic interaction of [french]{babel} with listings.sty Responsible-Changed-From-To: johannes->javier Responsible-Changed-By: gnats Responsible-Changed-When: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 11:24:28 +0200 Responsible-Changed-Why: Now maintaining babe

Bug#273093: Unpredictable behavior when two packages want to divert the same file

2012-07-18 Thread Frank Kuester
Russ Allbery writes: > Jonathan Nieder writes: > >> To be clear, which of the following is this report proposing? > >> * Packages should not divert a file unless that file is "divertable". >>To make a file divertable, the maintainer of the package shipping >>it adds a comment to debian/

Bug#659772: landscape sciposter + hyperref + latex + dvips = center-mirrored image

2012-07-13 Thread Frank Kuester
Heiko Oberdiek writes: > The PostScript language allows the setting of the page size: > operator `setpagedevice', entry `PageSize', but entry `Orientation' > is only intended for roll-fed media. Also there is no easy way > to extract these data without a PostScript interpreter. > At least there a

Bug#406526: Copyright file of texlive-bin is still problematic

2012-07-12 Thread Frank Kuester
Hi all, | texlive2012/texlive-bin/trunk$ head -10 debian/copyright | Copyright information for the texlive bundle | | Table of contents: | | 1. Copyright and License of the debian-specific adaptions | 2. License of the TeX live distribution as a compilation work | 3. LPPL | | | 1. Copyright a

Bug#627171: texlive-binaries: mktexpk (and mktexnam) don't cope with unset $HOME

2012-07-11 Thread Frank Kuester
Dear Stuart, more than a year ago you reported this bug: Stuart Prescott writes: > Some buildds now have $HOME unset and this leads to breakages in the > compilation > of various bits of documentation on the buildd; it may be a combination of > reduced permissions on the buildd as well as $HOM

Bug#659772: landscape sciposter + hyperref + latex + dvips = center-mirrored image

2012-07-11 Thread Frank Kuester
reassign 659772 texlive-science stop writes: > 1. Create a fresh file, say, q.tex, with the following contents: > \documentclass[landscape]{sciposter} > \usepackage{hyperref} > \begin{document} > abcABC > \end{document} > > 2. Run > latex q && dvips -o q.ps q.dvi > > 3a. Run >gv q.ps & > o

Bug#681061: lintian: False positive: unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt

2012-07-10 Thread Frank Kuester
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.10 Severity: normal In source package texlive-bin, the error tag unneeded-build-dep-on-quilt is found by quilt. However, we do use quilt in debian/rules: $ grep -i quilt debian/rules # this is for dh_quilt_patch (--with quilt) which reads this # variable and sets

Bug#483217: texlive-latex-base: 483217: status?

2012-07-05 Thread Frank Kuester
Hilmar Preusse writes: > On 29.06.12 Arne Wichmann (a...@anhrefn.saar.de) wrote: >> begin quotation from Norbert Preining (in >> <20120627143050.ge25...@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>): >> > On Mi, 27 Jun 2012, Arne Wichmann wrote: > > Hi, > >> > > Given that, the relevant files should be removed f

Bug#679942: Needs to be updated for emacs24

2012-07-02 Thread Frank Kuester
forcemerge 679942 679712 thanks Juhapekka Tolvanen writes: > Package: auctex > Version: 11.86-10 > Severity: normal Wishlist. > I just installed emacs24. It seems good enough so I'd like to > deinstall emacs23, but I can not do it, because auctex package has > erroneous Depends: -field: emacs23.

Bug#674888: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/sort-by-letters/frplainnat- letters.bst: Unknown keywords used in frplainnat-letters.bst

2012-05-28 Thread Frank Kuester
Norbert Preining writes: > Dear Thomas, > > as written in the information message of reportbug (if you used it), > this mailing list is not a LaTeX Help Desk. > > We see your bug, but we have no capacity to react on it. We see our > main responisibility an packaging TeX Live. So your options are:

Bug#673022: texlive-base: cannot upgrade to 2011.20120509-1

2012-05-25 Thread Frank Kuester
Norbert Preining writes: > Only two quick answers > > >> The only clear text in that garbled output is $DebCnfFile. This string >> occurse in /usr/share/texlive-bin/debianize-fmtutil, which is sourced by >> fmtutil. AFAIS it should only be called when the argument to fmtutil >> isn't --all, but

Bug#674090: texlive-binaries: updmap cannot find TLUtils.pm

2012-05-25 Thread Frank Kuester
Sanjoy Mahajan writes: > However, when I try to install the newest version, I get: > > # aptitude install texlive-base/unstable > The following packages will be upgraded: > texlive-base{b} [2011.20120424-1 -> 2012.20120516-1] > The following partially installed packages will be configured: >

Bug#673022: texlive-base: cannot upgrade to 2011.20120509-1

2012-05-23 Thread Frank Kuester
[resending since the message with non-printable characters was rejected] Yves-Alexis Perez writes: > So it did happen again for 2012.20120516-1, same symptoms. I tried to > upgrades, and each time the failing is for different commands again > (/tmp files attached) so my guess is that, like befor

Bug#673022: texlive-base: cannot upgrade to 2011.20120509-1

2012-05-23 Thread Frank Kuester
Yves-Alexis Perez writes: > So it did happen again for 2012.20120516-1, same symptoms. I tried to > upgrades, and each time the failing is for different commands again > (/tmp files attached) so my guess is that, like before, it'll end up > with a success, when it'll have “failed” all t

Bug#672876: texlive-binaries: updmap always fails

2012-05-17 Thread Frank Kuester
Norbert Preining writes: >> # updmap --syncwithtrees > > YOu should never do that on Debian ... .never ... There used to be a patch that disabled that action. Regards, Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont