Sorry for the late reply, but surprisingly Mr. Bloch did remove me from the
Cc: list.
The power of a license lies in it's written down terms and not in what someone
think's it says, or in their personal opinion or point of views.
To put things right: My only interest with Mr. Bloch is to put
#include hallo.h
* Joerg Schilling [Mon, Mar 27 2006, 06:13:06PM]:
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Da es offenbar Missverstaendnisse gibt und English fuer das Diskutieren
von Lizenz/Urherberrechtsproblemen nicht geeignet ist (anderes Rechtssystem)
nun in einer Sprache die jeder
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for this clarification.
Unfortunately it does not include a translation for an important part found in
the German text:
Punkt 4:
Es liegt ebenfalls keine Vertragsverletzung beim Vertrieb weiterer sich im
Archiv cdrtools befindlichen Werke
#include hallo.h
* Joerg Schilling [Sat, Apr 01 2006, 04:46:48PM]:
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for this clarification.
Unfortunately it does not include a translation for an important part found
in
the German text:
The translation has been sent to you and did not
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Da es offenbar Missverstaendnisse gibt und English fuer das Diskutieren
von Lizenz/Urherberrechtsproblemen nicht geeignet ist (anderes Rechtssystem)
nun in einer Sprache die jeder versteht
So please reply to my mail instead of adding unrelated new
#include hallo.h
* Joerg Schilling [Wed, Mar 22 2006, 03:16:26PM]:
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Joerg Schilling [Mon, Mar 20 2006, 11:21:30PM]:
It seems that you never did read and understand the GPL :-(
The GPL is as holey as a Swiss cheese when
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Eduard Bloch [Tue, Mar 21 2006, 05:32:17PM]:
And finally, in the last mail I have already presented the exact chain
of conclusions, including the intent of the OP. I expect you (as
programmer knowing how logic works) to be able to
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Joerg Schilling [Mon, Mar 20 2006, 11:21:30PM]:
It seems that you never did read and understand the GPL :-(
The GPL is as holey as a Swiss cheese when talking about the compile
environment:
...
Joerg, could you please stay
#include hallo.h
* Eduard Bloch [Tue, Mar 21 2006, 05:32:17PM]:
And finally, in the last mail I have already presented the exact chain
of conclusions, including the intent of the OP. I expect you (as
programmer knowing how logic works) to be able to find the wrong link
there -- so would you
#include hallo.h
* Joerg Schilling [Mon, Mar 20 2006, 11:21:30PM]:
It seems that you never did read and understand the GPL :-(
The GPL is as holey as a Swiss cheese when talking about the compile
environment:
...
Joerg, could you please stay ontopic and not flame? We try to discuss
with
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeez, you have ways of finding similarities. I would hardly translate
that as rubbish especially because of the context - it has been on the
same polemic levels as your claims about gcc because of beeing less
pervasive than Sun's compiler. Even then, is
#include hallo.h
* Joerg Schilling [Sat, Mar 18 2006, 10:10:55PM]:
You did write (easy to proof as) false claims many times in the past.
Just remember the case where you did call Sun Studio C rubbish just
because
it flags bad code that GCC let's pass.
He? I cannot remember
The cdrtools distribution is compiled from several
different works.
One complete and separate work is the Schily Makefilesystem.
It is independent of a specific project and published under th CDDL.
If you believe that the GPL is violating the Debian Social Contract
(see
#include hallo.h
* Joerg Schilling [Sat, Mar 18 2006, 01:09:03PM]:
The cdrtools distribution is compiled from several
different works.
One complete and separate work is the Schily Makefilesystem.
It is independent of a specific project and published under th CDDL.
You are free to
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Joerg Schilling [Sat, Mar 18 2006, 01:09:03PM]:
The cdrtools distribution is compiled from several
different works.
One complete and separate work is the Schily Makefilesystem.
It is independent of a specific project and
#include hallo.h
* Joerg Schilling [Sat, Mar 18 2006, 04:05:49PM]:
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Joerg Schilling [Sat, Mar 18 2006, 01:09:03PM]:
The cdrtools distribution is compiled from several
different works.
One complete and separate work is the
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the GPL is a free license acording to the Debian Social Contract
there is no need to do this..
Joerg, please stop that. You have already proved by your recent actions
that you DO NOT understand the GPL. Don't try to justify your claims
with
#include hallo.h
* Joerg Schilling [Sat, Mar 18 2006, 07:16:46PM]:
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the GPL is a free license acording to the Debian Social Contract
there is no need to do this..
Joerg, please stop that. You have already proved by your recent actions
Eduard Bloch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You did write (easy to proof as) false claims many times in the past.
Just remember the case where you did call Sun Studio C rubbish just
because
it flags bad code that GCC let's pass.
He? I cannot remember writting this, and I would not use the
Package: cdrtools
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 2.3
In cdrtools 2.01.01a03 license of several makefiles have been changed to a
custom version of CDDL, which is a non-GPL-compatible license. These
makefiles are used to build GPL-licensed binaries, which is a violation of
paragraph 3 of
20 matches
Mail list logo
