Package: ippsample
Version: 0.0~git20220607.72f89b3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
In spite of having the printing system wiped out (Bug#1040699) I installed
this package to try out ippserver.
brian@test-new:~$ /usr/sbin/ippserver -c $HOME/pdfsave -f application/pdf
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 12:58:07PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> The problem that I am trying to fix is the following: the AVX512 kernel
> (nicknamed
> “SkylakeX”) is miscompiled in openblas 0.3.13+ds-3, so that openblas gives
> incorrect numerical results in the
Control: tags 1037698 + patch
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for j4-dmenu-desktop (versioned as 2.16-1.1). The diff
is attached to this message.
Regards.
Jochen
diff -Nru j4-dmenu-desktop-2.16/debian/changelog j4-dmenu-desktop-2.16/debian/changelog
---
Package: ftp.debian.org
User: ftp.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: remove
Control: affects -1 src:theano src:deepnano src:keras
Control: reopen 1026539
Control: reopen 1027215
theano has been mostly abandoned upstream since 2018. (The Aesara fork
is not abandoned, but includes
Control: severity -1 important
On Sun, 18 Jun 2023 at 14:52:18 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jun 2023 at 14:47:00 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > I rebuilt librsvg in bookworm on the s390x porterbox zelenka, and can
> > confirm that 2.54.5+dfsg-1 now fails in bookworm too. So
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: uwsgi-plugin-lua...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:uwsgi-plugin-luajit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Please do the following binNMU:
nmu
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: uwsgi-plugin-mo...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:uwsgi-plugin-mongo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Please do the following binNMU:
nmu
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: uwsgi-plugin-...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:uwsgi-plugin-php
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Please do the following binNMU:
nmu
situation:
* clean debian bookworm install
* install icingaweb2 and the other icinga packages
* trying to configure mysql via the web-interface
* get tons of deprecation warnings that make the web-interface unusable:
https://vanheusden.com/permshare/debian-icinga2.png
Source: libsass
Version: 3.6.5+20220909-1
Followup-For: Bug #1037736
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
I have updated the symbols file to fix the issue, could you apply it on
next upload?
BTW, The issue should be the same with #1042201
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1042201
--
Source: openjdk-19
Version: 19.0.2+7-4
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=openjdk-19
openjdk-19 build-depends on missing:
- openjdk-18-jdk-headless:mipsel
Source: case
Version: 1.5.3+dfsg-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
case fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: pympress
Version: 1.7.1-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pympress fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: chemps2
Version: 1.8.12-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
chemps2 fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: glue
Version: 0.13-6
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
glue fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: celery
Version: 5.3.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
celery fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-django
Version: 3:3.2.20-1.1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-django fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: lazr.config
Version: 2.2.3-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
lazr.config fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: bottleneck
Version: 1.3.5+ds1-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
bottleneck fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: ns3
Version: 3.39-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
ns3 fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[6]: Entering
Source: sphinxcontrib-bibtex
Version: 2.5.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinxcontrib-bibtex fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: python-drizzle
Version: 1.13.4-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-drizzle fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pyro4
Version: 4.82-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pyro4 fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: dh-virtualenv
Version: 1.2.2-1.3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
dh-virtualenv fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: mutagen
Version: 1.46.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
mutagen fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: cherrypy3
Version: 18.8.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
cherrypy3 fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: libtext-markup-perl
Version: 0.24-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
libtext-markup-perl fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: python-taskflow
Version: 5.1.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-taskflow fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: tox
Version: 3.28.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
tox fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-gjson
Version: 1.0.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-gjson fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pypy3
Version: 7.3.12+dfsg-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pypy3 fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]:
Source: emscripten
Version: 3.1.6~dfsg-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
emscripten fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: qutip
Version: 4.7.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
qutip fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: rocsparse
Version: 5.3.0+dfsg-8
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
rocsparse fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sqlite-utils
Version: 3.30-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sqlite-utils fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: kombu
Version: 5.3.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
kombu fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-pgpy
Version: 0.6.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-pgpy fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Package: ansible-mitogen
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: important
Hi,
when ansible-mitogen and python3-mitogen 0.3.4-1 are installed, I cannot
run ansible against my fleet any more. The run asks for the become
password as usual, and then aborts with "sudo password is required". A
-vvv output of the
On 30.07.23 07:45, Detlef Matthiessen wrote:
642 QMatrix4x4 m = m1;
On a related note: a quick search for "digikam" and "642" yields the
following bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/digikam/+bug/2000718
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465548
Admittedly,
Quoting Antony Stone (2023-05-26 22:09:06)
> I am indeed interested in finding out what would be involved / required /
> expected in order to help keep Asterisk as a package in a future release of
> Debian Stable - and in the meantime, to ensure that it remains available in
> Backports.
On 2023-07-29 19:51, Anja wrote:
> This access is also logged by the website.
Just in case, you are not doing this already: You might like to mask out
the last octet of visitors IPv4 addresses or the last twelve octets for
IPv6 addresses. This still allows useful logging for statistics, but
makes
Control: block -1 by 1026042
Am 27.07.23 um 00:33 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2023-07-17 21:38:47 +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I would like to
On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 11:03:25 +0200 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
>
> > Just to complement, using the recent version of nfdump from github,
the
> > bug does not occur.
>
> Thanks for the report. Do you by any chance know which exact commit
> fixes this issue? Is the fix in 1.7.2 or
On 30/07/2023 05:09, наб wrote:
Package: coreutils
Version: 9.1-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
$ truncate -s 5G 5G
$ cat 5G | /bin/tac | wc -c
/bin/tac: /tmp/tacOOOwnf: read error: Illegal seek
0
наб
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.1
APT prefers stable-updates
APT
Package: mount
Version: 2.39.1-3
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
as the subject says, mount 2.39 fails to mount overlayfs. Apparently it deems
the "lowerdir" mount option invalid, no matter whether there is one, two or
several lower dirs. If there's an overlayfs in /etc/fstab, the system
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-emac...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:lsp-mode
Since I no longer use it (eglot is now included in Emacs and I have converted
my workflow to use it instead) I intend to orphan the lsp-mode package. The
change removing my name from
> I guess this is fixed, isn't it?
Yes, I think we can close this.
a.
> has this been fixed indeed?
yes:
https://salsa.debian.org/modsecurity-packaging-team/modsecurity-apache/-/blob/master/debian/rules#L19
modsecurity-apache is shipped with `--with-pcre2` since
2.9.7.
> Can/should this bug be closed?
Yes, I think it could be.
a.
Package: claws-mail
Version: 4.1.1-2~bpo11+1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I'm using claws-mail on Debian Bullseye. Update fails because of a
plugin version mismatch in bullseye-backports repository:
* claws-mail-bsfilter-plugin is still on version 4.1.0-2~bpo11+1
* claws-mail-pgpcore
Hi Bo,
Quoting Bo YU (2023-07-30 18:40:01)
> I have updated the symbols file to fix the issue, could you apply it on
> next upload?
Thanks a lot. I will apply now.
If you are generally interested in SASS tools and want to help maintain
them in Debian, then you are very welcome to join the team
Package: vnlog
Tags: patch, ftbfs, hppa
Version: 1.36-2
The file test/test_python3_parser.sh misses a trailing shebang
which makes the package fail to build on qemu based buildds.
Please add:
#!/bin/bash
to the top of test/test_python3_parser.sh to fix it.
(for example the test/test_c_api.sh
Source: fmtlib
Version: 9.1.0+ds1-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
fmtlib fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: sphinx-tabs
Version: 3.4.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinx-tabs fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-apt
Version: 2.6.0
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-apt fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: hackrf
Version: 2023.01.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
hackrf fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[3]:
Source: django-session-security
Version: 2.6.6+dfsg-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
django-session-security fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both
of which
are currently available in experimental.
Source: python-tornado
Version: 6.3.2-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-tornado fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pg8000
Version: 1.10.6-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pg8000 fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: flufl.lock
Version: 5.0.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
flufl.lock fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-amqp
Version: 5.1.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-amqp fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-gevent
Version: 22.10.2-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-gevent fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: sphinxcontrib-jquery
Version: 4.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinxcontrib-jquery fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: python-pkginfo
Version: 1.8.2-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-pkginfo fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: imexam
Version: 0.9.1-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
imexam fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: sphinx-rst-builder
Version: 0.0.3-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
sphinx-rst-builder fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: spectre-meltdown-checker
Version: 0.45-2
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org
Hi
The new 0.46 upstream adds:
feat: detect the vulnerability and mitigation of Zenbleed (CVE-2023-20593)
in particular. Can you update the package to the new upstream version?
(Might it be an
It looks like the new upstream repo for this extension is
https://gitlab.com/arcmenu/ArcMenu
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
Package: src:ms-gsl
Version: 4.0.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: sid trixie
The autopkg tests fail with LLVM-16. Just add one more warning suppression when
using LLVM-16.
proposed workaround at
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/679532497/ms-gsl_4.0.0-2.1_4.0.0-2.1ubuntu1.diff.gz
Dear maintainers,
I finally found when the problem happens. The installation of the NVIDIA
proprietary drivers led to a automatical change to the X.org session as
default.
The bug appears only under the X Window System.
I hope it can help.
Thank you in advance,
Best Regards
Alessio
Package: gpsd
Version: 3.22-4.1+b1
Followup-For: Bug #1034711
Dear Maintainer,
* What led up to the situation?
I executed ubxtool an got the following error message "ubxtool:
failed to import gps, check PYTHONPATH"
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 11:03:25 +0200 Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> Hi Marcelo,
>
>
> > Just to complement, using the recent version of nfdump from github,
the
> > bug does not occur.
>
> Thanks for the report. Do you by any chance know which exact commit
> fixes this issue? Is the fix in 1.7.2 or
Md Jafor's locationShared with you on Google
On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 05:26:32 +0200 "Olivier F. R. Dierick"
wrote:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 252.12-1~deb12u1
> Severity: normal
>
> * What led up to the situation?
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm testing games with Wine and contributing to its development.
>
> I was using Debian 8 until recently.
>
Package: pygame
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ni...@thykier.net
Hi
It seems like the pygame community got split after an internal
controversy:
https://old.reddit.com/r/pygame/comments/1112q10/pygame_community_edition_announcement/
The question now is whether Debian to track the fork or the
On Sun, 30 Jul 2023 04:25:59 +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >I'm now build-depending on publicsuffix and copying effective_tld_names.dat
> >from the publicsuffix package over the shipped version in
> >override_dh_auto_configure.
> >(The perl bindings in /usr/share/perl5/Mozilla/PublicSuffix.pm
package release.debian.org
tags 1035683 = bullseye pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: libbsd
Version:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:37:50PM +0100, Patrick Franz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 16:22:56 +0100 Julien Cristau
> wrote:
> [...]
> > Can you clarify the issue and how the 3 affected packages interact?
> The
> > mailing list links seem to talk about
Le dimanche 30 juillet 2023 à 15:00 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 12:58:07PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > The problem that I am trying to fix is the following: the AVX512 kernel
> > (nicknamed
> > “SkylakeX”) is miscompiled in openblas 0.3.13+ds-3, so that
Source: rocfft
Version: 5.5.0-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
rocfft fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-i3ipc
Version: 2.2.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-i3ipc fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-flask-marshmallow
Version: 0.15.0-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-flask-marshmallow fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both
of which
are currently available in experimental.
Source: flask-silk
Version: 0.2-21
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
flask-silk fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: poezio
Version: 0.14-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
poezio fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: flycheck
Version: 32~git.20200527.9c435db3-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
flycheck fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: xraylarch
Version: 0.9.58+ds1-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
xraylarch fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-pybedtools
Version: 0.9.0-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-pybedtools fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: hipblas
Version: 5.3.3-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
hipblas fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-babel
Version: 2.10.3-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-babel fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pyfuse3
Version: 3.2.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pyfuse3 fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-oslo.policy
Version: 4.1.1-2
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-oslo.policy fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of
which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: votca
Version: 2022.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
votca fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[5]: Entering
Source: librostlab
Version: 1.0.20-12
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
librostlab fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pygtkspellcheck
Version: 4.0.5-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
pygtkspellcheck fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
Source: restic
Version: 0.14.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
restic fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-djvulibre
Version: 0.8.8-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-djvulibre fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: nose
Version: 1.3.7-9
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
nose fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: python-whoosh
Version: 2.7.4+git6-g9134ad92-7
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-whoosh fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part
Source: khmer
Version: 3.0.0~a3+dfsg-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
khmer fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: python-django-celery-beat
Version: 2.5.0-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
python-django-celery-beat fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20,
both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Source: flufl.enum
Version: 4.1.1-5
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
User: python-modules-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: sphinx7.1
Hi,
flufl.enum fails to build with Sphinx 7.1 and docutils 0.20, both of which
are currently available in experimental.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
101 - 200 of 246 matches
Mail list logo