Hi Frank, hi Manoj,
(I just opened this bug to re-read it and comment on it, when I saw it has
been (theoretically) resolved.) Thank you!
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
close 528019
notfound 528019 2.13-1
fixed 528019 2.13-1
thanks
Hola José Luis,
On Dienstag, 26. Mai 2009, José Luis Redrejo Rodríguez wrote:
Are you sure it's not a bug in piupart?
see above :-)
If you take a look at the log:
Selecting previously deselected package gambas2-runtime.
tags 530586 +unreproducible
thanks
Hi Heikki,
please always mail the bugnumber, that will make sure it goes to the BTS and
that I and other people get a copy :)
On Dienstag, 26. Mai 2009, Heikki Kantola wrote:
Sorry, I suppose replicating my setup would be pretty hard since I there
might be
Hola,
found and fixed the bug in piuparts, see
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/piuparts?view=revrevision=418
regards thanks,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: freeradius
Version: 2.0.4+dfsg-6+b1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left owned and
unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8
and 10.7.3:
Hi Felix,
On Mittwoch, 27. Mai 2009, Felix Zielcke wrote:
We could remove the `ascii.pf2' and so only break the graphical terminal
on a package purge, but I don't think it would be good to remove the
whole /boot/grub. Maybe people want to purge the package but still wants
to have a working
Package: locales
Version: 2.9-13
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
Package: libpam-unix2
Version: 1:2.4.1-2
Severity: important
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
Hi Raphael,
I'm tempted to fix those bashisms now, by just calling bash explicitly. The
plugins are all really not important (I never used any of them) and are part
of the munin-plugins-extra package, that is unofficial unsupported plugins.
What do you think?
regards,
Holger
Hi Raphael,
On Donnerstag, 28. Mai 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
The fixes are trivial. If diverging from upstream is a concern then I'm ok,
otherwise am willing to provide a patch.
If you provide a patch, I'd be happy to apply it upstream + downstream ;) (Not
101% sure the plugins are in svn
Hi Colin,
On Freitag, 29. Mai 2009, Colin Watson wrote:
It doesn't rely on it - it calls it if it can, but ignores errors,
precisely so that it doesn't fail if delgroup is absent.
Ah.
I suppose I'll
make it check whether delgroup is present before doing this, though.
That would be nice,
severity 530902 important
thanks
On Freitag, 29. Mai 2009, Julien Cristau wrote:
Since when is that a serious bug, as opposed to minor or normal?
at least since a piuparts clean archive has been a release goal for lenny
(which will be renewed for squeeze) these bugs should be at least filed
Package: galeon-common
Version: 2.0.7-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install.
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Setting up galeon-common (2.0.7-1) ...
Package: libssh2-php
Version: 0.11.0-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install.
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Setting up libssh2-php (0.11.0-1) ...
tag 530147 +pending
thanks
Hi Raphael,
patch applied to the Debian package and upstream trunk, thank you!
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
this is essentially a duplicate of 518389 which has been closed by 1.2.6-11 by
removing the code in question.
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
clone 501189
retitle -1 please also create groups from the host-machine and not only users
- or none at all
reassign -1 xen-tools
thanks
Hi,
I'm gonna workaround this in munin now, but it feels wrong.
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
tags 514634 +pending
#fixed in svn
thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
package: vserver-debiantools
severity: important
x-debbugs-cc: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org, herb...@13thfloor.at,
dec...@jadplace.com, vser...@list.linux-vserver.org, mi...@riseup.net,
debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
thanks
On Dienstag, 27. Januar 2009, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
please do not
Hi,
On Montag, 9. Februar 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
After some investigations, we discovered that roundcube 0.1.1 is
vulnerable to this XSS attack but is also vulnerable to many others,
even trivial ones.
We believe that we cannot fix those security issues with simple
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2009, Vincent Bernat wrote:
It should be vulnerable too. Would it be possible to upgrade to 0.2-alpha?
Besides that it's in experimental atm, do you have a way to reduce it's
depends to something which is in etch/bpo or at least lenny?
(And I'm not sure Alexander
+1
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi Vincent,
On Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2009, Vincent Bernat wrote:
0.2alpha should run fine in Etch if you reenable the following patch:
fix-too-old-php-mail-mime.patch
ok, just like on bpo now :)
The future 0.2stable will need more work (even for lenny) since it uses
mdb.
hmpf. 0.2 stable
reopen 514889
severity 514889 important
tags 514889 +moreinfo
reassign 514889 powermgmt-base
thanks
Hi Virgo, hi release-team,
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Virgo Pärna wrote:
It is a problem, because it never does filesystem check - even after
crash, when it is necessary. And the
reassign 512546 linux-2.6
thanks
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
This kernel is not even in unstable yet, so I think support for this
hardware will have to wait till Lenny 'N' Half at least?
Such improved support is exactly the purpose of Lenny'n'half, yes.
I don't
clone 514784 -1
reassign 514784 kmenuedit
reassign -1 alacarte
thanks
Hi Prateek,
thanks for your bugreport. As it covers two issues I'm cloning it and reassign
to the relevant packages, so the respective maintainers can act.
regards,
Holger
On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009, Prateek
reassign 514805 initramfs-tools
severity 514805 minor
thanks
Hi Iuga,
thanks for your bugreport.
On Mittwoch, 11. Februar 2009, Iuga Marian Silviu wrote:
When I install Debian Lenny RC2 on hard disk,in Qemu, when I boot up,
an error message appears, after witch all continues.
Here is a
Hi Ola,
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Now I'm a bit puzzled. I'm still maintaining newvserver as I'm the
maintainer of the vserver-debiantool package. The newvserver tool is quite
far from what it once was as I have changed it rather lot of times.
What it basically is
Hi Virgo,
On Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009, Virgo Pärna wrote:
Please run on_ac_power ; echo $? - I expect the result is 255.
0 when in AC power. 1 when in battery.
Thats correct.
Then please also run cat /sys/class/power_supply/AC/online when on AC
power and on battery. I assume the
package: release-notes
x-debbugs-cc: pkg-gnutls-ma...@lists.alioth.debian.org,
debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
On Sonntag, 15. Februar 2009, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
I just wrote a blog post trying to outline some concrete steps that
people (users,
tags 515527 +moreinfo
thanks
Hi Barry,
thanks for your bugreport!
On Sonntag, 15. Februar 2009, Barry Horne wrote:
I have attached dual wide screen monitors to my GeForce 9600GT graphics
card. After installation of Debian the PC reboots and instead of GDM
appearing I simply get a blank
reassign 515527 xserver-xorg-video-nv
thanks
Hi Barry,
On Montag, 16. Februar 2009, Barry Horne wrote:
It is loading the nv driver according to the Xorg logs. I hope this
is what you are after.
yes, thanks.
I'm not sure if your card has a G80 board, but you might want to look at
here you can see the patch:
http://svn.debian.org/viewsvn/fai/people/michael/experimental/patches/bugfix-494431?rev=5258view=markup
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
package: lists.debian.org
severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: debian-rele...@bugs.debian.org
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 18. Februar 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote:
[No CC please, thank]
This will be done on a best-effort basis. We tend to always CC people on
-release because it's a role address list, where
reassign 510893 udev
severity 510893 normal
thanks
On Montag, 5. Januar 2009, Johannes Schmitz wrote:
After a fresh install there is no /dev/parport0. After loading
the ppdev module the device node is being created. udev should
load the module. For example:
SUBSYSTEM==module,
reassign 510964 network-manager-kde
thanks
On Dienstag, 6. Januar 2009, Sergio Jovani wrote:
With a updated system and running KDE, I can't configure static IP.
KNetworkManager has not this option, but if I configure it from
KControl, when I apply changes, configuration resets.
is
Hi,
On Dienstag, 6. Januar 2009, Sergio Jovani wrote:
User is in plugdev and netdev groups. In KNetworkManager, I don't have
option to configure static IP.
Ah. network-manager doesnt allow you to configure static addresses. That's a
missing feature. (In lenny for sure, maybe its fixed in
package: b43-fwcutter
severity: important
version: 1:011-1~etchnhalf.2
Hi,
/usr/share/b43-fwcutter/install_bcm43xx_firmware.sh in the binary package
downloads version 4.80.53.0 while the source package correctly has
4.150.10.5. The old version is unsupported upstream as of June 2008.
reassign 511257 mdadm
thanks
On Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2009, Rogaturus wrote:
Problem: 1u server IBM x330 series (2x1.4G p!!! Cpu, 2G Ram, 2 SCSI 36G HDD
on aic 7892 Ultra 160 SCSI adapter) work fine under Debian Etch (kernel
2.6.18). Root file system was placed on software mirror, created by
package: italc
severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
On Dienstag, 30. Dezember 2008, Valerio Pachera wrote:
In a previous mail I worte I wish ITALC to be preconfigured for the
next debian edu released and you ask instruction/help fot it.
Here it is the analisys I made.
Hi,
On Sonntag, 11. Januar 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
I didn't see a reply to the above comment (although there was some other
further discussion about restructuring these patterns in Lintian). In the
absence of further information on this, I'm going to assume that Lintian's
current behavior
package: xdebconfigurator
version: 1.35
Hi,
as far as I know this package wont be needed for squeeze anymore, in fact I
doubt if it's still useful in lenny. So I suggest to remove it from sid now
and will reassign+retitle this bug accordingly in a week or so, if no
objections come up.
Package: pdns-server
Version: 2.9.22-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
Package: lpr
Version: 1:2008.05.17
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
Package: pdns-recursor
Version: 3.1.7-5
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
#fixed in svn
tags 458879 +pending
thanks
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: resolvconf
Version: 1.43
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
Package: jade
Version: 1.2.1-47
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
Package: luckybackup
Version: 0.3.1-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install because
it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a conflict or
replaces
Package: atftpd
Version: 0.7.dfsg-7
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
Package: mixmaster
Version: 3.0.0-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on the
system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
Hi Arthur,
On Montag, 1. Juni 2009, Arthur de Jong wrote:
Version: 0.0.30-2
I also ran into this and while trying to narrow it down I found out that
if I first remove debian-edu-artwork and then install it again
everything works as expected. I was upgrading from 0.0.28 before.
did you
retitle 531714 munin-node: please suggest hdparm
thanks
Hi,
thanks for your bugreport. munin-node doesnt depend on packages which are
needed by the plugins, because it's up to the user which plugins to use. So
hdparm should be a suggests.
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description:
Hi,
On Freitag, 5. Juni 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
To make sure there are no other issues like the recently discovered in
texlive, it would be good to have an 'unpack, remove, purge' run next to
the 'unpack, configure, remove, purge' one that is currently running.
#531581 is the relevant bug for
reopen 528021
severity 528021 important
found 528021 1.11.3
found 528021 1.18
# please,
# read http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528021#101
# and http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528021#45
thanks
Hi,
you forgot to include the code you mentioned in that changelog
Hi Norbert,
On Samstag, 6. Juni 2009, Norbert Preining wrote:
That should settle these problems. Thanks for reminding me on that
issue, otherwise it would have skipped.
Thank _you_, for taking care of these issues!
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Hi,
On Samstag, 18. Juli 2009, Thomas Lange wrote:
FAI_CONFIGDIR is only used on the install server. It's not used by an
install client. Maybe the comment is a little bit confusing. So this
variable should be moved to make-fai-nfsroot.conf to make things
clearer.
Yes, if its _only_ used on
Hi Deniz,
On Samstag, 18. Juli 2009, Deniz Akcal wrote:
Only my laptop experiences this. I've also experienced this when using
Ubuntu 8.10. When I switch to tty1, if it shows gibberish I need to
switch back to the GUI then to tty2 or something then to tty1. If I go
GUI then back to tty1 if I
Hi,
On Donnerstag, 2. Juli 2009, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
I'm not _explicitly_ trying to install the smart plugin, whatever that
is.
it's a munin plugin, which is part of munin-node.
In other words, it's the package defaults that's trying to install
a plugin that requires python.
it's trying
package: wnpp
x-debbugs-cc: munin-deb-ma...@linpro.no, munin-us...@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi,
the munin package could need some more love:
- currently there are 35 open bugs, some with patches, some need to go
upstream, etc. - and there is a constant flow of new bugs coming, see
see
Hi Niels,
On Sonntag, 5. Juli 2009, Niels Thykier wrote:
I am not sure I am able to dedicate myself long term to this package,
but I have examined the patches for munin
(http://patch-tracking.debian.net/package/munin/1.2.6-12) and compared
them to munin-trunk (r2285). I have attached my
On Montag, 13. Juli 2009, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
- in this case it was Holger Levsen. Though, I just asked him and he
said that he doesn't care about etch-backports.
Given that Holger gives a damn
thanks for your understanding and your well done summary of my position.
love,
Holger
Hi,
On Montag, 13. Juli 2009, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
- in this case it was Holger Levsen. Though, I just asked him and he
said that he doesn't care about etch-backports.
given that its not possible/desirable to have backports from squeeze in
etch-bpo (see
http://lists.backports.org/lurker-bpo
On Montag, 13. Juli 2009, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
I'd still
recommend to upgrade to lenny, but thats the beauty of free software:
there is more than one way to do it and everybody can get involved :-)
Unfortunately, lenny doesn't ship roundcube so that doesn't buy one
anything.
I ment:
Hi Andrei,
On Samstag, 15. Mai 2010, Andrei Popescu wrote:
Suggested text:
Thanks for that!
I have one small addition...:
This change can however create security and/or privacy issues if the
system administrator is not aware of it and adds users to the private
group of another user. Also,
Hi Cleto,
I'm really sorry for the late reply! I'm very happy about you hacking on
piuparts and I know how the lack of my feedback slowed that down. I'm quite
unhappy about this, but such is life...
On Dienstag, 4. Mai 2010, Cleto Martin Angelina wrote:
Hi!
I'm writing a patch for this bug
Hi Cleto,
On Dienstag, 20. April 2010, Cleto Martin Angelina wrote:
b.) what is the debian_bundle issue?
Sorry about my poor explanation. In sid, if you import debian_budle
you get this message:
import debian_bundle
/usr/bin/ipython:1: DeprecationWarning: please use 'debian' instead of
tags 581969 + pending
thanks
Hi,
0.8.3 is in git and NEW, should hopefully be available in sid soon.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: rinputd
Version: 1.0.3-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install. I had to
kill dpkg manually.
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Unpacking rinputd
Package: ibus-table-latex
Version: 1.2.0.20100305-1
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install because
it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a replaces
Hi Chase,
On Montag, 17. Mai 2010, Chase Douglas wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org
wrote:
Note that this test was done in a chroot. This might be relevant for
debugging the cause, but not for the bug severity.
Is debconf supposed to work inside
Hi Hideki,
On Mittwoch, 19. Mai 2010, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Thank you for your report. I'm glad to have a chance to squash RC bug ;)
Thats the spirit! :-)
This is the problem.
old version's postrm runs after preinst script, however postinst is too
late. How do I deal with that? Any idea?
Hi,
a possible hack: remove that line from the old postrm in the new preinst?
it's hackish, but should do the trick. not sure if policy / common-sense
allows it or if the cure is worse then the problem :)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
found 562945 1.0.0
found 562945 1.1.1
notfound 562945 1.1.1+nmu1
found 562945 1.1.2
severity 562945 serious
thanks
Hi Gerit,
On Donnerstag, 25. März 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Donnerstag, 25. März 2010, Gerrit Pape wrote:
I think this is very wrong. See below...
Hi, this is by intention
Package: libpam-ssh
Version: 1.92-13
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies files from another
package in /usr. This is so wrong, I'm not even bothered to look up the part
of policy
tags 562945 - patch
thanks
#574223 shows that the nmu didnt fix the problem, so the patch aint working.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
package: debian-edu
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
-- Forwarded Message --
Betreff: Re: Drop usplash in Squeeze? Move to plymouth?
Datum: Freitag, 21. Mai 2010
Von: Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com
An: debian-...@lists.debian.org
[Holger Levsen]
I agree.
OK
Package: hylafax-server
Version: 2:6.0.4-2.l
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install.
apt-get install hylafax-server just hangs, with the process list as
below. Killing
Package: ttf-okolaks
Version: 0.5-2.2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to remove.
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
0m13.7s DEBUG: Starting command:
['chroot',
Package: libnet-ping-external-perl
Version: 0.11-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package removes files from another
package in /etc. This is so wrong, I'm not even bothered to look up the part
found 574461 1.1.40
#tags 574461 - moreinfo
#hopefully ;)
thanks
Hi Tiago,
sorry for taking so long to reply.
On Donnerstag, 25. März 2010, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
My cronjob file just checks if /sbin/apticron exists before running it:
Yes, but this check returns with an error if
package: logrotate
version: 3.7.8-6
x-debbugs-cc: 566...@bugs.debian.org, evg...@debian.org
Hi,
piuparts.debian.org since some time tests for failing logrotate runs of
packages, the results are at
http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/logrotate_error_after_removal_error.html
Looking at
Hi Paul,
On Samstag, 22. Mai 2010, Paul Martin wrote:
These error messages are correct. Logrotate is complaining that the
directory is missing, not that the files are missing. Logrotate
doesn't fail in this situation (even though it shouldn't occur with
correctly installed packages that have
tags 582630 + upstream
thanks
Hi,
On Samstag, 22. Mai 2010, Paul Martin wrote:
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 01:28:39PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
True, but wouldnt it be nicer if logrotate intercepted that error and
thus surpresses the message? The logrotate config file used says its ok
Package: dnscache-run
Version: 1:1.05-8
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies files from another
package in /usr. This is so wrong, I'm not even bothered to look up the part
of policy
Package: gpe-shield
Version: 0.31-3
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o
User: initscripts-ng-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: incorrect-dependency
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install due to
incorrect
package: lwat
severity: wishlist
x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org
On Sonntag, 7. März 2010, Nigel Barker wrote:
In the end I decided to weed out the old dhcpd.conf, which has been
around since sarge. I copied and pasted the netbooks from dhcpd.conf
into lwat one at a time (only 18 of
I think such a section would make sense. Thanks Ana for the idea! Cheers!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
package: buildd.debian.org
x-debbugs-cc: debian-edu-artwork
Hi,
please add armel to debian-edu-artwork's architectures.
Thanks,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
severity 573343 important
tags 573343 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi Petter,
thanks for your bug report
On Mittwoch, 10. März 2010, Petter Dass wrote:
Subject: base: Screen becomes one color. Sound continues.
Package: base
Justification: breaks the whole system
Severity: critical
As hardly every
Hi Petter,
On Mittwoch, 10. März 2010, Petter Dass wrote:
lspci -nn:
http://pastebin.com/qUvSLaUZ
dmesg
http://pastebin.com/GZu9urv4
The latter was so long, Terminal shortened it.
Please send those logs to the bug, pastebin.com will remove them eventually...
thanks,
Holger
reassign 573343 xserver-xorg-video-intel
thanks
Hi Petter,
rassigning to the hopefully correct package... you are using
xserver-xorg-video-intel, right?
(check with dpkg -l xserver-xorg-video-intel)
On Donnerstag, 11. März 2010, Petter Dass wrote:
I did. Twice.
If you read this, but not the
tags 580331 + upstream
severity 580331 important
thanks
Hi Frank,
On Mittwoch, 5. Mai 2010, Frank Van Damme wrote:
The good news is: the error has been corrected in the 1.4 branch of munin's
versioning system. Thus, upgrading the version to 1.4.5 once it comes
out should solve the problem.
tags 581044 - patch
thanks
Hi Joe,
On Montag, 10. Mai 2010, Joe Dalton wrote:
Please include the attached initial Danish debconf translation
Yay! I'm thrilled to see a danish translation!
But... you forgot to include the attachment :-)
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description:
Hi,
can you please try version 1.8.x and check if this bug still exists? There
have been tons of i18n related fixes since 1.5.x :-)
Thanks,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Samstag, 20. März 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
And given the fact that Debian Edu never have enabled this
module and do not really need it, I believe we should reduce its
depend on ignore (or perhaps even drop it?) in the common task to
avoid the problem.
Dropping it sounds sensible to
Hi,
On Samstag, 20. März 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Should it stay on our radar, or should we drop it from our radar?
... see below :)
and if it needs configuration anyway. It's only an apt-get call away
anyway :)
libpam-ssh do not need configuraiton. It simply kick into action for
Hi,
On Samstag, 20. März 2010, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
Also I think such a pam module is bad idea as it is a bad idea, to
use the login password to protect ssh keys with.
It work the other way around, where it allow you to log in using the
ssh key password (and ignore the password in
severity 574815 serious
# justification: prevent reaching squeeze
Hi,
On Sonntag, 21. März 2010, Ralf Treinen wrote:
python-kde4 contains, at least on amd64, dependencies on
python-sip4 (= none), python-sip4 ( none+~)
which is of course rubbish (and even syntactically wrong, as none is
package: installation-report
Hi,
I've just installed lenny using a 5.0.3 (normal) CD and after installing the
base system I choose to not use a network mirror. Now I have to wait for
20min for downloading some updates from volatile.d.o and security.d.o - which
is quite annoying as I just want
1301 - 1400 of 6829 matches
Mail list logo
